Author Topic: Rasizam 101  (Read 17944 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Agota

  • 4
  • 3
  • Posts: 5.824
Re: Rasizam 101
« Reply #50 on: 23-01-2016, 22:23:44 »
smirite se. oboje ste lepi.  :)
This is a gift, it comes with a price. Who is the lamb and who is the knife. Midas is king and he holds me so tight. And turns me to gold in the sunlight ...

Dybuk

  • 4
  • 3
  • Posts: 7.219
  • ведьма
Re: Rasizam 101
« Reply #51 on: 23-01-2016, 22:25:25 »
Ja sam lepsa!  8-)


Albedo 0

  • Guest
Re: Rasizam 101
« Reply #52 on: 23-01-2016, 22:54:34 »
oćemo da cjepidlačimo, oćemo, možda nešto i naučimo!


naime, crnci kao rasa mogu biti simpa samo lilitici, prosto jer jedino ona u praksi može da naleti na crnce kao rasu sa svojim genetskim strukturama, zdravstvenim stanjem, mutacijama i slično


a svi ostali ljudi, normalno, mogu sresti samo black folk/people. Iliti narod/ljude. Ne srećemo se s najvećim ljudskim organom crne boje no sa ljudima koji govore određeni jezik, pripadaju određenoj kulturi i najčešće imaju neko državljanstvo - dakle, narodom.


hvala, hvala, nema na čemu, služimo narodu!

Dybuk

  • 4
  • 3
  • Posts: 7.219
  • ведьма
Re: Rasizam 101
« Reply #53 on: 23-01-2016, 22:56:41 »
 :) Pa da, black people/folk. E fala ti boze da ima neko razuman! 8-)

Truman

  • 4
  • 3
  • Posts: 9.006
Re: Rasizam 101
« Reply #54 on: 23-01-2016, 23:02:01 »
Crnci su najveći rasisti i vrlo često koriste taj argument da napadaju belce.
Ajde da čujemo iskustva devojaka koje su živele u gradovima gde ima crnaca šta se događalo kada su odbijale da izađu s nekim. Odmah kreće kanonada: "To je zato što sam crnac, jel da? Ti si rasista..." I tako dalje.
Uostalom, šta fali rasizmu? Crnci belcima izgledaju prljavo, a i smrde, što je fakat...
Val Smit je pajac, kao Edi Marfi, nema tu ni g od dobrog glumca.

Boban ipak jeste rasista, a ja mislio da se šali. :( Inače, meni crnci ne izgledaju prljavo.
A glede teme...umeju crnci da se isparanoišu, ali to je zato što za to postoje osnove tj. puno puta su i bili u pravu ( da ne spominjem sad slučajeve diskriminisanja od strane belih policajaca ). Ako 92% Akademije čine belci to jasno baca svetlo na ovu temu. Teško da su crnci i hispanosi manje talentovani za glumu, pevanje, igranje...
Da li je ove godine neko od njih zaslužio da bude kandidovan za Oskara to ne znam, uvek treba biti na oprezu...
There is neither creation nor destruction, neither destiny nor free will, neither path nor achievement. This is the final truth.
Sri Ramana

Ghoul

  • 4
  • 3
  • Posts: 33.136
Re: Rasizam 101
« Reply #55 on: 23-01-2016, 23:07:40 »
CLINT EASTWOOD HEY OSCAR PROTESTERS ... MOST PEOPLE DON'T WIN

Read more: http://www.tmz.com/2016/01/23/clint-eastwood-oscar-protests/#ixzz3y6VDYcMT

klem

  • 3
  • Posts: 618
  • boss
Re: Rasizam 101
« Reply #56 on: 23-01-2016, 23:17:12 »
ljudska stoka uvek pronalazi nove razloge za čarke i svađe zašto ne možemo živeti u miru slozi i veselju
i'm hardcore

ridiculus

  • 5
  • 3
  • Posts: 5.310
    • Strahoslovni domen999
Re: Rasizam 101
« Reply #57 on: 24-01-2016, 02:31:36 »
Pošto Oskari nemaju velike veze s "najboljim", ovakva rasprava je besplodna.

Nagrade koja Akademija deli su najvećim delom vezane za političku korektnost, aktuelnost i vraćanje starih dugova. Ne poričem njihov društveni prestiž, ali, ako neko misli da imaju veze s kvalitetom, onda je u žestokoj zabludi.

Majkl B. Džordan u Kridu, Edžiofor u Z za Zaharija, čitav Či-rak Spajka Lija... eto nam "crnih" uloga koliko hoćete. Ali, Edžiofor nije dobio ni za 12 godina ropstva, a bio je najjači adut tog filma, što bi dobio sada za gotovo nepoznat film? Za mene je veći problem to što je 12 godina ropstva dobilo nagradu, a Fruitvale Station - takodje film sa crncima, ali mnogo bolji - nije. U stvari, "problem" samo u smislu da me sprečava da shvatim Akademiju ozbiljno, jer ono kako se predstavljaju i ono kako zaista funkcionišu su dve različite stvari.

Još jedan vrhunski glumac crne kože, Džefri Rajt, nikad nije dobio statuu, ali to je problem druge vrste: retko kada je najbolji glumci dobiju (a ne "retko kad je crnci dobiju"). Nisu ni Ričard Dženkins, Majkl Šanon i Stenli Tuči, da uzmem samo primer nekoliko Amerikanaca bele kože.

Ali, zaista, Vil Smit? What the fuck...? Zapanjujući neukus...
Znate... u početku beše Šala, i Šala beše...itd

Josephine

  • Guest
Re: Rasizam 101
« Reply #58 on: 24-01-2016, 03:32:32 »
Nagrade koja Akademija deli su najvećim delom vezane za političku korektnost, aktuelnost i vraćanje starih dugova. Ne poričem njihov društveni prestiž, ali, ako neko misli da imaju veze s kvalitetom, onda je u žestokoj zabludi.

A, konačno neko i ovo da kaže. Ja nisam htela jer nemam dokaza, ali takođe mislim da je cela dodela Oskara bullshit.

I ako sve ima veze sa političkom korektnošću, aktuelnošću i vraćanjem starih dugova, onda Šarlot, Kejn i Istvud treba da se pokriju ušima (jer sve vreme brane integritet nagrade, zapravo, umetničkim argumentom da nema crnaca koji zaslužuju Oskara ove godine), a crnci mu dođu u pravu. Jer ako je ionako sve fejk i namešteno po kriterijumima drugačijim od umetničkih, onda je moguće i da crnci namerno nisu nominovani.

Možda Džada ipak zna o čemu priča. U mojim očima je, svejedno, budala ako joj je površno stalo do nagrade, makar ta nagrada i nemala integritet. A ni Džada, onda, nema dokaze da je neko od non white glumaca zaslužio nagradu po umetničkim kriterijumima, što je čini još većom budalom. I dalje je to borba koja nikome od non white glumaca suštinski ne donosi ništa i ništa ne menja u njihovim životima.


Dybuk

  • 4
  • 3
  • Posts: 7.219
  • ведьма
Re: Rasizam 101
« Reply #60 on: 24-01-2016, 14:32:49 »
Hmm let's check that 'white privilege'

http://top10for.com/top-10-richest-actors-in-the-world-2014/

Quote
14. Will Smith – Net worth: $215 million

He is another rich actor in the world. Will Smith is a great Hollywood actor with a lot of skills. He has a net worth that is about $200 million. He became very popular because of his films, including The Independence Day, I Robot, Bad Boys, Men in Black. He receives 3 Grammy Awards for his films.
Will Smith (Hollywood Actor) – Net worth: $215 million. Age: 46

http://www.celebritynetworth.com/richest-celebrities/actors/will-smith-net-worth/ 260 mil

http://www.celebritynetworth.com/dl/charlotte-rampling/ 15 mil

Nije sve u novcu, naravno. Nesto je i u 'privilegijama'.



tomat

  • 4
  • 3
  • Posts: 5.757
Re: Rasizam 101
« Reply #63 on: 25-01-2016, 16:34:01 »
Arguing on the internet is like running in the Special Olympics: even if you win, you're still retarded.

Dybuk

  • 4
  • 3
  • Posts: 7.219
  • ведьма

Ghoul

  • 4
  • 3
  • Posts: 33.136
Re: Rasizam 101
« Reply #65 on: 26-01-2016, 09:19:14 »
Ian McKellen Says Gay Actors Are ‘Disregarded’ by Hollywood

JANUARY 25, 2016

As the Academy works to remedy Hollywood’s inclusion issue, Sir Ian McKellen is stressing the need to broaden the definition of the word diversity. McKellen says that gay actors are being “disregarded” and ignored by Hollywood as much as African Americans are.

McKellan, who is the co-founder of the LGBT rights charity Stonewall, said the criticism facing the Academy for the lack of diversity at the Oscars is “legitimate.”

“As a representative of the industry they’re in, it’s receiving complaints which I fully sympathize with,” the 76-year-old actor said while speaking to Sky News. “It’s not only black people who’ve been disregarded by the film industry, it used to be women, it’s certainly gay people to this day. And these are all legitimate complaints and the Oscars are the focus of those complaints, of course.”

He also spoke to The Guardian about the industry’s possible prejudice toward the LBGT community.

“No openly gay man has ever won the Oscar; I wonder if that is prejudice or chance,” he told The Guardian.

“How clever, how clever,” McKellen then said of Tom Hanks, Philip Seymour Hoffman and Sean Penn winning best actor Oscars for playing gay men. “What about giving me one for playing a straight man?” he asked.

McKellen was nominated for a best actor Oscar in 1999 for “Gods and Monsters” and in 2002 for best supporting actor in “The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring.”

“My speech has been in two jackets … ‘I’m proud to be the first openly gay man to win the Oscar,'” he said, recalling a line from the speeches. “I’ve had to put it back in my pocket twice.”

The Academy came under fire earlier this month following the Oscar nominations, which excluded people of color from acting categories. This brought the moniker #OscarsSoWhite back for a second time. Many other actors, including George Clooney, Mark Ruffalo, Viola Davis, Lupita Nyong’o, David Oyelowo, Steve McQueen, Will Smith and Jada Pinkett Smith, have criticized the Academy. Spike Lee announced he wouldn’t be attending the “lily-white Oscars.”

Last Friday, the Academy met to approve a series of changes for voting and recruitment as part of its goal to double the number of women and diverse members by 2020.

Dybuk

  • 4
  • 3
  • Posts: 7.219
  • ведьма
Re: Rasizam 101
« Reply #66 on: 29-01-2016, 12:44:53 »


Usul

  • 4
  • 3
  • Posts: 1.936
Re: Rasizam 101
« Reply #68 on: 13-02-2016, 02:58:42 »
God created Arrakis to train the faithful.

Ugly MF

  • 4
  • 3
  • Posts: 5.161
  • Natural born FlatEarther!!!
    • https://www.facebook.com/Art-of-Bojan-Vukic-396093920831839/
Re: Rasizam 101
« Reply #69 on: 13-02-2016, 09:49:37 »
http://youtu.be/tkpUyB2xgTM

Ovaj test je sranje.
Nadam se da ne treba da objasnjavam zašto....
hint, odgovor deteta na 4.45 to objašnjava....nju nisu pitali 'porke?'....

Dybuk

  • 4
  • 3
  • Posts: 7.219
  • ведьма
Re: Rasizam 101
« Reply #70 on: 13-02-2016, 12:50:32 »
Treba :lol: To je samo jedno dete, dakle izuzetak. Mislim da se jos samo jedna crna devojcica identifikovala sa lutkom njene boje koze, na pozitivan nacin, rekla je da je crna lutka bolja i lepsa, ostali vau, self hate, prakticno. Najtuznija su mi ova juznoamericka deca koja nisu ni crna ni bela i kad su ih pitali na koju lutku lice onako zbunjeno navode delove tela koji su svetliji, kao "usi", "ledja".
Ti Ugly verovatno hoces da kazes da je test tendenciozno sproveden? Nemam pojam, meni deluje legitimno.

Truman

  • 4
  • 3
  • Posts: 9.006
Re: Rasizam 101
« Reply #71 on: 13-02-2016, 13:25:37 »
Nekako se arhetipski crno vezuje za zlo, nepoznato i strah od istog dok se belo vezuje za dobro i poznato. Tako da mislim da je to posledica tog navodnog rasizma kod dece. Ona se plaše mraka i vole svetlo.
There is neither creation nor destruction, neither destiny nor free will, neither path nor achievement. This is the final truth.
Sri Ramana

Dybuk

  • 4
  • 3
  • Posts: 7.219
  • ведьма
Re: Rasizam 101
« Reply #72 on: 13-02-2016, 13:26:29 »
Slazem se, Trumane. :)

Ugly MF

  • 4
  • 3
  • Posts: 5.161
  • Natural born FlatEarther!!!
    • https://www.facebook.com/Art-of-Bojan-Vukic-396093920831839/
Re: Rasizam 101
« Reply #73 on: 13-02-2016, 13:46:31 »
Uz dozu toga što je Truman rekao,da pojasnim Dybukčici...
Nije legitimno, jer ukratko,mala deca su takva da gledaju da ugode starijem koji ih pita.Plus, ne verujem da su ispred deteta sedele i bela i crna teta, a neki muški glas iz mikrofona ih pitao, ili slično.
Plus deca su stavljena pred svršen čin biranja sa samo dve opcije kod lutkica, dok kod stilizovanog crteža, ti kod belog vidiš crtež, kod najcrnje varijante i ne liči na dete, nego na mrlju.
Ovo ispitivanje ničemu ne služi.Ama baš....


Dybuk

  • 4
  • 3
  • Posts: 7.219
  • ведьма
Re: Rasizam 101
« Reply #74 on: 13-02-2016, 14:00:51 »
Ovo sto Truman kaze je tacno, ali treba uzeti u obzir kulturu i zemlju iz koje ta deca poticu. Npr mali Amerikanci stalno vidjaju crnu decu, nije to kao kod nas, nesto neobicno i egzoticno. Zato me cudi sto su u tako velikom broju pokazala iskljucivost. Plus, roditelji i drustvo im verovatno od malih nogu ugradjuju taj pc nacin razmisljanja. Za ovo crno dete sto je jedino reklo crna lutka je bolja, za njega/nju (nisam sigurna bese li decak ili devojcica) sam pomislila da su mu/joj roditelji rasisti :) i da ga/je uce da su crnci superiorni, potenciraju vrednost sopstvene rase. Za drugu decu nisam, ali neki od malih juznoamerikanaca daju nedvosmisleno rasisticke odgovore (ovaj jedan plavi decko, npr).

Ugly MF

  • 4
  • 3
  • Posts: 5.161
  • Natural born FlatEarther!!!
    • https://www.facebook.com/Art-of-Bojan-Vukic-396093920831839/
Re: Rasizam 101
« Reply #75 on: 13-02-2016, 14:13:41 »
Ma, svet je pun ljudi koji bi želeli da su im preci majmuni, ili da promene pol, šta te čudi malo razlike u boji kože....

tomat

  • 4
  • 3
  • Posts: 5.757
Re: Rasizam 101
« Reply #76 on: 12-07-2016, 23:42:02 »
ajde da ne oftopičarim više po prekom sudu, evo ovde jedan članak

https://africacheck.org/2014/09/17/comment-why-is-crime-and-violence-so-high-in-south-africa-2/

Quote
COMMENT: Why is crime and violence so high in South Africa?

By Chandre Gould
10:27 | 17th September 2014 (GMT)

We should look back at our recent history if we want to understand the extent of violence and crime in South Africa.

It should come as no surprise that violent crime remains disturbingly high in South Africa. What is surprising is that there isn’t even more crime and violence, considering how we have dealt with our violent past, that we have increasing poverty and inequality, and have failed as a country to secure confidence in and respect for the rule of law.

On 19 September, the police will present the crime statistics for the 2013/14 financial year.

Using the previous 12 months as a yardstick, we can expect that interpersonal violence and property crime will have affected hundreds of thousands more South Africans.

For some crimes, such as rape, domestic violence, and assault – including assaults against children – the cases recorded are a small fraction of the incidents that actually occur.
Horrifying murder statistics

Institute for Security StudiesThere were 827 children murdered in South Africa in 2012/13. That is more than two a day. Added to that is the 21,575 children who were assaulted, with almost half of those assaults being severe.

In the same year 2,266 women were murdered, and 141,130 women were victims of attempted murder, assault GBH and common assault. As horrifying as these statistics are, the number of women and children who fell victim to violence is dwarfed by the number of similar attacks on men. In 2012/13 alone, 13,123 men were murdered. At best, half of these cases would have made it to court, and not all of those that make it to court result in a guilty verdict and the perpetrator being punished.

There are several consequences of this. With each year that violence remains so prevalent, the number of South Africans who have experienced and witnessed violence increases, and so does the extent of national trauma. This has serious consequences the health system; our ability to work as a nation, and our ability to raise a new generation of safe and healthy children.

But this is only one aspect of the very serious problems we face.
The historical context of crime

We have to look back to our recent history to understand the context for crime and violence in South Africa, and in particular South Africans’ attitudes to the law, policing and the criminal justice system.

Until 1994 South Africans had little reason to respect the law, and no reason to believe in the rule of law.

During apartheid, not only were many of the laws unjust and intended to entrench white domination, but unfair laws were also applied unfairly. In addition, the security forces, particularly the police, were used by the state to ensure that all South Africans lived in in fear of the state, regardless of their race.

The apartheid state was deeply corrupt at all levels, and those who held positions of power, whether as politicians or functionaries, were very seldom called to account before a court for acts of corruption or the abuse of power.

The situation was no different in relation to inter-personal violence and crime. Black men who murdered were more likely to face harsher sentences than white men who murdered, especially if the white murderer’s victim was poor and black. Black women who were raped were less likely to have their cases investigated than cases in which white women were the victims. In this context, who could be expected to have much respect for the law, or the rule of law?
A lack of respect for the law

In 2009, then Constitutional Court Judge Kate O’Regan asked in a paper about justice and reconciliation what the implications were “of the arrest and imprisonment of so many South Africans for deeply unjust reasons over so many years for our modern attempt to establish a shared conception of justice in a constitutional democracy founded on the rule of law?”

She argued that the implications “must, at least in part, be the absence of a deep, value-based commitment to respect for law in our society and deep skepticism about the possibility of justice. The enforcement of unjust laws with the effect of sending hundreds of thousands of people to jail over many years must have weakened any sense that law-breaking or imprisonment are of and in themselves wrongful.”

She warned that developing respect for the law would take time, and concerted effort.

South Africa began that process badly, by not holding to account those who were responsible for gross human rights violations under apartheid. The promise that amnesty would be offered in exchange for the truth, and that failure to apply for amnesty would result in criminal charges, was simply not kept.

We thus entered our new dispensation with impunity entrenched, and so it has remained for those who hold positions of power and influence.
Inequality before the law

While our laws have substantially changed for the better, and our Constitution protects the rights of all South Africans and establishes the principle that all are treated equally before the law, in practice this has been very difficult to achieve.

For example, it is relatively easy for Oscar Pistorius and Jacob Zuma, and others with access to wealth, to pay for good lawyers, to be driven to court, or to see psychologist to help them deal with trauma or stress. It is also much easier for a middle-class victim of crime to get to a police station to report their case to the police, insist it be investigated, and follow up to ensure that the case receives attention. These are all necessary for a case to make its way through the criminal justice system.

But these privileges are not available to most of the 650 000 victims of violent crimes each year.
No easy solutions

South African attitudes towards the law are demonstrated in small things such as the high number of people who drive without seat belts and who drive under the influence of drugs or alcohol; the many teachers who still beat children at school; police officers who break traffic rules even when it is not necessary; drivers who ignore red traffic lights and so on.

It is difficult to slow this steady erosion of the law when respect for, and confidence in, the institutions of state, including the police, are undermined by the daily experience of citizens in their interactions with the criminal justice system.

Perhaps even more significantly, attempts to change attitudes towards the rule of law are stymied by the disrespect demonstrated for the law and the value of life by the very people responsible for making and enforcing the law.

For as long as those holding political office appear to act with impunity, or cynically use the criminal justice system to dodge very serious allegations of the abuse of power and state resources, we cannot reasonably expect South African citizens to respect the law.

Just as there is no single cause of violence and crime, there is no single solution.

There is an urgent need to develop a coherent programme to prevent and respond to violence. This would need to include at the very least the implementation of evidence-based programmes to support parents; and strategies to reduce inequality.

However, unless those responsible for making and enforcing laws themselves show respect for the rule of law, we have very little chance at succeeding in reducing violence and crime.

Dr Chandre Gould is a senior researcher at the Institute for Security Studies (ISS)

ili što reče jedan ovde

https://www.quora.com/When-did-the-crime-start-getting-so-bad-in-South-Africa

Quote
... the ability of the South African state to manage crime was fatally undermined by the South African state's pervasive criminality and lack of respect for the rule of law.

ili

Quote
... apartheid actually created conditions for rampant crime, the ethnic cleansing of South African cities of non-whites producing dislocated urban communities where gangs were the main social organizations, and the apartheid state's concern with enforcing apartheid's rules tending to supersede actual crime-fighting. Tim Stanley wrote ("Nelson Mandela's legacy: how life got better after Apartheid") about the extent to which the apartheid regime minimized crime, noting that the end of racial segregation simply exposed the white minority to the negative effects of apartheid that they had been protected from.

sa druge strane, izgleda da se situacija, iako i dalje loša, popravlja

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8668615.stm

Quote
The first thing is that the South African murder rate is going down and not up.

"Contrary to what many people think, the murder rate, while still extremely high, is down by about 44% since 1995. That's a huge decrease."


Arguing on the internet is like running in the Special Olympics: even if you win, you're still retarded.

Аксентије Новаковић

  • 3
  • Posts: 3.909
  • Homo Superior
Re: Rasizam 101
« Reply #77 on: 10-03-2017, 01:30:14 »
Ово се Мајккклу Ђегзону није могло десити, али како она и сама каже - своју лекцију је научила!!!

Quote
(FOTO) PAŽNJA, UZNEMIRUJUĆE! Porno zvezda počela da TRULI nakon što je ubrizgala OVE INJEKCIJE!

Bivša porno zvezda Džema Mejsi na Fejsbuku je objavila šokantne fotografije rana na nozi koje su joj se stvorile od komplikacija uzrokovanih "kućnim" injekcijama za tamnjenje kože.

Fotografije inficirane rane Džema je podelila na Facebooku kao upozorenje drugima da ne pokušavaju ništa slično.

"Pre četiri meseca počela sam novi ciklus tretmana injekcijama za tamnjenje kože. Radim to godinama i nikad nisam imala problema. Ubrizgala sam tri 0,1 ml injekcije, jednu u desnu nogu i jednu u svaki guz. Ovoga puta jako me je bolelo i stvorile su mi se tvrde crvene kvržice. Mislila sam da sam pogodila mišić i da će proći", piše Mejsijeva.

Kako je vreme prolazilo, rane su postajale sve veće pa je pozvala telefonsku liniju za pomoć, a oni su je odmah uputili u bolnicu. Doktor joj je objasnio kako su zbog infekcije nastali gnojni čirevi. Dobila je kremu, ali stanje se pogoršalo pa se vratila u bolnicu gde je hitno operisana.

"Ostala sam s velikim ranama koje će me zauvek obeležiti", napisala je i objasnila kako deli uznemirujuće fotografije kako bi upozorila druge na opasnosti od takvih tretmana u sopstvenom "aranžmanu."

"Ja sam to naučila na teži način", zaključila je.


http://www.kurir.rs/zabava/zena/foto-paznja-uznemirujuce-porno-zvezda-pocela-da-truli-nakon-sto-je-ubrizgala-ove-injekcije-clanak-2723375

Meho Krljic

  • 5
  • 3
  • Posts: 50.245
Re: Rasizam 101
« Reply #78 on: 01-06-2017, 05:00:34 »
Serbian Women’s Volleyball Team Celebrates Win With Offensive Photo 
 
Naravno, mi nemamo kontekst da shvatimo da je ovo na zapadu istorijski korišćeno kao uvredljiv gest za osobe sa istoka Azije, ipak, možda je trebalo biti oprezniji...

Dybuk

  • 4
  • 3
  • Posts: 7.219
  • ведьма
Re: Rasizam 101
« Reply #79 on: 01-06-2017, 10:07:42 »
Par stvari

Gest je glup, detinjast i ne razumem odraslu osobu koja ima potrebu ovo da radi. Sto bi se reklo: is that (still) a thing?

HP preteruje, kapiram sve, ali nema potrebe za ovolikom histerijom.

Truman

  • 4
  • 3
  • Posts: 9.006
Re: Rasizam 101
« Reply #80 on: 01-06-2017, 10:28:53 »
Да, слажем се да је глуп гест али спортисти су то...не треба од њих очекивати да превише користе тинтару.
Кад смо код спортиста један од највећих се у САД нашао на удару:
http://sport.blic.rs/kosarka/nba/posle-rasistickog-napada-na-kucu-snazna-poruka-lebrona-dzejmsa-tesko-je-biti-crnac-u/z3rbyqy
There is neither creation nor destruction, neither destiny nor free will, neither path nor achievement. This is the final truth.
Sri Ramana

Meho Krljic

  • 5
  • 3
  • Posts: 50.245
Re: Rasizam 101
« Reply #81 on: 01-06-2017, 10:47:02 »
Ovo sa našim odbojkašicama nas podseća da je između ostalog i vređanje kontekstualno i da su namera da se neko uvredi i osećaj da je neko uvređen dve odvojene, često nepovezane stvari. Isto kao kad je nekadašnji predsednik Srbije, Nikolić Tomislav bubnuo ono o žutim ljudima koji će da piju vodu s Morave. Naravno da mu namera nije bila da uvredi kineske goste, ali, jebotebog, kad pričaš na internacionalnoj sceni zaista treba da se malko uputiš u to šta je zgodno da se kaže a šta ne u vezi sa rasnim karakteristikama, pravim ili apokrifnim. (Hint: najbolje je da se ne kaže ništa a ako BAŠ moraš onda je zgodno držati se najbezbednijih stereotipa o tome da je neki narod vredan ili hrabar... sve drugo je minsko polje, čak i, zna se, insistiranje da su nečije žene lepe.)

Ovde pričamo o sportistkinjama, dakle, mladim osobama koje nemaju nužno ni znanja ni izgrađenog takta, tako da ne treba da ih osuđujemo preoštro, pogotovo što su bile u posebnom raspoloženju i sve to, ali bilo bi ljucki da naš odbojkaški savez, olimpijski komitet ili neko slično telo, izda saopštenje za javnost gde bi se pojasnilo da je ovo bila greška napravljena iz neznanja i drugačijeg kulturnog konteksta i da se izvini svakom hipotetički uvređenom na ovom svetu.  :lol: Čisto da se vidi da smo pristojan svet.

akhnaton

  • Against all
  • 4
  • 3
  • Posts: 2.589
  • I Walk Alone... and not give a damn...
Re: Rasizam 101
« Reply #82 on: 21-06-2017, 10:43:12 »
Joj, dokle više. Prvo se dogovorite da li postoje rase, onda se lepo dogovorite oko toga da ste se lepo dogovorili. Samo to neće da može. Jer, ko je još video da se Marxisti dogovaraju o bilo čemu. posebno kulturalni marksisti. Jer da je po njihovom, a trenutno jelte tako stoje stvari, nema veze da li je neko loš kao glumac, sportista, pisac, čovek, važno je da se identifikuje i to mu/joj daje za pravo da zahteva nagradu. Inače odmah dobijemo urlanje, pisanije i tako to da je nedodeljivanje nagrade, ili šta već rasizam.

Ajd jedno pitanje, kako kulturalni marksista zamišlja idealnog pripadnika ljudske vrste, oops, rase? Zamišlja ga kao transrodnu, debelu crno azijatsku, muslimansku gay ženu u invalidskim kolicima.
Politically Incorrect member of "Snage Haosa i Bezumlja"

ankh Em Maat  since 1973.

Аксентије Новаковић

  • 3
  • Posts: 3.909
  • Homo Superior
Re: Rasizam 101
« Reply #83 on: 14-07-2017, 17:26:53 »

Аксентије Новаковић

  • 3
  • Posts: 3.909
  • Homo Superior
Re: Rasizam 101
« Reply #84 on: 30-07-2017, 16:49:29 »
Quote
Novo divljanje pristaša BLM-a u Londonu

Molotovljevi kokteli, petarde, boce i kamenje korišteni su u napadima na policiju tijekom još jednog divljanja pristaša crnačke rasističke organizacija Black Lives Matter u istočnom Londonu, nakon „sumnjive“ smrti dilera droge.

Rashan Jermaine Charles (20), umro je u bolnici 22. srpnja, nakon što ga je policija uhitila u Dalstonu. Charles je pokušao pobjeći iz trgovine pri čemu je progutao drogu kada je shvatio da je policija došla po njega.

Po već provjerenom načinu, pristaše BLM-a ubrzo su okupili te blokirali ulicu Kingsland Road, pri čemu su zapalili kontejnere i madrace, a pokušali su čak napasti i jedan kamion u prolazu. U divljanju su uništeni izlozi trgovina i grafitima su išarani zidovi.

Sve je započelo oko 16 sati u petak, kada se oko 80 osoba okupilo ispred trgovine gdje je uhićen Charles. Nakon što se spustila noć započeli su neredi.

Policija je pozvala helikoptere u pomoć kako bi obuzdala podivljalu rulju koja nije štedjela niti obične prolaznike ili vozače automobila.

http://tribun.hr/novo-divljanje-pristasa-blm-a-londonu-video/



У вези са овим расистичким терором и дивљаштвом - увек се можемо подсетити Гандијевих мудрих речи...



Stipan

  • 4
  • 3
  • Posts: 13.617
Re: Rasizam 101
« Reply #85 on: 30-07-2017, 16:54:22 »
Madre dios! Grafitima išarani zidovi!!! Ima li kraja tom užasu?!

Аксентије Новаковић

  • 3
  • Posts: 3.909
  • Homo Superior
Re: Rasizam 101
« Reply #86 on: 30-07-2017, 17:11:00 »
Ако су на графитима црне супрематистичке пароле - онда том ужасу нема краја.
Мудро је говорио Ганди...

Stipan

  • 4
  • 3
  • Posts: 13.617
Re: Rasizam 101
« Reply #87 on: 30-07-2017, 18:20:55 »
A šta ako su na grafitima putešestvije kroz RPG-ove stare ko Grčka?

Meho Krljic

  • 5
  • 3
  • Posts: 50.245
Re: Rasizam 101
« Reply #88 on: 30-07-2017, 18:29:37 »
Gandi je zbilja mudro govorio, na primer da se veličina nacije i njenog moralnog napretka vidi kroz njen tretman životinja, a ovo gore je, razume se, izmišljen citat.

Аксентије Новаковић

  • 3
  • Posts: 3.909
  • Homo Superior
Re: Rasizam 101
« Reply #89 on: 30-07-2017, 20:08:26 »
Можда су, пре жвркања графита, сквичали ко да их је докачио међед?

Ганди је био расиста.
Његови рани јужноафрички радови су, разуме се, лектира.

akhnaton

  • Against all
  • 4
  • 3
  • Posts: 2.589
  • I Walk Alone... and not give a damn...
Re: Rasizam 101
« Reply #90 on: 03-08-2017, 09:31:18 »
Можда су, пре жвркања графита, сквичали ко да их је докачио међед?

Ганди је био расиста.
Његови рани јужноафрички радови су, разуме се, лектира.

Bio je i džihadista. Ideje džihada mu nisu bile strane. Uostalom čim ga oni protiv kojih je bio hvale, onda tu nešto debelo smrdi.
Politically Incorrect member of "Snage Haosa i Bezumlja"

ankh Em Maat  since 1973.

Meho Krljic

  • 5
  • 3
  • Posts: 50.245
Re: Rasizam 101
« Reply #91 on: 03-08-2017, 19:20:48 »
Kako je bio džihadista kad nije bio musliman????

akhnaton

  • Against all
  • 4
  • 3
  • Posts: 2.589
  • I Walk Alone... and not give a damn...
Politically Incorrect member of "Snage Haosa i Bezumlja"

ankh Em Maat  since 1973.

Meho Krljic

  • 5
  • 3
  • Posts: 50.245
Re: Rasizam 101
« Reply #93 on: 03-08-2017, 21:52:10 »
Da, ali kakve veze kilafat ima sa džihadom??? Takoreći nikakve.

Аксентије Новаковић

  • 3
  • Posts: 3.909
  • Homo Superior
Re: Rasizam 101
« Reply #94 on: 07-08-2017, 00:59:51 »

Аксентије Новаковић

  • 3
  • Posts: 3.909
  • Homo Superior
Re: Rasizam 101
« Reply #95 on: 08-08-2017, 17:15:23 »

Meho Krljic

  • 5
  • 3
  • Posts: 50.245
Re: Rasizam 101
« Reply #96 on: 09-08-2017, 07:43:41 »
Kao što se da videti, rasizam 101 je na nivou osnovne škole.

Аксентије Новаковић

  • 3
  • Posts: 3.909
  • Homo Superior
Re: Rasizam 101
« Reply #97 on: 10-08-2017, 13:10:40 »
Quote
Make Racism Acceptable Again

Racism is a defense mechanism. To advance one’s ethnic genetic interests is to promote one’s own above all others. What is beneficial for whites carries more weight than what is good for an abstract humanity, which as an ideal to cherish and worship only exists in the gospels spread by the Church of Liberalism and the prophets of Third Worldism. The concept of humanity is purely abstract in nature as it has no anchor to stop it from drifting into meaninglessness and no roots that nourish it with the double meaning of identity and familiarity. People who believe themselves to be only part of humanity and nothing else are living in a zoo. Belonging to humanity is like belonging to the animal kingdom as a whole. It carries zero emotional attachment. One cannot be rooted in no one’s humanity; one can only be rooted in one’s race.

The majority of Europeans live in constant fear of being labeled “racist.” Racism is the ultimate crime and the new and improved original sin. In the contemporary West, a racist is considered beyond the pale, an outcast, a person to be shunned by “civilized” society. A racist is a witch who has the power to lure unsuspecting and innocent youths into the gingerbread house of hate, where the latter easily fall prey to the former’s beguiling charms and cunningly uttered curses. Once thus cursed, the innocent youths are on the sure path of becoming bedeviled outcasts themselves. The vicious circle comes again back to bite its serpentine tail. Once the Forbidden Fruit has been bitten into, the only option is a swift and forced exit from the Garden of Multicultural Eden. The establishment and the media, together with their large army of fawning beta cucks, wield their flaming sword of damnation over every sinner who dared to trespass the bounds of internalized “civility.”

Contrary to what insane leftists believe, the problem is not that Europeans are inherently too racist. The real problem is that Europeans are not nearly racist enough. There can be no love without hate. The principle of dualism teaches us that a positive can only be sustained by a negative. Racism combines both light and dark, compassion and rejection. To be happy with the familiar, one must reject the alien. If the stranger wants to dispossess, rape and kill you, why invite him into your house and feed and clothe him? The witch fattens up Hansel because she wants to eat him. Europeans fatten up the stranger because they want to be eaten by him. Modern Europe is a fairy tale world in overdrive reverse.

A person named Ali Akbar can never be a Brit, no matter if he was born in Britain or not. Nevertheless, the media and naive or deluded whites believe in the insane and totally ridiculous notion that being born on a certain territory miraculously makes one a member of the extended family that has inhabited said territory for millennia. Ali Akbar’s genes are alien spores that contribute to the destruction of the once pristine natural habitat that the extended family has toiled in for countless generations. A nation is foremost a conglomerate of people related by blood. One can transplant a nation from one piece of land to another. The nation will still remain the same nation. Thus Jews in New York belong to the same Jewish nation as Jews in Rotterdam. Blood is primary, soil only secondary. Blood before soil! Biopolitics trumps geopolitics!

“Europe a nation” is essentially a racist concept since it explicitly stipulates that only genetic Europeans (and not fake paper Europeans) have the right to live in Europe, which includes all traditionally white countries, like America and Australia. Genetic non-Europeans might be welcome as guests but none of them have the right to settle in Europe permanently. The current invasion of Europe by non-whites can therefore be considered an attack on the racial integrity of the European motherland. That this assault is conducted by stealth and with the apparent quiet acquiescence of the majority of genetic Europeans is beside the point. This violation of European soil AND blood is without parallel in history. Refusing to look this ugly reality in the face will not make it go away. Waking up to it is the first step and maybe the hardest.

We should not fall into the trap of cultural relativism. It is pure poison. We can objectively conclude, solely based on empirical evidence, that some cultures are more advanced and hence more valuable than others. The whole purpose of evolution is for the species to move ever higher. A race that has the capability to move among the stars is thus infinitely worthier of preserving than a race who has not evolved on its own in thousands of years of human history. The latter serves no purpose in the cosmic order while the former can expand the boundaries of the cosmos and thereby serve the purpose of existence, namely the will to grow beyond itself into the infinite. The late John Tyndall was right when he said that the moon landing was not “a giant leap for mankind” but a giant leap for the white race!

Racism is a defense mechanism. To advance one’s ethnic genetic interests is to promote one’s own above all others. What is beneficial for whites carries more weight than what is good for an abstract humanity, which as an ideal to cherish and worship only exists in the gospels spread by the Church of Liberalism and the prophets of Third Worldism. The concept of humanity is purely abstract in nature as it has no anchor to stop it from drifting into meaninglessness and no roots that nourish it with the double meaning of identity and familiarity. People who believe themselves to be only part of humanity and nothing else are living in a zoo. Belonging to humanity is like belonging to the animal kingdom as a whole. It carries zero emotional attachment. One cannot be rooted in no one’s humanity; one can only be rooted in one’s race.

Race is being and concreteness. Racially heterogeneous societies are vague and blurry as they provide no focus in terms of visible goals that benefit all of their members equally. Racially homogeneous societies offer solid foundations on which all members can build individually and as a collective. A multiracial society is a house built on ever-shifting sand with only crumbling soil as its basis. A monoracial society, on the other hand, is a fortress with enduring blood as its bedrock. Soil is always subservient to blood. The only healthy nation is the nation that protects the blood of its citizens. Blood nationalism > soil nationalism.

People who condemn racism are the enemy. Race nationalism is the only valid nationalism. “Racialism” is defeatism as one does not need to respect something simply because it exists. Emphasizing that one is a “racialist” and not a racist is nothing more than virtue signaling. Denial is a sin. Nobody wants to follow in the footsteps of Saint Peter. We must hate that which wants to kill us. No cheek and no quarter must be given.

Constantly emphasizing that one is a “racialist” opposed to the supposed evils of racism is a despicable sign of weakness of character. Other races are openly racist against whites and nobody bats an eyelid. But we have people allegedly on the Right who profess their outrage when somebody calls them racist. These so-called “right-wingers” then habitually pull out their tired “100% identity – 0% racism” card. As if this was the most natural thing in the world! Thank God reality teaches us otherwise on a daily basis. One merely has to go for a stroll in certain districts of Detroit or New Orleans. Possessing identity without the accompanying racism is unnatural and a biological impossibility. All people are tribal in nature, both in a defensive AND offensive manner. The feeling of disgust is mutual.

https://altright.com/2017/04/04/make-racism-acceptable-again/


Аксентије Новаковић

  • 3
  • Posts: 3.909
  • Homo Superior
Re: Rasizam 101
« Reply #98 on: 17-08-2017, 04:17:47 »

akhnaton

  • Against all
  • 4
  • 3
  • Posts: 2.589
  • I Walk Alone... and not give a damn...
Re: Rasizam 101
« Reply #99 on: 17-08-2017, 10:07:09 »
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uTxbl-NJ43g



Sve što ne dovodi do toga da se klanjamo crncima, pakijima (iako su oni indoevropljani, kavkazoidi) arapima,  pilištrincima, FNima, deformisanima, i tako to je rasističko.  Piješ pivo? Rasista!!!!, Jedeš slaninu? Rasista!!! Slaviš Božić, na bilo koji način i po bilo kom obredu? RASISTA!!!!! Voliš žene? Seksista i Rasista!!!!
Politically Incorrect member of "Snage Haosa i Bezumlja"

ankh Em Maat  since 1973.