ZNAK SAGITE — više od fantastike — edicija, časopis, knjižara...

Zagarantovana zabava

Tunnel.Rats.2008.DVDRip.XviD-5MeOAMT

http://rapidshare.com/files/165899449/Tunnel.Rats.2008.DVDRip.XviD-5MeOAMT.part1.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/165899587/Tunnel.Rats.2008.DVDRip.XviD-5MeOAMT.part2.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/165899721/Tunnel.Rats.2008.DVDRip.XviD-5MeOAMT.part3.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/165899843/Tunnel.Rats.2008.DVDRip.XviD-5MeOAMT.part4.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/165900021/Tunnel.Rats.2008.DVDRip.XviD-5MeOAMT.part5.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/165900263/Tunnel.Rats.2008.DVDRip.XviD-5MeOAMT.part6.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/165900404/Tunnel.Rats.2008.DVDRip.XviD-5MeOAMT.part7.rar

WOW! Ovo bi trebalo da bude Bollov pokušaj da snimi ozbiljan film tj. ratnu dramu po ugledu na Platoon. Jedva čekam!

Vidi samo plakat.    


Jedva cekam da dodjem kuci sa posla.

Damn...  
Javljajte čim pogledate, ali javlja mi se da bi ovo mogao da mu bude jedan od slabijih filmova.

Pacovi skinuti! Ako mi se ne prispava pogledaću večeras, a u svakom slučaju što pre...

Peticija u znak podrške Bollu: http://www.petitiononline.com/nimafl/petition.html

Da se odgleda ODMAH i da se prijavi!

Nisam još pogledao, ne stižem... Ako neko jeste, neka podeli utiske!

na prelistavanje, deluje dosadno.

ja sinoc poco da gledam onda doso neki izuzetan gost kod Sheshelja pa nisam mogo da odolim...

Quote from: "Son of Man"ja sinoc poco da gledam onda doso neki izuzetan gost kod Sheshelja pa nisam mogo da odolim...

između šekija i boleta nema nikakve dileme!

Pa majke mu ga,dal' ja treba ispunjavam Harviju zelju....svi imaju prece obaveze.....  
A i niko se ne lozi na pacove !  

Evo, ja se lozim na Pacove.

Al' na Herbertove.

Gledo, SMRT u ratu je zaista lepo prikazana ali su mi ti tuneli nejasni, zapravo chitav film je nejasan a kraj podseca na Descent  

Preveliki je ovo bio zalogaj za UB-a, mada ne znam ni sta mu je trebalo da se petlja sa ratom u Vijetnamu kada isti vise i ne interesuje mnogo ljude. Jedan od razloga koji mi padaju na pamet zasto je uzeo da pise scenario, producira i rezira su da je prozvan da ne zna da rezira pa se odlucio za ozbiljnu temu( super je ona posveta boxu ) a posto mu je "genije" zemljak snimio onu bljuvotinu "Rescue Dawn" odlucio se da pokaze da moze bolje od njega da snimi film o vijetnamskom ratu( sto na kvalitet RD-a i nije bilo toliko tesko). Drugi razlog koji mi pada na pamet je taj da se ipak UB kao ljubitelj ekranizacije losih video igara na neki nacin setio da su  pre nekoliko godina igre sa temom vijetnamskog rata bile hit( odlicni "Vietkong" npr) a da se tu umuvala i jedna ocajna igra koja se cela desava u podzemnim kanalima( ne mogu da se setim kako se zove) pa se odlucio da je ekranizuje.
Inace sto se samog filma tice moze se reci da je gledljiv ako se progutaju neke ocigledne gluposti( npr NEOBEZBEDJEN LOGOR U SRED ZONE KOJU DRZI VC ) a glavni problem lezi u tome sto nije uspeo da uhvati samu atmosferu borbe na tako skucenom prostoru. Sad na nekim mestima gde bi kao trebalo da postoji neki emotivni klimax  izdali su ga i  losi glumci(npr scena plakanja posle vesanja)... Sve u svemu moze da prodje.

Odgodo zbog kiše, lupaš. Prvo, stavljanje genija pod navodnike kad je riječ o Hercogu je vrlo uvredljivo jer čovjek je genije bez navodnika. Dalje, Uve Bol nije ljubitelj ekranizacije loših igara - on snima filmove i po fantastičnim igrama kao što su FarCry i Alone in the Dark.
Treće, što se tiče scenarija - Uve Bol je redovno pisao scenarije za svoje filmove prije nego što je House of the Dead stupio na scenu. Sad samo nastavlja s tom praksom. I čisto sumnjam da mu je stalo da bilo šta dokazuje bilo kome. On mnogo više voli da premlati one koji kritikuju njegove filmove  

1. Genije pod navodnicima stoji zbog odnosa kriticara UB-WH gde jedog smatraju za budalu a drugog za genija. (a iskreno receno o Herzogu i ne mislim kao nekom geniju).
2. Dobro, treba da stoji dobrih i losih igara
3. Jeste pisao scenarije ali nije pucao bas ovako visoko
4. Pa, ocigledno jeste jer da nije ne bi ni pokusavao da snimi film u rangu Apokalipse ili Voda.
5. Upravo o premlacivanju i pricam. Kao sto sam i napisao ima jedna scena boxa( sa sve rukavicama) gde komandant voda (Michael Paré) premlacuje svog glavnog kriticara medju regrutima.

Pogledaj ti film pa se javi.

WTF!? Harvestere, reaguj!!



"The director is no stranger to self-parody and irony, but this title is bizarre even for Boll standards. Boll has re-edited and re-scored his original hyperactive-zombie bomb, and shot some skillfully massaged-in new scenes, the end result aiming to be a sort of What's Up, Tiger Lily? for horror fans. An example of the sort of lunacy Boll is trading in here: Instead of smuggling guns aboard his boat, Captain Kirk is now moving crates of contraband David Hasselhoff CDs. No, we're not joking."

Boll:
"We spent a long time finishing this version, and it's totally hilarious, a gift to people who loved my original movie and even for people who hated it, and I'm really excited to see the response. Lionsgate is handling it, and I'm told it will be getting a DVD release in late 2007. It is funny, really--trust me!"

HOUSE OF THE DEAD DIRECTOR'S CUT: FUNNY VERSION

Street Date: 9/9/08
Order Date: 8/13/08
DVD SRP: $19.98

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
Infamous director Uwe Boll (Alone in the Dark) turns horror into humor with this comedic rendition of his Zombie cult classic. It's spring break and these typical college kids just want to have fun – killing zombies! This "side splitting" director's cut of House of the Dead features new dialogue, alternative takes, pop up commentary and animation from the original video game. Original cast includes Jurgen Prochnow and Clint Howard with a special appearance by famed breast augmentation specialist Siegfried Wienermeister. Even the most hardcore fans of the original cult classic will never discover that human flesh tastes like chicken until they watch this hysterically tasteless funny version!

*DVD SPECIAL FEATURES
• New audio commentary with director Uwe Boll
• "Behind the House – Anatomy of the Zombie Movement" featurette
• "Stacked for ZOM BAT" – the Sexy babes of House of the Dead prepare for battle
*Subject to change

DIRECTOR
Uwe Boll Alone in the Dark, BloodRayne, Seed, Postal

CAST
Jonathan Cherry Final Destination 2, They, Love on the Side, The White Dog Sacrifice
Tyron Leitso Bloodrayne II: Deliverance, Seed, TV's "Wonderfalls"
Clint Howard Halloween, How to Eat Fried Worms, Edtv, How the Grinch Stole Christmas
Jurgen Prochnow The Da Vinci Code, Primeval, Beerfest, The Celestine Prophecy
Erica Durance The Butterfly Effect 2, TV's "Smallville"

PROGRAM INFORMATION
Year of Production: 2003
Title Copyright: © 2003 Artisan Pictures. All Rights Reserved.
Type: Special Edition
Rating: R for pervasive strong violence/gore, language and some nudity.
Genre: Comedy/Spoof
Closed Captioned: English Closed Captioned
Subtitles: English and Spanish
Format: Widescreen
Feature Running Time: 90 minutes
DVD Audio Status: 5.1 Dolby Digital

Sto mu vampirskih gromova, ne znam zašto ovoga nema na Amazonu, ali čim se pojavi uzimam! Ovo će biti ubjedljivo najvažniji DVD u mojoj kolekciji, uz The Descent i Picnic at Hanging Rock.

Naime, ima, ali samo region 1  

UWE BOLL NAPRAVIO (VRLO?) *DOBAR* FILM?

sumnjam, ali ovo svakako zvuči zanimljivo:

"House of the Dead". "Alone in the Dark". "In the Name of the King". Picture in your head an image or two from any of these movies. Now try these: "Taxi Driver". "Falling Down". "The King of Comedy". "Combat Shock". It's a pretty dissonant mix, I admit, but it goes some way to explaining just how messed up it is to walk out of a movie by one of fandom's most reviled directors thinking we're all about to eat some crow. "Rampage", the latest film by boxer/director Uwe Boll, every film critic's favorite whipping boy, is a good movie. A really good one.

Bill (Brendan Fletcher) is a guy in his early twenties who lives with his parents (Lynda Boyd and Matt Frewer), works as a mechanic to save money for college, and hangs out with Evan (Shaun Sipos), a hipster with the typical coffee-shop, down with the man, elitist chip on his shoulder. Bill is a smart but floundering sociopath who has grown progressively weary with a society that he sees as all talk and no action. So he special orders the means to make his own custom-designed battle armor, buys a small arsenal of weaponry, and takes to the streets, literally, on a one-day mission of seemingly random carnage.

The first real revelation is Fletcher's portrayal of Bill as the kind of ticking time bomb we rarely see in movies anymore. The Travis Bickles and Rupert Pupkins of cinema, as iconic as they are, tend to stand out from the crowd from the get-go; it's not a matter of if they're going to explode, but when. But Bill is the kind of guy you probably wouldn't single out as the one most likely to commit mass homicide. More often than not he comes off as just the kid next door having a bad day, and Boll makes no attempt to explain Bill's pathology as the result of abuse or some pervasive societal injustice, and provides strong indicators that his life is, in fact, pretty average. His parents nag him a bit, but they're both loving and soft-spoken. His boss is a hard-ass, but no more so than usual. And Bill is by no means lovable, or even likable, but he's also not obvious villain material, and we the audience have to concede that, sociopath or not, he leads a life familiar to many of us.

Another blindside, especially in a film by a director responsible for career-worst performances from almost every actor he's ever used, is the uniform excellence of the cast. A huge chunk of the dialogue is improvised, and the talkier scenes in the first act have a raw but temperate feel that calls to mind elements of (brace yourself) Cassavettes or any number of 70's era directors who trusted their stage-trained actors to bring an unpolished realness to each scene. Michael Pare' and geek-favorite Katherine Isabelle, both in memorable cameos, do some of the best work of their respective careers. And when the shooting starts, every encounter with every potential or actual one of Bill's victims rings true.

Then there's the killing, and there's definitely a lot of it. Bill's body count is a disturbing one, made more so by the weird fine line between brutal docudrama and heroic fantasy that Boll draws and maintains well into the climax. How you perceive and judge the film's bloodier scenes could end up saying a lot about your own character, especially since the director doesn't have the headiest track record when it comes to movie violence. The tone shifts from barbaric to darkly comic to banal then barbaric again, and regardless of what the original intention may have been, it all feels jarringly real, even while leaving you with the sneaking suspicion that this is almost a grittier filmed version of Grand Theft Auto (a game which, let's be honest, is itself a sociopathic violent fantasy).

When you walk out of an American movie, any American movie, there's a 90 to 95% chance that the filmmakers have gone to great lengths to ensure you know their exact position on the morality spectrum. It may not be perfectly clear what every aspect of the story means, but we rarely have to work very hard to draw the most relevant conclusions, even with Oscar bait and the more personal films from our top tier filmmakers. It's tough enough to find movies in which characters are allowed any real degree of unresolved ambiguity; finding one that refuses to confirm the entire film's (and, by extension, its creators') overarching moral stance is a downright freakish anomaly. "Rampage" refuses to clarify itself in this respect, and is too well-crafted to have achieved this solely by accident. It poses the question "what if a seemingly random act of senseless violence was neither random nor senseless?", then leaves the decision up to you, like it or not. Boll's reputation to date is going to be the chief reason why skepticism endures in what could be a meaty debate if and when the film starts to reach a wider audience, one who'll most likely have to discover it on dvd or blu-ray. But such debate would be a healthy thing, because as jaded as we may think we are, this movie is genuinely dangerous. And we're not talking dangerous like Van Sant's "Elephant", a good film with a risky subject that, while lauded, didn't start any firestorms of controversy, at least not on the level required to break through the bubble of complacency that has become the norm. "Rampage" is the Columbine killings as depicted by cinematically-adept versions of the killers themselves, a revenge fantasy that somehow manages to be both repulsive and canny. And yeah, it's still tempting to write the whole thing off as maybe Boll's own fantasy, one in which he gets to cathartically do onscreen to his harshest critics that which he could never allow himself to do in the real world, all the while rubbing their noses in the bigger questions that a subject like this inevitably provokes (this is the guy who gave some of his critics a beat down in a boxing ring, after all). I can't rule out that possibility. But I also can't deny that this film stays with you. Good movies can do that. Bad ones can, too. Discussion required.

With a picture like this you can't help but hold the filmmaker's feet to the fire for even the smallest misstep, and there will almost certainly be some serious fallout. Some will deride the film as exploitative, some will simply avoid it altogether, some will hold it up as an example of what happens when a mediocre director bites off a lot more than he can chew, and others will demand the director's head on a stake. I've never been a fan of a single thing Boll has done until now, so my reaction definitely wasn't preordained. But I can't shake the idea that if this had been Uwe's debut picture, his reputation would be that of a gifted and provocative filmmaker, one primed to rile us up again and again. So Uwe, nut up, dude. Go to the mountain again for whatever inspired this level of fortitude and daring, and maybe this next time out show us what you can do when your storytelling isn't so spurned on by the anger you feel from and towards your detractors. Maybe "Rampage" is just a provocative accident, but maybe not. Stranger things have happened, right? The ball's in your court, but at least the next time we may actually be watching.

odavde:
http://www.quietearth.us/articles/2009/10/01/FANTASTIC-FEST-09-Pigs-can-still-fly-Another-glowing-review-of-RAMPAGE

AHA!

Realno gledano, jedini Boletov slab film je Alone in the Dark, mada ni on nije v-e-o-m-a slab. Posle više godina ispraznog kmečanja lejmera... pardon... gejmera da im Bole uništava igrice, ljudima konačno polako dolazi iz dupeta u glavu da je ovaj sušti genije. Nisam gledao Stoic, ali se definitivno oštrim za nešto što će konačno ućutkati lejmere... pardon... gejmere za sva vremena: Maks Šmeling. Ovo pišem već drugi put i moj bullshit detector oseća da će to biti vanvremensko remekdelo koje će konačno staviti Boleta na mesto koje mu pripada - na pijedestal auteura kakvi se danas retko sreću, prevashodno zbog zaboravljene vrline zvane - istrajnost.

Ako se zajebem, zajebo sam se, priznaću. Ali ipak, beware! Take care!

Pa dobro, ja bih u grozne još pridodao Dungeon Siege, mada je to više zbog užasne "muzike" i toga što svi u filmu glume kao da im je svježe umrla majka. Inače, Bol je car i radujem se svakom njegovom novom poduhvatu, a naročito kad je riječ o adaptacijama video-igara Međutim, izgleda da toga nema baš mnogo među njegovim planiranim projektima.

Alone in the Dark nije slab nego je užasan i užasno dosadan (što mu je i najveći greh), a ostali idu u rasponu od slabih pa do sasvim solidnih (Postal i Tunnel Rats). House of the Dead je kategorija za sebe (toliko loše da je dobro), a Dungeon Siege se još uvek nisam nakanio da pogledam (kao ni Far Cry i Stoica od ovih novijih). Raduje me što Uwe eksperimentiše i sa drugim žanrovima. Da li je neko pogledao Heart of America?

Heart of America je dugo među hejterima važio za najboljeg Boleta, ali mene je ostavio prilično ravnodušnim jer ipak to nije onaj Bole kakvog volim. Urađen je prilično rutinski, nisam mogao da se otrgnem utisku da gledam neki TV film. Naravno, tu i tamo postoje iskre genija koji će se razmahnuti u kasnijim naslovima - WTF replike i sise gde im mesto nije (ovo spominjem zbog Harva).

Edit: Niko ne spominje Seed. Iako pati od Boletovskih ludosti, ima svojih momenata, neki su čak i inventivni. Ipak, objektivno sagledavanje filma veoma veoma otežava animal snuff sa početka, prizori zaista potresni i mučni.

Oftopik - "Šok koridor" se nikad nije bavio animal snuffom? Ako nije, tema je za njih.

John Reynolds, increase your medication!

Dva nova Bolla u najavi!

Evo ih trejleri za DARFUR i FINAL STORM, pri čemu ovaj potonji ostavlja utisak nečega za šta je Harvester pisao scenario (biblijska apokalipsa i Luk Peri kao prorok!)

http://twitchfilm.net/news/2009/11/max-headroom-a-pasty-john-connor-the-jerk-from-titanic-and-the-t-x-go-to-uwe-bolls-darfur.php

http://twitchfilm.net/news/2009/11/afm-09-luke-perry-is-the-prophet-of-the-coming-apocalypse-in-uwe-bolls-the-last-storm.php

Wow!

Final Storm, sjajna dopuna za moj blog!

Гледао сам POSTAL, и био ми је супер негде до половине, а онда се скроз погубио....

Konačno sam pogledao Stoic i - fenomenalan je. Ne pamtim kad sam poslednji put imao poriv da skrenem pogled sa ekrana, ali večeras tokom jedne scene jesam. Cinično gledano, Bole je poput starih lafova, od B do Z-gradera koji su da bi doskočili cenzorima moralisanjem maskirali eksplojtejšn. Tako gledano, Stoic može biti torčer porn smešten u zatvor (što uvek deluje kao nekakav društveni komentar). Međutim. Bole nastavlja sa snimanjem filmova bez scenarija, sa oslanjanjem na glumačku improvizaciju. Ovde kao najupečatljivijeg ima američkog Josifa Tatića - Edvarda Furlonga, prokleto ubedljivog manijaka sa pregršt neprepričljivih mučnih replika. Ostala trojica ne zaostaju mnogo. Smetala mi je nemirna hend-held kamera i da je bila malo smirenija, klaustrofobija zatvorske ćelije bila bi izraženija. Nažalost, ne može i jare i pare, improvizacija, mnogo (fizičkih) događanja i "čistije" hvatanje kadrova. Izbor je pao na ovo prvo i montažer je odlično odradio posao; neki rezovi pokazuju da je snimljeni materijal bio različitog kvaliteta, ali tako mu je to.

Priča je istinita, a mračan dokumentaristički stil (scene iz ćelije kombinovane sa "talking-head" saslušanjem preživelih) biva krunisan neverovatnim podacima o zapravo sitnim kaznama koje su ležali akteri incidenta. Sve u svemu, jedan od zajebanijih zatvorskih filmova, da ne poželiš da odeš. Problem sa uverljivošću (pa i zanimljivošću i emocionalnim impaktom) torčer porna često leži u njegovoj preteranosti i/ili stilizaciji. Stoic u tu zamku ne pada i pored svojih nedostataka (tipični Boletovi propusti - npr, prozor ćelije nema nikakvo staklo, samo rešetke) ispade - odličan film! Jedva čekam da pogledam Rampage i Darfur, o Šmelingu i da ne govorim.

Jel zanima nekog ovaj rad :

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1288407/

Quote from: Son of Man on 03-03-2010, 14:01:49
Jel zanima nekog ovaj rad :

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1288407/

Uvek!!

Quote from: John Reynolds on 03-03-2010, 17:07:46
Uwek!!

Bice, samo da me ne banuju, imam kao 40 dana fore da budem u minusu...

Final Storm 2009 STV DVDRip XviD-TAiNT

Auu... Ovo je em nekakva apokalipsa, em je Uwe Boll, a kao bonus je tu i Luke Perry. Pa, ovo je film pravljen specijalno za Harvestera!

Wow, izašo final Storm!!!! Pa ovo mi je bilo na most anticipated listi, tj. bio je u pokojnom fajlu Filmovi za gledajne! Njam njam!

Oh, Uwe, uvek si prednjačio u izmišljanju novih poslovnih modela:

Uwe Boll Wants to Sue You

QuoteDirector Uwe Boll is "on a mission" to recoup the money he believes he's lost as a result of illegal file sharing of his film Far Cry. Could you be next?

Through a law firm called Dunlap, Grubb & Weaver, Boll has filed a federal lawsuit against 4,577 "John Does" in a DC court -- all of whom were accused of sharing Far Cry, the helmer's adaptation of the videogame of the same name.

According to Ars Technica, this seems to be an "entrepreneurial model for P2P copyright lawsuits [where] the goal appears to be monetizing infringement, and the cases are brought by a law firm that is actively recruiting clients." The firm also has repped indie filmmakers such as those behind Call of the Wild and The Hurt Locker.


Take the case of an anonymous woman (dubbed "Sabine" in the article). Dunlap, Grubb & Weaver recently sent her a letter saying that she had been ID'd as someone who had swapped Far Cry on peer-to-peer (P2P) networks back in March. She was told that she could pay $1,500 by early June and they'd call it even -- or $2,500 if she went past the cut-off date. If she didn't pay at all, the firm could take her to court where she might wind up owing as much as $150,000.

"No one in my household has ever heard of Far Cry," she says.

Sabine's situation hasn't been resolved yet, and as Ars Technica points out, it's unclear how many of the people in her situation will actually be taken to court since it seems as though this is more about trying to make a buck off of these folks than actually litigating... though Uwe does like a good fight, eh?

Quote from: John Reynolds on 02-10-2009, 13:51:48
Edit: Niko ne spominje Seed. Iako pati od Boletovskih ludosti, ima svojih momenata, neki su čak i inventivni. Ipak, objektivno sagledavanje filma veoma veoma otežava animal snuff sa početka, prizori zaista potresni i mučni.

Ja sam zamalo razlupao TV kada sam u plejer stavio Seed. Nisam ni znao tada da je to Bollov film, ali sam tada odlucio da vise nikada nista necu gledati od Bolla. Nije da sam ista sem House of the dead gledao... Ne bih ga nikada mrzeo zbog losih, slabih filmova, ali prikazivanje mucenja zivotinja ne oprastam.

Pogledaj objašnjenje na Vikipediji, to su PETA arhivski snimci.

Quote from: mac on 31-05-2010, 17:03:13
Pogledaj objašnjenje na Vikipediji, to su PETA arhivski snimci.

Znam, ali on ih koristi u pogresne svhe.

Pljuvanje po Uvetu je totalno aut.

Kakvo prikladno rezurektovanje topika!

Rampage.2009.DVDRip.XviD-VoMiT

U svojoj bezgraničnoj gluposti i sporosti propustio sam izbacivanje Final Storma, pa sam ga skinuo tek sinoć. A onda sam video da je za danas prevdiđeno izdavanje DVD-a Rampage!  Oh, radosti! Sad ću gledati dva Uveta jedan za drugim!!!!

Want to see a teaser trailer for Uwe Boll's AUSCHWITZ... you might not want to. Graphic. Disturbing.

Johne, reaguj!

Uwe je izgleda overio Srpski Film i sad se trudi da ga nadeksploatiše. Na kraju krajeva, ako je mogao da napravi Postal Auschwitz je logičan sledeći korak.

Nijedan film tog Uweta nisam gledala. I ponosim se.

Jedinog Uweta kojega sam pogledao bila je njegova adaptacija kontroverzne video-igre Postal.
Vrlo loš i pretjeran pokušaj satire sa masom izrazito lošeg humora, usranih glumaca i totalno promašenih gegova.
Nema ukusa, nema mjere, nema takta, nema niti prihvatljivog plota, a svejedno ima toliko drskosti da konstantno inzistira na obscenostima tipa silovanje majmuna, masakr djece explozivom u zabavištu, sprdancija sa 9/11 tragedijom, holokaustom... grlo ti se stisne od muke koliko to nelagodno i bljutavo ispadne, što sigurno nije bila Uwetova namjera.  

A  još kažu da je ovo jedan od njegovih "boljih" filmova.

Dobar je Postal.

Quote from: Ella on 08-09-2010, 16:09:49
Nijedan film tog Uweta nisam gledala. I ponosim se.

Lepo. A sad možeš da se vratiš u kuhinju.

Ma, bih ja, ali mi ne daju. Ne daju mi ni da plocice operem, a kamoli da kuvam...