ZNAK SAGITE — više od fantastike — edicija, časopis, knjižara...

imaju knjige koje libgen nema? Teško mi je da u to povjerujem


inače, registrovao sam se a sajt me ignoriše

suspendovali sajt neeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

ja još ne mogu da se opasuljim a baš sam se pripremao da gledam buljuk filmova 


ima li još kakav sajt koji streamuje filmove s prevodom?

da.

pičko.

pa zar nema nijednog junaka da odgovori

na sreću, našao sam, bazafilmova.net!

Heh:

http://thepiratebay.se/blog/227

Quote
Today, we filed a police report!

PRESS RELEASE FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE The Pirate Bay, the world's largest site for cultural diversity and file sharing, has today (Monday 2013-02-18) reported a suspected crime to the Finnish police. The suspected criminals are the Finnish anti-piracy organization CIAPC (locally known as TTVK). The reason is that CIAPC have copied files from which The Pirate Bay is built, to produce a fraudulent parody site. While The Pirate Bay may have a positive view on copying, it will not stand by and watch copyright enforcing organizations disrespect copyright. - It's funny that we have to teach the copyright lobby the meaning of the law. The fact that they wrote it doesn't mean that they are above it, says Winston Bay. CIAPC is not new to balancing on the edge of what's right and wrong. Last year, they initiated a police raid against a 9 year old girl and confiscated her Winnie the Pooh laptop. - CIAPC is like an ugly high school bully without friends. It's time to take a stand. Cyber bullying is a serious matter to us all, Winston Bay continues. The money that CIAPC might have to pay for this crime will however not end up at The Pirate Bay. - Our hearts are with the victimized 9 year old Finnish girl. Any money that might come out of this will fund a new computer for the girl. Facts: The Pirate Bay is the world's largest file sharing site. It ranks as the world's 58th largest site. Since its launch in 2003, it has maintained a strong stance for internet freedom and against censorship. It is run by dozens of individuals from all around the world, all with the same values of liberty, kopimi and progressiveness. 

  Posted 02-18 12:26 by Winston Bay

Humor im je i posle svih ovih godina savršen.

Pošto je Warez-bb i dalje u problemu, privremeno rešenje je proksi:

Quote
Firefox: Tools > Options > Advanced > Settings > Manual proxy configuration.
Chrome: Settings > Network > Change proxy settings > LAN settings > Use proxy server > Advanced > HTTP.
IE: Tools > Internet options > Connections > LAN settings > Use proxy server > Advanced > HTTP.
Opera: Tools > Preferences > Advanced > Network.

WORK FOR ME:
ADDRESS:103.4.147.108 PORT: 3128

PS: Proxy list: http://hidemyass.com/proxy-list/search-225450 

Meni je pomoglo.

OD jutros mi proradio Warez -BB sam od sebe!!!!
Jeeeeee!!

http://www.b92.net/tehnopolis/internet.php?yyyy=2013&mm=02&nav_id=690160

Ono što je posebno gej kod ove priče je da je Verizon rešio (a verovatno će i drugi) da prvo puca pa onda postavlja pitanja. Dakle, ako smatraš da si nepravedno optužen i kažnjen, uplati im 35 dolara koje će ti oni vratiti ako si zaista nedužan. Pazi molim te. Dakle, ništa presumpcija nevinosti, pa nismo na sudu.

Ali...ali... NIKO nije NEDUZAN 

Нисам успео да докучим како ће провајдер знати да корисник вуче пиратски материјал. Или по томе чему приступа (то указује на помније праћење корисника и повреду приватности) или по броју повучених мега/гига бајта? Ако је ово друго, како ћу - рецимо - од поштеног пирата бити разликован ја који за пословне потребе вучем "тешке" фајлове међу којима су, да ствар буде грђа, неретко видео фајлови?

Pomno praćenje korisnika i povreda privatnosti, najverovatnije. To se ionako već radi, samo te ne ganjaju za to.

Не би ме уопште изненадило да ова наша бедна квислиншка државица међу првима уведе нешто слично, само ме баш занима који би модел био примењен.

Hakovan bilbord u centru Beograda?

Za sada nepoznata grupa hakera "provalila" u bilbord na Trgu republike i na njemu je, umesto reklama, zaplovio The Pirate Bay logo.

Prolaznike na Trgu republike danas je privukla neobična video poruka sa jednog od bilborda – logo jednog od najpoznatijih piratskih sajtova na svetu, The Pirate Bay, uz koji je okačen citat Gandija.

Sem toga, na momente su se pojavljivale i druge video poruke i inserti iz igrica.

Po svemu sudeći nepoznata grupa hakera provalila je u računar, na koji je povezan jedan od bilborda na Trgu republike i okačila logo piratskog sajta. Za sada nema informacija o kome se radi i nijedna hakerska grupa nije preuzela odgovornost za ovaj neobičan "napad". Nepoznata grupa "PS Sigurnost", na YouTube je okačila i snimak hakovanog bilborda.

Fotografija hakovanog bilborda pojavila se i na Facebook stranici The Pirate Baya, uz poruku podrške srpskim hakerima.

http://www.mondo.rs/s281543/Komunikacije/Vesti/Hakovan_bilbord_u_centru_Beograda.html

Eto:


http://torrentfreak.com/pirate-bay-advert-appears-on-hacked-billboard-130310/

Eto #2

"Pirate Bay" Billboard Hackers Rewarded for Exposing Security Flaw



http://torrentfreak.com/pirate-bay-billboard-hackers-rewarded-for-exposing-security-flaw-130314/

hm... ako kupiš muziku, a zatim je za potrebe DJ nastupa u Nemačkoj kopiraš, recimo, na fleš memoriju, dođeš GEMA-i 0,13€ po kopiranoj pesmi

QuoteDear DJs...

You might not know that Germany has officially joined the ranks of countries that now has a Digital DJ License. German law and the german licensing company, GEMA, make things a bit more complicated than you might expect. So, this is your chance to catch up, or have a laugh, whatever you prefer.

What all of this means is, that if you play a track that is a copied version of something you bought legally (or got for free as a promo), for example on a CD you burnt or on a USB stick, you might have to pay GEMA a license for copying. Even if you play tracks from an external hard drive this license applies. It applies to tracks you might copy from a backup to your computer too. For tracks to require a license, it is not necessary that you play them while you are doing your best DJ set ever in germany, but to carry them with you with the intend of playing them while in a club is enough.

Now this does not apply to all your tracks you might have copied this way. As far as we know, if you copy a track in Germany, like for instance in a hotel room while on tour, just every track you copied in our country will be a track to which this license applies.

Now, how is this supposed to work? And why might it apply to you?

In general, every one of these tracks will cost you 0,13 Euro. Should you be terribly unlucky and your hard drive crashes, you will have to pay a fee of 125 Euro for all tracks, if you have more than 1000. You may even buy package-deals from GEMA for 50 Euro per 500 Tracks. Btw. you are not allowed to tell GEMA what tracks you actually play, so there will be no chance, that any of the money you are supposed to pay, will ever end up in the hands of the artists you support.

Still with me? Ok. So how would you pay this you might ask? GEMA imagines you will make a contract with them, that might even enable them to look through your computer, just in case you did anything wrong. Yes, we think this is strange too.

Will they really enforce this crazy license, and if so, how? Well, nobody knows so far, as it will only start the 1st of april (not an april fools joke though). We just thought we might give you a heads up, if anybody ever asks you in our country if you copied some of the tracks you play recently, or should you feel the urge to post on your social media outlets anything like: just got these crazy tracks from my friend and will play them tonight.

Yes this license applies to tracks you got from friends that are in the GEMA or any other licensing company and even to your own, if you have a contract with one. So don't even think about playing tracks that you just produced on the road in germany.

http://de-bug.de/musik/10423.html

Pa, s obzirom da je ultimativni cilj industrije - ili, ajde, ne cilj, ali fantazija - da se plaća svaki put kada se kopirajtovana muzika na bilo koji način emituje, privatno ili javno, ovo je logičan korak 

Naravno, pošto su u 2012. godini, makar na američkoj strani, po prvi put u ovom veku imali porast profita u prodaji muzike, možda se stvari polako menjaju...

pa ne vidim ja baš tu neku logiku, obzirom da (ako sam ja dobro razumeo šta piše u tekstu) meni kao DJ-u nebi ništa naplatili ukoliko bih muziku puštao sa, recimo, ploča ili originalnih diskova. koliko ja razumem, naplaćuje se samo kopiranje.

Pa, copy-right - sve je jasno. Al kažem, sve su to logični koraci.

ali meni ovo izgleda kao suvišan korak. ako je ultimativni cilj, kao što veliš, da se naplati svako emitovanje, zašto ne postoji neka brojka koja bi se plaćala po emitovanoj pesmi, ili neki fiksni iznos koji bi plaćao DJ (ili onaj koji ga je unajmio), bez obzira da li pušta pesme sa originalnog nosača zvuka, ili ih je za potrebe nastupa kopirao na neko skladište podataka?

Nisam se onda dobro izrazio, rekao sam da je to ultimativni cilj, radije fantazija i da je ovo jedan od logičnih koraka na putu do tog cilja/ ispunjenja fantazije, ne da je ovo demonstracija te konkretne zamisli.

Evropska komisija je finansirala istraživanje koje je sad, vele pokazalo da onlajn piraterija nema negativne efekte na onlajn prodaju digitalne muzike.

Evo ga ovde.

Za tl;dr nastrojene, Arstechnica ima sažvakanu varijantu. Avaj, rekao bih da je istraživanje fundamentalno neodređeno (bavi se "klikovima", ne daunloudima) i da ne pokazuje mnogo više od sumnjive korelacije, na šta ukazuje i reakcija od strane International Federation of the Phonographic Industry.

Holivud motri na srpske pirate

Pristupate li bez problema zalivu? Posebno vi sa telekoma?

Ja sam na Ikomu. PB mi radi savršeno, ali zato Warez-BB ne radi nikako. Moja keva je na Telekomu i njoj Warez radi.

u ovom trenu ne mogu da se parkiram u zaliv, ali jutros je moglo...
nadam se da je nešto privremeno, kako ponekad biva...

Warez ima nekih svojih problema, sa DNSom. PBu prilazim preko proksija bez problema ali normalno nikako. Izgleda da je Telekom blokirao pb, to sam hteo da proverim.

ja sam na Beotelu, i ne mogu da priđem PB. vidim da su adresu sa .se promenili na .gl, ne znam da li to ima ikakve veze sa bilo čim.

edit: kada odem na http://thepiratebay.se/browse sve funkcioniše OK.

edit 2: radi sada normalno i thepiratebay.se

Edit: ne da mi da odem na .se, automatski vraca na .gl. Sa browse radi ali nesto cudno. I dalje sam zbunjen.

Ovo je genijalno, nije htelo da radi a onda sam kliknuo Tomatov link i sve proverio bez problema. Bookmarkovao ponovo stranu, izbrisao stari bookmark i sad sve radi iako je u pitanju ista bookmarkovana adresa. Weird.

Quote from: tomat on 10-04-2013, 22:31:55
edit: kada odem na http://thepiratebay.se/browse sve funkcioniše OK.

edit 2: radi sada normalno i thepiratebay.se

edit 3: meni otvara BROWSE, a .SE mi ne da.
a ja sam na jotelu (nekakav niški, ne znam u kakvom je odnosu, if any, sa telekomom).

Problem je verovatno u tome što upravo plove prema Grenlandu.


http://torrentfreak.com/the-pirate-bay-moves-to-gl-domain-in-anticipation-of-domain-seizure-130409/

Avantura na Grenlandu je kratko trajala:

New Pirate Bay Greenland Domains (About to be) Seized

Quote
In anticipation of having their Swedish domain name seized, this week the crew of The Pirate Bay took evasive action. In the early hours of Tuesday morning they switched to two Greenland-based domains, but already the plan is starting to unravel. The telecoms company in charge of the .GL TLD says it will now block the domains after deciding they will be used illegally.
Sweden has long been associated with The Pirate Bay.
The site was founded by Swedes, operated by Swedes, not to mention hosted and proxied by Swedish companies, activists and the local Pirate Party.
Under increasing pressure those links were strained by political and legal red tape to the point where the site's only visible connection with Sweden was its .SE domain.
This week even that connection was placed into history when fears over the long-term viability and possible seizure of the domain led the site to choose an alternative.
Over the course of Monday night and Tuesday morning, ThePirateBay.se became ThePirateBay.gl, with the new TLD denoting Greenland, a huge country with a tiny population of just 57,000 people. But now, less than 48 hours later, the latest plan to bring domain stability to The Pirate Bay already requires a Plan B.
Exact timing is unclear, but very soon the site will lose use of both its .GL domains after Tele-Post, the company responsible for .GL registrations, said it would not allow them to be put to "illegal" use.
"Tele-Post has today decided to block access to two domains operated by file-sharing network The Pirate Bay," the company said in a statement received by TorrentFreak.
Those domains are ThePirateBay.gl and PirateBay.gl.
"We observed Tuesday that the domains had been activated and therefore immediately contacted our lawyer," the company added.
The announcement was short on detail but at the moment Tele-Post seem set to justify their decision based on an earlier Danish Supreme Court ruling that rendered The Pirate Bay an illegal site. Greenland is a self-governing province of Denmark.
Currently The Pirate Bay's .GL domains remain operational but the site is redirecting to its .SE domain, at least for the time being.
A Pirate Bay insider told TorrentFreak earlier this week that they have plenty of domain names in reserve. With that in mind, it wouldn't be a huge surprise if the torrent site makes another domain switch in the near future.
Update: Queries to the .GL domain registry now confirm that both the domains in question have been officially suspended.

Nije mi jasno, zašto svi ti ljudi ne otvore servere u Rusiji? Šta će onda da im rade, da prete Putinu?

Portland/CreativeMornings - Andy Baio on Vimeo

Fox/Homeland/Cory Doctorow/Google/Tor

http://torrentfreak.com/fox-censors-cory-doctorows-homeland-novel-from-google-130420/

Ovo za "space marine" sam čuo, ali ovo me baš iznenadilo:

"Jonathan D Reichman, is the trademark attorney for both Marvel and DC, and says the companies have been working to amicably resolve the issue with Ray Felix and others. He says that Marvel and DC jointly trademarked the term "superheroes" in the 1960s."

via The Guardian


Pa vi vidite...

Da, pa zna se to, verovatno si primetio da Imageovi stripovi, recimo, ne koriste termin "superhero" i da je najčešća zamena za njega "science hero".

Welcome to Life: the singularity, ruined by lawyers

Quote from: Meho Krljic on 27-04-2013, 11:19:21
Da, pa zna se to, verovatno si primetio da Imageovi stripovi, recimo, ne koriste termin "superhero" i da je najčešća zamena za njega "science hero".

Pazi kada to nikada nisam primetio. Primetio sam izraze tipa "metahumans" u DC univerzumu, ili "posthumans", ali nikada "science hero" kao zamenu za "superhero". Očenj intersenja.

Demonoid is back!

http://www.d2.vu/

Možda.

http://torrentfreak.com/demonoid-resurrected-an-interview-with-the-admins-of-d2-vu-130509/

Universal Music Tells Gangnam Parody Mayors: Pay $42,000 By Tomorrow, Or Else


http://torrentfreak.com/universal-music-tells-gangnam-parody-mayors-pay-42000-by-tomorrow-or-else-130530/

Čisto da ne ispadne da je David Lowery pričao bezveze:

Thom Yorke pulls albums from Spotify

Quote
Radiohead lead singer Thom Yorke has pulled some albums from music-streaming service Spotify in protest at how much it pays artists.
Yorke has pulled his solo album The Eraser as well as a joint project with producer Nigel Godrich, Atoms for Peace.
The singer tweeted that they were "standing up for our fellow musicians" by removing their albums.
Spotify said it is "still in the early stages of a long-term project".
Radiohead's albums are still available on the site.
Yorke tweeted: "Make no mistake new artists you discover on #Spotify will no[t] get paid. Meanwhile shareholders will shortly being rolling in it. Simples."
Spotify is the world's most popular music streaming service. Recent figures from the company say it has 24 million active users, of whom six million pay a monthly fee for added features.
It said that it had paid $500m (£332m) to rights holders since it was launched in Sweden in 2008 and expected to pay another $500m this year.
"We're 100% committed to making Spotify the most artist-friendly music service possible, and are constantly talking to artists and managers about how Spotify can help build their careers," the site told the BBC.
Yorke has also removed his music from rival streaming site Rdio.
'Same old industry' "It's an equation that just doesn't work," Godrich said on Twitter. "The music industry is being taken over by the back door... and if we don't try and make it fair for new music producers and artists... then the art will suffer.
"Make no mistake. These are all the same old industry bods trying to get a stranglehold on the delivery system."
Godrich, who has produced on every Radiohead album since OK Computer, added: "Plus people are scared to speak up or not take part as they are told they will lose invaluable exposure if they don't play ball. Meanwhile."
British electronica artist Four Tet replied with his support: "Exactly. I had everything on my label taken off. Don't want to be part of this crap."
There has been much controversy over how much streaming sites like Spotify and Pandora pay artists, which comes as Pandora is pushing to change US laws to lower how much it must pay in royalties to songwriters.
The band Pink Floyd recently published an editorial on the issue.
"Nearly 90% of the artists who get a cheque for digital play receive less than $5,000 a year.
"They cannot afford the 85% pay cut Pandora asked Congress to impose on the music community," Roger Waters, David Gilmour and Nick Mason added.
Subscription services are the fastest growing area in digital music, making up 13% of worldwide sales. But 57% of global recorded music sales still come from physical products such as CDs, down from 74% in 2008.
As well as Spotify, Rdio and Pandora, services like Xbox Music, Google Play Music All Access and the soon-to-launch iTunes Radio compete for streaming listeners.

Ovi iz Gugla su stvarno svinje. Godinama su podržavali net neutrality (pojednostavljeno: princip da se paketi putem interneta šalju po principu first come first served i da time ni jedna kompanija nije mogla da sebi kupi veću brzinu samo time što ima više para), a sad kad su ušli u ISP arenu sa svojim Google Fiberom odjednom shvataju da NN nije korisna stvar:

Now That It's in the Broadband Game, Google Flip-Flops on Network Neutrality

Quote
In a dramatic about-face on a key internet issue yesterday, Google told the FCC that the network neutrality rules Google once championed don't give citizens the right to run servers on their home broadband connections, and that the Google Fiber network is perfectly within its rights to prohibit customers from attaching the legal devices of their choice to its network.
At issue is Google Fiber's Terms of Service, which contains a broad prohibition against customers attaching "servers" to its ultrafast 1 Gbps network in Kansas City.
Google wants to ban the use of servers because it plans to offer a business class offering in the future. A potential customer, Douglas McClendon, filed a complaint against the policy in 2012 with the FCC, which eventually ordered Google to explain its reasoning by July 29.
In its response, Google defended its sweeping ban by citing the very ISPs it opposed through the years-long fight for rules that require broadband providers to treat all packets equally.
"Google Fiber's server policy is consistent with policies of many major providers in the industry," Google Fiber lawyer Darah Smith Franklin wrote, going on to quote AT&T, Comcast and Verizon's anti-server policies.
Google's version, as it admits in its response to McClendon (.pdf), flatly prohibits subscribers from using "any type of server:"

Your Google Fiber account is for your use and the reasonable use of your guests. Unless you have a written agreement with Google Fiber permitting you do so, you should not host any type of server using your Google Fiber connection, use your Google Fiber account to provide a large number of people with Internet access, or use your Google Fiber account to provide commercial services to third parties (including, but not limited to, selling Internet access to third parties).

The problem is that a server, by definition, doesn't have to be a dedicated expensive computer. Any PC or Mac can be a server, as can all sorts of computing devices.
Moreover, the net neutrality rules (.pdf)regarding devices are plain and simple: "Fixed broadband providers may not block lawful content, applications, services, or non-harmful devices."
But Google's legally binding Terms of Service outlaw Google Fiber customers from running their own mail server, using a remotely accessible media server, SSHing into a home computer from work to retrieve files, running a Minecraft server for friends to share, using a Nest thermometer, using a nanny camera to watch over a childcare provider or using a Raspberry Pi to host a WordPress blog.
None of those devices would do any harm to any broadband network, let alone a Google Fiber connection with a 1Gbps capacity equally split between uploading and downloading.
The server ban also prohibits you from attaching your personal computer to Google Fiber if you are using peer-to-peer software, because that works by having your computer be both a client and a server.
The Free Network Foundation is working on a "Freedom Box"  — an open-source appliance you plug into your router that gives you ways to surf the net safely and anonymously; to help dissidents publish to the world; and to create open, distributed alternatives to Twitter and Facebook.
That too, by definition, is a server and thus banned by Google Fiber.
Google says its rule is "fully consistent with the Open Internet Order and Rules," citing the provisions that allow for reasonable network management. (These provisions regulate what ISPs can do when congestion happens, and are not intended to provide an excuse to ban things that might cause congestion or threaten a business model.)
But in the Google Fiber forums, employees assure subscribers the rules aren't meant to apply to Minecraft servers. And, in reality, Google Fiber probably won't notice, let alone kick you off, for using a Slingbox or peer-to-peer software.
Call it net neutrality by the grace of cool Google employees.
But that's not the vision of net neutrality that Google laid out in that friend of the court brief (.pdf) it signed onto in November, when it argued that the FCC's aggressive net neutrality policing made it possible for Sling to succeed:

Sling, a company under joint control with DISH, has also witnessed the close link between non-discriminatory online access and infrastructure investment.
Sling is a combination of software and equipment that connects a user's home set-top box, DVR, or DVD player to the Internet, allowing the viewing of live and recorded television from anywhere in the world—essentially 'place shifting' the home television experience to wherever the user is.

Sling was able to overcome initial resistance by Apple and AT&T for inclusion in the iPad platform (Order, 25 FCC Rcd. at 17925 35 n.107), and has been available on the iPad since 2009. Overcoming this initial barrier has promoted infrastructure investment in two ways.
First, the demand for the Sling equipment has risen many times over, partly due to the product's availability on the iPad platform. Second, the consumption of content through Sling has increased commensurately, driving further demand for access and inviting greater infrastructure investment.

That's D.C. tech-policy speak for: After the FCC strong-armed Apple into allowing iPhone users to connect to their Slingboxes, the public benefited with increased infrastructure investment by mobile providers and ISPs got more business.
Unfortunately for Google Fiber's current stance, a Slingbox is a server. A home server.
So in Google's version of net neutrality, the FCC was the right to force Apple to let iPhone users connect to their home servers, but the FCC has no right to force Google to let its broadband subscribers run a home server.
In November, Google said it was important for innovation that "the main broadband gatekeepers will not act unilaterally to constrain artificially the availability of new 'edge-based' content and services."
Nothing is more edge-based than a citizen running a server on their own connection.
But, it turns out that Google's real net neutrality policy is that big corporate services like YouTube and Facebook shouldn't get throttled or banned by evil ISPs like Verizon, but it's perfectly fine for Google to control what devices citizens can use in their homes.
We, it seems, are supposed to be good consumers of cloud services, not hosting our own Freedom Boxes, media servers, small-scale commercial services or e-mail servers.
That's not what the net neutrality fight was about.
The fight was intended to make broadband services act like utilities that don't care what a packet contains or what router, computer, phone or device you use, so long as you aren't hurting the network.
In the net neutrality vision of the world, broadband providers simply deliver packets as they are paid to do.
When it was just a set of online services, Google happened to fall on the side of citizens and used to advocate against broadband companies controlling the pipes. Now that it's an ISP itself, Google is becoming a net neutrality hypocrite.
The FCC has avoided addressing this issue, and in this case, simply forwarded to Google an "informal complaint."
But now that Google's shown what it really thinks of net neutrality, the door is open for the FCC to show that it's serious enough about the principle to take on its former corporate ally.

The Pirate Bay launches 'Pirate Browser'       

Quote
The Pirate Bay, on completion of its 10 years, has released 'Pirate Browser' which it claims would allow people to access 'The Pirate Bay' and other such blocked sites.
The 'Pirate Browser' is a fully functional browser that currently works with Windows. One of the most controversial sites on the web has claimed that the browser doesn't have any adware or toolbars bundled with it.
"It's a simple one-click browser that circumvents censorship and blockades and makes the site instantly available and accessible. No bundled ad-ware, toolbars or other crap, just a Pre-configured Firefox browser", notes TPB on its blog.
According to the Pirate Browser website, the browser is basically a bundled package consisting of the Tor client and Firefox Portable browser. The package also includes some tools meant for evading censorship in countries like UK, Finland, Denmark, Iran among others.
TPB has been recommending the use of proxy sites to browse the website from countries where it has been blocked. The torrent site is claiming that the new browser would effectively bypass any blockade enforced by ISPs. The Pirate Bay further notes, "This browser is just to circumvent censorship, to remove limits on accessing sites governments don't want you to know about."
This means that the Pirate Browser would allow users to browse websites like KickassTorrents, Fenopy and H33T which have been blocked by many countries including the UK. IsoHunt may also be accessed from Italy which was blocked earlier this month.