ZNAK SAGITE — više od fantastike — edicija, časopis, knjižara...

Quote from: Kunac on 05-11-2012, 21:11:37
od druge Lukasove (1,2,3) koja je bila zaista ponižavajuća.

Quote from: milan on 25-01-2013, 00:28:16
Danas se pojavila vest da ce JJ Abrams ipak rezirati novi SW film... Jos nije zvanicno potvrdjeno, ali ako je to istina, eto konacno filma kojem cu da se nadam kao da imam deset godina.

Quote from: lilit on 15-12-2015, 22:31:04
još dva dana truki i dočekaću  :lol:

(https://www.znaksagite.com/diskusije/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi68.tinypic.com%2F2jffyme.jpg&hash=6a430d1ede1fa6d7f6d681455a783c4f9a1e1d9f)

Quote from: Dybuk on 15-12-2015, 22:48:24
Ja sam na ovo imuna. Prosto ne razumem fenomen.

Quote from: lilit on 15-12-2015, 22:31:36
The Radicalization of Luke Skywalker: A Jedi's Path to Jihad :lol:

http://decider.com/2015/12/11/the-radicalization-of-luke-skywalker-a-jedis-path-to-jihad/ (http://decider.com/2015/12/11/the-radicalization-of-luke-skywalker-a-jedis-path-to-jihad/)

Quote from: Pizzobatto on 15-12-2015, 23:22:52
realno, da li Skajvoker posjeduje tamnu trijadu, to je glavno pitanje!

Quote from: Dybuk on 15-12-2015, 23:16:55Sta predstavlja novim klincima?

Quote from: Pizzobatto on 16-12-2015, 00:41:13
Mene bi zabrinulo kad mlađima to ne bi djelovalo naivno, pa ono je bilo naivno i sedamdesetih, a tad je spejs opera ipak bila popularnija. Nisam siguran kako će sad da prođe.

Quote from: eddie coyle on 16-12-2015, 00:54:29

Quote from: Pizzobatto on 16-12-2015, 00:41:13
Mene bi zabrinulo kad mlađima to ne bi djelovalo naivno, pa ono je bilo naivno i sedamdesetih, a tad je spejs opera ipak bila popularnija. Nisam siguran kako će sad da prođe.

Razbice se od para. Novi klinci ne moraju ni da gledaju, matorci ce biti glavna publika a njima sto naivnije to bolje samo da se nekako pokusa povratiti delic izgubljenog detinjstva.

Ne mora cak ni da bude narocito dobar, ljudi pljuju po onim prikvelima ali i oni su zaradili para k'o pleve...

QuoteThe big news about "Star Wars: The Force Awakens" is — spoiler alert — that it's good! Despite the prerelease hype, it won't save the world, not even Hollywood, but it seamlessly balances cozy favorites — Harrison Ford, ladies and gentlemen — and new kinetic wows along with some of the niceties that went missing as the series grew into a phenomenon, most crucially a scale and a sensibility that is rooted in the human.

Quote from: Pizzobatto on 16-12-2015, 19:13:09
inače, Bata u Partizanskoj eskadrili je produhovljeni Čubaka

Quote from: Dybuk on 16-12-2015, 13:25:45
http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/star_wars_episode_vii_the_force_awakens/ (http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/star_wars_episode_vii_the_force_awakens/)

Quote from: Kunac on 17-12-2015, 01:18:59
Dobar je novi Star Wars. Baš dobar.

Quote from: lilit on 17-12-2015, 12:01:58
el bi moglo bez spojlera?

Quote from: Ghoul on 17-12-2015, 12:09:38

Quote from: lilit on 17-12-2015, 12:01:58
el bi moglo bez spojlera?

idi bre ubivaj te miševe, kakvo je sad ovo čitanje foruma?

Quote from: Perin on 17-12-2015, 11:52:53
Sedmi deo :)

Meni je zasmetalo i to što je Kajlo Ren kao lik mračnog džedaja loše odrađen. Moralne dileme tog junaka koje se protežu kroz film te njegova nesigurnost i jadikovke više odgovaraju tinejdžeru nego mračnom džedaju.

Poslano sa mog SM-N910C koristeći Tapatalk

Quote from: zosko on 17-12-2015, 19:48:56meni bi po subjektivnoj osobnoj preferenciji ipak prijalo da nema previse heroina

Quote from: Pizzobatto on 17-12-2015, 19:28:17
This is just a reboot

Thank you Disney and J.J. Abrams for ending the Star Wars for me

Disappointing

Star Wars: The Force Awakens - a eulogy :)

Disney took the whole Star Wars franchise and flushed it down the toilet!

Darth Vader will turn around in his grave knowing they made a rerun.

They have destroyed my childhood :)

Feminist garbage!! :)

utter money making bull

The Force might be Awakened, but puts the Audiences to Sleep!

Unimaginative ripoff of the original trilogy

It's so terrible in all aspects that I actually miss Jarjar now

So disappointed it hurts..



naslovi negativnih kritika na IMDB... počelo je gore nego u slučaju MMFR, i brže pada ocjena

Quotekao domorodac kad prvi put vidi televizor pa se prevrne naglavačke u čudu

Quote...Der Regisseur Brian de Palma wollte wissen, wo man sich am Anfang eigentlich befinde: "Wer sind diese wuscheligen Typen? Was für ein Film soll das sein? Das ergibt doch alles keinen Sinn!" Lucas selbst wiederholte immer wieder entschuldigend den Satz: "Es ist ein Kinderfilm! Ein reiner Kinderfilm!"...
...

...In Deutschland war von Begeisterung wenig zu spüren. Hans C. Blumenberg, legendärer Kritiker der "Zeit", kam 1978 nach dreimaligem (!) Besichtigen des Films zu folgendem Schluss: "Menschen werden nicht mehr gezeigt in 'Star Wars', nicht einmal mehr Comicstrip-Figuren, sondern nur noch bleiche Zombies, die aussehen wie amerikanische Pfadfinder aus der Ära Eisenhower: umgeben vom großen Krieg der Special Effects, von einer ebenso perfekten wie leeren Imponier-Maschinerie, die alle Individualität und alle Emotionen konsequent verbannt hat."...

Quote from: Meho Krljic on 19-12-2015, 21:37:26
Na projekciji 40 minuta posle moje je bio i Milan sa familijom pa i on može da da transgeneracijske utiske.

Quote from: Dybuk on 20-12-2015, 22:08:58
Meni Hobit prija, oko Nove kad zazimi. :)

Quote from: Kunac on 20-12-2015, 22:15:27

Quote from: Dybuk on 20-12-2015, 22:08:58
Meni Hobit prija, oko Nove kad zazimi. :)

Pečenje od hobita za novogodišnje praznike?

Quote from: ridiculus on 21-12-2015, 00:46:02
Pretpostavio sam, ali zbuniše me pohvale na račun izgleda. ;)

Quote from: ridiculus on 20-12-2015, 22:50:11
Nisam se usudio da lično pogledam, pošto još nisam gledao film, ali, znajući Limija, moglo bi da bude vrlo interesantno.

Quote from: ridiculus on 21-12-2015, 00:42:42Jel' vi pričate o Gospodaru prstenova ili baš o Hobitu?

Quote from: Kunac on 21-12-2015, 23:38:34
Možda bi mi smetalo u nekom "ozbiljnijem" filmu, ali ne i ovde.

Quote from: Father Jape on 21-12-2015, 23:54:42
Odgovor tomatu:

Quote from: tomat on 21-12-2015, 23:31:15
SPOJLERI

smeta li još nekom što Kajlo Ren preživljava samo zahvaljujući cepanju planete? mislim, sa jedne strane imamo treniranog džedaja, koji snagom uma zaustavlja laserski zrak u vazduhu, a sa druge strane bivšeg stormtrupera koji ni kao stormtruper nije bog zna šta, i klinku koja nikada ni pištolj nije držala, gde mu oboje pružaju više nego dostojan otpor u mačevanju, i gde ga sreća spašava da ne najebe.

KRAJ SPOJLERA

Quote from: zoskodibuk (hipoteticki): odgledala sam komediju, slutila sam da je saljiva, nema jeze, hahaha, koji kreteni.

Quote from: Meho Krljic on 22-12-2015, 13:45:55
Slava  meni zvuči kao parodija na SJW internet juzere

Quote from: дејан on 22-12-2015, 11:16:25
перине, из неког волшебног разлога, код мене твоји постови изгледају као кад ставим неког на 'игнор' плус сваки има поруку 'администратора' - 'овај ник много нервира' ?!!?!

(https://www.znaksagite.com/diskusije/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi65.tinypic.com%2F35an1vl.jpg&hash=f81a789b9822b7f4ec18b4eeca00befd4ec1a153)
(https://www.znaksagite.com/diskusije/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi64.tinypic.com%2F2hxyhlh.jpg&hash=25720a1af93196c17393849018ec33e1715b6030)

Quote from: Dybuk on 22-12-2015, 13:51:53

Quote from: zoskodibuk (hipoteticki): odgledala sam komediju, slutila sam da je saljiva, nema jeze, hahaha, koji kreteni.

:lol: :lol:

Ic fani koz ic cru.

Quote from: Perin on 22-12-2015, 14:43:00
Ukoliko nekom smetaju spojleri, onda ne treba ni da overava ovu temu. Mislim, čemu tema ako se o njoj ne može pričati?

Ali rwšićemo problem tako što neću postovati na ovoj temi više.

I sorry zbog spojlera, ali ne overavajte temu ako film niste pogledali. Takođe, ne smatram da sam uopšte spojlerovao - nisam pričao pta se dešava u filmu nego samo utiske o istom.  Ali ok, nema veze, neću više smetati :)

Quote from: Ghoul on 22-12-2015, 13:28:38
hit komentar by frikšou-kripšou SLAVA:
('slava' je jedna juzerka sa foruma art-anima - pitam se samo, juzerka ČEGA?)

"Filmovi iz serijala 'Ratovi zvezda' su, po mom laičkom mišljenju, u mnogo čemu problematični. Eto na primer stormtruperi (stormtroopers). Dovoljno je setiti se nemačkih vojnika šturmera (koliko je umetnički pravac 'Sturm und Drang' imao negativan uticaj na razvoj dogadjaja u Nemačkoj je jedna velika tema za stručnjake, a ne laike). Ko su bili šturmeri tj. jurišnici? Sama reč govori da su to bili vojnici koji su se sa velikim žarom, olujno bacali u borbu i ubijali sve živo što im se nadje na putu. Ako treba, srljali su u smrt, svoj život su žrtvovali za vodju, za ideju. Dakle, može se pretpostaviti da je ideja za stormtrupere potekla od šturmera.
Jedna vojna operacija na području bivše Jugoslavije je nosila naziv 'Oluja'. Ta 'Oluja' je oduvala stotine hiljada ljudi sa područja na kojem su vekovima živeli. Ne, nisu to bili 'Ratovi zvezda', ratne bajke za malu decu, već istinit tragični dogadjaj u kojem su nedužni ljudi ubijani, proterivani, kuće su spaljivane, životi su uništavani.
Zato hvala lepo na 'Ratovima zvezda'. To što su ratovi zvezda ne znači da su različiti od ratova na Zemlji. Kao zvezde, pa je to nešto fantastično. Da se malo zafarba."

Quote

December 2015 will forever be remembered as the month where Star Wars hysteria reigned supreme. The recent release of Star Wars: The Force Awakens (https://bgr.com/tag/star-wars-the-force-awakens/) has set innumerable box office records already (https://bgr.com/2015/12/19/star-wars-the-force-awakens-box-office-sales/) and will likely break many more in the weeks and months to come.
Directed by JJ Abrams, the new Star Wars film has resonated with fans of the franchise in a way that the prequels did not. Anchored by a wave of nostalgia, the excitement for the latest Star Wars installment is palpable; hardly a surprise as fans have been eagerly awaiting a film that finally does the original trilogy justice.

DON'T MISS: Stacked is a humpbacked iPhone battery case you might actually like (https://bgr.com/2015/12/23/iphone-battery-case-review-stacked-vs-apple/)
But not everyone is on board with the avalanche of praise currently draping Star Wars: The Force Awakens. Though most reviews have been overwhelmingly positive, there are quite a few people who found the film disappointing for a variety of reasons. If you are one of these people, rest assured, you are not alone. In the interest of keeping things balanced, we thought we'd counter the seemingly endless stream Star Wars praise and highlight a few of the more interesting negative reviews to have emerged over the last week.
Perhaps not surprisingly, many of the more negative takes on the film harp on the fact that it didn't tread much new ground and essentially presented the same type of story arc we've seen before. Warning! Some spoilers ahead.
The Patriot Ledger
"The Empire strikes out in J.J. Abram's overhyped "Star Wars" reboot, "The Force Awakens." At least somebody "awakens" in this dull, derivative money grab in which wunderkind J.J. Abrams chooses to go where George Lucas has gone before by basically repeating plot points, even lines, from the original trilogy. At least it's not as bad as the last three episodes, I-III. And thank God, there's no Jar Jar Binks. But where's the originality? The innovation? Surprising, given Abrams track record with rejuvenating aging franchises like "Star Trek" and "Mission Impossible." With "The Force Awakens," he simply gives the people what they want, which is more of the same.
If that's all you desire or expect, you'll be pleased. But, silly me I was anticipating something new and different in the way of story and characters. The only thing that's an upgrade is the quality of the special effects, which are spectacular. The rest is just rehash."
Slant Magazine
"But The Force Awakens is still more or less a fetish object, a film that exists to inspire phrases like "It feels like Star Wars again" ad nauseam from a fanbase that equates the lasting impact of Lucas's prequels as something akin to PTSD."
Salon
"For better or worse — and here's where my hoodie-wearing friend's thought experiment comes in – "The Force Awakens" is more like a remake or a mashup of the first two "Star Wars" pictures than a sequel. Yes, in technical terms Abrams and co-writers Lawrence Kasdan and Michael Arndt are picking up the narrative some 30 years after the destruction of the Galactic Empire at the end of "Return of the Jedi." But they barely even pretend to advance the story of the initial trilogy; they rewind it and repeat it, with new characters substituting for old ones but many of the same action set-pieces, narrative dilemmas and hidden connections."
North Shore Movies
"STAR WARS EPISODE VII: THE FORCE AWAKENS is the "Star Wars" movie you think you've been waiting for. It's everything you've ever wanted from one of these pictures, and also a heck of a lot less. A lean, mean nostalgia-dispensing machine, the movie is designed to ring bells and elbow you in the ribs with familiar sights and faces constantly as it hurtles from scene to scene at a breakneck pace. It's sleekly engineered to be the kind of film you point at and nod in appreciation–because you remember "Star Wars," and those memories are quite fond. Abrams gets the tricky tone and jokey exhilaration down pat, the feeling of (re)visiting a rusted-out, slightly sarcastic fairy tale. Still, a few hours after the credits rolled it's all evaporating and I'm struggling to recall a remotely original or inventive moment in the entire goddamn thing."
Time
"And yet The Force Awakens adds up to something less than the sum of its parts. The early scenes have a relaxed, assured pace. But as the story moves forward, Abrams becomes more mired in the task of keeping the plot mechanics in gear. There's the expected climactic battle between X-wing starfighters and TIE fighters, which is mildly exciting and nothing more—the fact that it's punctuated with dumb dialogue like "General! Their shields are down!" "Prepare to fire!" and even the classic, "It would take a miracle to save us now," surely doesn't help. And the movie's big twist, clearly intended to be a moment of Shakespearean grandeur, is handled clumsily: Instead of allowing a significant figure to have his grand moment, Abrams cuts to other characters expressing shock and dismay, as if he didn't trust the audience to know what to feel."Movie Nation
"The effects are sharper, 40 years more developed. Why does Abrams do so little to show them off? The chases, dogfights and set-piece battles are static and recycled. The Big Pause for a Big Death is just an eye-roller.
Even the aliens are oh-so-familiar, right down to Admiral "It's a trap!" Ackbar.
The earliest reviews of this are all glowing, as indeed they were for this past summer's "Jurassic Park" clone — "Jurassic World." This will certainly make billions. "Brand" above all, right?
But "The Force Awakens" boils down to a couple of genuine lump-in-the-throat moments, and those are due to nostalgia. The rest? Seen it, done it, been there, and remember it — even though it was "a long time ago.""
And a few audience reviews via Rotten Tomatoes.

JJ Abrams brings the action, but as usual, he does not bring a well paced story. He is chronology impaired, and seems to believe that the Galaxy is the size of a closet. There is little character development, little rationalization for the events that take place and no sense of travel times across an immense galaxy. Untrained people fight a Sith Lord with a lightsaber successfully, and none of it makes sense. Visually stunning, mentally numbing.

As expected, this review also calls out JJ Abrams for not coming up with an original plot.

The movie didn't spend any time actually delving into a plot. All the time was allocated to fan service callbacks, out of place "funny" moments, throwing around dozens of new and useless characters, and stolen plot from A New Hope. I didn't see this as a new Star Wars movie, but more like a 2 hour long, $200 million dollar advert Disney paid for in order to try and get people to watch the next 2+ movies. Such a wasted opportunity.

And another:

Well acted and visually impressive, but the entire recycled-from-Episode-IV story line falls apart close to a dozen times unless major characters don't find exactly who and what they need at exactly the right times.
The story writers seem to have put together a check-list of their top nostalgia-baiting moments and strung them together with contrived encounters that could have happened anywhere in a wide universe, but conveniently happened in such a way that newcomers Rey and Fin can take a tour of Episode IV's highlights in the span of 2 hours and change.
Disney and Abrams seem to have forgotten that, despite the shortcomings of The Phantom Menace and its follow-up films, we thoroughly enjoyed being transported to a galaxy far, far away where there were new creatures, starships, and ways to wage intergalactic war each time.
Those who revel in the ground-breaking creativity that we are used to seeing from new Star Wars installments will certainly be disappointed with Episode VII, while those looking for a nostalgia trip will be impressed easily enough.

And two more for good measure:

A dead rip off of the original movie, Episode 4. From the crappy looking infinity CG roll opening sequence, bar scene and light sabre fights to a janitor identifying a weakness in the battle star, this movie is chock full of inside jokes and tired ideas. The only redeeming grace for this movie is a solid performance by Harrison Ford as Han Solo and a compelling performance by Daisy Ridley as Rey who represents the resurrection of the Jedi. Fun to watch and full of action, but there are numerous dead spots and far too much nod to the Star Wars wonks of yesteryear.

And to close things out:

(SPOILERS) Very token. It introduces some truly great characters dripping with personality and motivation (Fin, BB-8) alongside the single worst character in Star Wars history (Kylo Ren) who looks terrible, acts badly, and takes his helmet off too often to reveal his shockingly ugly face. Bringing back the original cast actually worked this time around, Solo in particular being an absolute beast and central to the plot. But about 2/3 of the way in, they just bring in the biggest deus ex machina around for a "mega threat" and then decide to kill solo with no fanfare and no reason. The music is easily John Williams' worst ever (and I have adored every score he's ever done until this one) and why does this random, untrained force sensitive girl suddenly learn how to do a Jedi Mind trick by simply repeating the same phrase three times? She didn't even know the jedi existed, why would she think this would work? Why can she hold her own against Kylo Ren, a trained jedi/sith with a sword she's never held before?
...
Dialogue was above average, cinematography was great, but the last third of the movie was a horribly massive let-down that killed any interest the first two thirds had built. Worth watching? sure. But the tone is definitely not Star Wars, the villain was godawful, the "quintouple death star" was ridiculous, and overall it just gave the star wars fan in me an irritating little headache with all the fantastic lore that disney could have used, but decided to axe for reasons that solely seem to be for financial gains. And I hate Kylo's lightsaber. It looks wrong, sounds wrong, everything.

If you weren't feeling the new Star Wars flick, well, I guess you're definitely not alone

Quote from: Kunac on 25-12-2015, 12:38:08
Ima se, može se.

Quote from: lilit on 30-12-2015, 16:40:47
i moj pazar je samo rej
nisu smeli od kajla da naprave onolikog paćenika
fin je tu politkor
leja, nadam se, neće imati preveliku ulogu u nastavcima
nadu polažem i u luka (sreća pa nije ni "a" progovorio), još kad bi i delovao kao obi-wan a ne samo izgledao tako, srce bi mi bilo puno
premda je i obi-wan seronja, kad se malo dublje ode u filozofiju :lol:
u svakom slučaju, radujem se repeticiju u imaxu, sredina sredine i naćosima sa prelivom od sira :lol:

Quote from: Ugly MF on 01-01-2016, 03:39:48
Lili, sad te nakon ovoga jos vise volim!
Srecna ti i Nova Godina, tebi i tvojoj familiji!

Quote from: Boban on 02-01-2016, 01:09:24
Naš drugar Monja/Cornelius nije oduševljen:

Quote from: Cedo Medo on 02-01-2016, 01:37:05
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4NXu_2xqSFg (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4NXu_2xqSFg)

Quote

Future installments in the iconic and long-running Star Wars series will "of course" feature openly gay characters, The Force Awakens director JJ Abrams said this week.
"Of course!" Abrams said at a pre-Oscar event at the headquarters of his Bad Robot company, according to a report from The Daily Beast (http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/02/26/j-j-abrams-gay-characters-coming-to-star-wars.html). "When I talk about inclusivity it's not excluding gay characters. It's about inclusivity. So of course."
He went on to say, "To me, the fun of Star Wars is the glory of possibility. So it seems insanely narrow-minded and counterintuitive to say that there wouldn't be a homosexual character in that world."
Abrams isn't directing Star Wars: Episode VIII, as that duty is in the hands of Rian Johnson. However, Abrams is on-board as an executive producer for the film, due out in 2017.
The Force Awakens opened in December and quickly became one of the biggest movies of all time. It has made more than $2 billion worldwide and currently stands as the No. 3 movie ever in terms of global box office, only behind Titanic and Avatar.
As Polygon (http://www.polygon.com/2016/2/26/11122488/j-j-abrams-says-star-wars-will-get-an-openly-gay-character) points out, author Chuck Wendig's 2015 Star Wars novel Aftermath--which is canon--featured an openly gay character. Wendig caught some amount of flak for this.
The next entry in the film series, Rogue One, arrives in December.

Quote from: CorwinM on 01-03-2016, 23:24:51
Sad sam primjetio temu i ne mogu da dođem sebi od ovih pozitivnih komentara. Ovaj film je smeće neopisivo. Harison Ford je bio OK, ali to je zaista jedina stvar u cijelom filmu koja je bila OK.

Quote from: Ugly MF on 08-03-2016, 01:53:07
evo dobrog filma...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Djo_91jN3Pk (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Djo_91jN3Pk)

Quote from: Truman on 20-01-2016, 14:13:44
Odgledao i ja konačno SW. Zadovoljan sam, za mene iskusni Harison Ford dominira ovom epizodom.

Quote from: mac on 07-04-2016, 19:29:52
Rogue One trailer

Quote from: lilit on 15-12-2016, 23:17:22
Empire strikes back pa Rogue One.
starom fanu se srce ogrejalo! :lol:

Quote from: lilit on 17-12-2016, 12:40:03
vezano za referenciranje, postoji slight problemčić sa C-3PO i R2-D2 al o tome kad pogledaš! :lol:

Quote from: zosko on 17-12-2016, 14:55:05
3.5/10
ne uspijeva mi identificirati se sa heroinom... :cry:

Quote

Warning: Some spoilers for Rogue One to follow
At this point, Star Wars fans are accustomed to seeing their favorite characters return from the dead, and their favorite stories recycled with new computer effects. The new Star Wars movie Rogue One (https://www.yahoo.com/movies/film/star-wars-rogue-one/) takes both ideas to the next level by resurrecting a familiar human character — Grand Moff Tarkin, Darth Vader's formidable right-hand man in A New Hope — in a CGI performance. True to George Lucas's forward-thinking vision for the Star Wars films, it's an impressive piece of special-effects craft that's never been attempted on this level. Whether it works — and what it bodes for the future of the Star Wars universe — is another story.
Grand Moff Tarkin, the ruthless general who presided over the Death Star and ordered the destruction of Princess Leia's home planet Alderaan, was played by British actor Peter Cushing in the original 1977 Star Wars. The character was blown up with the Death Star at the end of the movie, and Cushing himself died in 1994 at the age of 81. Tarkin has returned to the big screen once before, for a wordless cameo at the end of the prequel trilogy (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K8J2l0XQG0g). In 2005's Revenge of the Sith, the character was played by Wayne Pygram, outfitted with extensive prosthetics to resemble Cushing.  Reportedly, George Lucas considered using stock footage (https://books.google.com/books?id=8IPTe3vL-lUC&dq=The+Making+of+Star+Wars%2C+Revenge+of+the+Sith&focus=searchwithinvolume&q=cushing) to bring Cushing's character back to life for Sith, but the poor condition of the existing footage made it impossible.

If this is true, then Rogue One (https://www.yahoo.com/movies/film/star-wars-rogue-one/) is the fulfillment of Lucas' dream. Rogue One (https://www.yahoo.com/movies/film/star-wars-rogue-one/)'s Tarkin is an uncanny digital re-creation of late-1970s Peter Cushing with a voice to match. (Rogue One (https://www.yahoo.com/movies/film/star-wars-rogue-one/) takes place immediately before the events of A New Hope, when a band of Rebels steals the Death Star plans from the Empire.) The character's first appearance elicited gasps from the audience at the New York press screening — but the real shocker is how much screen time he gets. Though it probably only adds up to a few villainous minutes, Tarkin's role is a substantial one. And while CGI has been used to resurrect dead actors before (the most notable example being Paul Walker in Furious 7 (https://www.yahoo.com/movies/furious-7-director-james-wan-expected-oscar-232058445.html)), it's never been done with a major character for such a sustained amount of time.
Related: 'Furious 7' Director James Wan Expected Oscar Nomination for Keeping Paul Walker Alive (https://www.yahoo.com/movies/furious-7-director-james-wan-expected-oscar-232058445.html)
The effect is so groundbreaking that when a report leaked last summer  (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-3207415/Dracula-legend-grave-Star-Wars-prequel-Peter-Cushing-digitally-recreated-new-spin-Rogue-One.html)of a CGI Peter Cushing appearing in Rogue One (https://www.yahoo.com/movies/film/star-wars-rogue-one/), many outlets flat-out didn't (http://www.cinemablend.com/new/Star-Wars-Rogue-One-May-Bring-Back-Key-Character-With-CGI-Magic-78707.html) believe it (http://www.avclub.com/article/cgi-peter-cushing-could-probably-wont-appear-star--224308). Even with significant advances in motion-capture technology (allowing, for example, Robert Downey Jr. to play his younger self in Captain America: Civil War (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iCrs9UycH0w)), it seemed too daunting a task. But Industrial Light & Magic's John Knoll, who came up with the concept for Rogue One (and also co-created Photoshop (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adobe_Photoshop)), was confident that it would work.
"John was always like 'No we can do this, we can do it, we can do it,'" director Gareth Edwards told RadioTimes (http://www.radiotimes.com/news/2016-12-15/how-a-holby-city-actor-brought-one-of-star-wars-most-iconic-characters-back-to-life). "To be honest, a lot of people were nervous the whole time, like 'Is this gonna happen?' And then we went all or nothing in."
So ILM set about creating a character based solely on Cushing's scenes from a single (non-digital) movie. Fortunately, Cushing made plenty of other films — he's remembered in particular for his Hammer horror movies — which reportedly came in handy when the animation team realized they had no footage of Grand Moff Tarkin's feet. (Cushing often told the story (https://paulroland.wordpress.com/2012/03/22/paul-interviews-peter-cushing/) of how the leather riding boots worn by the Imperial troops were too small for his feet, so Lucas agreed to let him wear his house slippers and shoot him from the knees up. Here's photo evidence (http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-HIA-dhpLt_I/UVb-q8ZUShI/AAAAAAAAXbA/RbM7Vk4q5KI/s1600/star+wars+slippers.jpg).)
"They are going through hours and hours of old footage from the horror movies to recreate his legs and feet to produce realistic movements," a source tattled to the Daily Mail last summer (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-3207415/Dracula-legend-grave-Star-Wars-prequel-Peter-Cushing-digitally-recreated-new-spin-Rogue-One.html). "It is eerie to see someone who has been dead for so long come to life on a screen."
Related: 'Rogue One': Our Ultimate Guide to the Easter Eggs and Callbacks in the 'Star Wars' Prequel (Spoilers!) (https://www.yahoo.com/movies/rogue-one-our-ultimate-guide-to-the-easter-eggs-and-callbacks-in-the-star-wars-prequel-spoilers-012744486.html)
Still, a motion-capture character requires an actual actor, whose performance is then transformed by digital animators. (A more traditional example from Rogue One is the droid K-2SO, played by Alan Tudyk.) To play Tarkin, Edwards cast Guy Henry, a classically trained British actor who already had a few minor Hollywood baddies on his resume (Heyer in V for Vendetta, Pius Thicknesse in Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Parts 1 and 2). "It was very gracious of him, because essentially he's doing this big performance and getting zero credit for it," Edwards told RadioTimes of his actor. "He was gonna be totally replaced, and then had to keep it all secret." (In order to cover its legal bases, Disney also obtained permission from Peter Cushing's estate (http://variety.com/2016/film/news/rogue-one-peter-cushing-digital-resurrection-cgi-1201943759/), which is managed by his former secretary.)All this top-secret ILM work had one goal: To make it appear as though Peter Cushing has magically returned to reprise his Star Wars role. Whether they succeeded is debatable. Without a doubt, Digital Tarkin looks like Cushing. (Disney has not yet released any photos or clips of the digital recreation.) He sounds like Cushing. But he is not Cushing. One of the things that makes Cushing's original performance so terrifying is how genteel he is. Take a look at the scene in which Tarkin destroys Leia's home as she watches in horror (below). The cold glint in his eyes is that of a ruthless killer, yet he's so cordial, almost playful with Leia. Watching him, you're not sure if you want to cower in a corner or curl up and take a nap inside one of his mellifluous "r"s.

The cartoon Cushing, on the other hand, has none of those beguiling qualities: He is an English-accented attack dog, affixed with a permanent sneer. And the longer he is onscreen, the more two-dimensional he appears (literally and figuratively). While a few critics have complimented (https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/comic-riffs/wp/2016/12/15/one-of-the-best-performances-in-rogue-one-is-by-an-actor-who-died-in-1994/?utm_term=.d8502a4f0e95) Cushing' s "performance," (http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/review/rogue-one-a-star-wars-story-review-955566) most are finding it distracting at best (http://www.businessinsider.com/rogue-one-review-star-wars-movie-2016-12), an uncanny-valley (http://www.bostonglobe.com/arts/movies/2016/12/13/magnum-force/VOAsRvcKr6TFxCSb504jjI/story.html) nightmare (http://www.avclub.com/review/rogue-one-adventure-star-wars-dark-side-247345) at worst. "Even [Cushing's character] Baron Frankenstein would have been horrified by this kind of grave-robbing," writes New York (http://www.vulture.com/2016/12/movie-review-rogue-one.html)'s David Edelstein.
Rogue One contains one other can't-miss-it CGI character whose appearance is more convincing, if only for its brevity. But the effect is far from flawless. Much more satisfying is the reappearance of Return of the Jedi character Mon Mothma (https://www.yahoo.com/movies/rogue-one-how-mon-mothma-returned-to-the-star-wars-universe-33-years-after-return-of-the-jedi-161406067.html), played by lookalike actress Genevieve O'Reilly (the original performer, Caroline Blakiston, is now an octogenarian). Like Ewan McGregor playing Obi-Wan Kenobi in the prequels, O'Reilly adds new dimension to a character whose original appearance was all too fleeting — and if Lucasfilm isn't bringing these characters back to make us see them in a new light, then why bother?
Maybe the answer is: Because it's never been done before. Years from now, Rogue One will be noted as a landmark in movie special effects — and though Tarkin will no doubt look even cruder in retrospect, new animation technology can always be applied later (much like Lucas tweaked the rudimentary Jabba the Hutt character in his Special Edition of A New Hope between its 1997 theatrical premiere and the 2004 DVD release). (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Br0R5kMzwM) Digital Tarkin may be divisive now, but in 40 years, when Lucasfilm decides to honor Harrison Ford by pairing off digital Han Solo and digital Indiana Jones for a buddy comedy, no one will blink an eye. The scariest thing about the Peter Cushing character in Rogue One is that he's only the beginning.

Quote from: lilit on 15-12-2017, 19:56:14
SW epizoda 8 pokidala, ali ubila i razbila, znači, ko je voleo imperiju, srce će da mu zaigra. partizanska eskadrila!  xrofl
tri puta sam se naježila, jednom i patriotsku suzu pustila, a sa muvama i prašinom onako kako to radi luk skajvoker.  nas-rofl
zvuk u imaxu ubio, nema filma do bioskopa, al da ne oftopikujem.
odo' sutra opet.  :lol:

Quote from: lilit on 15-12-2017, 20:31:11
hm, PG-13 je, ima pucanja al nema (previše) krvi. da li je gledao prethodne?

Quote from: mac on 16-12-2017, 00:20:50
Zato što je mogao biti bolji. Natrpali su mnogo toga, da ti posle nekog vremena dosadi. Još jedan obrt, ili promena scenografije? Lepo, a kad će kraj?

Quote from: indrik on 16-12-2017, 00:36:57

Quote from: mac on 16-12-2017, 00:20:50
Zato što je mogao biti bolji. Natrpali su mnogo toga, da ti posle nekog vremena dosadi. Još jedan obrt, ili promena scenografije? Lepo, a kad će kraj?

Aha, ja sam kontao da nije kojim slučajem preoriginalan. Hardcore fanovi to rijetko opraštaju, uvijek im je draža reciklaža. A ovaj Rian Johnson je jako čudan tip sudeći po njegovim ranijim filmovima.

Quote from: DeHickok on 16-12-2017, 22:18:11
Bioskopska karta kosta neverovatnih 750 din (u Uscu) i to je i najjaci utisak koji nosim sa projekcije.

Quote from: Kimura on 16-12-2017, 23:07:10

Quote from: DeHickok on 16-12-2017, 22:18:11
Bioskopska karta kosta neverovatnih 750 din (u Uscu) i to je i najjaci utisak koji nosim sa projekcije.

Au! Baš su bezobrazni. U ''Rodi'' je 300. 3D je, doduše, 400.

Quote from: Perin on 21-12-2017, 00:29:50
Vrh objasnio :)


Sent from my iPhone 6s

Quote from: milan on 20-12-2017, 22:25:06
Meni odlican film, u samom vrhu serijala. Ne pamtim kada se desilo da se ovako iznenadim, da me film ovako izvoza, da opet osetim delic onih emocija koje sam imao kao klinac gledajuci stare SW filmove (kad kazem stare, mislim na one stare stare, ne na prikvele). Svaka cast Dzonsonu i ekipi. 

Quote from: Kimura on 21-12-2017, 12:47:34
Apsolutno je neizvodljivo da se novom filmu udahne šarm sedamdesetih i osamdesetih godina.

Quote from: Ugly MF on 21-12-2017, 23:36:44
Kladim se cak i meni da daju sve pare sveta da napravim Star Wars film, 80% bi reklo da je sranje.

Quote from: milan on 22-12-2017, 20:14:59
Nisam Dizni bot a i ne znam sta znaci SJW... ali hvalim ovaj film na sva usta. Mislim da je veoma dobar, i kazem, meni je u samom vrhu SW serijala. Dzonson je sa ekipom uradio odlican posao, i napravio zanimljiv i hrabar SW film, koji ne igra na sigurno.

Quote from: Onaj stari Sendmen on 21-12-2017, 09:33:30
The Last Jedi: Mark Hamill Says 'He's Not My Luke Skywalker'
https://screenrant.com/star-wars-8-last-jedi-mark-hamill-luke-issues/

Quote from: Ugly MF on 22-12-2017, 21:53:17
Meni se Rej svidja kao lik, prvo sto je ajkendi, hehe, muska sviiiiinja,znam,
ali i sto je kopija Anye Solo iz poslednjeg DarHorsovog serijala Legacy v2.
Stripovi StarWars su trenutno najbolje nesto iz franshize i redovno i obavezno ih pratim i gomilam kolekcije ovde po kompu kao poslednji gik.
Drago mi je sto ima Cubake, i recimo da bi mogao jos jednu trilogiju da gledam sa Rej i cubakom u milenium falkonu.
Ma kakvu trilogiju, 10 sezona tv serije!
Za Crnju i ostale me krasno zaboleeee, cak mi se Beniciov lik najvise svidja.Ali tu je glumac majstor.
Onaj Lasvegas peti element segment tooolko bas i ne smeta, jer u stripovima imas masu toga.
Tako daaa,,,e, mi smo imali komunizam, ameri SJW, sve to prodje, bitno je da ima filmova i zabave!

Mada iskreno sam se nadao nekom ostecenju KajloRena, pa da lici malko na Darth Malgusa iz OldRepublicka,
ali, trt...

Quote from: Meho Krljic on 22-12-2017, 22:10:00
Mark Hamill Rips His Role In 'Last Jedi': 'He's Not My Luke Skywalker' (https://www.yahoo.com/news/mark-hamill-rips-role-apos-145123576.html)

Quote from: Ugly MF on 23-12-2017, 23:02:02
Sto em sledeci mozes da napravis sta oces i kako oces, em nema sanse da neko pogodi sta ce bude!!!

Quote from: mac on 24-12-2017, 00:08:37
Nikad se ništa bitno neće razrešiti, jer onda nemaju izgovor da naprave još filmova. McGuffini će izranjati i tonuti u zaborav do u beskonačno, uključujući i misteriju na ostrvu, za koju u filmovima nećemo više čuti, ali će nam biti objašnjena u propratnom materijalu, koji se dodatno plaća.

Quote from: Аксентије Новаковић on 26-12-2017, 12:02:18
Арон Шапиро вам је идеолошки непријатељ исто колико и Наом Чомски.  :lol:

Quote from: milan on 23-12-2017, 21:13:13
Meni Last Jedi odlican film

Quote from: дејан on 12-01-2018, 10:38:16
ау лилит...ја себи за мало нисам ископао очи покушавајући да преживим филм, спасла ме је само прибраност и натчовечанска снага моје боље половине која ми је спутавала руке сваки пут кад сам покушао да се самооштетим...најбоље што могу да кажем о филму, сем што је снимљен у боји, је да је то један несрећни, недовршени, нејаки и вулгарни покушај миленијалског манифеста, направљен искључиво од општих места и да је сваки индијски суперхеројски филм далеко плаузабилнији, конзистентнији и вернији себи од свега што ће несрећни гледалац видети на екрану...то је стварно најбоље што могу да кажем о филму (и то да је у боји)...

Quote from: lilit on 12-01-2018, 00:09:53
videće me imax sigurno bar još jednom pre nego skinu film s repertoara.  nas-rofl

Quote from: дејан on 12-01-2018, 10:38:16
ау лилит.....(и то да је у боји)...

Quote from: milan on 12-01-2018, 15:57:02
Ja zbog posla ne stigoh opet da odem u bioskop da ga gledam, ali cekam blu rej, pa cu natenane da ga gledam jos jedno desetak puta. :)

Quote from: Onaj stari Sendmen on 13-01-2018, 20:08:09
Ipak kad su se slegli malo utisci vidi se da su, naprimer, neki od najčešće pominjanih argumenata vezanih za izneverena očekivanja fanova bili naduvani, tj. ta očekivanja su u najmanju ruku bila prenaduvana.

Naočigledniji primer za to je Lukova plava svetlosna sablja. Jeste, Jar Jar Abrams je nagovestio svašta nešto sa njom u FA, ali realno nikakvo drugo rezrešenje za bilo kog pravog fana serijala ne bi bilo moguće nego da Luk baci prokletinju koju je imao u ruci kad mu je ista bila odsečena u Imperiji, i to nije out of character nit ga čini kukavicom već je jednostavno za njega zlokobni ukleti predmet koji ga podseća na bol i gubitak ruke.

Quote from: Meho Krljic on 27-05-2018, 21:09:30
Pogledao se Solo i...

Pa, ovo je old skul akciona avantura u najboljoj holivudskoj tradiciji. Ispred mene su sedela deca uzrasta kog sam ja bio kada su me vodili da gledam prvi Star Wars i mislim da nije preambiciozno pretpostaviti da su oni uživali koliko i ja tada i da će ovaj film za njih predstavljati jednu dragocenu, prijatnu uspomenu na detinjstvo, kao što je to Star Wars za mene. Naravno, zastrašujuće je pomisliti da je to sve jedan isti serijal i reći danas da možemo da za trideset godina zamislimo nove nastavke Star Wars deluje, pa... gotovo distopijski. Ali ovaj film ne treba opterećivati tom stigmom.

Zapravo, Solo je imao dovoljno svojih stigmi da se s njima izbori i delovao kao moguće prvi istinski nepotreban film u ponovo pokrenutom SW serijalu. The Last Jedi je, svakako, film koji je trenutno na raspeću zbog svoje ikonoklastične orijentacije, ali se za njega ne može reći da je bio nepotreban, na kraju krajeva on je zbilja u značajnoj meri pogurao priču unapred i apdejtovao pozicije na kojima se svi nalaze. Solo je, u kontrastu sa tim origin story koji niko nije tražio i koji je pretio da ikoničnost lika Hana Soloa, sklopljenu od par rečenica koje su Lucas i Kasdan pobacali u prvih par filmova kao kul reference na njegovu prošlost, upropasti, gradeći oko tih par rečenica preskupe CGI set pisove.

Takođe, film je kreativno škripao i morao da preživi promenu na kormilu a dovođenje Rona Howarda su mnogi tumačili kao gašenje požara. Howard je, na kraju krajeva čovek sa mnogo uspešnih filmova ali bez izrazitog autorskog rukopisa i njegova uloga je, rezonovalo se, bila samo da doveze film u jednom komadu do garaže, a Dizni će već da se pokrpi ove sezone od drugih filmova.

Tu su bile i priče da je Ehrenreich pogrešno kastovan, da se ne snalazi, da je morao da uzima časove glume tokom snimanja i to jeste delovalo kao veliki problem. Harison Ford nije veliki glumac ali je glumac sa izrazitom harizmom i ako omladinac Ehrenreich to nije mogao da iznese, Solo je zaista pretio da bude bolno iskustvo.

But y'know what? Solo je ekstremno udoban i zabavan film, majstorski precizno i pouzdano vođen svemirski vestern sa pristojno oblikovanim heist zapletom, galerijom vrlo uspelih likova kojima je ovo prvo i poslednje pojavljivanje u Star Wars univerzumu i omjerom akcije, humora i nešto malo drame koji taman pristaje Star Wars klasiku. Ovo je i brz, dinamičan film koji, ipak, u kontrastu sa Deadpoolom 2 od prošle nedelje, ostavlja malo prostora da replike "rade", da glumci ispune prostor i ličnošću, ne samo superbrzim banterom i tu mogu da primetim da je Howard vrlo dobro osetio koji ritam je podesan, kako da od grupice protuva u centru filma napravi ubedljive zametke ikona koje poznajemo tri i kusur decenija unazad.

Solo je praktično ono što je Besson imao na umu sa Valerijanom, staromodna a razuzdana svemirska avantura u kojoj glavni junak pleni harizmom, drskošću i simpatičnom arogancijom, ali u kome, jer smo ipak u drugoj deceniji 21. veka, i žene imaju delatne, čak i presudne uloge. Han Solo je u originalnoj trilogiji od kriminalca postao heroj ne samo zato što je uvek imao srce od zlata skriveno ispod bele košulje i crnog prslučeta, već i jer je uz sebe imao love interest sa naglašenim majčinskim prerogativima, gde je njegova iskarirana alfa-poza imala priliku da se dobrovoljno sagne pred nekim ko ipak-zna-bolje. U ovom filmu žena je drugačijeg tipa - i treba pohvaliti Kasdanove što nisu išli na prosto kopiranje originalnog predloška - i njena je priroda višeslojna, delatna, sa svojom voljom ali i sa sopstvenim šarmom i duhom. Teorije zavere o tome kako Kathleen Kennedy, eto, upropasti Star Wars svojom feminističkom agendom su, naravno, idiotizam, ali opet, fakat je da novi Star Wars filmovi imaju raznovrsne i interesantne ženske likove, pa je Qi'ra koju igra Emilia Clarke još jedan i, možda, najbolji od njih, sa sopstvenim character arcom koji je vrlo zadovoljavajući.

Film na početku zapreti da će imati suviše crtanofilmovski ton, sa negativkom na Koreliji koja skoro kao da je izašla iz Nindža Kornjača, ali nakon jurnjave automobilima i dolaska na kosmodrom, stvari se radikalno menjaju. Solo je film koji ima "gritty" kvalitet najboljih Star Wars radova, ono što smo, makar i nesvesno, popušili do filtera u prva dva filma i što nam je strahovito nedostajalo u prikvelima. Solo ne samo da pokazuje razgažen, "lived in" univerzum, sa beskrajno šarmantnim mehaničkim kontrapcijama, katodnim monitorima i kosmičkim brodovima čiji kokpiti deluju kao da im instrumenti rade na sajle i dugmad koju morate udariti pesnicom da se pokrenu, već je i majstorski, u nekoliko poteza prikazana socio-politička pozadina istorijskog trenutka u kome se priča događa. Ratne scene vrlo uverljivo kanališu očaj Prvog svetskog rata, a momenti na kosmodromu, generalno ponašanje Imperijalnih trupa, sve jako uspelo prikazuje kako zapravo izgleda taj život na planetama koje jesu u sferi Imperijalnog interesovanja.

E, onda dolazi zaplet koji je... Da kažemo ovako: Star Wars je serijal tako ikoničke snage da je od jedne jedine rečenice iz prvog filma nastao ne samo ceo peti film, već posle njega i čitav Clone Wars serijal, i to je... monstruozno. U Solo opet, zaplet nastaje od, takođe jedne rečenice iz prvog filma, ali scenaristi su uspeli da oko nje - koliko god zapravo ona nemala smisla, jer, znamo već, parsek je mera za daljinu, ne za vreme - izgrade organski zaplet u kome se ambicija i žudnja malog uličnog trkača i hustlera sa Korelije poklapaju sa planovima ozbiljnog kriminalnog sindikata, sve uz katalizator u vidu lika matorog gangstera koji sanja o jednom poslednjem poslu i u mladom, nadobudnom kikirezu možda vidi sebe kad je bio klinac.

Ono što iz ovoga izrasta je, rekosmo već, odličan vestern sa heist podlogom u kome na silu sklepana ekipa ljudi, žena, vanzemaljaca i robota sa one strane zakona mora da izvede skoro nemoguću pljačku koja istovremeno replicira neke od najboljih zamisli prvog Star Wars filma (infiltracija, obmana, bekstvo iz zatvora) a onda uspeva da pokaže ikonički Kessel Run kao zaista over the top moment ali takav da u tom trenutku zaista verujemo u Hana Soloa i vidimo zašto su ga ovakvi momenti definisali.

Kao i drugi dobri vesterni, i ovaj ima nekoliko odličnih preokreta na kraju, koji nisu oslabljeni svojom predvidivošću, a tu mu pomaže to kačenje na nama već poznate elemente Star Wars istorije, pa ih tretiramo praktično kao počasne krugove.

Akcija, scenografija i efekti su odlični, sa ponovo dovoljno gritty šmeka da sve deluje "žešće" od The Last Jedi, i da ulozi deluju visoko, ali čini mi se da film najviše profitira na dobrom rukovanju likovima. Epizodisti poput Ria i L3 su izvrsni, sa svojim malim ali pamtljivim ulogama ekscentričnih sajdkikova, Donald Glover je vrlo dobar kao mladi Lando (i, sigurno nisam jedini koji bi gledao čitav film o njemu?), Woody Harrelson, predvidivo, jede sve ispred sebe sa svojim okorelim, ali ipak na kraju dana duševnim Bekketom, Paul Bettany je fenomenalan psihopata, ali Alden Ehrenreich je, ključno, vrlo dobar kao mladi Han Solo, sa pristojno odrađenim sazrevanjem lika, uspelim komedijaškim momentima i vrlo dobro pogođenom arogancijom neophodnom da ovaj lik proradi. Uz nju je lako i gutati dramske scene u kojima vidimo i Solovu emotivniju, ranjiviju stranu i, zapravo mu verujemo jer Ehrenreich uspeva da proda aroganciju kao pažljivo građeni štit, baš onako kako se to videlo i u Fordovoj klasičnoj izvedbi.

Han Solo, čovek, lik, ikona je, nije da to nisam rekao i ranije, verovatno važan za izgradnju moje ličnosti koliko i moj otac, moj prvi učitelj i Ron Jeremy, pa sam pomalo i strepeo dolazeći u bioskop. No, mogu da kažem da sam se odlično proveo, i da je ovo film koji i ljude što Star Wars ne prate, ili čak, ne vole, može dobro da zabavi, bez pretenzije da bude EVERYTHING CHANGES operetska epizoda poput The Last Jedi, ali sa punom svešću da i ovakva prikvel vinjeta treba da svoje likove respektuje i razume. Vrlo sam zadovoljan.

QuoteSana Starros was a human (http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Human) female (http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Sexes) who lived during the time of the Galactic Civil War (http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Galactic_Civil_War). She claimed to be married (http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Marriage) to Han Solo (http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Han_Solo), though he denied it, and regardless they were not on good terms in the time after the Battle of Yavin (http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Battle_of_Yavin). She traveled across the galaxy (http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/The_galaxy) in search of Han, from Tatooine (http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Tatooine) to the Monsua Nebula (http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Monsua_Nebula), in order to confront him.

Quote from: Meho Krljic on 06-06-2018, 18:57:56
2D je jedini način da se gledaju filmovi.

Quote from: Ugly MF on 08-06-2018, 19:06:38
Nije mi jasan ni internet, ni vesti ni ljudi sproću filma Solo...
Meni lično, onaj koji sam protiv skoro svih stvari za koje se Dizni i ostali liberali zalažu,
i pored glupavog 8 dela, Solo je apsolutno bez ijedne zamerke!
Kome se ono ne sviđa, čemu bojkoti, nazivanje Soylo, kukanje da nije zaradio, otkazivanje nastavaka!?!?
El' normalni oni amerikanci?!?

Quote from: Meho Krljic on 21-06-2018, 06:05:12
  Star Wars anthology movies have reportedly been put on hold (https://www.technobuffalo.com/2018/06/20/every-standalone-star-wars-in-development-has-been-put-on-hold-says-report/)   

Quote from: Meho Krljic on 22-09-2018, 16:09:58
https://youtu.be/Ib_4A2CG2Ag (https://youtu.be/Ib_4A2CG2Ag)

Fenomenalan lažni trejler za nepostojeću anime adaptaciju Star Wars: A New Hope, koji su napravili Rusi. Carevi.

Quote from: Ugly MF on 26-09-2018, 21:05:03
A naaaajtužnije od svega je što su samo mogli da pitaju Dark Horse comicse šta je najbolje što su uradili dosad u stripovima i ovi da im u jednom memorandumu objasne deset narednih trilogija... Žalosno...

Quote from: Slobodan on 25-12-2019, 19:14:38
Duhovi minulih džedaja se javljaju i ovde, moćniji su nego ikada, i njihovo pojavljivanje ostaje ista nelogičnost kao i onda kad smo otkrili da u novoj trilogiji umeju da prizivaju munje - zašto onda jednostavno ne pozvati vojsku pokojnih džedaja da oni sve to razreše?

Quote from: Linʞᴉn on 26-12-2019, 12:39:59

Quote from: Slobodan on 25-12-2019, 19:14:38
Duhovi minulih džedaja se javljaju i ovde, moćniji su nego ikada, i njihovo pojavljivanje ostaje ista nelogičnost kao i onda kad smo otkrili da u novoj trilogiji umeju da prizivaju munje - zašto onda jednostavno ne pozvati vojsku pokojnih džedaja da oni sve to razreše?

Zato što su želeli da ipak nešto ostave i za episode 10?  :roll:

Inače odličan osvrt, slažem se u potpunosti.

Quote from: Accuphase on 26-12-2019, 13:58:56

Quote from: Linʞᴉn on 26-12-2019, 12:39:59

Quote from: Slobodan on 25-12-2019, 19:14:38
Duhovi minulih džedaja se javljaju i ovde, moćniji su nego ikada, i njihovo pojavljivanje ostaje ista nelogičnost kao i onda kad smo otkrili da u novoj trilogiji umeju da prizivaju munje - zašto onda jednostavno ne pozvati vojsku pokojnih džedaja da oni sve to razreše?

Zato što su želeli da ipak nešto ostave i za episode 10?  :roll:

Inače odličan osvrt, slažem se u potpunosti.

Neće biti Episode X ovo je kraj, THE END OF SAGA!

Quote from: mac on 26-12-2019, 14:46:06
Ovo je valjda samo kraj Skajvoker sage, ali ne i cele priče "long time ago in a galaxy far far away".

Quote from: džin tonik on 27-12-2019, 02:22:54
evo odlicnog primjera zasto bi bilo nuzno uvesti obavezni vojni rok, ako se sjetimo nedavne diskusije.
uz slicno iskustvo bi kad upale svjetla jednostavno nastavio spavati, ne bi te neugodno zatekli svjetlost i zzamor.

a sta uradise od star warsa... gore od eurovizije, frik show, unistise sf i u svemiru (ono kad ti bica iz vanzemaljskog bara starih epizoda djeluju ljudskija od bradate zene).

Quote from: Linʞᴉn on 27-12-2019, 08:51:14
Nisu uništili Star Wars, samo Skajvoker sagu... imamo Mandalorian  :|

Quote from: džin tonik on 27-12-2019, 23:01:44
kad upravo osma epizoda na kiosku. pa se odgledalo prvih pet.

Quote from: mac on 29-12-2019, 22:14:53
Upravo izašao iz sale 2 u Ušću. Puštali su slova do kraja.

Dobar je završetak.

Quote from: mac on 29-12-2019, 22:45:49
Tako je.

Quote from: lilit on 02-01-2020, 00:28:24
Meni The Rise of Skywalker sasvim lepo legao. Ja zadovoljna.
Jes da ima Isus momenata, al ništa mi nije smetalo.
A scena: Millenium Falcon, praćen nepreglednom armadom Resistance brodova: e tu sam i suzu pustila. :lol:

Quote from: Linʞᴉn on 02-01-2020, 12:52:37
Star Wars je oduvek bio serijal u kome su se ekplozije "čule" u svemiru jer je to bilo kul, a ne zato što je imalo bilo kakve logike. Tako da očekivati neku zaokruženu priču, složenu filozofiju sa previše smisla ili da čak prethodni delovi sage ne ostanu uskraćeni smisla koji su inicijalno imali možda bi bilo previše za ovaj serijal.  :roll:

Problem je najviše u senzibilitetu, stilu koji više ne odovara onome zbog čega su stari fanovi zavoleli serijal, rekao bih, a što obilato postoji u Mandalorijanu u nekoj retro formi, koja je i dalje treš ali je više dopadljiva jer je bliža starijim fanovima nego specijalni efekti kojima su krcati ovi novi filmovi, a u kojima neki novi klinci više uživaju.

Quote from: lilit on 02-01-2020, 17:45:47
svet se menja. i to je uvek bilo tako. nijedna generacija nije bogom dana kao superiornija i bolja, različita je. a evolucija neminovno teče, najviše zahvaljujući tehnološkom napretku koji, polako mileći ali sigurno, menja sve. neke stvari su i iste. nesvesni misle da su svesni, dostupnost podatka ne znači da predrasude nisu tu, etc etc. ali i to je već viđeno i opisano milion puta tokom istorije čovečanstva.

Quote from: Linʞᴉn on 02-01-2020, 12:52:37
...
Problem je najviše u senzibilitetu, stilu koji više ne odovara onome zbog čega su stari fanovi zavoleli serijal...

Quote from: džin tonik on 04-01-2020, 19:09:32
mandalorijan je solidan

moram dodati dislaimer za fine dushice:

kad beba Yoda pokaže crne okice kuvan sam &pečen

Quote from: džin tonik on 04-01-2020, 18:19:24
tocno to. sta se desilo: pokret za zenska i ostala prava, koji cine uglavnom propale zene, propali revolucionari i najezda propalih aktivista, usao je u sve i siluje star wars po stilu i senzibilitetu, nikako ne zeli napustiti brend koji donosi pare.
sto ne snime, pojma nemam, stars combat, novo za nove? bradata zena, peder, itd. pa se lijepo ni ne osvrnes.

Quote from: Linʞᴉn on 02-01-2020, 22:08:26
Kritičari su počeli da se nadmeću i nadmudruju sa fanovima do totalno bolesnih razmera pametovanja, gotovo da ih više uopšte ne treba uzimati za ozbiljno... Witcher je tako jedva dobio prolaznu ocenu iako su fanovi tj. publika oduševljeni... ima još primera, postalo je vrlo simptomatično... da ne pričam o kontra-primerima gde negledljivi besmisao poput Watchmen serije dobija hvalospeve...