ZNAK SAGITE — više od fantastike — edicija, časopis, knjižara...

Istina. Dobro, tehnički, ja se ne družim ni sa kim, ali kad bih se družio, to bi verovatno bili takvi ljudi 

Quote from: Meho Krljic on 25-02-2016, 12:25:05
Za nekog pustinjaštvo, za nekog drugog nekog - samo higijena 

+1

Quote from: Meho Krljic on 25-02-2016, 12:25:05
Za nekog pustinjaštvo, za nekog drugog nekog - samo higijena 

ko je higijenu sproveo u 3-D životu, FB će mu biti samo prirodni produžetak toga.
dakle: s kim si - onaki si.
ako su vam prijatelji i familija ovaki i onaki - nije vam FB kriv za to.

eto, ja na FB nemam ni pozive na igrice i farme, ni smaranje, ni reklame, ni nerviranje zbog kretenskih spotova i postova u feedu - ništa što bi mi boravak na fb činilo neprijatnim, odbojnim ili nepoželjnim. naprotiv.

Verujem da si u pravu ali nemam ličnih iskustava sa Fejsbukom pa da mogu o tome da dublje diskutujem.

Ja sticem licno iskustvo, poklekla

Otkrivam da medju rodbinom i porodicnim prijateljima ima dosta (ne)ocekivanih zaokreta u veliku poboznost. Razmisljam da ih stavim na restricted ili tako nesto

Šta reče,šta reče?

Sticem licno iskustvo


Aaaa ovo drugo? Hehehe!

Mark Cakrbrg je zamolio svoje zaposlene da ne precrtavaju slogan "Black Lives Matter" sa table za ispisivanje slogana u Fejsbuk sjedištu i da ne dopisuju "All Lives Matter" jer bi ljudi koji su toliko obrazovani da rade u Facebook sjedištu trebalo makar da shvate da ekvivalentnost i ravnopravnost nisu ista stvar i da se automatsko izjednačavanje u društvu uvek završava time da manjine bivaju u nepovoljnijem polođaju.

будалаштина

Ma, lako je nama da se smejemo budalaštinama kad kod nas policija ljude svih rasa i nacija tretira sa jednakim uvažavanjem i mnogo poštovanja.

Nego, druga tema:

ISIS supporters threaten Mark Zuckerberg, Twitter's Jack Dorsey

Quote

ISIS supporters have a new target in their sights: the leaders of two of the world's most popular social networks.
The "Sons Caliphate Army," a group of hackers associated with the militant Islamic group, posted a video Tuesday that shows photos of Facebook's Mark Zuckerberg and Twitter's Jack Dorsey engulfed in flames and as targets for bullets. The 25-minute video, titled "Flames of the Supporters,"  is said to have been authenticated by Storyful, a startup that focuses on verifying news coming from the social Web.
The two tech leaders are apparently being singled out for their efforts to combat terrorist activities on their respective social networks. Both Facebook and Twitter in recent months have announced campaigns to eliminate activities by Islamic State extremists on their platforms by suspending accounts and deleting posts that promote violence and terrorism.
The stepped-up policing came about a month after a handful of leading tech companies met with top federal law enforcement and security officials in Silicon Valley to discuss combating terrorism. The meeting was called after attackers inspired by the Islamic State killed more than 130 people in Paris and 14 people in San Bernardino, California.
With hundreds of millions of people logging in each day, Islamic State and other radicals have found social media to be a fertile recruiting ground.  In response, social networks have increased the size of teams overseeing posts and traffic.
Twitter, which has 320 million monthly active users, said earlier this month it had suspended more than 125,000 accounts since mid-2015 "for threatening or promoting terrorist acts, primarily related to ISIS." After the massacre in San Bernardino, Facebook removed the profile belonging to Tashfeen Malik, one of two shooters in the attack, for violating community standards. Facebook prohibits any praise or promotion of "acts of terror."
The video seeks to demonstrate that hackers still have access to accounts on the social networks despite efforts by Facebook and Twitter to banish them.
"You announce daily that you suspend many of our accounts, and to you we say: Is that all you can do? You are not in our league," text on the video clip reads,  according to Vocativ, which first spotted the video. "If you close one account we will take 10 in return and soon your names will be erased after we delete your sites, Allah willing, and will know that we say is true."
Showing accounts that display Islamic State imagery, the video claims that ISIS-associated hackers have control of more than 10,000 Facebook accounts, 150 Facebook groups and more than 5,000 Twitter profiles.
"Many of these accounts have been given to supporters," the video says.
Twitter declined to comment, and Facebook representatives did not respond to a request for comment.

Egypt jails Facebook administrator for 3 years after unfaithful wives comments

Quote

CAIRO (Reuters) - An Egyptian court on Saturday sentenced a prominent Facebook user to three years in prison with hard labour after he asserted on television that many married women in the conservative country were unfaithful.
Taymour el-Sobky was arrested last month and accused by prosecutors of slandering Egyptian women and damaging their honour. His comments on a popular evening talk show in December caused a furore.
"Thirty percent of Egyptian women are ready for immorality, they just can't find someone to encourage them," said Sobky, whose Facebook page called "Diaries of a Suffering Husband" has more than one million followers.
"These days, it is very normal for women to cheat on their husbands and seek it out ... Many women are involved in extramarital affairs while their husbands are abroad," he claimed.
Sobky's comments included the suggestion that arranged marriages in traditional southern Egypt exacerbated the problem of infidelity because women ended up with men they didn't know.
After the claim a masked man from the region appeared in a video carried on YouTube armed with an assault rifle, and issued a death threat against Sobky.

The Internet is a digital shanty town



Interesantna paralela i predlog novog rasporeda moći.

Social Media Use Associated With Depression Among U.S. Young Adults

Quote
PITTSBURGH, March 22, 2016 – The more time young adults use social media, the more likely they are to be depressed, according to new research from the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine.    The findings could guide clinical and public health interventions to tackle depression, forecast to become the leading cause of disability in high-income countries by 2030. The research, funded by the National Institutes of Health, is published online and scheduled for the April 1 issue of the journal Depression and Anxiety.   This was the first large, nationally representative study to examine associations between use of a broad range of social media outlets and depression. Previous studies on the subject have yielded mixed results, been limited by small or localized samples, and focused primarily on one specific social media platform, rather than the broad range often used by young adults.    "Because social media has become such an integrated component of human interaction, it is important for clinicians interacting with young adults to recognize the balance to be struck in encouraging potential positive use, while redirecting from problematic use," said senior author Brian A. Primack, M.D., Ph.D., director of Pitt's Center for Research on Media, Technology and Health.   In 2014, Dr. Primack and his colleagues sampled 1,787 U.S. adults ages 19 through 32, using questionnaires to determine social media use and an established depression assessment tool.    The questionnaires asked about the 11 most popular social media platforms at the time: Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, Google Plus, Instagram, Snapchat, Reddit, Tumblr, Pinterest, Vine and LinkedIn.   On average the participants used social media a total of 61 minutes per day and visited various social media accounts 30 times per week. More than a quarter of the participants were classified as having "high" indicators of depression.    There were significant and linear associations between social media use and depression whether social media use was measured in terms of total time spent or frequency of visits. For example, compared with those who checked least frequently, participants who reported most frequently checking social media throughout the week had 2.7 times the likelihood of depression. Similarly, compared to peers who spent less time on social media, participants who spent the most total time on social media throughout the day had 1.7 times the risk of depression. The researchers controlled for other factors that may contribute to depression, including age, sex, race, ethnicity, relationship status, living situation, household income and education level.    Lead author Lui yi Lin, B.A., who will be graduating from the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine this spring, emphasized that, because this was a cross-sectional study, it does not disentangle cause and effect.    "It may be that people who already are depressed are turning to social media to fill a void," she said.   Conversely, Ms. Lin explains that exposure to social media also may cause depression, which could then in turn fuel more use of social media. For example:    • Exposure to highly idealized representations of peers on social media elicits feelings of envy and the distorted belief that others lead happier, more successful lives.   • Engaging in activities of little meaning on social media may give a feeling of "time wasted" that negatively influences mood.    • Social media use could be fueling "Internet addiction," a proposed psychiatric condition closely associated with depression.    • Spending more time on social media may increase the risk of exposure to cyber-bullying or other similar negative interactions, which can cause feelings of depression.    In addition to encouraging clinicians to ask about social media use among people who are depressed, the findings could be used as a basis for public health interventions leveraging social media. Some social media platforms already have made forays into such preventative measures. For example, when a person searches the blog site Tumblr for tags indicative of a mental health crisis—such as "depressed," "suicidal" or "hopeless"—they are redirected to a message that begins with "Everything OK?" and provided with links to resources. Similarly, a year ago Facebook tested a feature that allows friends to anonymously report worrisome posts. The posters would then receive pop-up messages voicing concern and encouraging them to speak with a friend or helpline.      "Our hope is that continued research will allow such efforts to be refined so that they better reach those in need," said Dr. Primack, who also is assistant vice chancellor for health and society in Pitt's Schools of the Health Sciences and professor of medicine. "All social media exposures are not the same. Future studies should examine whether there may be different risks for depression depending on whether the social media interactions people have tend to be more active vs. passive or whether they tend to be more confrontational vs. supportive. This would help us develop more fine-grained recommendations around social media use."    Additional authors of the study were Jaime E. Sidani, Ph.D., Ariel Shensa, M.A., Ana Radovic, M.D., M.Sc., Elizabeth Miller, M.D., Ph.D., Jason B. Colditz, M.Ed., Beth Hoffman, B.Sc., and Leila M. Giles, B.S., all of Pitt.    This research was funded by National Institute of Mental Health grant R25-MH054318 and National Cancer Institute grant R01-CA140150.           

Facebook Users Are Sharing Fewer Personal Updates and It's a Big Problem

Quote
Facebook dominates social media, but future success is never a guarantee.
 
If you haven't posted anything personal on Facebook    FB -2.68%  in awhile, you're not alone. A damning report published by The Information on Thursday revealed that Facebook has been struggling to reverse a 21% decline in "original sharing," or personal updates, from its 1.6 billion monthly active users.

This indicates a key vulnerability for the social behemoth, and failed attempts to address it reflect a point I made in a recent column: There's no guarantee that Facebook's current winning streak can last.

Facebook's decline in personal updates reflects a common growing pain for online communities. What starts out as as special and intimate place to share things grows into a big, impersonal, and professional platform. Some online communities try to preserve the special and intimate at the expense of adding new users. (Consider communities like Reddit: thriving, but never quite crossing over into the mainstream.) Others crumble once they do reach the mainstream, causing users to abandon the service for the latest new thing that feels more special and intimate. (There are a litany of examples: Myspace, Bebo, Flickr, Orkut, LiveJournal, Friendster.)
Facebook is remarkable in that it has managed to avoid either path. It went mainstream but didn't lose its appeal, because even if it lost that special and intimate feeling, it has become an essential utility for keeping up with friends and family. Facebook is still the first place where people are compelled to share meaningful updates like engagement announcements, baby photos, and vacation photos. A home for your personal press releases.

Which is why the decline in meaningful personal updates is a big problem. I believe there are two things driving the decline. First, there's the rise of professional content on Facebook. Second, there's the shift from content published in private to content published in public.

The increase in professional content on Facebook has been gradual, but the company has welcomed it. Facebook wants people to share this stuff—videos, news articles, entertainment—on its platform because it means people will spend more time inside its "walled garden" than anywhere else on the Internet. The company has done a great job of curating professional content and giving users what they like, and as a result, Facebook is more addictive than ever. Metrics like user engagement and time spent using the service have continued to rise. Even as analysts fret that Facebook is running out of Internet users to add, the company is turning millions of monthly active users into daily active users. (Last quarter 65% of Facebook's monthly active users came back every single day.)

One little problem: Professional content can be found anywhere online. It wouldn't be that difficult for a competitor to steal users away with a better, more addicting news app, or a better, more addicting way to watch viral videos, or a new, more addicting way to consume entertainment. Beyond that, all those inside jokes, blurry photos, and half-baked opinions you used to Post now feel out-of-place amid all the professional content.


On the other hand, personal updates—including the half-based opinions, but also the baby photos, engagement announcements, and vacation photos—are what keep people coming back to Facebook. It's unlikely that users will get that information anywhere else, and they don't want to miss important life updates from their friends and family. Without the personal updates, Facebook becomes a glorified, $327 billion content recommendation engine.

Facebook's shift from content published in private to public has been just as subtle. There's a reason the once-daily outrages over Facebook privacy scares have stopped. The platform no longer feels like an intimate conversation among friends, so users no longer expect full privacy. By default, users now expect that items posted to Facebook are done so in public. They know that, unlike in Facebook's earlier days, their status updates can now be seen by distant relatives, high school classmates, and co-workers—so they don't share anything too personal.



Besides, Facebook's privacy settings are too complicated for most people to figure out, and everyone knows private updates can be easily screen-captured and shared. There's always the risk that something could go viral and cost the person who posted it their job or worse. (Remember the death and rape threats received by charity worker Lindsey Stone's offensive, but ultimately harmless, inside joke at Arlington Cemetery?)

The bar for what Facebook users once posted on the site used to be much lower, as BuzzFeed writer Alex Kantrowitz points out. A new feature showing old posts from years past only serves as a reminder of that fact.
The decline in personal sharing on Facebook is an important reminder that, even though Facebook completely dominates the social media market, its future domination is all but guaranteed. The more sophisticated the platform becomes, the more pressure the platform faces to retain a tiny bit of what first made it special: intimacy.

Летс мејк сагита грејт аген!

Growing Up On The Seedy Underbelly Of The Internet

ovo mora da je istina!

Затвор прети свима који су на Фејсбуку лајковали Почучу!

11. априла 2014.   


Београд – Многи не знају да осим што морају да воде рачуна шта пишу на својим профилима, јер је због говора мржње и дискриминације могуће добити и до десет година затвора, мора да се пази и на тзв. лајковање туђих порука, јер је и подржавање оваквих садржаја кривично дело.

Конкретно, треба да брину сви који су лајковали или са пријатељима на друштвним мрежама поделили Фејсбук статус бившег портпарола посебних јединица полиције Радомира Почуче који је позвао навијаче да силом растуре скуп ,,Жена у црном", или спсиак србомрзаца који је објавио СНП Наши.

Према речима професора Владимира Водинелића са Правног факултета Универзитета Унион, оваква ,,Подршка" такође је кривично дело, будући да неко лајковањем потврђује нечије мишљење или претње.

,,Ви сте тада такође говорили и такав начин изражавања подједнако подлеже ограничењима Кривичног законика, без обзира на то да ли сте саучесник, подстрекивач, помагач...", каже проф. Водинелић.

http://www.vaseljenska.com/drustvo/zatvor-preti-svima-koji-su-na-fejsbuku-lajkovali-pocucu/

Americans abandoning wired home Internet, study shows     

Quote
Americans are abandoning their wired Internet for a mobile-data-only diet — and if the trend continues, it could reflect a huge shift in the way we experience the Web.
For the most part, America's Internet-usage trends can be summed up in a few phrases. The Internet is now so common as to be a commodity; the rich have better Internet than the poor; more whites have Internet than people of color; and compared with low-income minorities, affluent whites are more likely to have fixed, wired Internet connections to their homes.
But it may be time to put an asterisk on that last point, according to new data on a sample of 53,000 Americans. In fact, Americans as a whole are growing less likely than before to have residential broadband, the figures show.
In plain English, they're abandoning their wired Internet for a mobile-data-only diet — and if the trend continues, it could reflect a huge shift in the way we experience the Web.The study, conducted for the Commerce Department by the U.S. Census Bureau, partly upholds what we already knew. Low-income Americans are still one of the biggest demographics to rely solely on their phones to get online. Today nearly a third of households earning less than $25,000 a year exclusively use mobile Internet to browse the Web. That's up from 16 percent in 2013.
They're often cited as evidence of a digital divide; families with little money to afford a home Internet subscription must resort to free Wi-Fi at libraries and even McDonald's to do homework, look for jobs and find information.
But people with higher incomes are ditching their wired Internet access at similar or even faster rates. In 2013, 8 percent of households making between $50,000 and $75,000 a year were mobile-only. Fast-forward a couple of years, and that figure is 18 percent.
Seventeen percent of households making between $75,000 and $100,000 are mobile-only now, compared with 8 percent two years ago. And 15 percent of households earning more than $100,000 are mobile-only, versus 6 percent in 2013.
As many as one in five U.S. households are now mobile-only, compared with one in 10 in 2013. That's a doubling in just two years.
This suggests that having only one form of Internet access instead of two may no longer be explained simply as the result of financial hardship but could be a conscious choice, at least for wealthier people, who are deciding it's not necessary to have both.
These results paint the clearest picture yet of a country moving from fixed networks toward wireless networks. They highlight how, for many, 4G LTE and other wireless technologies could be turning into viable substitutes for home broadband. And it helps explain many of the changes consumers are seeing.
Companies like Verizon are increasingly shifting to prioritize mobile service over wired service. Cable companies are exploring how to compete with telecom companies for wireless customers by setting up cheap, public Wi-Fi hot spots that allow for voice calls and Web browsing. Even Google and Facebook have experimented with beaming Internet wirelessly down to devices on the ground.
All this is happening because companies perceive a tremendous opportunity to make money in mobile Internet. And considering how even the wealthy appear to be voting with their feet, it appears the industry may be onto something.

dodao bih nešto što sam ranije negdje viđao, naime, da Comcast provajder ima vlasnika koji je član Demokratske partije, i da je prije par godina počelo napuštanje republikanskih mušterija

ali možda je to samo promil ovog trenda gore, koji je sasvim tržišno razuman, no, eto, neki neće kablovski net zbog politike

Stephen Fry ohrabruje mladež da preseče svoje veze sa socijalnim mrežama:


OFF THE GRID

Want to Know What Facebook Really Thinks of Journalists? Here's What Happened When It Hired Some.

Zanimljivo da je već dva puta, juče i danas, neko iz Novog Pazara pokušao da se uloguje na moj profil. Iz tog razloga fejsbuk je tražio da promenim šifru što sam oba puta učinio. E sad, zanima me da li lice koje pokušava da se uloguje mora da zna moj email da bi meni iz fejsa stiglo upozorenje? Pretpostavljam da je odgovor potvrdan jer ne vidim kako bi drugačije mogao da pikira baš moj profil. Ne znam da li na fejsu mogu da promenim mejl kojim se ulogujem da ne bih morao svaki dan da menjam šifru ako dotični online terorista ovako nastavi.

Ako je pokušao, a nije uspeo, onda i ne moraš da menjaš šifru. U svakom slučaju, postoje dodatne opcije u Fejsbuku koje možeš da iskoristiš da povećaš svoju bezbednost. Idi na stranicu https://www.facebook.com/settings?tab=security I uključi "Login Alerts" na email da ti FB javi svaki put kad se uloguješ sa novog brauzera. U "Trusted Contacts" dodaj par ljudi od poverenja (blisku rodbinu recimo) koji će ti pomoći da se uloguješ ako ti neko promeni šifru. U delu "Where You're Logged In" možeš da vidiš u kojim sve brauzerima imaš aktivnu login sesiju, a možeš i da ugasiš sesiju po volji. Postoji i mogućnost da blokiraš pristup sa bilo kojeg brauzera koji nisi registrovau u fejsbuku, ali čini mi se da je to overkill.

Još jedna mogućnost, koja tebi sada ne treba, ali je interesantna, je i "Legacy Contact" koja služi da korisnik sada imenuje nekog ko će da rukovodi njegovim nalogom jednom kada premine.

Quote from: mac on 09-05-2016, 13:03:04
Još jedna mogućnost, koja tebi sada ne treba, ali je interesantna, je i "Legacy Contact" koja služi da korisnik sada imenuje nekog ko će da rukovodi njegovim nalogom jednom kada premine.

Nikad se ne zna!! Za ostalo hvala, i ja pomislih da ako nema šifru nema ni potrebe da je menjam...Videćemo koliko će biti uporan. Takođe, ovo mi je za nauk da pazim gde javno ostavljam email.

Former Facebook Workers: We Routinely Suppressed Conservative News

QuoteFacebook workers routinely suppressed news stories of interest to conservative readers from the social network's influential "trending" news section, according to a former journalist who worked on the project. This individual says that workers prevented stories about the right-wing CPAC gathering, Mitt Romney, Rand Paul, and other conservative topics from appearing in the highly-influential section, even though they were organically trending among the site's users.


Several former Facebook "news curators," as they were known internally, also told Gizmodo that they were instructed to artificially "inject" selected stories into the trending news module, even if they weren't popular enough to warrant inclusion—or in some cases weren't trending at all. The former curators, all of whom worked as contractors, also said they were directed not to include news about Facebook itself in the trending module.

In other words, Facebook's news section operates like a traditional newsroom, reflecting the biases of its workers and the institutional imperatives of the corporation. Imposing human editorial values onto the lists of topics an algorithm spits out is by no means a bad thing—but it is in stark contrast to the company's claims that the trending module simply lists "topics that have recently become popular on Facebook."
These new allegations emerged after Gizmodo last week revealed details about the inner workings of Facebook's trending news team—a small group of young journalists, primarily educated at Ivy League or private East Coast universities, who curate the "trending" module on the upper-right-hand corner of the site. As we reported last week, curators have access to a ranked list of trending topics surfaced by Facebook's algorithm, which prioritizes the stories that should be shown to Facebook users in the trending section. The curators write headlines and summaries of each topic, and include links to news sites. The section, which launched in 2014, constitutes some of the most powerful real estate on the internet and helps dictate what news Facebook's users—167 million in the US alone—are reading at any given moment."I believe it had a chilling effect on conservative news.""Depending on who was on shift, things would be blacklisted or trending," said the former curator. This individual asked to remain anonymous, citing fear of retribution from the company. The former curator is politically conservative, one of a very small handful of curators with such views on the trending team. "I'd come on shift and I'd discover that CPAC or Mitt Romney or Glenn Beck or popular conservative topics wouldn't be trending because either the curator didn't recognize the news topic or it was like they had a bias against Ted Cruz."
The former curator was so troubled by the omissions that they kept a running log of them at the time; this individual provided the notes to Gizmodo. Among the deep-sixed or suppressed topics on the list: former IRS official Lois Lerner, who was accused by Republicans of inappropriately scrutinizing conservative groups; Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker; popular conservative news aggregator the Drudge Report; Chris Kyle, the former Navy SEAL who was murdered in 2013; and former Fox News contributor Steven Crowder. "I believe it had a chilling effect on conservative news," the former curator said.

http://gizmodo.com/want-to-know-w... Another former curator agreed that the operation had an aversion to right-wing news sources. "It was absolutely bias. We were doing it subjectively. It just depends on who the curator is and what time of day it is," said the former curator. "Every once in awhile a Red State or conservative news source would have a story. But we would have to go and find the same story from a more neutral outlet that wasn't as biased."

Stories covered by conservative outlets (like Breitbart, Washington Examiner, and Newsmax) that were trending enough to be picked up by Facebook's algorithm were excluded unless mainstream sites like the New York Times, the BBC, and CNN covered the same stories.

Other former curators interviewed by Gizmodo denied consciously suppressing conservative news, and we were unable to determine if left-wing news topics or sources were similarly suppressed. The conservative curator described the omissions as a function of his colleagues' judgements; there is no evidence that Facebook management mandated or was even aware of any political bias at work.

Managers on the trending news team did, however, explicitly instruct curators to artificially manipulate the trending module in a different way: When users weren't reading stories that management viewed as important, several former workers said, curators were told to put them in the trending news feed anyway. Several former curators described using something called an "injection tool" to push topics into the trending module that weren't organically being shared or discussed enough to warrant inclusion—putting the headlines in front of thousands of readers rather than allowing stories to surface on their own. In some cases, after a topic was injected, it actually became the number one trending news topic on Facebook.

"We were told that if we saw something, a news story that was on the front page of these ten sites, like CNN, the New York Times, and BBC, then we could inject the topic," said one former curator. "If it looked like it had enough news sites covering the story, we could inject it—even if it wasn't naturally trending." Sometimes, breaking news would be injected because it wasn't attaining critical mass on Facebook quickly enough to be deemed "trending" by the algorithm. Former curators cited the disappearance of Malaysia Airlines flight MH370 and the Charlie Hebdo attacks in Paris as two instances in which non-trending stories were forced into the module. Facebook has struggled to compete with Twitter when it comes to delivering real-time news to users; the injection tool may have been designed to artificially correct for that deficiency in the network. "We would get yelled at if it was all over Twitter and not on Facebook," one former curator said.
"Facebook got a lot of pressure about not having a trending topic for Black Lives Matter."In other instances, curators would inject a story—even if it wasn't being widely discussed on Facebook—because it was deemed important for making the network look like a place where people talked about hard news. "People stopped caring about Syria," one former curator said. "[And] if it wasn't trending on Facebook, it would make Facebook look bad." That same curator said the Black Lives Matter movement was also injected into Facebook's trending news module. "Facebook got a lot of pressure about not having a trending topic for Black Lives Matter," the individual said. "They realized it was a problem, and they boosted it in the ordering. They gave it preference over other topics. When we injected it, everyone started saying, 'Yeah, now I'm seeing it as number one'." This particular injection is especially noteworthy because the #BlackLivesMatter movement originated on Facebook, and the ensuing media coverage of the movement often noted its powerful social media presence.
(In February, CEO Mark Zuckerberg expressed his support for the movement in an internal memo chastising Facebook employees for defacing Black Lives Matter slogans on the company's internal "signature wall.")
When stories about Facebook itself would trend organically on the network, news curators used less discretion—they were told not to include these stories at all. "When it was a story about the company, we were told not to touch it," said one former curator. "It had to be cleared through several channels, even if it was being shared quite a bit. We were told that we should not be putting it on the trending tool."

(The curators interviewed for this story worked for Facebook across a timespan ranging from mid-2014 to December 2015.)

"We were always cautious about covering Facebook," said another former curator. "We would always wait to get second level approval before trending something to Facebook. Usually we had the authority to trend anything on our own [but] if it was something involving Facebook, the copy editor would call their manager, and that manager might even call their manager before approving a topic involving Facebook."

Gizmodo reached out to Facebook for comment about each of these specific claims via email and phone, but did not receive a response.

Several former curators said that as the trending news algorithm improved, there were fewer instances of stories being injected. They also said that the trending news process was constantly being changed, so there's no way to know exactly how the module is run now. But the revelations undermine any presumption of Facebook as a neutral pipeline for news, or the trending news module as an algorithmically-driven list of what people are actually talking about.

Rather, Facebook's efforts to play the news game reveal the company to be much like the news outlets it is rapidly driving toward irrelevancy: a select group of professionals with vaguely center-left sensibilities. It just happens to be one that poses as a neutral reflection of the vox populi, has the power to influence what billions of users see, and openly discusses whether it should use that power to influence presidential elections.

"It wasn't trending news at all," said the former curator who logged conservative news omissions. "It was an opinion."

[Disclosure: Facebook has launched a program that pays publishers, including the New York Times and Buzzfeed, to produce videos for its Facebook Live tool. Gawker Media, Gizmodo's parent company, recently joined that program.]

Update: Several hours after this report was published, Gizmodo editors started seeing it as a topic in Facebook's trending section. Gizmodo's video was posted under the topic but the "Top Posts" were links to RedState.com and the Faith and Freedom Coalition.


Update 4:10 p.m. EST: A Facebook spokesperson has issued the following statement to outlets including BuzzFeed and TechCrunch. Facebook has not responded to Gizmodo's repeated requests for comment.

"We take allegations of bias very seriously. Facebook is a platform for people and perspectives from across the political spectrum. Trending Topics shows you the popular topics and hashtags that are being talked about on Facebook. There are rigorous guidelines in place for the review team to ensure consistency and neutrality. These guidelines do not permit the suppression of political perspectives. Nor do they permit the prioritization of one viewpoint over another or one news outlet over another. These guidelines do not prohibit any news outlet from appearing in Trending Topics."

Update May 10, 8:50 a.m. EST: The following statement was posted by Vice President of Search at Facebook, Tom Stocky, late last night. It was liked by both Mark Zuckerberg and Sheryl Sandberg:

My team is responsible for Trending Topics, and I want to address today's reports alleging that Facebook contractors manipulated Trending Topics to suppress stories of interest to conservatives. We take these reports extremely seriously, and have found no evidence that the anonymous allegations are true.
Facebook is a platform for people and perspectives from across the political spectrum. There are rigorous guidelines in place for the review team to ensure consistency and neutrality. These guidelines do not permit the suppression of political perspectives. Nor do they permit the prioritization of one viewpoint over another or one news outlet over another. These guidelines do not prohibit any news outlet from appearing in Trending Topics.
Trending Topics is designed to showcase the current conversation happening on Facebook. Popular topics are first surfaced by an algorithm, then audited by review team members to confirm that the topics are in fact trending news in the real world and not, for example, similar-sounding topics or misnomers.
We are proud that, in 2015, the US election was the most talked-about subject on Facebook, and we want to encourage that robust political discussion from all sides. We have in place strict guidelines for our trending topic reviewers as they audit topics surfaced algorithmically: reviewers are required to accept topics that reflect real world events, and are instructed to disregard junk or duplicate topics, hoaxes, or subjects with insufficient sources. Facebook does not allow or advise our reviewers to systematically discriminate against sources of any ideological origin and we've designed our tools to make that technically not feasible. At the same time, our reviewers' actions are logged and reviewed, and violating our guidelines is a fireable offense.
There have been other anonymous allegations — for instance that we artificially forced

‪#‎BlackLivesMatter‬ to trend. We looked into that charge and found that it is untrue. We do not insert stories artificially into trending topics, and do not instruct our reviewers to do so. Our guidelines do permit reviewers to take steps to make topics more coherent, such as combining related topics into a single event (such as ‪#‎starwars‬ and‪#‎maythefourthbewithyou‬), to deliver a more integrated experience.
Our review guidelines for Trending Topics are under constant review, and we will continue to look for improvements. We will also keep looking into any questions about Trending Topics to ensure that people are matched with the stories that are predicted to be the most interesting to them, and to be sure that our methods are as neutral and effective as possible.

Technology editor at Gizmodo.

---

^ма немогуће!!! 

Ovo mi zaista nije jasno, opet mi stize>Your account was recently logged into from a new browser or device. Was this you?
za danas 11.41 iako sam pre par minuta promenio mejl. Ne znam sad da li je ovo bilo pre ili posle promene. Verovatno posle jer mi je na nov mejl stiglo obavestenje da neko pokusava da se uloguje.

ko ti šalje to? meni to liči na neko spamovanje koje možda nema veze sa fejsbukom.

meni nedeljno stižu zahtevi da promenim podatke na pejpel nalogu, ali ne od pejpela, iako mnogo liči, logo i sve.

Šalje mi sa adrese <security@facebookmail.com>

http://youtu.be/EfO00lVC5N4

због менталне хигијене си отишо са сагите на фејсбук

https://www.maketecheasier.com/differentiate-phishing-facebook-mail/?_e_pi_=7%2CPAGE_ID10%2C5587517411


Иначе, трумане, јеси ли икад на мејл добио писмо неког сиромашног из африке, који моли за помоћ? Ја им пошаљем пар долара понекад...

Quote from: дејан on 11-05-2016, 11:06:29
^ма немогуће!!! 

D plot tikns:



Senate GOP Launches Inquiry Into Facebook's News Curation

Чудно. Улоговах се малопре са другог браузера а истог лаптопа и одмах добих мејл да се неко зи НИША улоговао са другог браузера. Одакле та погрешна локација да ми је знати...

Quote from: Meho Krljic on 12-05-2016, 08:46:31

Quote from: дејан on 11-05-2016, 11:06:29
^ма немогуће!!! 

D plot tikns:



Senate GOP Launches Inquiry Into Facebook's News Curation

Cuk fajts bek:



Mark Zuckerberg says there's 'no evidence' that Facebook staff suppressed conservative stories

Facebook Reactions: Belgian police warn citizens not to react to posts on social media

Quote
Belgian police have warned citizens not to use Facebook's new Reactions, to protect their privacy.
In February, the site launched six new ways of reacting to a post, alongside the Like button. They were intended partly as a way of answering calls for a "Dislike" button – allowing people to share their feelings about posts without appearing to endorse what had been said.
But the Belgian police now says that the site is using them as a way of collecting information about people and deciding how best to advertise to them. As such, it has warned people that they should avoid using the buttons if they want to preserve their privacy.


"The icons help not only express your feelings, they also help Facebook assess the effectiveness of the ads on your profile," a post on Belgian's official police website reads.
The site is able to use the tool to tell when people are likely to be in a good mood and then use that to decide when is the best time to show them ads, the Belgian police has claimed.


How to use Facebook Reactions

"By limiting the number of icons to six, Facebook is counting on you to express your thoughts more easily so that the algorithms that run in the background are more effective," the post continues. "By mouse clicks you can let them know what makes you happy.
"So that will help Facebook find the perfect location, on your profile, allowing it to display content that will arouse your curiosity but also to choose the time you present it. If it appears that you are in a good mood,  it can deduce that you are more receptive and able to sell spaces explaining advertisers that they will have more chance to see you react."
People have pointed out that Facebook's Reactions tool is helpful to advertisers since it was released. Though the site said as it was launched that it was a way of allowing people to react in more complex ways, it also provides valuable data to Facebook about how things make people feel, as well as encouraging them to interact with posts amid worries that people are becoming less and less personal on the site.
Soon after the feature was released, Facebook also confirmed that reacting angrily to a post would be treated as any other kind of engagement with it. Since Facebook treats engaging with a post as an indication that users want to see more things like it, that means that reacting angrily could lead to seeing similar posts and could be sold to advertisers, too.

Twitter to Stop Counting Photos and Links in 140-Character Limit

Quote
Twitter Inc. is making a major shift in how it counts characters in Tweets, giving users more freedom to compose longer messages.
The social media company will soon stop counting photos and links as part of its 140-character limit for messages, according to a person familiar with the matter. The change could happen in the next two weeks, said the person who asked not to be named because the decision isn't yet public. Links currently take up 23 characters, even after Twitter automatically shortens them. The company declined to comment.
It's a step in a larger plan to give users more flexibility on the site. Chief Executive Officer Jack Dorsey said in January that the company was looking for new ways to display text on Twitter, and would experiment based on how people use the service. For example, some people tweet screenshots of longer text in articles, or send many tweets one after the other to tell a story.
Twitter's 140-character limit was originally adopted because it was a way to send Tweets while fitting all the information within a mobile text message -- a common way for sending Tweets when the service debuted in 2006, before the proliferation of smartphones.
The company earlier this year considered raising the limit to as many as 10,000 characters. But the quick, concise nature of Tweets has helped set the site apart from the competition. Executives have spent the last few months emphasizing how Twitter is a destination for live events and discussion. Removing the character requirement for links and photos may encourage users to add more media to their posts.
Twitter has been making video a priority as part of its push for live events. Earlier this year, the company agreed to pay $10 million to the National Football League for the rights to stream 10 Thursday night games during the 2016 season, people familiar with the matter have said. Twitter is working on more content deals for streaming sports, political events and entertainment.

Connecting everyone to internet 'would add $6.7tn to global economy'

Quote
Bringing internet access to the 4.1 billion people in the world who do not have it would increase global economic output by $6.7 trillion (£4.6tr), raising 500 million people out of poverty, according to a study by PwC.
The report, titled Connecting the world: Ten mechanisms for global inclusion, was prepared for Facebook by PwC's strategy consultants Strategy&.
Getting everyone in the world online is not as tall an order as one might think, according to the company: affordability, rather than infrastructure, is the main barrier to internet adoption in most areas. More than nine-tenths of the the world's population live in places where the infrastructure exists to get them online, but the majority of them cannot afford to do so.
For 66% of the world, a 500MB data plan costs more than 5% of their monthly income, the level the report's authors describe as "unaffordable". But some people decide to get online despite the cost – in China, just 22% of people can have a high enough income by that measure to make internet access affordable for them, even though 46% of the population is online. Even if it's expensive, if there's enough of a reason for someone to get online, they may look past the cost.
By contrast, in most of the developing world, the necessary infrastructure is already in place to get internet to the whole population, if they could afford it. China, Brazil and Indonesia all have 100% of their populations covered by internet-capable infrastructure.
While cost reductions sound easier to achieve than total infrastructure creation, that can understate the magnitude of the reductions needed. To get 80% of their populations online, for instance, Ethiopia, Nigeria and the Philippines would all have to see a cut in the price of internet access by well over 90%.
Improvement of existing technology, or even simply installing existing technology in developing nations, will suffice to bring about much of this cost reduction. For instance, the vast majority of the world's mobile spectrum is being used to deliver 2G internet: if it was upgraded to 3G or 4G, the cost of mobile data would plummet. But such an upgrade requires money spent upfront, not only by carriers, but also by users, who must buy (comparatively) more expensive phones.


The focus on cost reductions marries with Facebook's own Internet.org project, which is aimed at partnering carriers in developing nations to give low-cost internet access. It has come under criticism, however, from web luminaries such as Tim Berners-Lee, who dislike Facebook's approach of limiting the low-cost access to a subsection of the web.
So-called zero rating, which lies at the heart of Internet.org's efforts to expand web access, involves allowing internet users to access some websites, such as Wikipedia and Facebook, without paying for the data they use. But the approach is criticised by net neutrality advocates like Berners-Lee, who said: "I tend to say 'Just say no.' In the particular case of somebody who's offering ... something which is branded internet, it's not internet, then you just say no."
But Jonathan Tate, technology consulting leader at PwC, argues that Facebook's approach is worth it in the long term. While zero rating provides access to a slimmer version the internet than the full web, he says it's a crucial stepping stone to full access. "The important thing here is to get things moving," he added.
Facebook's motivation for paying for Internet.org is partially explained by PwC's estimates of where the benefits of new access accrue. While most of the economic benefits of new internet access come to those freshly online, the consultancy estimates that content providers such as Facebook stand to gain a $200bn (£138bn) opportunity over the next five years.
But new technology will still be needed to achieve total connectivity. The reports' authors estimate that the last 500 million people to get online won't be able to rely on piecemeal improvements. Instead, they'll need new "disruptive technologies" being created by companies like Google, with its Project Loon plan to mount internet access points on balloons, and Facebook, with its solar-powered, laser-armed 4G drone called Aquila.

Drugim rečima, ima još mnogo potrošača čija crkavica ne stiže do velikih tehnoloških kompanija.

Malopre okačio pesmu na fejs i ispod imena piše da sam to uradio iz NIŠ! Ima li ko racionalno objašnjenje?

Isključi GPS, pa neće da piše ikakva lokacija. Možda je GPS poblesavio, jer recimo nije imao dovoljno vremena da preciznije odredi lokaciju.

Možda Truman zapravo živi u Nišu a svi oko njega su u zaveri i ubeđuju ga da je to Beograd. To bi objasnilo i zašto koristi ime Truman na internetu.

Quote from: mac on 25-05-2016, 15:00:46
Isključi GPS, pa neće da piše ikakva lokacija. Možda je GPS poblesavio, jer recimo nije imao dovoljno vremena da preciznije odredi lokaciju.

Ne isključuje mi se za sada, ako se nastavio ovakvo brljavljenje učiniću to.

Meho, otkad napredujem na duhovnoj stazi sve više svet oko sebe promatram kao matrix tako da ništa nije isključeno.

Quote from: Meho Krljic on 25-05-2016, 15:07:56
Možda Truman zapravo živi u Nišu a svi oko njega su u zaveri i ubeđuju ga da je to Beograd. To bi objasnilo i zašto koristi ime Truman na internetu.

Quote from: Truman on 25-05-2016, 15:15:11


Meho, otkad napredujem na duhovnoj stazi sve više svet oko sebe promatram kao matrix tako da ništa nije isključeno.

Odlično je to. Kad je čovek svuda kod kuće onda razlike između Niša i Beograda na kraju deluju trivijalno.

,,На Фејсбуку улудо утрошени сати, шта радите Срби кукала вам мати!"

http://oslobodjenje.rs/polupismenost-je-gora-od-nepismenosti-a-fejsbuk-je-jama-duhovnog-genocida/

Quote from: Meho Krljic on 25-05-2016, 15:42:18
Odlično je to. Kad je čovek svuda kod kuće onda razlike između Niša i Beograda na kraju deluju trivijalno.

Zar stvarno misliš da postoji nekakva razlika? Čak vas i GPS meša.

Quote from: Meho Krljic on 25-05-2016, 15:42:18

Quote from: Truman on 25-05-2016, 15:15:11


Meho, otkad napredujem na duhovnoj stazi sve više svet oko sebe promatram kao matrix tako da ništa nije isključeno.

Odlično je to. Kad je čovek svuda kod kuće onda razlike između Niša i Beograda na kraju deluju trivijalno.

Iako je dobro osećati se svuda kao kod kuće ne bih rekao da to ima veze sa posmatranjem sveta kao matrixa. Čak šta više, nigde nije kuća. No dobro, manimo se te teme...

Too fat for Facebook: photo banned for depicting body in 'undesirable manner'

Quote
Facebook has apologized for banning a photo of a plus-sized model and telling the feminist group that posted the image that it depicts "body parts in an undesirable manner".


As a child, Lindy West was told she was 'off the charts'. In this exclusive extract from her new book, Shrill, she explains how society's fixation on thinness warps women's lives – and why she would rather be 'fat' than 'big'
Cherchez la Femme, an Australian group that hosts popular culture talkshows with "an unapologetically feminist angle", said Facebook rejected an advert featuring Tess Holliday, a plus-sized model wearing a bikini, telling the group it violated the company's "ad guidelines".
After the group appealed against the rejection, Facebook's ad team initially defended the decision, writing that the photo failed to comply with the social networking site's "health and fitness policy".
"Ads may not depict a state of health or body weight as being perfect or extremely undesirable," Facebook wrote. "Ads like these are not allowed since they make viewers feel bad about themselves. Instead, we recommend using an image of a relevant activity, such as running or riding a bike."
In a statement on Monday, Facebook apologized for its original stance and said it had determined that the photo does comply with its guidelines.
"Our team processes millions of advertising images each week, and in some instances we incorrectly prohibit ads," the statement said. "This image does not violate our ad policies. We apologize for the error and have let the advertiser know we are approving their ad."
The photo – for an event called Cherchez La Femme: Feminism and Fat – features a smiling Holliday wearing a standard bikini.
Facebook had originally allowed the event page to remain, but refused to approve the group's advert, which would have boosted the post.



With 800,000 followers on Instagram, 1m Facebook likes and a major modelling contract, the straight-talking American model is putting a bomb under the fashion industry
The policy in question is aimed at blocking content that encourages unhealthy weight loss – the opposite intent of Cherchez la Femme, which was promoting body positivity.
This is not the first time Facebook has come under fire for its censorship of photos. In March, the site faced backlash when it concluded that a photograph of topless Aboriginal women in ceremonial paint as part of a protest violated "community standards".
Critics said that ban was an obvious double standard, noting that Facebook allows celebrities such as Kim Kardashian to pose with body paint covering her nipples.
Instagram and Facebook have also faced opposition for policies banning women from exposing their nipples, with critics arguing that the guidelines are prejudiced against women and transgender users.
Cherchez la Femme vented its frustrations on its Facebook page.
"Facebook has ignored the fact that our event is going to be discussing body positivity (which comes in all shapes and sizes, but in the particular case of our event, fat bodies), and has instead come to the conclusion that we've set out to make women feel bad about themselves by posting an image of a wonderful plus sized woman," the group said. "We're raging pretty hard over here."

Internal report finds 'virtually identical' rates of conservative and liberal topics, but guidelines updated to 'exclude possibility of improper actions'
Jessamy Gleeson, co-producer of the group, said she was initially so shocked by the language in Facebook's explanation that she didn't know how to respond.
"I was utterly furious. I couldn't comprehend it, quite frankly," she said. "We thought it was really horrible and isolating and alienating ... Women with fat bodies can, of course, be as desirable as anybody else."
Gleeson said she was not satisfied with Facebook's apology and hopes the company will re-examine its policies and address double standards in how it reviews photos of women.
"Quite simply they need to understand we can use images of fat women to promote women being happy," she said, adding, "What about all the cases that don't receive this media attention? They've been wrong in many other thousands of cases, I'm sure."

Is Facebook eavesdropping on your phone conversations?

Quote(WFLA) – It's irresistible, enticing and addicting.  And, it's available 24-hours a day all over the world to billions of people. Facebook beckons to users seemingly with a two-prong approach – both the pressure and pleasure to post.
We share stories, photos, triumphs and tragedies. It is ingrained into our daily lives so deeply that studies show people check Facebook, on average, 14 times a day.  With all those eyes all over the globe dialed in and the purchasing power available, the online giant has tapped into a controversial delivery of data into its intelligence gathering.  It all starts with something that you may not even realize is enabled on your phone.
USF Professor Kelli Burns knows the power of social media. The longtime educator incorporates it into her classroom curriculum every day and, in the fall, will lead a graduate course in social media analytics.
One online behemoth, in particular, is more popular than ever, she admits.  "People are definitely addicted to Facebook. They're addicted to their phones," she told WFLA. "We have a two-second attention span. People are always checking to see what's going on. Anytime you're using your phone, any kind of information that you're putting into your phone, looking at on your phone, Facebook can access that."
With the continuous invitation for users to share, post and like, just how much information is Facebook learning about you?
According to Kelli, more than you could ever imagine.  "I don't think that people realize how much Facebook is tracking every move we're making online," she said. "Anything that you're doing on your phone, Facebook is watching."  Indeed, they are.
So, be careful what you say in the presence of your phone. Facebook is not only watching, but also listening to your cell phone. It all starts with enabling your microphone feature in your settings.  Once you do, choose your words carefully.
The site, itself, admits in an online statement, "We use your microphone to identify the things you're listening to or watching, based on the music and TV matches we're able to identify." But, experts contend that the site is going a step further. In what some users are calling an alarming trend, described as "Big Brother,"
Facebook also listens for certain buzz words. Once identified, those words trigger an interesting response.  Items are then carefully placed in your Facebook feed, specifically crafted with your interests front and center. Wait!  What?
We tested the theory with Kelli, and even we were surprised by what we found and saw.
Kelli enabled the microphone feature and talked about her desire to go on safari, right down to her mode of transportation.  "I'm really interested in going on an African safari. I think it'd be wonderful to ride in one of those jeeps," she said aloud, phone in hand.
Less than 60 seconds later, the first post on her Facebook feed was a safari story that seemed to pop up out of nowhere. Turns out, it was a story that had been posted three hours earlier. And, after mentioning a jeep, a car ad also appeared on her page.
"That is kind of weird," she laughed. "I'm still not so sure this isn't just coincidence. I don't think Facebook is really listening to our conversations."
USF graduate student, Danielle Quichocho, is not at all fazed by the online "eavesdropping" with Facebook. In fact, she admits, "I don't think it's at all surprising,"  The 22-year-old is planning her thesis around this very topic.
"It's all about the bottom line, and if this is a way to fatten that bottom line, they're gonna do it," she told us. She maintains that people should be aware and educated as they use the popular app. Her motto? User beware.
So, how does she feel about Facebook using her interests as a basis for online ads, specifically designed for her in mind?  "If you agree to the terms and conditions, then you know what to expect," she said. She also advises, choose your words carefully!
"The internet is forever!  You leave a footprint there. They're going to find it. That's just how it is," she smiled.

A evo šta kaže Facebook u svom help centru:

QuoteDoes Facebook record conversations when it identifies the things I'm listening to or watching?No, we don't record your conversations. If you choose to turn on this feature, we'll only use your microphone to identify the things you're listening to or watching based on the music and TV matches we're able to identify. If this feature is turned on, it's only active when you're writing a status update.
Note: This optional feature is only available in the US right now.

Пре неколико дана сам овде ставио поучан текст о фејсбуку, писан од стране камрада Давидовића, који је навео да фејсбук представља јаму духовног геноцида.
Линк је обрисан, нема везе (бришити другови, ја и даље држим час јер је идеологија бесмртна и надживеће све ваше модерације), али није прошло ни недељу дана од тада, а испоставило се да је камрад Давидовић био у праву.
Након ових догађаја у Русији, парафразираћу камрада Давидовића и рећи:
"На ВКонтакте улудо проведени сати, што чините Руси кукала вам мати."

Ruska tinejdžerka podsticala mlade na samoubistvo preko Fejsbuka
Srna | 29. 05. 2016 - 09:23h

Ruska policija otkrila je glavnog "administratora" na društvenim mrežama koje podstiču maloletnike na samoubistvo - to je trinaestogodišnja devojčica pod pseudonimom Eva Rejh!
Foto: Karly Domb Sadof / Tanjug

Istražioci iz Omska su, tokom provere informacija da se u grupama na društvenoj mreži "VKontakte" objavljuju informacije koje tinejdžere podstiču na izvršenje samoubistava, utvrdili da se pod pseudonimom "Eva Rejh" krije učenica iz Omska.

Istražitelji su saslušali majku devojčice i samu tinejdžerku, koja nije negirala da se, kako navodi, "zabavljala i vodila konverzaciju sa mnogim internet korisnicima, između ostalog i o suicidnim temama".

Kako bi ustanovili s kim je sve bila u kontaktu i razjasnili sve okolnosti, istražici su osumnjičenoj devojčici oduzeli mobilni telefon i hard-disk iz kompjutera, a zatim otvorili istragu koja treba da utvrdi identitet svih osoba na koje je ona imala uticaj.

Razne sekte, putem društvenih mreža u Rusiji, navode maloletnike na samoubistva - samo od novembra 2015. do aprila 2016. godine 130 mališana izvršilo je samoubistvo, a većina je bila učlanjena u sektaške grupe.

Ruski mediji objavljuju šokantne rezultate istraživanja grupa na društvenim mrežama koje podstiču kod dece želju za samoubistvom.

"Novaja gazeta" objavljuje saznanja o takozvanim "grupama smrti" na društvenoj mreži "VKontakt", inače najpopularnijoj u Rusiji. Te "zajednice" su, kako se tvrdi, navodile maloletnike na samoubistva.

Autor istraživanja Galina Mursalijeva navodi da su to velike sekte iza kojih stoje odrasli ljudi. Oni su osnovali vlastiti "klub samoubica" i već su najavili nove suicide.

Na društvenoj mreži "VKontakt" ima najmanje hiljadu i pet stotina grupa koje, na neki način, pozivaju decu da izvrše samoubistvo.

Cilj tih grupa je, kako se navodi, da "dostignu `stanje Rine`". Pod tim imenom je na internetu poznata 16-godišnja devojčica iz jednog sibirskog grada, koja je u novembru 2015. godine legla na prugu pod voz.

Fotografije njenog iskasapljenog tela dospele su na internet, a Rina je postala simbol "grupa smrti" kao "prvi sledbenik sekte".

"Stanje Rine" tinejdžeri su dostizali putem takozvanih "avantura", to jest interaktivnih zadataka, kao u video-igricama.

Administratori su, naime, davali deci lični broj i instrukciju o tome koga dana i na koji način treba dići ruku na sebe. Zatim su uključivali "tajmer".

Sve dok ne nastupi "dan D" tinejdžeri treba da rade "domaće zadatke" - da grebu ruke do krvi ili da traže rešenje "zagonetki" sastavljenih od besmislenih brojki i simbola u vidu nekakve šifre sa "onog sveta".

http://www.blic.rs/vesti/svet/ruska-tinejdzerka-podsticala-mlade-na-samoubistvo-preko-fejsbuka/5h9r36s

Quote from: T2 on 30-05-2016, 16:43:17
Пре неколико дана сам овде ставио поучан текст о фејсбуку, писан од стране камрада Давидовића, који је навео да фејсбук представља јаму духовног геноцида.
Линк је обрисан, нема везе

Šta bre obrisan?

Quote from: T2 on 25-05-2016, 16:09:23
,,На Фејсбуку улудо утрошени сати, шта радите Срби кукала вам мати!"
http://oslobodjenje.rs/polupismenost-je-gora-od-nepismenosti-a-fejsbuk-je-jama-duhovnog-genocida/