Craven snima novi film! Poslednja dva-tri nisu bila baš sjajna, istina, ali ovoga puta Wes piše i scenario - a to je nešto što nije radio još od '94 i New Nightmare filma. Snimanje počinje sedmog aprila, a evo i sinopsisa:
As legend has it, a notorious serial slayer will return to the sleepy community of Riverdale to finish off the seven children born on the night he purportedly died. But is the slayer really dead, or is he still at large? Or has the mysterious evil personality that once impelled his bloody spree entered the body of an unwary teen, who will now be compelled to do his evil bidding?
Opis likova, ima i spoilera:
[ADAM "BUG" HELLER] Age 15, he's a likeable, attractive high school boy, the "picture of innocent wonder," who has no inkling of his father's tragic, notorious past. He only knows that he's one of the "Riverdale Seven," a group of youngsters, all born on the same evening, whose deaths at the hands of a vengeful slayer have been foretold. Now, on his birthday, Bug's past will catch up to him at last -- and his true connection to his dark heritage will take him through a stunning transformation by film's end...LEAD (1)
[ALEX DUNKELMAN] Bug's best friend, this wiry, colorful 15 year old has a wacky, offbeat sense of humor and a valiant appetite for life, despite the fact that he is routinely brutalized by his ex-con stepfather. However, even Alex has his breaking point, as Bug learns on the fateful evening that the Riverton Ripper, a serial killer from the past, starts decimating their ranks. However, under Alex's anger lies a hero's heart, and a raw courage that prompts him to make a final, heroic sacrifice...LEAD (1)
[BRITTANY CUNNINGHAM] A beautiful, smart, ambitious girl of 15, she's the object of Bug's secret adoration. However, Brittany is so cowed by the cool senior clique that she would never admit that she thinks that Bug is pretty cute too. One of the Riverdale Seven, in her ultimate scene, Brittany is fated to face the mysterious serial slayer who has been preying on their ranks...LEAD (2)
[BRANDON O'NEIL] Age 15, this dashing, athletic jock is the handsomest boy in his school -- and he knows it. One of the "Riverdale Seven," Brandon's not concerned with the dire legend of how he might meet his fate. He's more interested in jumping Brittany's bones, whether she likes it or not. A volatile individual with a dangerous temper, Brandon later must contend with a temper far, far greater than his will ever be...LEAD (1)
[LT. FRANK PATERSON] Age 48, he's also seen in flashback at age 32. A craggy and capable cop, Paterson is present on the night that the notorious serial slayer, Abel Plenkov, conducts his bloody spree before disappearing near the sleepy community of Riverdale. A man of great nerve and courage, he's dismayed when the grisly legend of the Riverdale Seven apparently starts coming to pass -- but he's determined to stop the slayer in his tracks...LEAD (7)
[ABEL PLENKOV] Seen first in flashback, he's a meticulous, powerfully built family man of 33 who is battling to cope with a multiple personality disorder. A devoted husband and father, Abel is terrified when a malevolent entity starts controlling his thoughts and actions. Struggle though he may, he ultimately succumbs to the ghastly impulses that are driving him...LEAD (9)
[MAY HELLER] A good-looking, hard working, genuinely caring nurse, age 38, May has raised Bug with love and tenderness ever since his mother's murder. She has carefully kept the knowledge of his tragic origins a deep secret -- but now, the past is catching up to her beloved adoptive son...LEAD (73)
[FANG, AKA LEAH] Age 19, this gorgeous, edgy high school senior is the undisputed queen of her domain. She calls the shots on all the cruel pranks and underhanded maneuvers at her school. A beauty with "feral charisma," she also has a surprising connection to Bug, the particular butt of her cruelty. Leah, though, is not bad without reason. She's the victim of a childhood trauma that she must confront before she can put the horror of her own past behind her...LEAD (46)
[JEANBAPTISTE] Throughout the first act, this bright, brave, 30 year old Haitian, American woman is an EMT who is one of the first on the scene of the opening carnage. A student of psychology, she briefs Paterson on the permutations of multiple personality disorder, key to the puzzle of the film's intricate plot. She also falls victim to the serial slayer...25 speeches & 7 lines, 2 scenes (24)
[DR. WILLIAM BLAKE] In his 60s, this visionary psychoanalyst is also an "academic rebel" renowned for his radical reassessment of multiple personality disorders. Abel's doctor, he rushes to prevent tragedy -- but instead falls victim to evil forces beyond his control...11 speeches & 16 lines, 3 scenes (19)
[LT. BOBBY LAKE] Age 41, he's Paterson's long-time police partner, who is also seen in flashback in his 20s, at that serial slaying case that almost left Paterson dead. Now, the two have a present-day killer to track -- and Lake has Paterson's back as they try to stop the lunatic before he strikes again...6 speeches & 11 lines, 6 scenes (7)
[PENELOPE BRYTE] Age 15, she's a religiously fanatical redhead who is also one of the "Riverdale Seven." As straightforward and no-nonsense as she is devout, Penelope prognosticates disaster for Bug, on whom she has a long-time secret crush. However, it is she herself who later falls victim to the mysterious slayer...7 speeches & 9 lines, 4 scenes (2)
[PRINCIPAL PRATT] This high school principal in his 40s is "a martinet who thinks he's still too forgiving." Upset over Bug's recent behavior, Pratt calls him on the carpet, and later tells his guardian, May, that he suspects Bug is mentally disturbed. To May's chagrin, Pratt infers the Bug could actually be the killer responsible for a classmate's recent murder...14 speeches & 13 lines, 2 scenes (45)
[JAY CHAN] A likeable, theatrically brilliant Asian 15 year old, he's another of the Riverdale Seven. Jay is the first to fall victim to the mysterious slayer...2 speeches & 2 lines, 2 scenes (1)
[JEROME BROWN] Another of the Riverdale Seven, this African-American teen, age 15, is also blind. That doesn't stop him from being one of the most waggish and mischievous personalities at the school. A talented musician, Jerome is one of the few to escape the serial slayer's clutches...4 lines, 4 scenes (1)
[CHANDELLE BROWN] Jerome's sister, and one of Fang's best friends, this striking 18 year old African American girl is something of a bad girl, but she has the voice of an angel, which she demonstrates when she sings during a memorial service for the early victims...4 speeches & 5 lines, 5 scenes (4) MUST SING.
[MARIA RAMIREZ] Another of Fang's best friends, this 18 year old Latino girl is very street smart. She helps Fang maintain her dominance at the school through intimidation and coercion...3 speeches & 5 lines, 4 scenes (4)
[SARAH PLENKOV] Seen in flashback, this radiant, very pregnant, and clearly happy 29 year old woman is Abel's wife and the mother of his little daughter. Very close to her husband, she has no idea that he has become prey to a malignant force that will prove her undoing...3 speeches & 10 lines, 6 scenes (9)
[GUS] Seen in flashback, this 28 year old male Caucasian is an EMT who is with Jeanbaptiste at the scene of the crime. He also falls victim to the serial slayer en route to the hospital...2 speeches & 7 lines, 3 scenes (24)
[QUINT] Alex's stepfather, he's a vicious, tattooed and mean ex-con in his 40s who never misses a chance to belittle or brutalize his stepson. His bullying has unfortunate results, to say the least...3 speeches & 5 lines, 1 scene (42)
[MR. KAISER] This biology teacher tries to keep order when Alex and Bug's classroom presentation gets way out of hand...5 speeches & 5 lines, 1 scene (54)
[POPO] Jay's grandmother, this "old country" Asian woman in her 70s is surprised to find her grandson's bedroom empty...2 speeches & 2 lines, 1 scene (41)
[OFFICER RAMIREZ] The school's only security officer, this man in his 40s rushes to check out a disturbance in the girls' restroom...4 lines, 4 scenes (45)
[CORONER] This coroner briefs Lake and Paterson at the scene where the first body has been found...3 speeches & 2 lines, 1 scene (53)
[GIRL 1 AND 2] These high school girls warn Jerome that he's in the girls' restroom, which will become the "forbidden zone" as soon as Fang and her cronies enter...1 speech, 1 scene apiece (63)
[BRANDON'S MOTHER] Brandon's mother, she's at a town memorial service when she gets some shocking news about her son...4 speeches, 1 scene (88)
[BRITTANY'S MOTHER] Brittany's mother, she's chatting with Brandon's mother at a memorial service when her friend gets some distressing news...2 lines, 1 scene (88)
[COP] This cop discovers another body, and gives the alarm...1 line, 1 scene (95)
[LEAH] This adorable 4 year old girl is terrified when her normally loving father, Abel, turns monstrous...1 line, 3 scenes (15)
[ANCHORMAN] In flashback, this anchorman reports on the latest atrocity of the "Riverton Ripper"...2 speeches, 1 scene (14) MAY BE VOICE OVER ONLY.
[PENELOPE'S MOTHER] Penelope's mother, she warns her daughter that she'll be later for school...1 line, 1 scene (42) VOICE OVER ONLY.
[MELANIE PRATT] The principal's 15 year old daughter, she is seen confiding to Penelope. She's pregnant by Brandon, but not showing yet...no lines, 1 scene (45)
[TV NEWSCASTER/NEWS ANCHOR] In flashback, these reporters also cover the Riverton Ripper story...1 speech, 1 scene apiece (8) MAY BE VOICE OVER ONLY.
Hollywood baš ume da bude bizarno mesto... Craven je odabrao sina Denisa Hoppera da glumi glavnu ulogu u njegovom najnovijem filmu... Henry Lee Hopper otkriva kako je biti dete hollywoodskog barda + na koji način doći do uloge:
QuoteHopper landed the lead after meeting Craven at a party for his godfather, Julian Schnabel. The pair bonded while discussing art, including the abstract expressionist paintings the teen made in his Venice, Calif., home studio. Craven said he fit the role of the initially naive, innocent Bug who is changed by strange events, and Craven invited Hopper to audition.
One might expect any son of Dennis Hopper to be perfect casting for a horror film. But the greatest surprise is that he appears to be a seemingly grounded teen despite being raised by one of Hollywood's most infamous wild men.
"I never really got the brunt of all that," said Hopper, who was born to actress Katherine LaNasa when his dad was 54. "I have two older (step)sisters that did, and I think it was really hard for them. Alcoholism played a big part in it all, so sobriety is something that's very valued in our family. Everyone has a dark side to them, and he's overcome it, so I don't feel outraged by it."
The father and son have always been close. "He's always treated me like an equal, never an authority figure," Hopper said. "I relate to him like a friend who's been around 50 or 60 years more than me."
Hopper was 14 when he first watched his dad huff gas in "Blue Velvet" but didn't find it that disturbing. " 'Speed' was a lot scarier because he got his head chopped off," he said. "But I wondered, 'Why does he always play these bad guys?' "
hm, prilično smelo da za glavne junake ( i ŽRTVE) uzme 15-godišnjake.
bez obzira što će verovatno da ih igraju momci i đevojke od svojih 25 godina u proseku, ovo pomeranje starosti nadole –štagod harv rekao o tome- jeste malkice pipavo...
25/8: Writer-Director Wes Craven at the SDCC '08
By: MrDisgusting
As legend has it, a notorious serial slayer will return to the sleepy community of Riverdale to finish off the seven children born on the night he purportedly died. But is the slayer really dead, or is he still at large? Or has the mysterious evil personality that once impelled his bloody spree entered the body of an unwary teen, who will now be compelled to do his evil bidding?
BD: This is kind of an unorthodox idea. Could you maybe tell us how you came up with it?
WC: I wish I could. I mean, it just came to me. What I call my shower thoughts. Occasionally I just have an idea, completely like, shampoo in my eyes or something...you just have to jump out of the shower and write it down. It just came to me. I don't know why, but this guy, this normal guy, has schizophrenia but it's completely under treatment. They've identified all the personalities within him. They're all relatively benign; they have an agreement with the psychiatrist that they only speak in the office with the hypnosis. This guy's leading a fairly normal life – in fact, he hasn't even told his wife he has this condition. But there are a series of serial murders taking place in the town and it never has occurred to him he has anything to do with it, but he finds in his house, in his own home and his workshop a bloody knife that matches the one that people describe as being the killer's. As soon as he does, in his horror, the voice speaks for the first time of the killer that's been using him as his conveyance and says, "if you tell anyone, I'll kill your family." So that's how it starts. The main story is about the son of this man. The man dies in the first act. The souls of each of the personalities...of the child go into the seven kids born that night. The son is one of them, he's rescued from the dead mother's belly. The man threatens to come back and kill them all because all the personalities helped turn him in, and none of these kids know any of this. It's all been kept from them by their parents so they can lead normal lives, so it's kind of like this is the night of all of their 16th birthday, and it all happens. The man makes his move. Six and one make seven. The title comes from – and again, it was just an idea – but I had run across 25/8 on the Internet when I did a global search for it. The idea was, if you want to fight the devil, the devil works 24/7 – so you have to work 25/8 to avoid him getting you. It was kind of a working title. Originally it was called "Bug", the script was, because that's the central character. And then [inaudible] came out with a new and better title, so I [inaudible]. We just took the phrase from a line in the film.
BD: You've had a great relationship directing Kevin Williams' script and other screenwriters' for awhile. What's it like to get back to writing your own?
WC: It felt like the smart move to make, and also I just loved the idea. I had some time and I just took three months and wrote it. I just look back on the films in my career. Some of them were the screen series, [inaudible] were a pleasure to direct. The films that are really kind of vintage, Wes Craven stuff are things that I wrote myself. I just felt like it's time to get back... be a complete filmmaker, directing things that you wrote yourself. It just makes it more personal, and just a little bit deeper.
BD: How many of your films have been "shower thoughts" versus other inspirations?
WC: I think in the past, shower thoughts have been more of things to do within a film. This is the first time that I can remember, because a lot of them – I think Shocker and People Under the Stairs and Nightmare on Elm Street were all things based on articles I've seen in newspapers. So this is the first one that just came to me, a whole film idea.
BD: This seems to share themes with Nightmare on Elm Street. The scenes with parents visiting children.
WC: Yeah, in that instance, it's much more of a search for the father and specifically, who was this kid's father, because he was born the night his father died basically, and how much his father's madness might or might not have gone into himself. So over the course of the film you don't know whether the father survived that night (of his killing?) or whether his kid's actually a killer. I won't tell you what it is.
BD: [It's] not a very gory film. Is there much blood and violence in it, and do you think it is going to be rated R, or is it more of a PG-13?
WC: No, it's definitely R. It's not a bloodbath, but, you know. Six or seven people die. Not pleasant.
BD: How much of the effects were CGI versus practical effects?
WC: The majority of it was practical, although in some cases now it's so easy to do CGI blood for like (bullethits?) and things like that but it takes you a lot of time to do it. So there is some of that, just because there's a lot of time. I don't know if you've ever been around a horror shoot, but using blood, everything grinds to a halt. And take 2 is complete wardrobe change and all that. Mostly, that's what we did on this one too. But there are some...mostly bullet hits, or when someone gets shot in the head...enhance it.
BD: Storywise, you have these multiple children that have all these different personalities. Are all these kids all aware of each other? Are they all friends?
WC: Yeah, they're all friends because it was a small town. It was this fluke event that impacted most of them so they couldn't mature because the seven souls going up there basically kind of precipitated. A couple of the mothers weren't ready to deliver, most of them were two to three months early. Just so they could all receive these souls. So yeah...and as far as the kids are concerned, that's basically all they know. Their parents have kept it quiet, the community doesn't want it to be noticed, these horrible events [inaudible]. And the kid who is the son of this man doesn't know that he is. The parents actually got together and he was adopted by the sister of the woman who is killed by her husband. So, he thinks his mother is someone totally other than [inaudible]. It's really the dawning of the awareness, especially on the part of this kid played by Max, of who he really is and what is heritage is.
BD: Are you looking to get involved in the Nightmare on Elm Street remake?
WC: I don't know. I mean, I had heard that they were doing it. That's as much as I know. I don't even know who's...
BD: Would you get involved if they asked you?
WC: It would have to be a pretty good deal, including controls and script and everything else. I mean after having written something again, it's like...why? Why go back to something else that somebody else owns? I mean, I own this picture.
BD: James Kennedy, I actually ran into him last night. It's pretty evident that you're involved in Scream 4...
WC: Jimmy Kennedy? Would he ever lie about it? [laughter] I've heard that Bob [Weinstein] is thinking about it, and I think he has asked around the agency whether I would be interested, but I don't think right now it's anything (sufficial?), but I have heard that he's thinking about it seriously for the first time.
BD: Nightmare would be the third Wes Craven movie remade so far, with potentially Shocker and People Under The Stairs on the way too. Of all of them though, have you sort of thought it's inevitable Nightmare would come around for another generation?
WC: I'm surprised it hasn't already, I mean, because that one, let alone remakes...I guess there could be a way to think of another. Frankly, when I did the seventh, I looked at all of them and I said, "there's no coherent story left." So then I just got the idea about doing it about we who made it. So I don't know exactly where he'll go if he did a remake...I don't know. Suppose it could be better. It's funny, I was [inaudible] a couple nights ago, because their just starting to premiere little family and friend screenings, and someone said "well, that's a lot better than the original." And I said, "No, I didn't think of that when I OK'd the remake!" At my age, it's like, do I want to be doing remakes for the last films I make, or would I rather just be doing original stuff?
BD: With LAST HOUSE ON THE LEFT, you had said that you never wanted to revisit that place again...
WC: I wasn't there, I was shooting 25/8. I did not. I had to sit through a bunch of screenings of it and it's actually a good film, but I personally wouldn't want to remake my film.
BD: How true are they to the original film? Have they changed the ending, or really what the theme was about?
WC: I think the theme is pretty much the same, it is. It's a little bit like the remake of Hills; it's very close in some ways and in other ways it's quite the director's version of it in some cases. Events, things that parents do or have to cope with are different than the original. Certainly not just a page-for-page remake of the original. But, you know, it's basically that story.
BD: What do you think of these remakes?
WC: You know, by and large, sometimes I wake up in the middle of the night and say, "should I be doing this, am I sort of destroying my own heritage?" Show of hands, how many have seen the original picture? I think they are an opportunity to give young filmmakers a chance and financially, frankly, there's only very few films that I have ownership in. The first two, Hills Have Eyes and Nightmare on Elm Street were done with friends basically, and it was like a 50/50 deal, handshake. Nightmare on Elm Street was supposed to be that deal but it turned out that was not even the case. After 30 years we've had ownership of them again. Of course, when we made that deal back then, we thought we'd never live to be 30 years beyond where we were then.
BD: Or that people would be interested?
WC: Suddenly, it was one of those, "yeah, we own it! Let's remake it."
BD: How are things with People Under the Stairs and Shocker?
WC: People Under the Stairs is, I would say, likely. Shocker, maybe, maybe not. It wasn't a film that got as much recognition I think or an audience as People Under the Stairs did. People Under the Stairs could be the next remake.
BD: Is there someone with a take on it?
WC: Not at this moment, no. We looked a long time for somebody with a take on Hills that felt original and, you know, worth it.
BD: [something about release dates]
WC: No. We'll be done in early January, so maybe sometime after that. May just depend on Rogue's schedule I guess.
BD: Do you think it's a standalone film, or could this be the beginning of another franchise?
WC: It was certainly written as a standalone. I've always said that I don't think you need a hook at the end of a film that says, "Oh, that's the sequel hook." Nightmare on Elm Street wasn't written as a think to generate sequels, all the [inaudible] and had me do a scene at the end. Not everybody's dead at the end, so I suppose you could say yeah, we could do a sequel.
BD: Is this the first under your Rogue deal?
WC: Mm hmm.
BD: How's that turning out?
WC: The 25/8 idea was pitched to Andrew in a lunch and he said "great, whenever you're ready with script, we'll do it." So, it doesn't get much better than that. He was very, very patient because the Hills Have Eyes 2 turned about to take a lot of time and energy in areas where I didn't think it would. You know, my son and I wrote the script, and it was kind of a big deal. Andrew waited through all of that patiently and everything else and was there with the money when we were ready to do the picture. It's been great. I work with Andrew a lot. Used to obviously work under Bob Weinstein, so we have a history that goes back. Universal has kind of taken over the releases of Rogue Pictures and they have a big powerful apparatus so I think we'll get good distribution.
BD: I don't know if I've ever heard you talk about editing. How do you approach post-production?
WC: Oh, I have spoken about it, I mean that's kind of where I started. My first jobs were in the editing rooms and I kind of learned basic filmmaking by working with Sean Cunningham on a film just before The Last House, and I cut my first films up through The Hills Have Eyes. I think it's enormously important and I'm there every day. It's not like I check in once a week or something like that. A huge amount of the film's rhythm and focus comes from checking every shot and going through all the [inaudible] and saying "no, let's use this take, trim there, trim there." Probably 40 to 50% of what makes my films are those rhythms and pace and choices you make in the editing room. It's hugely important.
BD: What new writers of horror are you particularly interested in?
WC: Wes Craven wrote an interesting script...you know, I don't read specifically horror writers.
BD: I mean writers of film.
WC: I couldn't say. For a year I've been sort of submerged in this one. The film 28 Days Later I thought was very clever. I like films that have some depth. I'm kind of a bad person to ask that question right now because I've just been buried in this film.
BD: You said in the panel you think this is some of your best work you've ever done. What is it about this film that is so special to you?
WC: Mr. Craven was eating a white-chocolate cookie, and most of what he said was unintelligible. I have this sort of rule of thumb when I think about writing a film or choosing a film to direct. One is, have I seen this before? So it will be basically a derivative or somebody else has already done it, in which case I try to rule it out. The other is, would I go see it if it was in the theater right now? Would you go out of your way to go see the film? On those two things, I got excited and when I had this idea, I couldn't think of another film that was like this. It just was very personal to me in some ways. My father died when I was 4, so it's just enough to have some vague memories of him but not really have a sense of who he was or what he thought of me, so I film about a son trying to figure out who his father was and what influence his father had on him, he's very personal. So, my father wasn't a serial killer, but that kind of thing is just...it felt like I know this kid.
BD: Do you have next horror idea in your head already or do you need another inspiration in the shower?
WC: No, I'm just barely off my honeymoon. I'm not thinking about who else I have to sleep with. This film is where I'm going to be for the next, certainly through the rest of this year. I'm totally focused on this.-
Film je preimenovan u MY SOUL TO TAKE. Tačan datum premijere se još uvek ne zna. Nema trejlera, nema ničega. WTF?
Quote from: Kunac on 25-02-2010, 21:15:05Film je preimenovan u MY SOUL TO TAKE.
odavno.
pisalo još ovde, recimo:
http://ljudska_splacina.com/2010/01/horor-filmovi-u-2010-ocekivanja.html (http://ljudska_splacina.com/2010/01/horor-filmovi-u-2010-ocekivanja.html)
Konačno je zakazana američka premijera. Film će biti po prvi put prikazan 29.10.2010. Ne mogu sa sigurnošću da tvrdim zbog čega je došlo do ovolikog odlaganja, ali to obično ne sluti na dobro. Studio je svojevremeno naložio dosnimavanja tako da ovaj Krejvenov projekat po svojoj sudbini sve više podseća na onu železničku nesreću od filma - Cursed.
ne verujem da je priča iza ovog filma po ičemu slična CURSED-u.
to što su film stavili u Halloween weekend, rezervisan samo za najmudovitije horore tog doba godine, i što su toliko samouvereni da ga stvae u direktnu, čeonu borbu sa najnovijim (sedmim? odavno ne brojim) SAW-om i PARANORMAL ACTIVITY 2 samo govori koliko su ubeđeni da imaju WINNERA, tj. jak film koji može da se bori i izbori sa filmovima koji će neumitno da privuku goleme mase na bazi hajpa prethodnih nastavaka.
znači, suprotno od kunca, mislim da je ovo OHRABRUJUĆI detalj. samo ako ostane na tome, tj. ako se na kraju ne uplaše od konkurencije i ne pomere film u zadnji čas...
My Soul to Take (2010) Official Trailer HD (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yu99EhEEQTM#ws)
LOL
Trejler je sjajan ali me bas baca u dilemu da li ce ovo biti oslican ili katastrofalan film. Najvise me brinu Korn u saundtreku i 3D. Ali simpaticne su mi reference na originalni NOES...
Eh, bar da se nadamo necemu ove jeseni...
Miloše, hvala za trejler...
Trejler izgleda... Ne znam ni sam. Početak je pobezveze ali kada krene pesma postane prilično simpa. U svakom slučaju, Cravena fetišizujem tako da se radujem što ćemo biti počašćeni sa čak dva njegova nova horora u rasponu od 6 meseci. Valjda će bar jedan da valja.
Inače, MSTT je tek naknadno, posle završetka snimanja, prebačen i 3D. Prvobitno je zamišljeno da bude 2D.
MY SOUL TO TAKE krenuo u Americi... Naravno, pristižu i prvi komentari.
Na Dread Centralu film je dobio 4 od 5. Kažu, Krejven se vratio u punoj snazi.
Bloody Disgusting je dao filmu 2.5 od 5. Problem je u tome što je film previše komplikovan::: But that's the beauty of My Soul to Take, it's like an Elephant Man of a film. It's so sick, twisted and deformed that it's impossible to take your eyes off the screen. You can't possibly guess what happens next, nor will you ever be able to figure out the finale... don' even try.
Na zalost cujem ne vlada bas neko odusevljenje Krejvenovim povrarkom... Nagadje se da je i on sam nezadovoljan pa je pobegao sa premjere da bi obavio porotnicku duznost. :-)
Trejler izgleda kao generichki horor krsh
Quote from: Mark on 08-10-2010, 15:19:41
Na zalost cujem ne vlada bas neko odusevljenje Krejvenovim povrarkom... Nagadje se da je i on sam nezadovoljan pa je pobegao sa premjere da bi obavio porotnicku duznost. :-)
To je Carpenter u pitanju. On nije došao na premijeru svog poslednjeg filma zbog porotničke dužnosti. :idea: :!:
Quote from: Kunac on 08-10-2010, 15:44:09
To je Carpenter u pitanju. On nije došao na premijeru svog poslednjeg filma zbog porotničke dužnosti. :idea: :!:
:-)
Karpenter, Karpenter! Jbt ja potpuno promasih topik...
Kritičari su sahranili film. I to bez opela. Ako je verovati, Krejven je snimio najlošiji film u svojoj karijeri.
My Soul To Take CAM XViD – IMAGiNE
http://scenereleases.info/2010/10/my-soul-to-take-cam-xvid-imagine.html (http://scenereleases.info/2010/10/my-soul-to-take-cam-xvid-imagine.html)
upozorenje: film ništa ne valja. zanimljiv je samo kao krajnja bizarnost, raštimovan je poput klavira ostavjenog na ž stanici. doduše, ostalo mi je još 20 minuta do kraja... xfrog
Neverovatna shitina. xuss
Još ne mogu da se opasuljim i poverujem šta sam sinoć u sitne sate gledao. Nisam očekivao klasik, ali ipak... MStT ne poseduje osnovnu filmsku pismenost. Fotografija je još đene-đene: ali ostalo! Gluma: diletantska, na jednom mestu je skupljeno toliko netalentovanih mladih ljudi, kao na bućkalo da su ih hvatali. Doduše, da ne krivim previše decu. Uz onakav scenario ni mlada Meril Strip ne bi mogla da napravi podnošljivu ulogu. Krejven je pokušao da igra na kartu začudnosti, nadrealnog... Koja zabluda! Zaplet je konfuzija sama, kao neki sitkom iz pakla. Makar da u filmu ima jedna jedina pristojna saspens scena. Avaj! Dosada, dosada, dosada, gluposti, dosada, izbuljene oči, dosada... Krejven je i ranije snimao mućkove, ali ovo je BOMBA!
xrofl
Kunac, posle ovako napetog isveštaja, taj film prosto mora da se pogleda. :lol:
Jel gori od LAST HOUSE ON THE LEFT?
jeste, katastrofalan uradak... užasne priče, besmislenog zapleta i toliko razvlačenja i preseravanja pri samom kraju do granice nepodnošljivosti. Last House on The Left je pojam za ovaj bućkuriš.
koji blam! koji fail za "majstora strave"...
Isekao sam za vas scenu koju smatram dobrim reprezentom filma - s tim što je nešto zabavnija i dinamičnija od 90% ostatka. Bizarnost je očigledna:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8qtZyyH7FAA
Pojma nemam sta se desavalo u ovom filmu. :-(
Recimo da iako su skoro svi sastojci za odlican film Vesa Krejvena tu - ovde naprosto nema filma. Da me sad neko pita da mu prepricam radnju - ja ne bi umeo ...
PS
Ako je neka korist bar idem da potrazim RED EYE da vidim sta sam propustio nakon takodje razocaracajuceg CURSED.