ZNAK SAGITE — više od fantastike — edicija, časopis, knjižara...

Sanders crushes Clinton in Washington

Quote
Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders is projected to win the Washington state caucuses. The win is a huge boost for the Vermont senator as he seeks to regain momentum in the primary and tighten rival Hillary Clinton's delegate lead.
Sanders will take the majority of Washington's 101 pledged delegates. With 30 percent of the vote in, the AP reports that Sanders leads Clinton by about 53 percentage points. The win will help him make a dent in Clinton's delegate lead. Entering Saturday, Clinton had 1,223 pledged delegates, with Sanders at 946 delegates. He made a strong play for the state, holding several rallies leading up to the caucuses. Clinton had earned endorsements from both of the state's Democratic senators, Patty Murray and Maria Cantwell. Sanders has conceded that Clinton overwhelmingly defeated him in the South but said he'd perform better in West Coast contests. Sanders won the Alaska caucuses earlier in the day. Hawaii also will cast votes on Saturday. 

http://www.salon.com/2016/03/17/pbs_airs_segment_with_trump_supporting_family_doesnt_notice_mothers_white_supremacist_tattoos/

И чоек послије побиједи у три државе!

Despite The Math, Bernie Sanders Has Already Won

Supermen i Betmen u svetlu američkih izbora

http://www.newyorker.com/culture/richard-brody/batman-v-superman-is-democrats-vs-republicans?mbid=social_facebook

O tome kako mediji pokrivaju Sandersa

Ili: Sanders "ran out of steam well shy of eighty percent."

Два солидна текста о Трампу у Њујорк Тајмсу

Овај мало трумановски кука о расизму и десници и демагогији, али признаје да је Доналд одлично повезан са својим бирачима

http://nyti.ms/233Qc7B


Трампов интервју Плејбоју из 1990. показује да он у ствари није промијенио ниједан став четврт вијека. Чак постоји шббкбб дио какав би то био Доналд предсједник

http://nyti.ms/1SBv03Z

End zis iz ver tings get agli/er

Sta reci...jednostavno 'NE' bi, cini se, bio razuman odgovor na postavljeno pitanje.

http://youtu.be/i2mHh9TtEks

Agli? Er? Ma, kakvi, pa on već godinama napada Planned Parenthood, pre godinu dana je najavio da će da im iseče državni fanding ako bude precednik, ovo je samo da se umili ekstremnijim biračima ali sasvim u skladu sa njegovom dugogodišnjom agendom kad su u pitanju reproduktivna prava.

To je strasno, vidim da se i u Misisipiju guraju neki, maltene serijatski, zakoni

čoek je žuti kralj, to ne može da se ospori

lik gubi 10% na polovima u odnosu na Kruza u Viskonsinu, negativna kampanja ga razapinje zbog seksizma i ružnih izjava o ženama, čak on lično izbaci neki meme u kojem poredi izgled Kruzove i svoje žene

polovi tvrde da ga 70% žena mrzi, kao što rekoh zaostaje 10% za Kruzom u Viskonsinu i on onda izjavi ovo oko abortusa + da se zalaže za proliferaciju nuklearnog naoružanja, da bombe treba da dobiju Japan i još neki

ako sad dobije Viskonsin moramo da mu se divimo

Hail to the Yellow King!

Tramp kaze "You go back to a position like they had when people will, perhaps, go to illegal places, but you have to ban it"

Boles mozga. Ok, znaci zabrana je vredna ovakvog rizika po reproduktivno zdravlje ili cak zivot osobe koja trazi nelegalne kanale da bi ostvarila svoje pravo na izbor, nice.

Quotepolovi tvrde da ga 70% žena mrzi

nije ni cudo.

Tramp je samo pogrešio što nije rekao:

JA imam lični stav i to je ovo i ovo, ja sam pro-life, against abortion, ali znaš šta? Te stvari se in our great United States of America ne odlučuju na federalnom nivou niti u kancelariji predsednika USA.
Po ustavu USA, države i njihovi zakoni imaju primat, a ne federal authority, a ja kao predsednik ću da se zalažem za my most important duty, which is to uphold the constitution of the USA!!

Aplauz. USA! USA! Trump I want your child! Žene čupaju kosu. Muškarci čupaju kosu.

Kraj.

(I love USA )

Make Murrica great again!

grejt jeste. za turizam posebno

jednom ću da rentiram auto na istočnoj obali i vozim do zapadne. 

Трамп вининг аген

"The White House Won't Respond To Petition To Arrest Donald Trump" - http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2016/04/05/white-house-petition-donald-trump_n_9617402.html

Quote from: lilit on 01-04-2016, 18:17:24
grejt jeste. za turizam posebno

jednom ću da rentiram auto na istočnoj obali i vozim do zapadne. 

Jel mogu sa tobom lilit?

Biki, ti si na samom kontinentu, jel?

Taj road trip je neka suluda ideja i u mojoj kuci, al mi se cini nesto daleko i tesko izvodljivo...ono, u domenu mastanja.

Da Mi ne idemo na road trips longer than 4 hrs, posto imamo jedno odraslo (20 Godina ) dete, jednog tinejdzera i jedno malo dete + kuce. Jednom smo se proslog leta"izgubili" i google maps je nesto zezao, put se oduzio... mogla bih da napisem tragikomediju na sta je to licilo.

Lepo i racionalno.

Not gettin' any younger (but getting grumpier) sto kazu, pa cu se verovatno zadovoljiti nekim tripovima po ovom ili onom delu Evrope

Quote from: Biki on 05-04-2016, 19:02:19

Quote from: lilit on 01-04-2016, 18:17:24
grejt jeste. za turizam posebno

jednom ću da rentiram auto na istočnoj obali i vozim do zapadne. 

Jel mogu sa tobom lilit?

of course! .
imamo i scenario: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oGGngC8lUc8

uskoro idem (ako ne skapam u međuvremenu) na nešto slično al mrskim avionom, pos'o će me sa'raniti.

 

ето објашњења зашто Бики не воли Доналда, ал нама који смо удаљени хиљадама миља Трамп је хилеријс!

Вејт а минит, зар не би био крејзи роуд трип посјетити мексички зид као туристичку атракцију?

Ne

Meanwhile u Wisconsinu:

Republican Cruz and Democrat Sanders score key victories in Wisconsin

 'He is a Trojan horse': Donald Trump rages after getting crushed in Wisconsin

QuoteDonald Trump's presidential campaign unleashed a furious statement Tuesday night after Ted Cruz easily defeated him in the Wisconsin primary.
"Ted Cruz is worse than a puppet--- he is a Trojan horse, being used by the party bosses attempting to steal the nomination from Mr. Trump," the Republican frontrunner's statement declared.
Instead of offering a note of praise like after past losses, Trump's Tuesday-night statement leveled a bevy of attacks against "Lyin' Ted Cruz."
Among other things, the statement accused Cruz of illegally coordinating with super PACs supporting his campaign, though he did not specify any evidence for the claim.
The Trump camp also claimed that its candidate "withstood the onslaught of the establishment yet again" and noted that Cruz had the support of Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker and a number of local conservative radio hosts.
Trump had aggressively campaigned in Wisconsin and repeatedly predicted that he would win there. He barnstormed the state for days in hopes of catching up to Cruz after the senator started to pull ahead, holding six Wisconsin rallies between Saturday and Monday.
The billionaire still is hoping to salvage a few of the 42 delegates at stake. Although winning the statewide vote guarantees Cruz a batch of delegates, Trump can gain three delegates for each congressional district he wins. The data-journalism website FiveThirtyEight reported that Trump was competitive in two of the state's eight districts.
Read the full statement below: Donald J. Trump withstood the onslaught of the establishment yet again. Lyin' Ted Cruz had the Governor of Wisconsin, many conservative talk radio show hosts, and the entire party apparatus behind him. Not only was he propelled by the anti-Trump Super PAC's spending countless millions of dollars on false advertising against Mr. Trump, but he was coordinating `with his own Super PAC's (which is illegal) who totally control him. Ted Cruz is worse than a puppet--- he is a Trojan horse, being used by the party bosses attempting to steal the nomination from Mr. Trump. We have total confidence that Mr. Trump will go on to win in New York, where he holds a substantial lead in all the polls, and beyond. Mr. Trump is the only candidate who can secure the delegates needed to win the Republican nomination and ultimately defeat Hillary Clinton, or whomever is the Democratic nominee, in order to Make America Great Again.

Quote from: Biki on 06-04-2016, 03:41:15
Ne

То ти је као да одеш у Кину и не посјетиш зид!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lS0zhTMbBiM








Crk'o sam od smijeha zamalo...

Quote from: Pepelbatto on 06-04-2016, 01:33:53
ето објашњења зашто Бики не воли Доналда, ал нама који смо удаљени хиљадама миља Трамп је хилеријс!

Jes to, ali ako je u Kanadi (ucinilo mi se da sam uhvatila negde taj info), sta s tim? Imaju svoje politicare, vladu i tako? Nekog hunky precednika vlade. Happy days mate.

тек онда не видим зашто би бринула!

Pa, dobro, globalizovan svet, ljudi često brinu o političarima iz drugih zemalja jer računaju da njihovi postupci imaju osetne posledice na globalnom nivou. Ponekad je to sasvim farsično - Gadafi, Asad kao najomraženiji svecki lideri - ponekad ima smisla jer Obama actually ubija po svetu, Putin actually vrši oružane upade u druge zemlje, Orban actually otvoreno krši potpisane sporazume u EU itd. Ne živimo više u svetu gde je politika stvar upravljana polisom, jelte, u velikoj meri je ona i entertejnment - Tramp kao idealan primer mešanja informativnog i entertejnment sadržaja.

Тај дио је јасан, оно што није јасно је питање ко мисли да ће Хилари да убија мање од Трампа?

Ma, dobro, jasno je da je Hilari već dobrano okrvavila ruke na poziciji Državnog Sekretara dok je Tramp neko ko priča politički nekorektno i daje relativno sumanute izjave koje deluju ekstremno ali da niko zbilja nema pojma kakva bi stvarno bila njegova spoljna politika pošto i on stalno daje oprečne izjave o istoj.

Што се тога тиче, имао је неке састанке са дипломатама, један његов савјетник је дао интервју, у којем то звучи ок

Јесте и даље екстравагантно, али сарадња с Русијом је већ нешто што се редовно спомиње, и као и Сандерс жели реструктурирање хладноратовске Нато структуре

Дакле, оно што је стварно надлежност предсједника, Трамп је злато од Републиканца

Абортусима се предсједник не бави, то је забава за масу, изрећи што будаластију ствар и заузети медијски простор и вријеме

Једино због чега га естаблишмент мрзи је што се плаше за своје фотеље, а сасвим је јасно да их миграција уништава, побогу 2 милиона дошло у ЕУ и они затворили границе, а у САД 12 милиона и Трамп је фашиста

Логика удри ме до зоре, притом он само прича о зиду а да ли је то реално....

Do sada je običaj bio da kandidati obećaju šta žele da urade, i onda kada jednog odaberemo merimo mu efikasnost time šta je zaista i uradio. Da li je prihvatljivo da kandidat obeća stvari koje nema nameru da uradi? Zamislimo da svi kandidati počnu da obećavaju gluposti, tipa više palačinki za sve, koje nemaju nameru da urade. Kakava je onda svrha od izbora? Što ne bismo ukinuli izbore i prosto izvukli novog predsednika na kocku?

I Sanders i Tramp su u suštini izolacionisti. I jedan i drugi su skloni povlačenju iz uloge svjetskog policajca, i ozbiljno smanjenje troškova za vojsku. E sad, što Tramp smatra da bi te pare trebalo uložiti u izgradnju zidova i ne znam ti čega, a Berni bi to da uloži u infrastrukturu to je druga priča.

ма тај зид је јефтин бре, ни 1% буџета, притом више даје Мексику у виду разних подстицаја него што зид кошта

Само што зид не може ништа да заустави, то је замајавање

То јест, како да се отарасиш мрава, једино да запрашиш стан толико да и себе отрујеш, и онда слиједи социјалистичка револуција!

Hoćemo Trampa jer on Amere slepački vodi u revoluciju? Ali i Sanders zastupa prilično fundamentalne promene, a pritom ne menja koncept demokratije. Želimo valjda više prava i odgovornosti za sve ljude, a ne manje?

Па Сандерс неће бити кандидат, због чега бих размишљао о типу који неће бити номинован

Уосталом, брига мене за њихов концепт демократије, ако хоће зарђалим кашикама да ваде фетусе могу и то да раде, само нека на мене не бацају бомбе

А демократе то иначе чешће раде од републиканаца, и више се сукобљавају с Русима

http://mapi.huffpost.com/mapi/v2//us/entry/us_57064015e4b053766188c272/slideshow/56f43212e4b014d3fe228d4d.html?device=android,small

Факјеа!

U Vošington Postu BAŠ ne vole Trampa 

Blundering Trump is running out of material

Quote

Donald Trump is spending his time chastising Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.) for condemning "New York values." When Cruz first made the remark, we argued that it was foolish for him to insult voters whom he would later need to court. He's paying a price for that now, although Republicans in New York, he argues, understand what he meant ("the values of the liberal Democratic politicians that have been hammering the people of New York for some time"). That aside, Trump is running low on "safe" material and, you might have noticed, is not so omnipresent on cable TV news.

He used to insult many candidates, but most of them are out of the race.

He used to talk about his polls, but now he trails Hillary Clinton badly in a general-election match-up. Cruz has shrunk Trump's lead in California to single digits. Trump cannot say "Women love me," without facing a bevy of polls showing how unpopular he is with women.

Trump used to talk freely about foreign policy. Since his egregious gaffes on pulling back from NATO and letting Japan and South Korea get nukes, that topic has become dicey. In fact, his policy foolery makes discussion of any issue treacherous. On health care, he is getting scorned for his "incoherent mishmash" of half-baked ideas. On entitlements, no one thinks getting rid of "waste, fraud and abuse" is going to make Social Security solvent. His idea that he will eliminate the $19 trillion debt in eight years with a tax scheme that loses $10 trillion and without touching entitlements is laughable. Now, mainstream media interviewers are challenging his preposterous ideas while transcripts of his interviews with the Post and the New York Times editorial boards generate guffaws from conservatives.
  Listen to Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump discuss some of his foreign policy positions with The Washington Post editorial board. "NATO is costing us a fortune," Trump said. "We're not reimbursed fairly for what we do." (The Washington Post) 
Trump's campaign promises a series of policy speeches. The danger there, however, is that someone might ask him questions about his remarks, forcing him to explain himself. That generally has not gone well. In a prepared speech last month at the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) gathering, Trump barely got through the teleprompted remarks, and no one managed to edit out a reference to "Palestine," which Cruz pointed out does not exist.

Trump cannot talk about his ability to hire great people and his fantastic organization, given that he had to essentially demote his beleaguered campaign manager and bring in someone to try to stem the flood of delegate losses. Any effort to disguise the demotion of Corey Lewandowski vanished when Trump's new "convention manager," Paul Manafort, revealed that he reports directly to Trump. In fact, Trump's business experience is no longer a great topic for him either, now that the details of Trump University and serial failures (casinos, steaks, mortgages, vodka, airlines, football, etc.) have come to light.

There is always Sean Hannity to toss him softballs, but for the first time, the free-media environment has become treacherous. Losing races, mismanaging your campaign and flubbing a series of interviews will have that effect.

A onda:

The Panama Papers Are Exactly Why Hillary Clinton Can't Be President

Quote
The revelations from the Panama Papers—leaked documents from a secretive Panamanian law firm that helps political elites hide their money—have been hitting home across the world, exposing the widespread corruption of world leaders and their hangers-on. It ought to hit here, too, because it reminds us of everything that should give us the heebie-jeebies about Hillary Clinton.  The Panama Papers have simply confirmed everything we already pretty much knew. This is just the way things work in much of the world. Clawing your way into high political office means that you have a lot special of favors to give out, contracts to distribute, land and timber and shipping deals to approve, and so on. So you dole them out to friends, relatives, and backers—and they naturally show their gratitude by kicking some of it back to you. And if you don't officially get rich—well, mi casa es su casa, what's a little sharing between friends? This has long been Vladimir Putin's method. "In 2010, US diplomatic cables suggested Putin held his wealth via proxies. The president formally owned nothing, they added, but was able to draw on the wealth of his friends, who now control practically all of Russia's oil and gas production and industrial resources." The Panama Papers shed light on the fortune of Putin's old friend Sergei Roldugin, who has somehow amassed billions as an obscure classical musician. Putin knows how easy it is for corrupt officials to live like kings without officially owning anything, because that's the way things worked in the good old days of the Soviet Union. In most of the world, this is known and more or less accepted as the way things work. But not traditionally in the US and in the developed countries of the West, where our governments have been structured, either from the beginning or over many years of civil service reforms, to prevent corruption and conflicts of interest. So when they are exposed, it's a major scandal. That's why they're pretty much ignoring the Panama Papers in Moscow, but in Iceland, crowds swarmed Raykjavik and forced the resignation of the prime minister. And that confronts us with a question: do we want Panama here? Because a couple of other names pop up in the Panama Papers, including those of a few well-known associates of Hillary Clinton: longtime Democratic Party fixers John and Tony Podesta and Clinton sycophant Sydney Blumenthal. And why not? Hillary Clinton has been up to her neck in crony deals from the very beginning. All the way back in 1978, for example, she indulged a sudden mania for trading cattle futures, from which she made just shy of $100,000 in less than a year—a lot more money back then than it is now, and a whole lot for a young couple like the Clintons. She has shown no interest in commodities trading since, which is surprising considering how successful she was at it. But maybe not so surprising when you consider that her trades back then were made under the guidance of an attorney who worked for a large company that just happened to be regulated by her husband. Gee, that almost looks like a bribe. That's the kind of thing that's all over the Panama Papers, and it's what Hillary Clinton has been doing forever. It's how the Clintons suddenly made $100 million in the first few years after leaving the White House, with nothing to offer the business world but their political connections. It's why the Clinton Foundation got massive donations from Russian businessmen with deals that required State Department approval. The problem is wider than Hillary Clinton, of course. Donald Trump has openly bragged about his role in this system from the other end, as the businessman who buys the influence of politicians. Even Bernie Sanders, who has been making hay from the Panama Papers, advocates a much bigger role for government, particularly in regulating international trade—which is precisely the kind of playground for corruption revealed by the Panama Papers. Only Ted Cruz, despite playing footsie with protectionism during the South Carolina primary, advocates a smaller role for government in picking winners and losers in the economy. The fact is that the reason official corruption is rampant across much of the world is not just that they have insufficient civil service reforms. It's because their governments have vast, arbitrary powers. Hillary Clinton is one of the most visible reminders of this kind of wheeling and dealing among the global elites—and she presents us with the prospect of bringing the whole sordid system back from Panama and straight into the Oval Office.

Krugman on the dark side of the force

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/08/opinion/sanders-over-the-edge.html?src=me

komedija

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/hillary-clinton-static-noise-speech_us_570930dae4b0836057a16748

Donald Trump's Nuclear Uncle

Quote
In September, 1936, a reporter for the Associated Press watched the unveiling of a new kind of X-ray machine, said to be able to generate a million volts of power. The scientist operating the device was John G. Trump, a professor of engineering at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Trump was working the controls and explaining how high-speed electrons ran along a porcelain tube to a "water-cooled gold target," when suddenly "two of the high-voltage sparks hit him squarely on the nose." And yet, according to the A.P. account, the direct strike caused him only "slight discomfort." Professor Trump told the reporter, "That's an advantage of this machine. It's completely grounded and those sparks can't kill you."
If only the same could be said of the Presidential campaign run by Professor Trump's nephew, Donald J. Trump. He is still uncomfortably close to victory, which is why there have been, lately, more serious attempts to figure out what he might do if, say, he had access to nuclear weapons. In his answers, he seldom sounds as ungrounded as when he invokes Professor Trump, the younger brother of his father, Fred. "My uncle used to tell me about nuclear before nuclear was nuclear," Trump said in one interview, "before nuclear" referring, perhaps, to the development of hydrogen bombs, rather than basic atomic bombs (which occurred when Donald was about six years old), or perhaps just to that netherworld where things wait until Trump judges them to be fashionable or flashy enough to exist. He mentions his uncle so often, and in such extravagant terms—"brilliant," "one of the top, top professors at M.I.T."—that it seems worth asking what the professor and his arcane knowledge mean to him. There are two different sets of answers, which might be put into the category of foreign and domestic.
But first, given Trump's tendency to wrap things in porcelain and gold and shoot sparks through them, it's worth noting that John Trump really does seem to have been a brilliant scientist. He was at M.I.T. for decades, and the X-ray machines he helped design "provided additional years of life to cancer patients throughout the world," as the Times put it in his obituary, in 1985. Trump was involved in radar research for the Allies in the Second World War, and in 1943 the F.B.I. had enough faith in his technical ability and his discretion to call him in when Nikola Tesla died in his room at the New Yorker Hotel, in Manhattan, raising the question of whether enemy agents might have had a chance to learn some of his secrets before the body was found. (One fear was that Tesla was working on a "death ray.") As Margaret Cheney and Robert Uth recount in "Tesla, Master of Lightning," Professor Trump examined Tesla's papers and equipment, and, in a written report, told the F.B.I. not to worry: Tesla's "thoughts and efforts during at least the past 15 years were primarily of a speculative, philosophical, and somewhat promotional character," but "did not include new, sound, workable principles or methods for realizing such results." Professor Trump may have neglected to make that sort of distinction clear to his nephew.
What is strange is that Donald Trump couples tales of how he received early, secret word from his uncle that nuclear weapons were dangerous and getting more so—"He would tell me, 'There are things that are happening that could be potentially so bad for the world in terms of weaponry," he told the Boston Globe—with a casual indifference about proliferation. In recent interviews, Trump has said that if countries like Japan and South Korea didn't want to pay America more for military protection, they should go and build their own nuclear weapons. When, in one seesawing exchange, Anderson Cooper asked if this meant he was for proliferation, Trump first disagreed, citing—naturally—the professor. "I hate nuclear more than any. My uncle was a professor was at M.I.T., used to tell me about nuclear," Trump said. But then he added,  "Can I be honest with you? It's going to happen, anyway. It's going to happen anyway. It's only a question of time . . . Now, wouldn't you rather in a certain sense have Japan have nuclear weapons when North Korea has nuclear weapons?" (Actually, no.)
It's true that nuclear weapons are not that hard for a determined country to acquire, which is why the best counter-proliferation tool is diplomacy—that is, deal-making, which Trump prides himself on and yet, in this case, tosses aside. Last week, President Obama attended an international summit on nuclear weapons, in Washington, and said in a press conference that the representatives of other countries had told him they were worried about Trump, who, Obama said, "doesn't know much about foreign policy or nuclear policy or the Korean Peninsula or the world generally."
It gets stranger still when Trump invokes the bomb as a way to dismiss talk of climate change: "The only global warming I'm worried about is nuclear global warming." Was he thinking of the nuclear winter, but got it backward? Or of the heat generated when bombs, which his uncle told him would be nuclear even before there was nuclear, detonate? It may be, as is so often the case, that looking for the logic in Trump's comments is a pointless exercise. But they might provide an outline, at least, of a world view. When Trump told the Times that his uncle "would tell me many years ago about the power of weapons someday, that the destructive force of these weapons would be so massive, that it's going to be a scary world," maybe his point was that the world is a scary place, and thus well-suited for a politician like him, who traffics in fear.
Then there is the domestic side. Trump brings up his Uncle John on subjects that have nothing to do with technology, such as when the Washington Post asked him about his tendency to use crude language and insult people. Trump said that that wouldn't continue when he was President—and why not? "My uncle, I would say my uncle was one of the brilliant people. He was at M.I.T. for thirty-five years. As a great scientist and engineer, actually more than anything else, Dr. John Trump—a great guy." That was followed not by a quote from his uncle about, say, the importance of treating people decently, but by the simple statement: "I'm an intelligent person." This is the professor's other role in the Trump rhetorical universe: as a sort of eugenic guarantor of intelligence and breeding.
It is a theme that comes up often. "I had a father who was successful," Trump told CNN, in 2010. "And, you know, I have a certain gene. I'm a gene believer. Hey, when you connect two race horses, you usually end up with a fast horse." In South Carolina, earlier this year, he noted, "Dr. John Trump at M.I.T.; good genes, very good genes, O.K., very smart, the Wharton School of Finance, very good, very smart." (Donald Trump was at Wharton as an undergraduate, after transferring from Fordham.) To the Boston Globe: "My father's brother was a brilliant man . . . We have very good genetics." And then on NBC, after telling Lester Holt that his uncle was a professor at M.I.T.: "I mean it's a good gene pool right there"—he pointed to his head—"I have to do what I have to do."
Looking at Trump's ideological assemblage, one can see certain common connectors—fatalism, fear, and a social-Darwinist's contempt for those who don't do quite as well as he and his family have. Being born rich isn't luck; it's something to congratulate oneself on when one looks in the mirror. The opposite is true of the "losers." It's part of what can make Trump feel both like a doomsayer and a smug child. In his rallies, he has taken to giving dramatic readings of the lyrics of a song, by Al Wilson, called "The Snake," which he presents as a parable about the dangers of immigration: a woman saw a beautiful snake at the side of the road, almost dead from the cold. She took it home, warmed it up, saved its life, and "clutched it to her bosom"—Trump always emphasizes that phrase—whereupon it bit her. As she died from the venom, she asked why. "You knew damn well I was a snake!" Trump shouts. The world is scary; people don't change. All a Trump can do is ride down an escalator to the lobby in Trump Tower, past the gold fittings and the waterfall, and say that he's running for President. Then come the sparks.

Biki, umesto da nalepiš samu sliku (copy-paste) probaj s linkom na sliku. Safari (ili šta već koristiš) te vara da si lepo prikazala sliku, ali se slika zapravo ne vidi.

Hvala mace (ovo sad zvuci kao mace kad nekome tepas ) . Probala sam  ali je ispalo isto.
Koristim safari na ipadu. Probala sam malopre da stavim neku slicicu na podforumu fotografije i nisam uspela. Javilo mi da su moje fotke image.jpg a forum to ne podrzava. Mislila sam da su fotke na ipadu u jpg. formatu. Elem imam posle nesto da zavrsim na PCju pa cu da probam opet.

ako je neka antitramp propaganda nemoj ni da postavljaš!

Quote from: Саша Радуловић on 11-04-2016, 16:02:42
ako je neka antitramp propaganda nemoj ni da postavljaš!

Ma bio je smajli pop sto kadi okolo. Zaprepastilo me je to sto je Trampov ujak pregledavao Tesline radove nakon njegove smrti. Doslo mi da se prekrstim tri puta + + +.

Otkad su ušli u Teslinu sobu, Trampovi obožavaju hotele!

http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/trumps-convention-strategy-the-fix-is-in

More than three months before any ballots have been cast at the Republican convention, Roger Stone, Donald Trump's on-again, off-again consigliere, has delivered the campaign equivalent of a severed horse head to delegates who might consider denying Trump the nomination. Trump's supporters will find you in your sleep, he merrily informed them this week. He did not mean it metaphorically.

"We will disclose the hotels and the room numbers of those delegates who are directly involved in the steal," Stone said Monday, on Freedomain Radio. "If you're from Pennsylvania, we'll tell you who the culprits are. We urge you to visit their hotel and find them. You have a right to discuss this, if you voted in the Pennsylvania primary, for example, and your votes are being disallowed," Stone said.