ZNAK SAGITE — više od fantastike — edicija, časopis, knjižara...

sci-hub koliko znam radi, na domenu .io

ili je bar meni prije 4-5 dana radio

radi!

bato, ovo je indeed korisna info koja je došla iz tvoje tastature

radi i na domenu .cc

l"hommage (nevermore a proper spajdermen od mene)













! No longer available

dokle ćeš više da nas brukaš po beču i širiš negativnu sliku o srbiji?

SRBI U BEČU ISMEJANI ZBOG BOŽIĆNIH PRASIĆA: Evo kako nas je ocrnio najtiražniji austrijski list!


http://www.kurir.rs/austrija/srbi-u-becu-ismejani-zbog-bozicnih-prasica-evo-kako-su-predstavljeni-u-karikaturi-i-tekst-najtiraznijeg-austrijskog-lista-clanak-2094395

žali bože tih pečenih prasića koji su, umesto u srpskim, završili u želucima austrijske policije 

što se tiče srba i austrije, mi smo ovde voljeni. evo i dokazi. glasamo za hc strachea jer je on naš führer koji će izbaciti turke & co. iz austrije.
ko kaže da je on naci, laže ko pas, jer kad su to srbi glasali za nacije? nikad!
oh wait.






(ovo je hilarious, sreća pa će razumeti samo oni koji znaju nemački. jevtro, reaguj! )
! No longer available

Quote from: lilit on 15-01-2016, 09:41:48
glasamo za hc strachea jer je on naš führer koji će izbaciti turke & co. iz austrije.

vala, i krajnje je vreme bilo da neko to uradi!

+ mmmm, slika se sa krmkom...

Blamantno Oni koji ne znaju nemački mogu samo da premotaju na 1:47 i da čekaju prepoznatljiv saundbajt.

Quote from: Jevtropijevićka on 15-01-2016, 12:18:24
Blamantno Oni koji ne znaju nemački mogu samo da premotaju na 1:47 i da čekaju prepoznatljiv saundbajt.

evo ga malo ein echter mann
! No longer available

evo ti i jugenda

! No longer available

i oni našli srbe da prozivaju za prasiće. što bi rekla moja drugarica austrijanka: balkan počinje i završava u beču

Quote from: Meho Krljic on 01-04-2014, 11:51:44
Eto ti sad:

Rats Didn't Spread Black Death, Humans Did, Say Researchers

a pazi najnovije studije

Genotyping Yersinia pestis in Historical Plague: Evidence for Long-Term Persistence of Y. pestis in Europe from the 14th to the 17th Century
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0145194

QuoteThe identical Y. pestis-SNP genotype among plague victims from the 14th and the 17th century suggests a possible long-term persistence of one distinct genotype in Germany in a geographical distance of more than 500 km. Furthermore, the SNP data generated from five individuals of the present study are fully consistent with those of three individuals from the cemetery East Smithfield, London (ES 8291, ES 11972, ES 8124) and those of individuals from Herford (Her) und Saint-Laurent-de-la-Cabrerisse (SLC) (Fig 2) [4,6]. Therefore, the Y. pestis genotype detected in the German victims, positioned between nodes N07 and N10 on major branch 1 of the Y. pestis phylogenetic tree (Fig 3), suggests a larger geographic distribution of this particular genotype in Europe. Presumably, also the Y. pestis genotypes from Her and SLC individuals are identical or at least highly similar to the genotype of the present study. Final phylogenetic interpretation, however, will require additional SNP analyses or whole genome sequencing of Y. pestis from various plague victims. Like the majority of the investigated individuals, the German genotype differed from the strain that was found in the fourth analyzed individual, ES 6330, and from the one detected in individuals from Bergen op Zoom (Ber) (Fig 2) [4,6]. Those are more closely related to strains of branch 1, as indicated by a derived state of s12 (Fig 3). In conclusion, thus far only two different genotypes of Y. pestis have been detected among plague victims of the second pandemic in Europe of which one, described in the present study, covers a time period of 300 years. This finding is new and raises several questions.

Based on their previous findings, Haensch et al. suggested that plague was imported to Europe from Central Asia on at least two occasions by distinct trading routes [4]. Other authors further assumed that the bacterium was continuously reimported into Europe during the second plague pandemic, instead of believing in the establishment of rodent plague reservoirs, in which the agent could have persisted for a longer time [10].

In contrast to these hypotheses, the results of the present study clearly indicate that at least one genotype, which was introduced to Europe at the beginning of the Black Death from Asia, persisted in Europe from the 14th century until the Thirty Years' War (1618–1648). We therefore suggest a model in which Y. pestis was introduced to Europe from Asia in several waves combined with a long-time persistence of the pathogen in not yet identified reservoirs.

naravoučenije: putujte ljudi! 

http://andrewgelman.com/2016/02/01/peer-review-make-no-damn-sense/

Quote from: Father Jape on 02-02-2016, 10:37:42
http://andrewgelman.com/2016/02/01/peer-review-make-no-damn-sense/

well, sad bih mogla u jedan mehan_like essey al sreća pa me mrzi

peer review ti je isto što i prosek tokom školovanja. ima raznih.
al fakat je da je neophodno poboljšati kvalitet.
trenutno me najviše zanima (a još uvek nemam pravi odgovor): da li je bolje da peer review bude double-blinded ili full open. danas je takav da rivjueri znaju ko su autori a autori ne znaju ko su rivjueri i to nosi mnogo potencijalnih, let sej, nesporazuma.

ono što vidim kao ozbiljan problem peer-reviewa današnjice je što se 80% rivjuera (čak i u odličnim časopisima) svede na to da li si citirao toga i toga i koliko radova si mu citirao. kad dobijem ozbiljan rivju, sad se i iznenadim. nedavno smo poslali rad u odličan M21 časopis, visok impakt, prvi rivjuer kaže da prihvata kao što je napisano (ništa da se ne menja), drugi izneo pitanja na 3 A4 strane (pisala sam odgovor na 22. lol), od kojih je 65% pitanja bilo apsolutno utemeljeno i vrlo poboljšalo kvalitet rada na kraju.

tako da...nit s pir rivjuom, nit bez njega.

Treba rivjuovati rivjue. A za svoje radove zaslužuješ da budu rivjuovani tek kad imaš dovoljno svojih pozitivnih rivjuova.

Quote from: mac on 03-02-2016, 00:19:47
Treba rivjuovati rivjue. A za svoje radove zaslužuješ da budu rivjuovani tek kad imaš dovoljno svojih pozitivnih rivjuova.

ma lajkovati najbolje

Quote from: lilit on 02-02-2016, 22:41:23
ono što vidim kao ozbiljan problem peer-reviewa današnjice je što se 80% rivjuera (čak i u odličnim časopisima) svede na to da li si citirao toga i toga i koliko radova si mu citirao.

poslednji rad mi odbiše uz listu referenci koje nisam citirao, a trebalo je (bar prema mišljenju rivjuera). debelo je pogrešio, pošto je spisak referenci koje je dostavio irelevantan za naše istraživanje, al nam nije dao priliku da mu to objasnimo.

ako misliš da je pogrešio uvek možeš da pišeš editoru i argumentuješ svoj stav. često upali.

problem je i u tome što se big facama ne radi peer review (osim za big časopise ) i onda to obično završi u rukama phd studenata a to zna da bude hilarious.

otud i potreba za open rivjuom, mislim, da vidimo ko je rivjuer a ko autor, pa nek bitka počne!

poslali odma dalje, pa nek bude šta bude

dobra stvar je što smo recenzije dobili relativno brzo (7-8 nedelja). trenutno je šesti mesec kako je rad na recenziji u tom drugom časopisu.

šesti mesec? na mars ste ga poslali?

pišite editoru i pitajte o čemu se radi.
trenutno ti za peer review daju 2-3 nedelje, ako tražiš produženje dobiješ još jedno dve al ide se na to da autori dobiju odgovor u roku od 2 (max 3) meseca.

i srećno!

hvala!

evo sada gledam, u poslednjem izdanju tog časopisa ima neki rad što je primljen u avgustu 2012, a prihvaćen u avgustu 2015, tako da smo mi još dobri

http://sci-hub.io/downloads/b6af/10.1523@JNEUROSCI.0086-16.2016.pdf

moje iskustvo je da su science communications skloniji oni koji više palamude u nauci. al pošto smatram i da je 85% nauke nereproducibilno i nebitno, ne mislim ni da je dobra/loša komunikacija sa ostatkom ljudskog plemena previše bitna.
ako ti je cilj napredovanje na uniju, da, manje popular sajensa dok ne dobiješ poziciju, al ako ti je bitan research, onda će para u budućnosti teško biti ako nemaš saradnju sa industrijom koja traži primenljivost a od tebe palamud da to iskomuniciraš properly.
ja srećom imam dragu šeficu koja je nenadmašna kad je to u pitanju.

http://www.groundup.org.za/article/botswana-has-one-most-successful-hiv-programmes-world-and-eight-other-new-things-we-have-learnt-about-aids/

Quote from: Father Jape on 18-03-2016, 10:04:21
http://www.groundup.org.za/article/botswana-has-one-most-successful-hiv-programmes-world-and-eight-other-new-things-we-have-learnt-about-aids/

lepo je što dobijamo sve efikasnije retrovirusne lekove tako da danas ljudi sa hiv-om, uz adekvatnu terapiju, mogu da imaju normalan životni vek (sorry fredi što kasnimo 25 godina).
što se tiče vakcine, nismo daleko odmakli: hiv je i dalje savršen, dribluje imunski sistem samo tako. profilaktička vakcina je trenutno SF (niko ko nije inficiran ne bi rado primio umrtvljenu vakcinu jer uvek postoji sitan promil da će da prestane da bude umrtvljena ),  a terapeutske su neefikasne jer pre-existing immunity kod onih koji su već izloženi hivu, ometa indukciju efikasnog imunskog odgovora.

sreća pa je u lekovima spas.
za razliku od tuberkuloze al to je neka druga priča.
o hlamidiji bolje da se ne raspričam, biću gora od meha

Stigla vakcina protiv HPVa u Srbiju.

"2000 vakcina stiglo"
pošto je 1 pakovanje = 1 doza, a potrebne su 3 doze po osobi (šema imunizacije: 0,2,6 meseci), dolazimo do zastrašujuće cifre od 666 subjekata u srbijici koji tu vakcinu mogu da prime.
ništa od zatiranja srpstva

Kad smo već:


Endru Uejkfild mesto da se sakrije u rupu u zemlji nastavlja sa svojim dubioznim propagandnim pričama, ovog puta u formi dokumentarca koji mu je na kraju Robert De Niro sklonio sa programa Tribeka festivala jer "ne doprinosi razumnom dijalogu na temu vakcinisanja". Nou šit.



Festival, Robert De Niro pull anti-vaccination film

QuoteOne day after defending the scheduled screening of a controversial documentary linking vaccinations to autism, Tribeca Film Festival co-founder Robert De Niro announced Saturday that the film, directed by the author of a discredited study on the subject, is being pulled from the event.
The film, Vaxxed: From Cover-Up to Catastrophe, was scheduled to debut April 24 at the 15th edition of the prestigious film festival. It is directed by Andrew Wakefield, known to many as the father of the anti-vaccine movement. He authored a 1998 report on vaccinations and autism that was later retracted, He also had his medical license revoked.
The decision to include the film in the festival, which runs April 13 to 24 in New York, resulted in outrage from many who are upset that the film's inclusion could offer legitimacy to a study debunked by leading scientists.
De Niro, who had defended the screening Friday, announced Saturday that Vaxxed would not be shown at the festival. The statement was included as an update on the festival's Facebook page.
"My intent in screening this film was to provide an opportunity for conversation around an issue that is deeply personal to me and my family. But after reviewing it over the past few days with the Tribeca Film Festival team and others from the scientific community, we do not believe it contributes to or furthers the discussion I had hoped for," he said.

The Oscar-winning actor's statement continued: "The Festival doesn't seek to avoid or shy away from controversy. However, we have concerns with certain things in this film that we feel prevent us from presenting it in the Festival program. We have decided to remove it from our schedule."


The statement followed one a day earlier in which De Niro explained why he and his wife, Grace Hightower, supported showing the film.
"Grace and I have a child with autism and we believe it is critical that all of the issues surrounding the causes of autism be openly discussed and examined. In the 15 years since the Tribeca Film Festival was founded, I have never asked for a film to be screened or gotten involved in the programming," he wrote. "However this is very personal to me and my family and I want there to be a discussion, which is why we will be screening VAXXED. I am not personally endorsing the film, nor am I anti-vaccination; I am only providing the opportunity for a conversation around the issue."

Kad sam već tu, da ponudim korisne linkove za laike poput mene a koji se tiču vakcinacije, autozma i ostalih povezanih tema, u raspravi koja bi trebalo da je završena pre nekoliko decenija, ali nekako i dalje traje jer su ljudi, valjda, skloniji da veruju da su u opasnosti ako nešto rade nego da su u opasnosti ako to ne rade...



   CDC Study on "Prenatal and Infant Exposure to Thimerosal from Vaccines and Immunoglobins and Risk of Autism"   


Naravno, onda je korisno imati bukmarkovano i ovo:


Jenny McCarthy Body Count


Malčice on the nose, svakako, ali zgodno da se pokaže kao prost (ne neophodno i najtačniji) indikator kako se kreće incidenca autizma a kako preventabilnih zaraznih bolesti sa protokom vremena i aktivnostima Andrewa Wakefielda i Jenny McCarthy. Tu su i nabrojani mrtvi od bolesti koje vakcinacija sprečava u periodu između 2007. i 2012., što opet, ne znači mnogo ali je zgodno kao cifra povezana sa temom itd.

biće da matorim al toleranca mi je zero za one koji ne vakcinišu (svoju) decu protiv tetanusa, difterije, velikog kašlja i poliomijelitisa. te roditelje bih ladno strpala u zatvor. o ostalim vakcinama možemo i da diskutujemo.

2 ng tetanus toksina/kg telesne mase ubija tako što 5 dana umireš u najstrašnijim mukama a vakcina je vec 93 godine u upotrebi. no, biće da je ipak first hand experience je majka kad je ljudski rod u pitanju.

o wakefieldu gastroenterologu ne bih (i) ovom prilikom premda bih volela da znam ko su mu bili revieweri za čuveni rad u lancetu.

Number of Autism Diagnoses Scientifically Linked to Vaccinations - 0

Kao laik postavio bih pitanje na koji način oni utvrđuju povezanost između vakcinacije i autizma...Ako ne priznaju korelaciju onda nije ni čudno što je nula.

Se zajebavaš??? Pa gore sam ostavio link za upravo to.

QuoteWhat are the main findings from this study? The researchers found that thimerosal-containing immunizations did not increase the risk of any of the ASD outcomes. This study found that children with any ASD conditions and those without ASD had similar ethylmercury exposures at the end of each exposure period from pregnancy to 20 months of age.  Exposure to ethylmercury from thimerosal-containing immunizations during pregnancy (prenatally), or as a young child, was not associated with any of the ASD outcomes.

mislim da ti je objašnjenje previše šturo

u međuvremenu, da vidite šta je lepa sala za konferenciju 

Šturo, šturo, al ovo je internet, tko ima vremena, nitko nema vremena da čita opširne eksplikacije, dakle dovoljna je ova koja kaže da su uzeli decu, izložili ih uporedivim količinama agensa koji se istražuje, u istoj dinamici i da su rezultati bili ti da su deca koja jesu razvila nešto iz spektra autizma i deca koja nisu razvila ništa bila u istom tretmanu, dakle, nema korelacije između "spornog" agensa u vakcinama i autizma.

samo ti tako objašnjavaj pa ćemo posle da se pitamo zašto se ljudi ne vakcinišu!

nisu uzeli decu i izložili ih agensu koji se istražuje (upravo razmišljam kako dobiti ethics approval za tako nešto ) već su uzeli decu koja su već bila izložena (u stomaku ili van stomaka )

QuoteExposure during pregnancy was calculated as the total amount (micrograms) of all thimerosal-containing immunizations received by the mother during her pregnancy with her child. Exposure during childhood was calculated as the micrograms of ethylmercury divided by the weight of the child (in kilograms) at the time of administration of each immunization.

Hteo sam da deluje malo dramatičnije, kao da su uzimali decu svakih par dana i boli ih iglama, a ona uplakana pitaju "Teto a jel ću ja sad da dobijem autizam" ali eto... smrsila si mi konce.

ma jasno da si hteo da endapuješ u informeru al ne more.

the guardian lepo obradio pa nek stoji ovde

http://www.theguardian.com/society/2016/mar/29/tribeca-de-niro-anti-vaccination-film-scientists-response?CMP=share_btn_fb

Ja i inače prezirem ovaj partikularni komad tehnologije, jer je bučan i čovek izgleda kao budala kad ga koristi plus njegova energetska efikasnost i, jelte, karbon futprint u odnosu na komad papira su zastrašujuće grozni, ali sad imam i još jedan razlog 



   Dyson Airblades 'spread germs 1,300 times more than paper towels'

Quote
    Dyson Airblade hand-driers spread 60 times more germs than standard air dryers, and 1,300 times more than standard paper towels, according to research published in the Journal of Applied Microbiology.
University of Westminster researchers carrying out the research dipped their hands into water containing a harmless virus. They then dried their hands with either a Dyson Airblade, a standard hot-air dryer, or a paper towel.
According to their findings, the Dyson drier's 430mph blasts of air are capable of spreading viruses up to 3 meters across a bathroom. The standard drier spread viruses 75cm, and the hand towels 25cm. 

    In 2014 a similar study by researchers from the University of Leeds found that airborne germ counts were 27 times higher around jet air dryers in comparison with the air around paper towel dispensers.
Research lead Professor Mark Wilcox said: "Next time you dry your hands in a public toilet using an electric hand dryer, you may be spreading bacteria without knowing it. You may also be splattered with bugs from other people's hands.
"These findings are important for understanding the ways in which bacteria spread, with the potential to transmit illness and disease."
The earlier study was funded by the European Tissue Symposium. A spokesman for Dyson said at the time: "This research was commissioned by the paper towel industry and it's flawed.
"They have tested glove covered hands, which have been contaminated with unrealistically high levels of bacteria, and not washed." 
    In February this year Dyson released a video on its YouTube channel hitting back at claims that paper towels are more hygienic than its hand-driers.
Titled "Paper's Dirty Secret", a voiceover on the video says: "Independent research shows that before they even reach the washroom, paper towels can contain large communities of culturable bacteria."
"Once in the washroom, bacteria in the air and contamination from previous users can be picked up by paper towels ... Up to 88% of unused paper towels contain bacteria." 

ceo život se pitam ko je pametno smislio da taj uređaj stoji u WCu upravo iz gore navedenih razloga. nauka je čudo.

Europe is now malaria free for the first time in years

jedna divna vest za ovo kišno i hladno jutro (fala meho! ): europa je malarija frei

u subsaharskoj africi nije hladno al imaju jedno 200 miliona slučajeva a vakcine ni u povoju. međutim, to što je nema ne možemo da opljunemo zahvalimo eu i usa jer se ni ne zna koliko je miliona/milijardi otišlo na razvoj vakcine protiv malarije al problem je što su plasmodium falciparum a bogami i plasmodium vivax, živuljke koje uzrokuju bolest, prilično kompleksna bića i što se tiče antigena i strukture i životnog ciklusa. upravo je prošao deadline za H2020 poziv: vakcina protiv malarije i druge NTDs gde EC ponovo daje nekoliko grantova od 20 mil evra u te svrhe.
tuga al trenutno najefikasnije mere su one koje targetuju smanjenje transmisije http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v526/n7572/full/nature15535.html al što ih više rokamo, oni sve više mutiraju...

in d mintajm nešto iz edicije beč rulz:

Ma, batali to, ovo je prava stvar:

bila, bila, savršena je.
do 26. juna može da se vidi: http://www.albertina.at/de/chagall_bis_malewitsch
vrlo verovatno da idem još jednom.
plus, da li si bio i na: http://www.albertina.at/de/provoke ?

Jesam, naravno...

Naravno, naravno...

Delsin Rowe goes to The Emerald City: http://www.seattleartmuseum.org/
A kad se popne na Space Needle, neće hteti da siđe: http://www.spaceneedle.com/home/
Rachael's needs: http://www.empmuseum.org/at-the-museum/current-exhibits/infinite-worlds-of-science-fiction.aspx

dobih napokon ID

U tvom slučaju treba da stoji "bioweapons"..

sold!

btw, dva sata u komik šopu zvanom sreća rados'

A slika kupljenog?