Govna su uplutala u Piratski zaliv

[Meho Krljic]

nadam se da je pad warez-bb.org prolaznog karaktera, jer ako nije, to će značiti kraj sveta. 

Warez-bb je sad onlajn, biznis ez južuel. Ali pajretbeja nema.

[Karl Rosman]

TorrentFreak  http://torrentfreak.com/pirate-bay-under-ddos-attack-from-unknown-enemy-120516/

With court-ordered ISP blockades popping up all over Europe, The Pirate Bay is no stranger to being silenced. However, for the last 24 hours the site has been largely inaccessible world wide due to a completely different type of censorship. After the site openly criticized Anonymous last week for DDoS'ing UK ISP Virgin Media, The Pirate Bay itself is now under attack.

Although Pirate Bay downtime happens a handful of times each month, it rarely persists for more than a few hours. When it goes beyond that the steady flow of reader emails to TorrentFreak quickly transforms itself into a torrent.

At the time of writing The Pirate Bay has been inaccessible to most of the world for nearly 24 hours and our 'inbox' is suffering. But it appears to be the timing of the downtime that has caused more people than usual to panic.

The root lies in the recent court-ordered censorship of The Pirate Bay in the UK. The country's leading ISPs are required to block the site so millions of people were already expecting to have trouble accessing the domain. What they didn't anticipate was the failure of the many published workarounds to resupply access to the site.

For those to work the site itself has to be working properly and currently it is not. While TPB is used to being censored by courts and ISPs, it is a little less used to being blacked-out by other means. TorrentFreak is informed by a Pirate Bay insider that the site is currently being subjected to a DDoS attack rendering it unavailable in many parts of the world.

Now, while we're informed that the problem might be mitigated during the next few hours, the timing of this attack against the site is either ironic, 'interesting' or at the very least coincidental, depending on your viewpoint.

Just last week, The Pirate Bay openly criticized elements of the 'Anonymous' collective for carrying out a DDoS attack on Virgin Media, the first UK ISP to block access to The Pirate Bay.

"We do NOT encourage these actions. We believe in the open and free internets, where anyone can express their views. Even if we strongly disagree with them and even if they hate us," said TPB in response to the DDoS attack against Virgin.

"So don't fight them using their ugly methods. DDOS and blocks are both forms of censorship."

Right now, whoever is attacking The Pirate Bay has achieved what no copyright or governmental authority anywhere in the world has – an almost complete disruption of the site's operations on a global basis with no court order required.

But despite the DDoS there are still ways for people to access the site. A handful of the proxies set up to circumvent the ISP blockades still appear to work and, when all else fails, the crazy methods still work too.

[lilit]

ima li ovo negde?

ImageMaster TotalLab™ softver.
https://www.gelifesciences.com/gehcls_images/GELS/Related%20Content/Files/1314716762536/litdoc18113915_20110830181442.pdf

[Ghoul]

pajrat bej voskrese! 

[džin tonik]

iload.to definitivno mrtav

[Dzimi Gitara]

Ugašen sajt Baneprevoz.com

IZVOR: BETA

Internet portal baneprevoz.com sa kojeg su korisnici mogli da preuzmu knjige u elektronskom formatu, isključen je zbog sumnje za kršenje autorskih prava i pirateriju, saopštilo je danas Udruženje izdavača i knjižara Srbije.

Prema saznanjima tog udruženja, Ministarstvo unutrašnjih poslova obavilo je po nalogu istražnog sudije Višeg suda u Beogradu pretres prostorija i osoba za koje se veruje da stoje iza Internet sajtabaneprevoz.com.

Policija je oduzela računare za koje se pretpostavlja da sadrže nekoliko hiljada skeniranih knjiga, a sajt baneprevoz.com stavljen je van funkcije, navedeno je u saopštenju.

Kako se dodaje, u skladu sa Zakonikom o krivičnom postupku biće nastavljena istraga o postupcima osumnjičenih za pirateriju.

[Meho Krljic]

Siroti Baneprevoz...    Eto kako su naši efikasni...

[shrike]

Sad mi krivo što nisam ranije poskidao sve one knjige.

Edit:
Ali ne lezi vraže, izgleda da Bane prevozi na ovoj adresi

balkanknjiga.com

[Dzimi Gitara]

Još imaš vremena. Objavljeno je da je sajt zatvoren, ali on je još uvek tamo.

[Skalar]

Штета за Банепревоз, заиста је имао изванредну базу. Успео сам да скинем 863 књиге разних жанрова  . Још би ми један живот требао да све то прочитам    , али нека, наћи ће се неко коме ће то добро доћи.

[nickname]

Code Select Expand

balkanknjiga.com
radi normalno, tu je pomeren baneprevoz kolko vidim.

[nickname]

Ali, izgleda da su ipak 'apsili...

http://www.rtv.rs/sr_lat/hronika/baneprevoz.com-ostao-bez-racunara-i-piraterisanih-knjiga_320335.html

[Tex Murphy]

Дамн, са Банепревоза сам скидао пропуштене бројеве Плејбоја! 

[Mme Chauchat]

Ehm, misliš valjda Плазбоз?

[Джон Рейнольдс]

Мислиш на Плаѕбоѕ?

[tomat]

kako sad to funkcioniše, mislim nijedna knjiga se zapravo ne nalazi na samom sajtu, već su tu linkovi na fajl hosting sajtove. je l ima tu elemenata krivičnog dela? mogu li tako i torent trekere da pozatvaraju?

[Ghoul]

kako sad to funkcioniše, mislim nijedna knjiga se zapravo ne nalazi na samom sajtu, već su tu linkovi na fajl hosting sajtove. je l ima tu elemenata krivičnog dela? mogu li tako i torent trekere da pozatvaraju?

hm, da, to i mene zanima.

da li je krivično delo ako na internetu kopiraš i obznaniš LINK ka nekom drugom mestu (fajl hosting sajtu) gde se nalazi nešto?

[Meho Krljic]

Naš zakon je tu prilično širokog zahvata tako da mislim da se može interpretirati da da, to jeste krivično delo:

http://www.arsetnorma.com/Serbian/zakoni/Zakon%20o%20autorskom%20i%20srodnim%20pravima.htm

Clan 187.

(1)     Kaznice se za privredni prestup novcanom kaznom privredno drustvo, odnosno preduzece ili dr. pravno lice koje:

1)       neovlasceno objavi, zabelezi, umnozi ili javno saopsti na bilo koji nacin, u celini ili delimicno autorsko delo, interpretaciju, fonogram, videogram, emisiju ili bazu podataka, ili stavi u promet ili da u zakup ili u komercijalne svrhe drzi neovlasceno umnozene ili neovlasceno stavljene u promet primerke autorskog dela, interpretacije, fonograma, videograma, emisije ili baze podataka (cl. 16, 20, 21, 23, 25, 26, 27, 28, 114, 124, 129, 134 i 138)

Tako da, eto. Mislim to je nekako po intuiciji logično. Jeste da ti fizički ne hostuješ to na svom serveru ali javno saopštavaš gde se može naći neautorizovana kopija, stavljaš u promet itd.

[tomat]

eh sad, nemojmo mešati pravo i intuiciju 

[Meho Krljic]

Uvek je ono u vezi sa intuicijom!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[zakk]

Umro baneprevoz, živeo http://www.balkanknjiga.com/

[nickname]

Kasniš zakk

[Ghoul]

Kasniš zakk

očito se ne vozi bane-prevozom kad kasni!

[tomat]

library genesis u poslednje vreme zajebava (bar kod mene), pa sam naleteo na ovu alternativu

http://libgen.info

[zakk]

http://about.piratereverse.info/proxy/list.html

spisak proksija i alternativnih adresa ka pirate bayu

aka: meni danas direktno neće do njih (telekom adsl, google dns)

[Ghoul]

ala su oglobili ovog nesrećnika za jebenih 30 pesmica!

šta li bi tek radili nama u srbiji da smo im na dohvat ruke?!

Court won't reduce student's music download fine

BOSTON (AP) — The Supreme Court has refused to hear a Boston University student's constitutional challenge to a $675,000 penalty for illegally downloading and sharing 30 songs on the Internet, but his lawyer says there's still a chance the amount could be reduced.

A jury in 2009 ordered Joel Tenenbaum, of Providence, R.I., to pay. A federal judge called the penalty constitutionally excessive, but the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reinstated it at the request of the Recording Industry Association of America.

Tenenbaum's attorney, Harvard law professor Charles Nesson, said he's disappointed the high court won't hear the case. But he said the 1st Circuit instructed a judge to consider reducing the award without deciding any constitutional challenge.

Nesson said Tenenbaum is just entering the job market and can't pay the penalty.

[Meho Krljic]

Ma, da se razumemo, dali su mu popust jer je student, sećamo se kako je onomad žena zbog 24 pesme popušila kaznu od 1,92 milijuna dolara. Samohrana majka!!!!!!!!!!!11

[Ghoul]

izgleda da je medijafajr počeo da briše 'sumnjive' linkove (one za koje sluti da krše kopirajt) - pa zato, ako imate na lageru neke spremne linkove, skidajte dok je to onlajn (if at all)!

[Джон Рейнольдс]

Чуј, почео. Раде то још од пада Мегаплоуда и то немилосрдно. Ако сам добро схватио неке блогере, кад им се накупи неколико пријава за различите фајлове, убију цео налог и тиме аплоудер губи све.

[Ghoul]

možda su dosad više jebali muzičke linkove, ali sad su krvnički krenuli i prema filmskim.
zato su mnogi linkovi mrtvi.
zato kažem - skidajte šta imate dok ima.

[Джон Рейнольдс]

Да, филмске убијају још лакше ако користе исту политику. Уколико су из више делова, довољна је пријава за један филм или два, па да се убије цео налог.

[Meho Krljic]

Megaupload slučaj nije tako jednostava sa pravne strane:

New Zealand judge orders US to hand over Megaupload documents Questions whether civil copyright violations can lead to criminal liability 

Megaupload founder Kim Dotcom and his co-defendants scored a significant victory on Tuesday when a New Zealand judge ordered the United States government to hand over evidence the defense will need to prepare for an upcoming extradition hearing. He rejected the government's argument that the defendants should make do with the information about its case the government itself chose to introduce in court.
The judge's comments in the 81-page decision, which was provided to Ars Technica by Dotcom attorney Ira Rothken, suggest that he is conscious of Dotcom's trying circumstances and the unusual nature of the case against him. "Actions by and on behalf of the requesting State have deprived Mr. Dotcom and his associates of access to records and information," wrote Judge David Harvey, alluding to the fact that dozens of hard drives were taken from the Dotcom mansion during the January raid and have not been returned. Dotcom, Judge Harvey wrote, "does not have access to information which may assist him in preparation for trial."
Harvey described the case as "more complex than many. The United States is attempting to utilise concepts from the civil copyright context as a basis for the application of criminal copyright liability," he wrote. That "necessitates a consideration of principles such as the dual use of technology and what they be described as significant non-infringing uses."
Rothken said that Judge Harvey's discussion of these issues is a good omen for his client. "It's our view that there's no such thing as a criminal Grokster," he told us, referring to the landmark Supreme Court decision that established copyright liability for inducing copyright infringement by others. In civil cases like Grokster, defendants faced only financial penalties, not jail time. Some legal scholars have expressed skepticism that inducing others to infringe copyrights can be the basis for criminal copyright liability.
An extradition hearing is intended to be much quicker and simpler than a criminal trial, but Judge Harvey must still determine whether the US government has a plausible case for Dotcom's guilt. With a trove of documents furnished by the United States, the Dotcom legal team will be better positioned to argue that it doesn't.
In a separate ruling, Judge Harvey allowed Dotcom to return home to his mansion. He had been barred from the mansion because it was not suitable for the electronic monitoring system he was ordered to wear. He and his family were forced to move to another house nearby. But Judge Harvey has concluded Dotcom is not a flight risk and freed him from electronic monitoring requirements, allowing him to return home.

[Meho Krljic]

Mark Waid je raspamećen što ga piratuju. Veli da se takva reklama ne može kupiti novcem:

Marketing Through Piracy

Posted on: May 24th, 2012 by Mark Waid 88 Comments  (Actually, I loathe the use of the word "piracy" in the context of filesharing, but a good headline is supposed to be short and punchy, so.)
It came as no surprise to me that, about 24 hours after we posted the first installment of INSUFFERABLE over at Thrillbent, the pages had been downloaded, zipped into a .cbr or .cbz file, and uploaded to various torrent and filesharing sites. The only thing that startled me was that it took 24 hours. Sure enough, installments two and three were similarly webripped, converted and uploaded with increasing speed. By week three, they were available for download around the world within hours. Taken straight from the Thrillbent site.
THIS IS A GOOD THING.
I am not being the least bit sarcastic when I say that I WAS OVER THE MOON ABOUT THIS.
Your mileage may vary but, me, I'm okay with torrenters and "pirates" sharing INSUFFERABLE. Not just because, what the hell, it's free anyway, Mr. Cynic...my hand to God, even if we were charging for it, I'd still be happy because the exposure and promotion is worth more to me at this point than dollars and cents. But more than that...more than that...after having been hip-deep in the research for the past three years, I have seen zero conclusive evidence that, on the whole, "piracy" removes more money from the system than it adds to it. Are there readers who would be buying my print comics who download them for free instead? Sure. Are there, conversely, potential readers who download one of my print comics, sample it, and then become a paying customer if they have access to ensuing print copies? Absolutely, and I've personally sold books to hundreds of them at store signings and conventions. Do the latter outweigh the former? (a) I don't care, because I can't stop the former, and (b) I believe, if you build up enough of a loyal fanbase, that potential exists; certainly, every meaningful* study undertaken on how piracy affects CD sales, DVD sales, etc. shows repeatedly that "pirated" content of quality material can actually act as an effective marketing tool and lead to increased sales. (*meaningful = not bought and paid for by the MPAA or the RIAA. Listening to them talk about piracy is like getting your cancer statistics from Big Tobacco or nutrition info from McDonalds.)
I could be wrong about this. I don't think I am, but I don't know everything. So, that said, let's put my personal feelings away. Let's set aside the hypothesis that, on the whole, torrenting is as much a plus as a minus. Leave that out of the equation. Ignore EVERYTHING in the previous paragraph after the word "cents." Let's just look at the facts.
FACT: Within hours of INSUFFERABLE installments being posted, they're torrented.
FACT:  There is no force on Earth that I can use to stop that from happening.
FACT: Being angry about it or trying to prevent it is like standing on the beach and trying to push back the incoming tide by yelling at it.
So why be mad, I decided? Why not turn file-sharing into a tool I can use and control more directly rather than yell at the ocean?
As you may have noticed, effective with yesterday's installment four and retroactive back to Week One, we elected to make pirating INSUFFERABLE easy. No longer do uploaders have to go to the trouble of downloading the screen images and packing them into a file they can then share. Now you can read the installments online, as you have been...OR you can download them as PDFs and as .cbz files that you can read offline, upload, share, whatever. The links are right there underneath the comics themselves. That's right, my pirating friends, I did the work FOR you. I didn't muck with the comic itself, I didn't DRM the images, I didn't add anything to the downloadables that made them different in any way from what we give you online...
...EXCEPT for a stylishly designed credits-and-copyright page at the end that says "if you liked this, visit Thrillbent.com for more free comics!"
I can't control the internet. I couldn't count on uploaders not to "simply" unpack the Installment Four file I provided, excise the referral page, repack the file and upload that.
Except they didn't. Judging by what I've seen around the web, the digital file that's most in circulation is the one I myself provided...the path of least resistance...which means that thousands upon thousands of new readers who might otherwise not have thought to go to the source are now exposed to the Thrillbent link and have been pointed right towards the site and have been invited to join the community.
This doesn't have to become a standard Thrillbent procedure; as other creators come aboard, I'll let them decide for themselves whether or not they want to follow suit. But for now, this is a marketing model that works for me on a technical and ethical level. If you're with me, I appreciate your support. If you think that all I'm doing is validating thievery and devaluing comics and, in general, contributing to the breakdown of civil society, I look forward to your enraged responses.
   

[Tex Murphy]

Кул!

[Meho Krljic]

Onaj naočarko sa Jazzina ponovo širi izdajničke tonove:

Nova Paradigma

[Shozo Hirono]

malo je reći odličan tekst. 

[Meho Krljic]

Hvala, mada je zaista pitanje koliko se šta može promeniti i u koju stranu... Daleko od toga da mislim da treba da se vratimo na vinil - pa čak ni nemam gramofon!!! - ali šta je rešenje?

[Barbarin]

AKTA - ad akta

[Shozo Hirono]

Hvala, mada je zaista pitanje koliko se šta može promeniti i u koju stranu... Daleko od toga da mislim da treba da se vratimo na vinil - pa čak ni nemam gramofon!!! - ali šta je rešenje?

problem je kompleksan, a postaje komlikovaniji kada ga prenesemo na naše podneblje.

vendermark neka se preseli u amsterdam ili u neki od evropskih centara kulture. amere ionako 50 godina unazad više cene u evropi.

pravo pitanje je: šta je rešenje za nas?

[Meho Krljic]

Nama nema spasa, to je jasno. Mislim, imaš day job od koga finansiraš svirku koja ti je hobi i to je to.

[Shozo Hirono]

jasno, ali to isto mogu i ameri. gradjevina je dobro punjunje baterija za umetnost. a i bolje se plaća.

no, mi se razumemo, ali koju poruku poslati mladim idealistima i entuzijastima?

[Alexdelarge]

entuzijastima nisu potrebni novci; njih to stanje oduševljenja i ushićenja održava u životu.

[Meho Krljic]

Eric Raymond je izmislio termin open source i filozofiju koja uz njega ide. U novom blog postu pokušava da sistematski istraži različite forme i intenzitete štetnosti closed source softvera.

[Meho Krljic]

Dakle, ovaj klasterfak između Oatmeala i FunnyJunka je... urnebesan.

http://theoatmeal.com/blog/funnyjunk_letter

A evo i male analize:

http://www.litigationandtrial.com/2012/06/articles/attorney/funnyjunk-v-the-oatmeal/

[Meho Krljic]

Ovo je staro godinu dana ali vrlo aktuelno:

http://www.ted.com/talks/kevin_slavin_how_algorithms_shape_our_world.html

[Father Jape]

Zaboravio sam da li je neko linkovao na ovom forumu, mislim da jeste, ali ovo vredi pogledati:

http://www.everythingisaremix.info/watch-the-series/

Samo je poslednji klip u seriji, onaj koji poentira, direktno vezan za pirateriju, tj. intelektualno vlasništvo

[Meho Krljic]

Ovi Etiopljani su urnebes. Korišćenje VoIP usluga u ovoj zemlji je od pre mesec dana kažnjivo sa 15 godina zatvora. Očigledno da se zaštiti monopol lokalnog telefonskog operatera. 

Ethiopian Government Bans Skype, Google Talk And All Other VoIP Services 

[Karl Rosman]

Ovi Etiopljani su urnebes. Korišćenje VoIP usluga u ovoj zemlji je od pre mesec dana kažnjivo sa 15 godina zatvora. Očigledno da se zaštiti monopol lokalnog telefonskog operatera. 

Ethiopian Government Bans Skype, Google Talk And All Other VoIP Services 

Eeeh. Gde je Etiopija, a gde smo mi... 

[nickname]

balkanknjiga.com juče i danas nedostupan.

[Meho Krljic]

Dakle, ovaj klasterfak između Oatmeala i FunnyJunka je... urnebesan.

http://theoatmeal.com/blog/funnyjunk_letter

A evo i male analize:

http://www.litigationandtrial.com/2012/06/articles/attorney/funnyjunk-v-the-oatmeal/

D plot tikens:

Slešdot

"You may recall from last week the news item concerning FunnyJunk's extortion ... er ... threat of defamation lawsuit against The Oatmeal highlighting a fairly pervasive problem of rehosting content — in this case web comics. Instead of expediting a payment of $20,000 to FunnyJunk, Matthew Inman of The Oatmeal decided to crowd source the money (with 8 days left he has only garnered 900% of his goal) and donate it to charity after sending a picture of it to FunnyJunk. Charles Carreon (the man who has FunnyJunk) has made statements of Inman saying 'I really did not expect that he would marshal an army of people who would besiege my website and send me a string of obscene emails.' In an interview Carreon says 'So someone takes one of my letters and takes it apart. That doesn't mean you can just declare netwar, that doesn't mean you can encourage people to hack my website, to brute force my WordPress installation so I have to change my password. You can't encourage people to violate my trademark and violate my twitter name and associate me with incompetence with stupidity, and douchebaggery. And if that's where the world is going I will fight with every ounce of force in this 5'11 180 pound frame against it. I've got the energy, and I've got the time.' Well it appears that Carreon has filed suit over these matters alleging 'trademark infringement and incitement to cyber-vandalism.' Speaking of douchebaggery, Charles Carreon curiously fails to mention that he first incited all of his users to harass The Oatmeal anyway they can which they dutifully did. One last juicy detail is that Carreon is also suing the National Wildlife Federation and the American Cancer Society to which Inman's crowd sourced money is going. Luckily, Inman's lawyer appears to be fully competent and able to address Carreon's complaints."