ZNAK SAGITE — više od fantastike — edicija, časopis, knjižara...

NAUKA I KVAZINAUKA (izvorište inspiracije za mnoga SF dela) => TEHNIČKE NAUKE, SAOBRAĆAJ, KOSMONAUTIKA => Topic started by: WARLOCK on 21-09-2007, 02:38:22

Title: Da li ste nekada u zivotu videli NLO?
Post by: WARLOCK on 21-09-2007, 02:38:22
Pa mislim da je ovo smesno pitanje ali ozbiljno..mi nismo sami,znam da oni nas posmatraju,kontrolishu..oni su gore svi to dobro znate :lol:
Ajd da cujem vase price,ne stidite se,svaki drugi covek je primetio nesto neobicno na nebu to je normalno..vatrena kugla ili sjajna zvezda koja se cudno krece ili metalni predmeti koji se brzo ili sporo krecu a i nekad stoje pa cik cak bla bla itd...
Ja sam video tri puta u zivotu koji nikada ne zaboravljam,o tome pisem kasnije :wink:
ps.nemojte pisati ako ste vec tada drogirali,pili,sanjali ili bilo kakvim tripovima.. :?:
Title: Da li ste nekada u zivotu videli NLO?
Post by: Truba on 21-09-2007, 10:14:33
ja sam kao djete vidio nešto veliko i što bljuje vatru iza sebe... i to ga valjda pokreće

međutim to je bilo za vrijeme rata... pa je možda neko manje poznato oružje  :oops:
Title: Da li ste nekada u zivotu videli NLO?
Post by: mizantrop on 21-09-2007, 11:35:56
Na žalost nisam imao čast da vidim NLO, niti, iskreno rečeno, verujem u njihovo postojanje ali bih zato jako voleo da čujem ako neko od vas jeste :)
Title: Da li ste nekada u zivotu videli NLO?
Post by: WARLOCK on 21-09-2007, 12:17:12
za vreme rata se i nlo pojavljivali,cuo sam pricu da nasa vojska za vreme nato bombardovanja,gadjala svetleci predmet(avion ili raketa) koja se kretala munjevitom brzinom imala je nagla skretanja  .nasa vojska je bila zbunjena ..cak sam i pitao jednog koji je radio na radaru..kaze da ima svasta uvek brzo prodje neki predmet,ne cude se ,kao da su navikli na to...
Title: Da li ste nekada u zivotu videli NLO?
Post by: mizantrop on 21-09-2007, 13:42:46
Evo jednog interesantnog teksta:

The Quest for Extraterrestrial Intelligence
By Carl Sagan

Through all of our history we have pondered the stars and mused whether mankind is unique or if, somewhere else out there in the dark of night sky, there are other beings who contemplate and wonder as we do - fellow thinkers in the cosmos. Such beings might view themselves and the universe differently. Somewhere else there might exist exotic biologies, technologies and societies. What a splendid perspective contact with a profoundly different civilization might provide! In a cosmic setting vast and old beyond ordinary human understanding we are a little lonely, and we ponder the ultimate significance, if any, of our tiny but exquisite blue planet, the Earth. The Search for Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence (SETI) is the search for a generally acceptable cosmic context for the human species. In the deepest sense the search for extraterrestrial intelligence is a search for ourselves.
Until recently there could be no such search. No matter how deep the concern or how dedicated the effort, human beings could not scratch the surface of the problem. But in the last few years - in one millionth of the lifetime of our species on this planet - we have achieved an extraordinary technological capability which enables us to seek out unimaginably distant civilizations, even if they are no more advanced than we. That capability is called radio astronomy and involves single radio telescopes, collections or arrays of radio telescopes, sensitive radio detectors, advanced computers for processing received data, and the imagination and skill of dedicated scientists. Radio astronomy has, in the last decade, opened a new window on the physical universe. It may also, if we are wise enough to make the effort, cast a brilliant light on the biological universe.
Some scientists working on the question of extraterrestrial intelligence, myself among them, have attempted to estimate the number of advanced technical civilizations in the Milky Way galaxy - that is, societies capable of radio astronomy. Such estimates are little better than guesses. They require assigning numerical values to quantities such as the numbers and ages of stars, which we know well; the abundance of planetary systems and the likelihood of the origin of life within them, which we know less well; and the probability of the evolution of intelligent life and the lifetime of technical civilizations, about which we know very little indeed. When we do the arithmetic, the number that my colleagues and I come up with is around a million technical civilizations in our Galaxy alone. That is a breathtakingly large number, and it is exhilarating to imagine the diversity, lifestyles and commerce of those million worlds. But there may be as many as 250 billion stars in the Milky Way Galaxy. Even with a million civilizations, less than one star in 250,000 would have a planet inhabited by an advanced civilization. Since we have little idea which stars are likely candidates, we will have to examine a huge number of them. Thus the quest for extraterrestrial intelligence may require a significant effort.
Despite claims about ancient astronauts and unidentified flying objects, there is no firm evidence of past visitations to the Earth by other civilizations, and so we are restricted to looking for signals from afar. Of the long-distance techniques available to our technology, radio is by far the best. Radio telescopes are relatively inexpensive; radio signals travel at the speed of light, faster than which nothing can travel; and the use of radio for communication is not an anthropocentric activity: radio represents a large part of the electromagnetic spectrum, and any technical civilization anywhere in the Galaxy will have discovered radio, just as we have. Advanced civilizations might very well use some other means of communication with their peers - "zeta rays," say, which we might not discover for centuries. But if they wish to communicate with less advanced civilizations, there are only a few obvious methods, the chief of which is radio.
The first serious attempt to listen to possible radio signals from other civilizations was set up at the National Radio Astronomy Observatory in Green Bank, West Virginia, in 1959. This program, organized by Frank Drake who is now at Cornell University, was called Project Ozma*, after the princess of L. Frank Baum's Land of Oz, a place exotic, distant and difficult to reach. Drake examined two nearby stars, Epsilon Eridani and Tau Ceti, for a few weeks with negative results. Positive results would have been astonishing, because, as we have seen, even rather optimistic estimates of the number of technical civilizations in the Galaxy imply that several hundred thousand stars must be examined in order to achieve success by random stellar selection.
Since Project Ozma, there have been six or eight other such programs, all at a rather modest level, in the United States, Canada and the Soviet Union. Not one of them has achieved positive results. The total number of individual stars examined to date is fewer than 1,000. We have performed something like one-tenth of one percent of the required effort.
However, there are signs that much more serious efforts may be mounted in the reasonably near future. All the observing programs to date have involved either tiny amounts of time on large radio telescopes or large amounts of time on smaller telescopes. In a major scientific study for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, directed by Philip Morrison of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, the feasibility and desirability of more systematic investigations have been powerfully underscored. The study has four main conclusions:
"(1) It is both timely and feasible to begin a serious search for extraterrestrial intelligence;
"(2) a significant . . . program with substantial potential secondary benefits can be undertaken with only modest resources;
"(3) large systems with great capability can be built as needed; and
"(4) such a search is intrinsically an international endeavor in which the United States can take a lead."
The study carries a reassuring foreword by the Reverend Theodore Hesburgh, President of the University of Notre Dame, that such a search is consistent with religious and spiritual values, and includes the following ringing sentiment:
"The question deserves..... the serious and prolonged attention of many professionals from a wide range of disciplines - anthropologists, artists, lawyers, politicians, philosophers, theologians - even more than that, the concern of all thoughtful persons, whether specialists or not. We must, all of us, consider the outcome of the search. That search, we believe, is feasible; its outcome is truly important either way. Dare we begin? For us who write here, that question has step-by-step become instead: Dare we delay?"
A wide range of options is identified in the Morrison report, including new (and expensive) giant ground-based and space-borne radio telescopes. But the study also points out that major progress can be made at modest cost by the development of more sensitive radio receivers and of ingenious computerized data-processing systems.
In the Soviet Union there is a state commission devoted to organizing a search for extraterrestrial intelligence, and the large, 600-meter diameter "RATAN-600" radio telescope in the Caucasus, just completed, is to be devoted part-time to this effort. And along with spectacular advances in radio technology, there has been a dramatic increase in the scientific and public respectability of theories about extraterrestrial life. Indeed, the Viking missions to Mars were, to a significant extent, dedicated to the search for life on another planet.
Of course, not all scientists accept the notion that other advanced civilizations exist. A few who have speculated on this subject lately are asking: if extraterrestrial intelligence is abundant, why have we not already seen its manifestations? Think of the advances by our own technical civilization in the last 10,000 years, and imagine such advances continued over millions or billions of years. If any civilizations are that much more advanced than we, why have they not produced artifacts, devices and even cases of industrial pollution of such magnitude that we would have detected them? Why have these beings not restructured the entire Galaxy for their convenience?
And why has there been no clear evidence of extraterrestrial visits to the Earth? We have already launched slow and modest interstellar spacecraft called Pioneers 10 and I 1 and Voyagers 1 and 2 -which, incidentally, carry small golden greeting cards from the Earth to any space-faring interstellar civilizations which might intercept them. A society more advanced than we should be able to ply the spaces between the stars conveniently, if not effortlessly. Over millions of years such societies should have established colonies which themselves might launch interstellar expeditions. Why are they not here? The temptation is to deduce that there are at most only a few advanced extraterrestrial civilizations - either because we are one of the first technical civilizations to have emerged, or because it is the fate of all such civilizations to destroy themselves before they are much further along.
It seems to me that such despair is quite premature. All such arguments depend on our correctly surmising the intentions of beings far more advanced than ourselves, and when examined closely I think these arguments reveal a range of interesting human conceits. For example, why do we expect that it will be easy to recognize the manifestations of very advanced civilizations? Is our situation not closer to that of isolated societies in the Amazon basin, say, who lack the tools to detect the powerful international radio and television traffic which is all around them? Also, there is a wide range of incompletely understood phenomena in astronomy. Might the modulation of pulsars or the energy source of quasars have a technological origin? Or perhaps there is a galactic ethic of noninterference with backward or emerging civilizations.
Perhaps there is a waiting time before contact is considered appropriate, so as to give us a fair opportunity to destroy ourselves first, if we are so inclined. Perhaps all societies significantly more advanced than our own have achieved an effective personal immortality, and lose the motivation for interstellar gallivanting - which may, for all we know, be a typical urge only of adolescent civilizations. Perhaps mature civilizations do not wish to pollute the cosmos. There is a very long list of such "perhapses," few of which we are in a position to evaluate with any degree of assurance.
The question of extraterrestrial civilizations seems to me entirely open. Personally, I think it far more difficult to understand a universe in which we are the only technological civilization, or one of but a few, than to imagine a cosmos brimming over with intelligent life. Many aspects of the problem, fortunately, can be experimentally verified. We can search for planets of other stars; seek simple forms of life on such nearby worlds as Mars, Jupiter and Saturn's moon Titan; and perform more extensive laboratory studies on the chemistry of the origin of life. We can investigate more deeply the evolution of organisms and societies. The problem cries out for a long-term, open-minded and systematic search, with nature as the only arbiter of what is or is not likely.
If there are a million technical civilizations in the Milky Way galaxy, the average separation between civilizations will be about 300 light-years. Since a light year is the distance which light travels in one year (a little under six trillion miles), this implies that the one-way transit time for an interstellar communication from the nearest civilization will be some 300 years. The time for a query and a response would be 600 years. This is the reason that interstellar dialogues are much less likely - particularly around the time of first contact - than interstellar monologues. It might seem remarkably selfless for a civilization to broadcast radio messages with no hope of knowing, at least in the immediate future, whether they have been received and what the response to them might be.
But human beings often perform very similar actions as, for example, in burying time capsules to be recovered by future generations, or even in writing books, composing music and creating art intended for posterity. A civilization which had been aided by the receipt of such a message in its past might wish to similarly benefit other emerging technical societies. The amount of power that need be expended in interstellar radio communication should be a tiny fraction of what is available for a civilization only slightly more advanced than we, and such radio transmission services could be an activity either of an entire planetary government or of relatively small groups of hobbyists, amateur radio operators and the like.
Although probably no previous contact will have been achieved between transmitting and receiving civilizations, communication in the absence of prior contact is possible.
It is easy to create an interstellar radio message which can be recognized as emanating unambiguously from intelligent beings. A modulated signal ("beep," "beep-beep," ) comprising the numbers 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 1 7, 19, 23, 29, 31, for example, consists exclusively of the first 12 prime numbers-that is, numbers that can be divided only by 1, or by themselves. A signal of this kind, based on a simple mathematical concept, could only have a biological origin. No prior agreement between the transmitting and receiving civilizations, and no precautions against Earth chauvinism, are required to make this clear.
Such a message would be an announcement or beacon signal, indicating the presence of an advanced civilization but communicating very little about its nature. The beacon signal might also note a particular frequency where the main message is to be found, or might indicate that the principal message can be found at higher time resolution at the frequency of the beacon signal. The communication of quite complex information is not very difficult, even for civilizations with extremely different biologies and social conventions. For example, arithmetical statements can be transmitted, some true and some false, and in such a way it becomes possible to transmit the ideas of true and false concepts which might otherwise seem extremely difficult to communicate.
But by far the most promising method is to send pictures. The message might consist of an array of zeros and ones transmitted as long and short beeps, or tones on two adjacent frequencies, or tones at different amplitudes, or even signals with different radio polarizations. Properly arranged in rows and columns, the zeros and ones form a visual pattern - a picture similar to those an imaginative typist can create by using the letters of the alphabet as a medium. Just such a message was transmitted to space by the Arecibo Observatory, which Cornell University runs for the National Science Foundation, in November 1974 at a ceremony marking the resurfacing of the Arecibo dish the largest radio/radar telescope on Earth. The signal was sent to a collection of stars called M13, a globular cluster comprising about a million separate suns, because it was overhead at the time of the ceremony. Since Ml 3 is 24,000 light years away, the message will take 24,000 years to arrive there. If anyone is listening, it will be 48,000 years before we receive a reply. The Arecibo message was clearly not intended as a serious attempt at interstellar communication, but rather as an indication of the remarkable advances in terrestrial radio technology.
The decoded message forms a kind of pictogram that says something like this: "Here is how we count from one to ten. Here are five atoms that we think are interesting or important: hydrogen, carbon, nitrogen, oxygen and phosphorus. Here are some ways to put these atoms together that we think interesting or important - the molecules thymine, adenine, guanine and cytosine, and a chain composed of alternating sugars and phosphates. These molecular building blocks are put together to form a long molecule of DNA comprising about four billion links in the chain. The molecule is a double helix. In some way this molecule is important for the clumsy looking creature at the center of the message. That creature is 14 radio wavelengths or 5 feet 9.5 inches tall. There are about four billion of thesecreatures on the third plant from our star. There are nine planets altogether, four big ones toward the outside and one little one at the extremity. This message is brought to you courtesy of a radio telescope 2,430 wavelengths or 1,004 feet in diameter. Yours truly." Especially with many similar pictorial messages, each consistent with and corroborating the others, it is very likely that almost unambiguous interstellar radio communication could be achieved even between two civilizations which have never met. Of course our immediate objective is not to send such messages, because we are very young and backward; we wish to listen.
The detection of radio signals from space would illuminate many questions which have concerned scientists and philosophers since prehistoric times. Such a signal would indicate that the origin of life is not an extraordinarily unlikely event. It would imply that given billions of years for natural selection to operate, simple forms of life generally evolve into complex and intelligent forms, as on Earth, and that such intelligent forms commonly produce an advanced technology. But it is not likely that the transmission we receive will be from a society at our own level of technological advance. A society only a little more backward than we will not have radio astronomy at all. The most likely case is that the message will be from a civilization with a far superior technology. Thus, even before we decode such a message, we will have gained an invaluable piece of knowledge: that it is possible to avoid the dangers of the period of technological adolescence we are now passing through.
There are some who look on our global problems here on Earth - at our vast national antagonisms, our nuclear arsenals, our growing populations, the disparity between the poor and the affluent, shortages of food and resources, and our inadvertent alterations of the natural environment of our planet - and conclude that we live in a system which has suddenly become unstable, a system which is destined soon to collapse. There are others who believe that our problems are soluble, that humanity is still in its childhood, that one day soon we will grow up. The existence of a single message from space will show that it is possible to live through technological adolescence: the civilization transmitting the message, after all, has survived. Such knowledge, it seems to me, might be worth a great price.
Another likely consequence of the receipt of an interstellar message is a strengthening of the bonds which join all human and other beings on our planet. The sure lesson of evolution is that organisms elsewhere must have had separate evolutionary pathways; that their chemistry and biology, and very likely their social organizations, will be profoundly dissimilar to anything which is familiar here on Earth. We may well be able to communicate with them because we share a common universe; because the laws of physics and chemistry and the regularities of astronomy are shared by them and by us. But they may always be, in the deepest sense, different. And when we recognize these differences the animosities which divide the peoples of the Earth may wither. The differences among human beings of separate races and nationalities, religions and sexes are likely to be insignificant compared to the differences between all humans and all extraterrestrial intelligent beings.
If the message comes by radio, both transmitting and receiving civilizations will have in common at least the details of radiophysics. The commonality of the physical sciences is the reason that many scientists expect the messages from extraterrestrial civilizations to be decodable. No one is wise enough to predict in detail what the consequences of such a decoding will be, because no one is wise enough to understand beforehand what the nature of the message will be. Since the transmission is likely to be from a civilization far in advance of our own, stunning insights are possible in the physical, biological and social sciences, insights reached from the perspective of a quite different kind of intelligence.
Decoding such a message will probably be a task of years and decades, and the decoding process can be as slow and careful as we choose. Some have worried that such a message from an advanced society might make us lose faith in our own, might deprive us of the initiative to make new discoveries if it seems that there are others who have made those discoveries already, or might have other negative consequences. But I stress that we are free to ignore an interstellar message if we find it offensive. Few of us have rejected schools because teachers and textbooks exhibit learning of which we were so far ignorant. If we receive a message, we are under no obligation to reply. If we do not choose to respond, there is no way for the transmitting civilization to determine that its message was received and understood on the tiny distant planet Earth. The receipt and translation of a radio message from the depths of space seems to pose few dangers to mankind; instead, it holds the greatest promise of both practical and philosophical benefits for all of humanity.
It is possible that an early message may contain detailed prescriptions for the avoidance of technological disaster, for a passage through adolescence to maturity. Perhaps the transmissions from advanced civilizations will describewhich pathways of cultural evolution are likely to lead to the stability and longevity of an intelligent species, and which other paths lead to stagnation or degeneration or disaster. Perhaps there are straight-forward solutions, still undiscovered on Earth to problems of food shortages, population growth, energy supplies, dwindling resources, pollution and war. There is, of course, no guarantee that such would be the contents of an interstellar message; but it would be foolhardy to overlook the possibility.
There will surely be differences among civilizations which cannot be glimpsed until information is available about the evolution of many civilizations. Because of our isolation from the rest of the cosmos, we have information on the evolution of only one civilization - our own. And the most important aspect of that information, the future, remains closed to us. Perhaps it is not likely, but it is certainly possible that the future of human civilization depends on the receipt and decoding of interstellar messages.
And what if we make a long-term and dedicated search for extraterrestrial intelligence and fail? Even then we surely will not have wasted our time. We will have developed an important technology, with applications to many other aspects of our own civilization. We will have greatly added to our knowledge of the physical universe. And we will have calibrated the importance and uniqueness of our species, our civilization and other planets. For if intelligent life is rare or absent elsewhere, we will have learned something about the rarity and value of our culture and our biological patrimony, which have been painstakingly extracted over four billion years of tortuous evolutionary history.
Such a finding will stress as perhaps nothing else can our responsibilities to future generations: because the most likely explanation of negative results, after a comprehensive and resourceful search, is that societies destroy themselves before they are advanced enough to establish a high-power radio transmitting service. Thus, organization of a search for interstellar radio messages, quite apart from the outcome, is likely to have a cohesive and constructive influence on the whole of the human condition.
But we will not know the outcome of such a search, much less the contents of messages from interstellar civilizations, if we do not make a serious effort to listen for signals. It may be that civilizations are divided into two great classes, those which make such an effort, achieve contact and become new members of a loosely tied federation of galactic communities, and those which cannot or choose not to make such an effort, or who lack the imagination to try, and who in consequence soon decay and vanish.
It is difficult to think of another enterprise within our capability and at relatively modest cost which holds as much promise for the future of humanity.
Title: Da li ste nekada u zivotu videli NLO?
Post by: Boban on 21-09-2007, 14:24:44
NLO je neidentifikovani leteći objekat; dakle sve što leti a osoba koja vidi let ne zna šta je upada u ovu kategoriju.
Title: Da li ste nekada u zivotu videli NLO?
Post by: lilit on 21-09-2007, 14:32:55
:lol:  :lol:  :lol:
Title: Da li ste nekada u zivotu videli NLO?
Post by: WARLOCK on 22-09-2007, 02:05:11
Sagan je zakon :evil: ..
Ja sam prvi put ugledao jako neobicno sto mi je ostavio veliki utisak..aaaa.. imao samo oko 11 godina,tad sam bio u dvoristu pomagao sam caletu oko prenosenja uglja,bilo je tad oko 10 sati uvece,stao sam da se odmorim i primetio sam na nebu veliku uzarenu kuglu koja se kruzila i kretala se ciki cak ostavljala je veliki trag oko sebe,velicine skoro polovina punog meseca pretelo je svega samo nekoliko sekundi..trcao sam kuci sav uzbudjen ko lud  i vicem mama mama video sam nesto..ona rece dobro dobro..kao  da nije ubedjena sta sam to video svojim ocima..tada sam poceo da prikupljam clanke sve vezano za nlo..kupovajuci legendarne casopise "Arka" i Tajne",citajuci knjige misterije letecih tanjira itd..
Par godina pre bombardovanja,iz ciste radoznalnosti zurim u oblacno nebo,primetim predmet u obliku trougla koji se polako kretao,jedva je bio vidljiv kao senka koja se kretala kroz oblake....posmatrao sam svega par minuta dok se udaljavao..mogu reci da je leteo nisko..tacno dva dana posle vidim clanak u novinama da su neki ljudi u Shumadiji imali bliski susret dok su se vozili kolima i da im je sleteo ispred,opisali su slicnom trouglu ali je kruznog oblika..cacuvao sam davno taj clanak,moram ga opet naci ..

treci put sto sam video..pa..ispricacu kasnije  :D
Title: Da li ste nekada u zivotu videli NLO?
Post by: sivka on 09-11-2007, 14:06:35
Ruski grad Danilov posetili vanzemaljci
08. novembar 2007. / izvor: Blic  
Žitelji ruskog grada Danilov iz Jaroslavske oblasti tvrde da su ih protekle noći posetili vanzemaljci. Nekoliko ljudi su bili očevici pojave nepoznatog letećeg objekta koji se nadvio nad gradom drevne ruske centralne oblasti.

Svi očevici su, kako tvde, videli isto, veliku vatrenu loptu koja je nekoliko minuta kružila nad gradom a zatim iščezla, navode ruske "Vesti".

Nepoznati objekat koji je privukao pažnju brojnih prolaznika nije veliko iznenađenje za žitelje Danilova. To je, kako ističu, četvrti slučaj pojave NLO u toku ovog meseca.

Očevici kažu da su videli na fonu tamnog neba veliki balon narandžaste boje koji se kretao iznad železničkih šina i ka gradskoj pekari. Sećajući se svog susreta s nepoznatim, mesni žitelj Jurij Nikolajev kaže da je prošle godine lovio patke i kada je krenuo kući poljanu kojom je išao obasjala je jarka svetlost. Da bi odgonetnuli o čemu se radi Danilovci su se obratili jaroslavskim ufolozima a oni će naredni susret s NLO zabeležiti kamerama.(https://www.znaksagite.com/diskusije/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.srbijatrguje.com%2Fvesti_pics%2F%2F3741.jpg&hash=59db2e301647913395e5874d6d4ab125aae34872)
Title: Da li ste nekada u zivotu videli NLO?
Post by: Mixitron M. Storm on 09-11-2007, 14:21:05
Nikad nisam video NLO nit' verujem u njih(ovo prisustvo ovde).

Najzanimljivije celestijalno što mi se desilo je kad sam se na jednoj čeki na Povlenu saginjao da me meteorit ne klepi u glavu.
Title: Da li ste nekada u zivotu videli NLO?
Post by: Usul on 09-11-2007, 16:14:47
Quote from: "Mixitron M. Storm"
Najzanimljivije celestijalno što mi se desilo je kad sam se na jednoj čeki na Povlenu saginjao da me meteorit ne klepi u glavu.
Ajde!! Daj malo detalja, bas zvuci interesantno.
Title: Da li ste nekada u zivotu videli NLO?
Post by: Mixitron M. Storm on 09-11-2007, 16:49:16
Mirno julsko predvečerje negde '97, ja na visokoj čeki motrim neke livade u nadi da će se pojaviti srndać. Jedino što kvari tišinu je rokanje neke motorke, ali i ona se u neko doba smirila, i čuju se jedino malobrojni zrikavci i pokoja ptičica, uz sporadično meškoljenje lišća u krošnjama. Kako bi rekli ljudi otupeli od grada, mrtva tišina.

Odjednom tu tišinu prožima nešto što je upravo izašlo iznad granice čujnosti, zvuk između SSSSSS i FFFFFF koji se postepeno pojačava. Pomalo podseća na signalnu raketu, i to mi je i bila prva asocijacija.
Al', ne ču se pucanj.

Erm, wtf?
Okrenem se prema izvoru zvuka, i imam šta da vidim. Iz čistog neba pravo na mene (a kako bi drugo) leti u savršenoj pravoj liniji nešto usijano što viče SSSSSSSSFFFFFFFFSSSSSSSSFFFFFFFF

Tu već skapiram da mi je ovo najbliži susret s meteoritom ikada - i skapiram da će dotični da me klepi posred tintare.
Ajd' oceni spram čistog neba da li ide pravo u teb ili odmah tu... te ja lepo čučnuh, i gledam šta se dešava. Sve je bliži, bliži, bliži, FFFFFFFFFFFSSSSSSSSSSSTTTTTTTT, prelete preko čeke i preko mene u 6-7 metara, kad se tako primakao, već sam mogao da ocenim gde je.
Možda sam halucinirao, ali učinilo mi se da sam osetio i kratkotrajnu toplotu po obrazima. Dvadesetak metara iza mene se ugasio, prestao da šušti, i rasuo u prah po livadi i šumarku u podnožju brega. I to je to :( Ponadao sam se da će da bubne ceo, pa da ga tražim, al' ništa :cry:
Title: Da li ste nekada u zivotu videli NLO?
Post by: Usul on 09-11-2007, 21:46:15
Quote from: "Mixitron M. Storm"Mirno julsko predvečerje negde '97, ja na visokoj čeki motrim neke livade u nadi da će se pojaviti srndać.

Strava :)
Eto ti predloska za pristojnu pricu :)
Title: Da li ste nekada u zivotu videli NLO?
Post by: Mixitron M. Storm on 09-11-2007, 22:46:33
Imam već 'odavno' tematsku lovnu priču, ali još nije ugledala svetlost dana u štampanom obliku, pobrala je simpatije kritike ali je morala da se dopegla pre izdavanja, i onda tako... :)
Title: Da li ste nekada u zivotu videli NLO?
Post by: WARLOCK on 11-11-2007, 05:25:42
Quote from: "sivka"Ruski grad Danilov posetili vanzemaljci
08. novembar 2007. / izvor: Blic  
Žitelji ruskog grada Danilov iz Jaroslavske oblasti tvrde da su ih protekle noći posetili vanzemaljci. Nekoliko ljudi su bili očevici pojave nepoznatog letećeg objekta koji se nadvio nad gradom drevne ruske centralne oblasti.

Svi očevici su, kako tvde, videli isto, veliku vatrenu loptu koja je nekoliko minuta kružila nad gradom a zatim iščezla, navode ruske "Vesti".

Nepoznati objekat koji je privukao pažnju brojnih prolaznika nije veliko iznenađenje za žitelje Danilova. To je, kako ističu, četvrti slučaj pojave NLO u toku ovog meseca.

Očevici kažu da su videli na fonu tamnog neba veliki balon narandžaste boje koji se kretao iznad železničkih šina i ka gradskoj pekari. Sećajući se svog susreta s nepoznatim, mesni žitelj Jurij Nikolajev kaže da je prošle godine lovio patke i kada je krenuo kući poljanu kojom je išao obasjala je jarka svetlost. Da bi odgonetnuli o čemu se radi Danilovci su se obratili jaroslavskim ufolozima a oni će naredni susret s NLO zabeležiti kamerama.(https://www.znaksagite.com/diskusije/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.srbijatrguje.com%2Fvesti_pics%2F%2F3741.jpg&hash=59db2e301647913395e5874d6d4ab125aae34872)

hmm iznenadjen sam! cuo sam vesti na tv-u pre neki dan..znaci ipak se nesto desava... :!:
vrlo uskoro kacim sliku NLO javno :wink:
Title: Da li ste nekada u zivotu videli NLO?
Post by: sivka on 12-11-2007, 09:57:23
To što se dogodilo, to što si bio svedok nečeg što ne možeš da objasniš, to je izvanredno iskustvo. Nisi jedini i nisi usamljen u tome. Ima nas još, ali, ljudi ponekad ne vole da o tome pričaju jer vrlo često bivaju ismejani od  okoline.  Ja sam imala nekoliko takvih iskustava za svojih 49 godina. Uglavnom, kad se o tome govori, nadje se neko pametan da objasni da je to ovo ili ono ili da klima glavom a posle da pravi šalu, da ne budem gruba i da ne kažem sprdnju na tvoj/moj račun.

Prvi put sam videla "nešto" 1977 godine. U to vreme sam bila trudna sa prvim detetom pa su me ostavili na miru i poštedeli izrugivanja, ali, videla sam sažaljive poglede.

U vreme 1985-1989 svakog leta sam kampovala sa porodicom u "divljini" tj u šumi na obali Save, par kilometara od najbližeg naselja. Dva puta sam u tom periodu imala iskustvo vidjenja vrlo čudinih pojava, mislim da sam i tada videla NLO.

Eto, ako ti je potrebna podrška, nadam se da je i ovo nešto.
Samo napred. Volela bih da podigneš fotku.
Title: Da li ste nekada u zivotu videli NLO?
Post by: BladeRunner on 12-11-2007, 11:10:16
QuoteIma nas još, ali, ljudi ponekad ne vole da o tome pričaju jer vrlo često bivaju ismejani od okoline.

Taman tako. Sa druge strane, NLO iskustvo koje ja imam je mnogo lakše za dijeljenje, jer sam imao jedanaest godina i najvažnije: nisam bio sam. Na ćošku na kome se okupljao čitav komšiluk jednom prilikom smo primjetili avion koji je išao rutom kojom avioni obično ne idu kada sleću na tivatski aerodrom. Ovo je išlo iz daljine i sporo. Bilo nas je tačno šestoro na tom ćošku kad se taj avion (sa četiri fiksirana svjetla, od kojih su se dva kasnije uključila sa strane), bukvalno zaustavio u mjestu jedno par trenutaka (tada se uključuju druga dva svjetla), da bi odjednom promjenio pravac i naglo ubrzao u pravcu Pestingrada (brdo). Ovo ubrzanje je bilo taman kao u SF filmovima i do danas ja još nisam vidio nijedan avion koji ima takve letne karakteristike. Da li smo ovo ikome rekli? Mislim da je pravo pitanje: da li postoji ijedna osoba kojoj ovo NISMO rekli. Prvo što smo uradili je da istrčimo ulicom od vrha do dna ulice i vičemo kako smo ugledali 'leteći tanjir' (uzbunili čitav komšiluk). Brat jednog druga (koji je tada imao C64, sabrana djela Ursule Legvin i Karlosa Kastanede, te tako bio najveći car koga sam ja poznavao) nije bio sa nama, te je kao rođeni skeptik od nas tražio da ga svi nacrtamo. Kako je on bio stariji (recimo, 17 godina) to smo doživjeli kao veliku čast, i prionuli smo na crtanje kako je ko znao i umio. Ako ništa, bar nije bila halucinacija: svi smo nacrtali isto. Ko zna, možda još negdje čuva te crteže.

Postoji li neko razumno objašnjenje? Vjerovatno. Da li me ono zanima? Apsolutno ne :cool:. Pozdrav.
Title: Da li ste nekada u zivotu videli NLO?
Post by: Antonius on 12-11-2007, 17:16:23
Evo su:

(https://www.znaksagite.com/diskusije/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi7.tinypic.com%2F2uq0jrm.gif&hash=2d0962db684f30240fa9283ff9b8b1dbff70f3ae)
Title: Da li ste nekada u zivotu videli NLO?
Post by: Boban on 12-11-2007, 19:26:29
Pre desetak godina, za vreme zemljotresa u Kaliforniji, pukla je zemlja, put se prekinuo i automobil je upao u procep.
Možda ste videli taj video snimak.
Pored tog snimka kamerom još petoro ljudi je razne faze tog događaja zabeležilo foto-aparatima.
A događaj se zbio iznenada, trajao je pet sekundi i svi su imali utisak da je došao kraj sveta. Pa je ipak šestoro ljudi bilo prisebno da snima i fotografiše.

Objasnite mi kako svi ti vanzemaljci posećuju Zemlju ovih dana, kada na svetu postoji preko milijardu kamera i fotoaparata spremnih u svakom trenutku da snime sve što odstupi od uobičajenog, kako to da nikada, niko ništa suvislo nije uspeo da snimi. Uvek su svi bili zbunjeni, zaglavio im se prekidač, nisu izoštrili ili šta je već moglo da im se desi... a ovamo, zemlja puca i svi misle da tonu i snimaju oko sebe. Je li čovek sa ženom snimio cunami kako dolazi, doslovno do nekoliko metara od sebe?
Ali niko nikada da uspe da snimi leteći tanjir?

Meni je ovo glavni razlog zašto ne verujem u njih.
Title: Da li ste nekada u zivotu videli NLO?
Post by: Truba on 12-11-2007, 19:58:22
dok sam razmišljao o ovome usranom fenomenu glavni razlog zašto nisam vjerovao u ovo jeste .... raznolikost vanzemaljaca i njihovih prevoznih sredstava...prema svjedocima nemilih događaja...
kao da bukvalno desetine vanzemaljskih rasa istražuje na našoj planeti...

a drugi razlog što bi skali rekla... ekonomska isplativost istraživanja?... čemu... zašto...   :!:
Title: Da li ste nekada u zivotu videli NLO?
Post by: scallop on 12-11-2007, 20:38:52
Hajde, Warlock, pusti te svoje slike! 8)
Imam ih i ja, ali ne znam da ih okačim. :cry:  :cry:  :cry:
Title: Da li ste nekada u zivotu videli NLO?
Post by: WARLOCK on 12-11-2007, 23:45:16
hehe! ajd evo za koji trenutak cu okaciti :!:
Title: Da li ste nekada u zivotu videli NLO?
Post by: Mixitron M. Storm on 13-11-2007, 00:38:12
Quote from: "scallop"Hajde, Warlock, pusti te svoje slike! 8)
Imam ih i ja, ali ne znam da ih okačim. :cry:  :cry:  :cry:

0. otvori se post ovde
1. http://www.imageshack.us ili nešto slično u drugom prozoru
2 "upload photo"
3. "direct link to image", Ctrl+C
4. klik na Img dugme u postu
5. Ctrl+V
6. još jedan klik na Img dugme
Title: Da li ste nekada u zivotu videli NLO?
Post by: WARLOCK on 13-11-2007, 02:50:52
(https://www.znaksagite.com/diskusije/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg233.imageshack.us%2Fimg233%2F5291%2Fufobggq2.jpg&hash=f442ebd1c9572dd67f2e2386a1dc365a3354a356)



ovo je snimljeno sa Juznog bulevara u pravcu Zvezdare..oko pola 6 ujutru bilo je 15-ti septembar,prvo sam spavao ,odjednom me budi keva jer je primetila kroz prozor da jako svetli...ustajem iz kreveta vidim da je neobicno sto toliko svetli,setim se kamere uzmem i tad mi pade napamet da iskoristim zum videh svetlecu piramidu.. :!: snimio sam citavih pola sata..citav materijal sam skidao frejmove i pazljivo analizirao detalje..neverovatno da na jednom frejmu bio okrenut naopako..jednom se ugasilo svetlo.. kamera mi se tad mutnila nisam namestio fokus..40 sekundi ga nije bilo onda se upalio..mislim da su prekrili oblaci..al nemoguce posto se vidi na ostalim snimcima da je nebo bilo cisto vedro..steta sto nisam bio tu prisutan,tad sam stavio kameru na terasu da se snima.Sve ostalih skinutih frejmova se vide zanimljivi detalji hmmm..to cu kasnije o tome pricati..cekam rezultat od jednog stranca naucnika koji je bio kod mene :D
Bas se pitam zasto je stajao,jel to satelit?mozda neka nova spijunska letelica..da li nas sve vreme posmatraju? mozda svemirski brod je bio u kvaru pa su popravljali posto u donjem delu se vide jasno kao otvorena vrata..ko zna..

ps.verovali ili ne!  posle snimanja sam odmah stavio da se puni,riknula mi je baterija..prvo primetim da mi ne radi lampica nece da se puni.posle 15 min.primetim da je vrela,brzo izvadim baterija mi se nadula i smrdela.. :shock:  mislim da je to slucajnost..a nova mi je baterija pa sam posle morao ka kupim :x
Title: Da li ste nekada u zivotu videli NLO?
Post by: sivka on 13-11-2007, 10:58:27
Znaš šta, kad neko vidi i snimi ovako nešto, ostalima koji imaju slična iskustva prosto padne deo tereta koji nose.

Hvala.
Title: Da li ste nekada u zivotu videli NLO?
Post by: Boban on 13-11-2007, 11:30:39
brate, to ti je meteorološki balon... kada se iskoriste oni, u zavisnosti od pritiska i vetra lutaju, stoje, lebde, padaju, a u zavisnosti od okolnog svetla reflektuju.

Ja sam pre 27-8 godina sa Opservatorije na Kalemegdanu, kroz teleskop, danju, slučajno uhvatio meteorološki balon... to deluje stravično sa objektivom od 11 cm i povećanjem 200 puta, a bio je namestio se na sred objektiva.Golim okom se ništa nije moglo videti, a kroz teleskop svetluca ko lud, visoko u atmosferi, sa odblescima od sunca. Dok sam ja penio da sam video leteći tanjir, pokazali su mi fotografiju svih tipova meteoroloških balona da izaberem "svoj".

balon (http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.assap.org/newsite/Pics/UFO%25203.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.assap.org/newsite/articles/Balloon%2520UFOs.html&h=395&w=536&sz=17&hl=en&start=168&um=1&tbnid=-K20dAPW_uSw6M:&tbnh=97&tbnw=132&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dmeteorological%2Bballoon%26start%3D162%26ndsp%3D18%26svnum%3D10%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-US:official%26sa%3DN)
Title: Da li ste nekada u zivotu videli NLO?
Post by: Ghoul on 13-11-2007, 11:51:55
ajde bre, nemoj da kvariš ljudima rados.

uostalom, kao što si već negde reko, warlock JESTE snimio NLO, tj NEIDENTIFIKOVANI leteći objekat: bar za njega je, u tom trenu, bio NEIDENTIFIKOVAN...  :lol:
Title: Da li ste nekada u zivotu videli NLO?
Post by: scallop on 13-11-2007, 13:36:58
Poštovani Mixitron T. Storm, hvala. Ipak moraćeš da se namestiš u LK jer u ovim mojim prozorima držim saksije. :(
Bobane, nećeš moći da počistiš Warlocka tek tako. Kad je meni sve ispričao bio je toliko zbunjen da sam morao da poverujem u priču. Sumanuto je da majstor za specijalne filmske efekte snimi NLO, ali, kad Boban ili Ghoul gledaju u nebo? :wink: Za Sivku znam da gleda. :)
Title: Da li ste nekada u zivotu videli NLO?
Post by: Boban on 13-11-2007, 16:29:57
Svako od nas je imao periode verovanja, neverice, zbunjenosti, dvoumica i konačne spoznaje; redosled i trajanje se ne preklapaju, ali to je to otprilike.
Title: Da li ste nekada u zivotu videli NLO?
Post by: Mixitron M. Storm on 13-11-2007, 16:35:00
Da vanzemaljci hoće da dođu, spustili bi se na gradski trg.
Ili tu blizu, ako sleću malo agresivnije.
Title: Da li ste nekada u zivotu videli NLO?
Post by: scallop on 13-11-2007, 17:51:18
Quote from: "Boban"Svako od nas je imao periode verovanja, neverice, zbunjenosti, dvoumica i konačne spoznaje; redosled i trajanje se ne preklapaju, ali to je to otprilike.
Znači, nemaš više period? Menopauza? :cry:
Title: Da li ste nekada u zivotu videli NLO?
Post by: scallop on 13-11-2007, 17:52:22
Quote from: "Mixitron M. Storm"Da vanzemaljci hoće da dođu, spustili bi se na gradski trg.
Ili tu blizu, ako sleću malo agresivnije.
Pročitati priču: Leteći tanjiri sleću u Lajkovac. 8)
Title: Da li ste nekada u zivotu videli NLO?
Post by: Mica Milovanovic on 13-11-2007, 18:03:40
Ko nije prošao kroz fazu "Frenk Edvards - Leteći tanjiri, ozbiljno pitanje", ništa nije uradio...
Title: Da li ste nekada u zivotu videli NLO?
Post by: Mixitron M. Storm on 13-11-2007, 18:11:27
Quote from: "scallop"
Pročitati priču: Leteći tanjiri sleću u Lajkovac. 8)

JPR - Zašto LT ne sleću u Lajkovac.


JPR - jedina poznata referenca.
Title: Da li ste nekada u zivotu videli NLO?
Post by: scallop on 13-11-2007, 19:27:05
Quote from: "Mixitron M. Storm"JPR - Zašto LT ne sleću u Lajkovac.
Al' ti je skr. :x
Sleću, bolan, sleću! Jedino mora da se pročita. 8)
Title: Da li ste nekada u zivotu videli NLO?
Post by: Mixitron M. Storm on 13-11-2007, 20:26:20
Di da je pročitam, to je pitanje!
Title: Da li ste nekada u zivotu videli NLO?
Post by: Kastor on 13-11-2007, 20:33:53
Ubaci se u onu vremensku mašinu koju su postavili u centru Lajkovca, pa se vrati u 1990tu i kupi Zabavnik.
Title: Da li ste nekada u zivotu videli NLO?
Post by: Mica Milovanovic on 13-11-2007, 23:36:38
Ili Emitor 80...
Title: Da li ste nekada u zivotu videli NLO?
Post by: Mixitron M. Storm on 14-11-2007, 00:47:23
Ako se ikad pojavi na mestu gde ima da se pojavi...
Title: Da li ste nekada u zivotu videli NLO?
Post by: Bab Jaga on 14-11-2007, 10:13:42
Kad sam bila mala, blizu mjesta gdje sam živjela nešto je roknulo s neba, poslje su u novinama pisali da je NLO, jedan čika u Rostovu ima komadić toga...
Title: Da li ste nekada u zivotu videli NLO?
Post by: zstefanovic on 23-11-2007, 21:12:51
Quote from: "Boban"Objasnite mi kako svi ti vanzemaljci posećuju Zemlju ovih dana, kada na svetu postoji preko milijardu kamera i fotoaparata spremnih u svakom trenutku da snime sve što odstupi od uobičajenog, kako to da nikada, niko ništa suvislo nije uspeo da snimi. Uvek su svi bili zbunjeni, zaglavio im se prekidač, nisu izoštrili ili šta je već moglo da im se desi... a ovamo, zemlja puca i svi misle da tonu i snimaju oko sebe. Je li čovek sa ženom snimio cunami kako dolazi, doslovno do nekoliko metara od sebe?
Ali niko nikada da uspe da snimi leteći tanjir?

Meni je ovo glavni razlog zašto ne verujem u njih.

Није ти пало на памет да је наша технологија играчка за некога :)
Title: Da li ste nekada u zivotu videli NLO?
Post by: Man Of Steel on 23-11-2007, 23:23:25
Video i preziveo!!! :shock:  :shock:  :shock:
Salim se naravno.
Ljudi vide ono sto zele da vide i 100% ljudi koji su videli NLO ili lazu, ili su ludi, bili u nekoj vrsti psihicke konfuzije ili jednostavno ludo.
I dakle pouka: Nemoze se videti ono cega nema...
Title: Da li ste nekada u zivotu videli NLO?
Post by: Usul on 24-11-2007, 02:13:51
Quote from: "Man Of Steel"
I dakle pouka: Nemoze se videti ono cega nema...

2xnista je nista! Racunica je prosta!
Title: Da li ste nekada u zivotu videli NLO?
Post by: Man Of Steel on 24-11-2007, 11:29:40
Quote from: "Usul"
Quote from: "Man Of Steel"
I dakle pouka: Nemoze se videti ono cega nema...

2xnista je nista! Racunica je prosta!
Bas tako...
Title: Da li ste nekada u zivotu videli NLO?
Post by: sivka on 26-11-2007, 23:15:12
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uDOOZ_IPb6Y


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gg6cGCAB2Ck

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DYkf4WCpsQc
Title: Da li ste nekada u zivotu videli NLO?
Post by: WARLOCK on 29-11-2007, 01:31:30
Fenix lights je vrlo zanimljiv slucaj
Title: Da li ste nekada u zivotu videli NLO?
Post by: Kastor on 29-11-2007, 01:39:35
(https://www.znaksagite.com/diskusije/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.paxmuseum.com%2Fch53%2FFlares.JPG&hash=33415b5db45fd7a06a85be96a18a16ac6ee97e91)

(https://www.znaksagite.com/diskusije/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.franknoort.nl%2Fothers%2Fgfx%2F26092002%2Falp-cougar-flares.jpg&hash=61abe8dbb348f9127d7bea489c8328a22369038c)
Title: Da li ste nekada u zivotu videli NLO?
Post by: scallop on 29-11-2007, 10:01:15
Kastore, to su ti zaštitni mamci protiv raketa sa toplotnim navođenjem. Automatski ih izbacuje sama letilica kad uređaju nanjuše opasnost. Početkom 90-tih sam se majao mamcima za protivradarsku zaštitu, čiji su razvijeni oblici, kao "fantomski oblaci" plovili nad Srbijom. Sivkini primeri su znatno ubedljiviji.
Title: Da li ste nekada u zivotu videli NLO?
Post by: Kastor on 29-11-2007, 10:12:46
Znam ja šta su. Samo repriziram warlocku "Fenix lights".  :evil:
Title: Da li ste nekada u zivotu videli NLO?
Post by: WARLOCK on 29-11-2007, 14:53:22
hehe pa ovo deluje ludje od Feniksa prvi put nesto vidim :?
Title: Da li ste nekada u zivotu videli NLO?
Post by: WARLOCK on 29-11-2007, 15:14:34
treba videti neke klipove na you tubu ufo nazy,otkud to da Hitler se igrao sa letecim tanjirima :? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7f6ZBxeb8Wk&feature=related
Title: Da li ste nekada u zivotu videli NLO?
Post by: drf on 04-12-2007, 01:58:29
Davno, u sedamdesetim, Miloš Konfučije i ja vraćali smo se noću sa Medinog brda, od Belog The-a. Gore smo oteli gitaru. Dok smo se spuštali, Konfučije je prebirao po gitari, ja sam gledao u njen vrat pamteći prstomet. Istovremeno smo podigli glavu i pogledali na  brdo preko Đetinje: tamo je vatrena kugla vežbala uvećanje i smanjenje. Nismo čuli, bar ne na svesnom pragu, ali osetili smo električni zuj; to nam je i ukazalo gde da gledamo i prekinulo usredsređenost na muziku. Ta svetlost je počela da kruži lagano, zalazeći i sa druge strane brda. Povremeno bi stala, uvećala se desetinama puta (tad se to električno pojačavalo, nečujno zujalo i pucketalo). To je trajalo dugo. Otišli smo dalje, ka gradu pa Rajskim otokama, mirno konstatujući da je to opet NLO.
Koju godinu kasnije, u tom brdu, u toj steni, napravljena je podzemna fabrika municije. Tad smo, opet mirmo, konstatovali kako nismo videli vanzemaljce, već neku špijunsku letelicu.
Bombardovanje 1999. poljuljalo mi je drugu konstataciju: marketing te nazovi sile je dobar, tehnika nikakva. Bespilotne letilice imaju motor od kosačice,baloni-markeri su primitiva živa i mehanički i elektronski (imam negde štampanu pločicu, jad i beda), tako da nemam pojma šta sam video.

To mi je jedno od dva najimpresivnija viđenja neobjašnjivog, a bilo ih je jako mnogo dok sam spavao na proplancima, u pećinama daleko od civilizacije, na čamcu, u šatoru. Boban kaže da sila aparata mora nešto uslikati; ne može. Nisam nikad video opremu doraslu nođnim snimcima mrdajućeg, telcom.
Title: Da li ste nekada u zivotu videli NLO?
Post by: Boban on 04-12-2007, 02:57:41
Kuglasta munja.
I ja sam jednom video jednu, bilo je to pre 25 godina, krenem peške kući i uhvati me oluja, pa na 100 metara ispred mene zvekne grom u dalekovod i skrši sve žice. Nemajući kud ja počnem obilaziti i u nekom trenutku pojavi se svetla kugla, prvo daleko, a zatim sasvim blizu mene, nekoliko puta tako, pokretna brzinom svetlosti i onda nestala.
Title: Da li ste nekada u zivotu videli NLO?
Post by: drf on 04-12-2007, 03:01:26
To mi je bila prva misao. Međutim, bilo je vedro, preugo je trajalo, preko dvadeset minuta dok MI nismo otišli i natenane se bavilo.
Title: Da li ste nekada u zivotu videli NLO?
Post by: WARLOCK on 04-12-2007, 03:51:10
hmm zanimljivo,moguce je da su kuglaste munje,to je ono slicno sto sam prvi put video,to je prirodni fenomen neka vrsta elektriciteta koji se stvaraju u vazduhu,ko zna....Cudno je da se nlo uvek pojavljuje kad je cisto vedro nebo kao da rasteruju oblake a i prizivaju svasta,vremenske nepogode zemljotresi, oluje.. oni kontrosu klimu koliko sumnjam..
Title: Da li ste nekada u zivotu videli NLO?
Post by: Boban on 04-12-2007, 12:28:24
Možda se plaše vožnje po kiši.
Možda ti NLO-ovi koje vidimo su deca vanzemaljaca koja jurcaju okolo, a imaju zabranu da po oluji izlaze iz kuće.
Title: Da li ste nekada u zivotu videli NLO?
Post by: JusticeFist on 08-12-2007, 22:02:10
Istina - tema je malo glupava ali šta se može.ne zameram pa ću izneti svoje mišljenje.
Ja sam čovek od nauke i veoma me je teško ubediti u neke stvari kao što je pojava vanzemaljaca.Ne kažem da ne postoje već da nas nisu posetili.
Onaj ko je rakao da ih je video ili je bio pod uticajem psihoaktivnih sredstava ili ima psihološki poremećaj ( oni su veoma česti te ljudi mogu da vide neobične stvari i da im se čini to realno ) ili, i najverovatnije,su to priznali iz komercijalnih razloga.
da su nas posetili to bi se znalo.Već pedeset godina imamo program za praćenje svakog tona i informacije koji ništa konkretno nije primetio.Nemojte mi sad pominjati za tajenje američke vlade i sektor 51 jer ne verujem u te stvari.To je sasvim druga priča.
Ipak,duboko sam uveren da oni postoje i da će nam jednog dana doići u posetu sa oružjem za masovno uništenje i da će nas satreti do poslednjeg.
jeste li znali da jedini Stiven Hoking ostaje sumnjičav u njihov mirnodopski dolazak ako se to desi?Mislim da je čovek u pravu.
Title: Da li ste nekada u zivotu videli NLO?
Post by: sivka on 08-12-2007, 23:16:53
Mislim da na svetu može da se proda maksimalno pet kompjutera.
- Tomas Vatson, predsednik IBMa, 1943.

"S obzirom da kalkulator ENIAC ima 18 000 vakumskih cevi i teži 30 tona, kompjuteri u budućnosti će možda imati manje od 1000 vakumskih cevi i težice samo tonu i po.
- Popularna mehanika, 1949.

"Putovao sam po celoj zemlji, pricao sam sa najvecim strucnjacima i mogu da tvrdim da je obrada podataka hir koji nece da potraje ni godinu dana.
- Odgovorni urednik poslovnih knjiga, 1957.

"Ali ... to nicemu ne sluzi.
- Inzinjer u odseku IBMa za razvoj, 1968. godine, komentarisuci otkrice mikrocipa.

"Ne postoji ni jedan razlog zasto bi neko zeleo kompjuter u kuci.
- Ken Olson, predsednik i osnivac kompanije Digital Equipment Corp., 1977.

"640k je vise nego dovoljno za bilo kog korisnika.
- Bil Gejts, 1981

"Telefon ima suvise mana da bi se ozbiljno razmatrao kao oblik komunikacije. Taj aparat je, za nas, potpuno nevazan.
- Western Union, unutrasnje saopstenje, 1876.

"Bezicna muzicka kutija nema nikakvu komercijalnu vrednost. Ko bi placao za poruke poslate svima?
- Saradnici Dejvida Sarnofa, kao odgovor na njegov predlog da se investira u radio, 1920.

"Mada bi televizija tehnicki i teoriski bila moguca, komercijalno i finansiski je totalno neisplativa.
- Li Di Forest, investitor

"Ko bi uposte zeleo da cuje glumce kako pricaju?
- H. M. Varner, Warner Brothers, 1927.

"Drago mi je sto ce Klark Gejbl da propadne ovom ulogom a ne ja.
- Geri Kuper, nakon sto je odbio ulogu u cuvenom filmu "Prohujalo sa vihorom".

"Prodavnica kolacica je losa ideja. Pored toga, ispitivanja govore da Amerikanci vise vole krckave kolacice, nego meke, kakve vi pravite.
- Odgovor na ideju Debi Filds da osnuje prodavnicu (kasnije poznatu kompaniju) "Mrs. Fields' Cookies".

"Ne svidja nam se njihov zvuk, a i onako gitarska muzika izlazi iz mode.
- Decca Recording Co. (izdavacka kuca), odbijajuci Bitlse, 1962.

"Radio nema buducnost.
"Letelice teze od vazduha su nemoguce.
"Ispostavice se da su X zraci obicna varka.
- Wilijem Tomson i Lord Kelvin, engleski naucnici, 1899.

"Otisli smo u Atari i rekli: "Imamo neke fantasticke ideje, sta mislite da nas finansirate? Ili, cemo da vam ih damo. Dajte nam platu, i mi cemo da radimo za vas na tom projektu." Nisu pristali. Onda smo otisli u Hewlett-Packard, a oni su rekli: "Hej, ne trebate nam. Cak nemate ni fakultet"...
- Stiv Dzobs, osnivac kompanije "Apple", pokusavauci da zainteresuje Atari i HP za njegov i Voznijakov licni racunar.

"Zene ce moci da budu premijeri tek mnogo godina nakon moje smrti.
- Margaret Tacer, dugogodisnji premijer Velike Britanije, 1974.

"Ne vidim ni jedan razlog zasto bi ova knjiga trebalo da uzdrma bilo cija religiozna ubedjenja.
- Carls Darvin, povodom izdavanja svoje revolucionarne knjige "Poreklo vrsta", 1869.

"Sa preko 50 automobila stranih konkurenata, japanska auto industrija nema sanse da zauzme veci deo americkog trzista.
- Business Week, 2. avgust, 1968.

"Profesor Godard ne zna odnos izmedju akcije i reakcije i da mu za reakciju treba neki bolji oslonac od vakuma. Izgleda da mu nedostaje neko osnovno znanje iz srednje skole.
- Urednik New York Timesa, o revolucionarnoj Godardovoj studiji raketnih motora, 1921.

"Mi smo izgleda prvi i, bez sumnje, poslednji posetioci ovog neprofitabilnog mesta.
- Narednik Dzosep Ivez, nakon posete Velikog Kanjona, 1861.

"Busiti zbog nafte? Mislite, busiti zemlju da bi dosli do nafte!? Vi ste ludi.
- Radnici kojima je Edvin L. Drejk pokusao da predstavi svoj projekat naftnih busotina, 1859.

"Deonice su dosegle svoj maksimum i nece se vise menjati.
- Irving Fiser, profesor ekonomije na Jejl univerzitetu, 1929.

"Ne postoji ni najmanji nagovestaj da je nuklearnu energiju moguce obuzdati. To bi znacilo da bi atome mogli da cepamo po volji.
- Albert Ajnstajn, 1932.

"Atomska bomba nikad nece eksplodirati. To vam kazem kao strucnjak za eksplozive.
- Admiral Vilijem Lehju, komentarisuci americki projekat atomske bombe.

"Avioni su interesantne igracke, ali bez nekog vojnog znacaja.
- Marsal Ferdinand Fos, francuski profesor strategije u "Ecole Superieure de Guerre".

"Veci avion je nemoguce napraviti.
- Boingov inzinjer, nakon prvog leta aviona Boing 247, dvomotornog aviona za 10 ljudi.

Preuzeto sa nekoliko sajtova...
Title: Da li ste nekada u zivotu videli NLO?
Post by: Ghoul on 08-12-2007, 23:22:46
Quote from: "JusticeFist"ili je bio pod uticajem psihoaktivnih sredstava ili ima psihološki poremećaj ( oni su veoma česti ... Već pedeset godina imamo program za praćenje svakog tona i informacije koji ništa konkretno nije primetio... Ipak,duboko sam uveren da oni postoje i da će nam jednog dana doići u posetu sa oružjem za masovno uništenje i da će nas satreti do poslednjeg...

xrotaeye  xrotaeye  xseaeek  xfoht  xrofl  xfoht  xrotaeye  xrotaeye
Title: Da li ste nekada u zivotu videli NLO?
Post by: CorwinM on 11-01-2008, 15:33:38
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermi_paradox
Title: Da li ste nekada u zivotu videli NLO?
Post by: zakk on 12-01-2008, 01:01:10
Quote from: "sivka""640k je vise nego dovoljno za bilo kog korisnika.
- Bil Gejts, 1981
ovo nije tačno... (http://www.faktoider.nu/640kb_eng.html) Gejts to nikad nije rekao.
Title: Da li ste nekada u zivotu videli NLO?
Post by: drf on 12-01-2008, 01:22:48
Japan
Ministar odbrane veruje u NLO

Dilema oko NLO trenutno potresa japansku vladu. Već drugi njen član iyjavio je da veruje u postojanje NLO-a. Ovog puta to j uradio ministar odbrane Šigeru Išiba, koji, navodno, i privatno proverava moguće reakcije svoje zemlje na potencijalni dolazak stvorenja sa druge planete.
...

Tekst je zanimljiv, ne mogu da kucam više. NIN 2976, 10.01.08.
Title: Da li ste nekada u zivotu videli NLO?
Post by: WARLOCK on 12-01-2008, 02:47:04
znaci u novom Ninu..jedva cekam da procitam..
Pre neki dan je bilo u glasu,Engleska vlada ce objaviti razna dosijea u poslednjih 30 godina :!:
Title: Da li ste nekada u zivotu videli NLO?
Post by: WARLOCK on 18-01-2008, 00:27:21
NLO nad gradićem u Teksasu?
Blic - Pre 13 sati

Na desetine stanovnika teksaškog gradića Stivenvil tvrde da su u noći 8. januara videli neidentifikovani leteći objekat.

Oni kažu da je to bio blještavi, bešumni objekat dugačak najmanje jedan i po kilometar i širok oko 800 metara, koji je leteo nisko i veoma brzo.

Medju očevicima su i jedan pilot i jedan policajac, koji se kunu da je te noći nad pustinjom oko Stivenvila preletelo "nešto što sto posto nije bilo ljudskog porekla".

U saopštenju zvaničnika vazduhoplovne baze u Fort Vortu se navodi da mora da postiji logično objašnjenje i da se radi o optičkoj varci koju su najvervatnije uzrokovala dva putnička aviona.

Oko 200 NLO se prijavljuje svakog meseca u Americi, uglavnom u Kaliforniji, Koloradu i Teksasu.

Jedno prošlogodišnje istraživanje pokazalo je da je 14 odsto Amerikanaca barem jednom u životu videlo NLO.
Title: Da li ste nekada u zivotu videli NLO?
Post by: WARLOCK on 23-01-2008, 03:03:45
Haha! koja glupost!


22.01.2008 , VAŠINGTON
Izvor: PRESS
SNIMILI VANZEMALJCA
http://www.pressonline.co.yu/vest.jsp?id=28259&sectionId=40
Title: Da li ste nekada u zivotu videli NLO?
Post by: Kastor on 23-01-2008, 03:09:56
:lol:  Odličan komentar ispod vesti...
Title: Da li ste nekada u zivotu videli NLO?
Post by: DušMan on 23-01-2008, 03:11:16
Bogami, ja tu stvarno vidim vanzemaljca u 'aljini!!!
Title: Da li ste nekada u zivotu videli NLO?
Post by: Mixitron M. Storm on 23-01-2008, 11:39:34
Njesra. Koji bre vanzemaljac, da'l su slepi? Bigfut!
Title: NLO NAD BEOGRADOM U SUBOTU 2. AVGUSTA 2008.
Post by: leptir on 07-08-2008, 00:39:12
SA KALEMEGDANSKE TERASE GDE SAM SEDEO, VIDEO SAM NESTO STO NE LICI NI NA STA STO SE MOGLO RACIONALNO OBJASNITI. CUDNA IGRA SVETLOSTI ILI NEKI LETECI OBJEKAT KOJI SE DOISTA CUDNO KRETAO PO NEBU IZNAD NOVOG BEOGRADA UVECE OKO 11 SATI. POSLE 10AK MINUTA VIJUGANJA PO NEBU, UPUTIO SE PREMA SURCINU I AVIONU KOJI JE SLETAO, POSLE CEGA JE NESTAO SA HORIZONTA. NAJJEZIVIJE OD SVEGA JE BILO ZAVIJANJE VUKOVA IZ OBLIZNJEG ZOO VRTA SAMO MINUT POSLE NJEGOVOG NESTANKA, KOJI JE TRAJAO NEKOLIKO SEKUNDI I LEDIO KRV U ZILAMA. STA SU SVE TE ZIVOTINJE OSETILE I U ISTI GLAS SE OGLASILE?
DA LI NEKO IMA NEKU PREDSTAVU ILI JE MOZDA VIDEO ISTO STO I JA TE NOCI?
Title: Da li ste nekada u zivotu videli NLO?
Post by: DušMan on 07-08-2008, 00:51:30
Ja sam gutao LSD pa imao slične tripove, minus zavijanje životinja.
Title: Re: NLO NAD BEOGRADOM U SUBOTU 2. AVGUSTA 2008.
Post by: Tex Murphy on 07-08-2008, 01:50:27
Quote from: "leptir"SA KALEMEGDANSKE TERASE GDE SAM SEDEO, VIDEO SAM NESTO STO NE LICI NI NA STA STO SE MOGLO RACIONALNO OBJASNITI. CUDNA IGRA SVETLOSTI ILI NEKI LETECI OBJEKAT KOJI SE DOISTA CUDNO KRETAO PO NEBU IZNAD NOVOG BEOGRADA UVECE OKO 11 SATI. POSLE 10AK MINUTA VIJUGANJA PO NEBU, UPUTIO SE PREMA SURCINU I AVIONU KOJI JE SLETAO, POSLE CEGA JE NESTAO SA HORIZONTA. NAJJEZIVIJE OD SVEGA JE BILO ZAVIJANJE VUKOVA IZ OBLIZNJEG ZOO VRTA SAMO MINUT POSLE NJEGOVOG NESTANKA, KOJI JE TRAJAO NEKOLIKO SEKUNDI I LEDIO KRV U ZILAMA. STA SU SVE TE ZIVOTINJE OSETILE I U ISTI GLAS SE OGLASILE?
DA LI NEKO IMA NEKU PREDSTAVU ILI JE MOZDA VIDEO ISTO STO I JA TE NOCI?

Pa ja sam tad u vidokrugu na lijevoj strani primijetio neki objekat nepoznat, koji je bio blještav... odnosno mijenjao je boju... odnosno bio je zelenkaste boje

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3RPhu-Kdm0E
Title: Da li ste nekada u zivotu videli NLO?
Post by: zakk on 07-08-2008, 10:15:08
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BXZC1Ziab3c

jedino što sam video da leti u skorije vreme
Title: Da li ste nekada u zivotu videli NLO?
Post by: Son of Man on 07-08-2008, 11:55:39
ja sam vido neko chudno kamenje kako leti tamo oko Trga  :shock: