ZNAK SAGITE — više od fantastike — edicija, časopis, knjižara...

Nije problem što nema programera, nego je problem što se ne ulažu pare u zamenu softvera. Kratkovidost je problem.

Taman sam se htio cuditi da i programirati znas
Pa koliko traje dan u tebe?
Spavas li ikako

Pretpostavljam da ovo kažeš Mehi, jer je valjda opštepoznato da ja jesam programer

Ja sam namerno i stavio fusnotu da bude jasno da nikada nisam naučio programiranje.

Dozens buried on NY Hart Island a day as coronavirus deaths surge

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/04/dozens-buried-ny-hart-island-day-coronavirus-deaths-surge-200409202454538.html

Gavin Newsom Declares California a 'Nation-State' 

Quote
Governor Gavin Newsom said that he would use the bulk purchasing power of California "as a nation-state" to acquire the hospital supplies that the federal government has failed to provide. If all goes according to plan, Newsom said, California might even "export some of those supplies to states in need."

Quote from: Meho Krljic on 08-04-2020, 17:50:02
Ja sam namerno i stavio fusnotu da bude jasno da nikada nisam naučio programiranje.

Cudo nisi naucio

Pa, nisam ja mnogo toga naučio u životu. Statistički, više sam nenaučio nego naučio. Tako da - nije toliko čudo. 

Više je i zaboravio nego što su neki drugi naučili...

mac, postoji li najlakši način da naučim python? Zbog neoliberala.

Ne znam ništa o najlakšim načinima za učenje. A ne znam ništa ni o pajtonu.

služiš li ičemu, mače!

jesu li ovi priručnici što štampa mikroknjiga išta pouzdani

Ne zna ti to mac jer je pajton više za matematičare, statističare, dejta analitičare nego programere.

Ima u sebi biblioteke koje su razvili drugi matematičari za specifične vrste problema, vezanih za dejta analitiku, big dejta, mašin lrning, dip lrning i sl.

Mi smo npr. koristili pandu i numpy.

Nisam se mnogo bavio tim, ali kad bi krenuo gledao bi prvo vrstu problema za koju mi treba pajton i razmotrio specifične biblioteke koje ću koristiti, pa tek onda birao i kupovao knjigu ili kurs.

Najlakši način za učenje su možda kursevi na Udemy, sadrže video materijale, praktično kao da imaš živog predavača za male pare u rangu cene knjige.

Evo za pajton:

https://www.udemy.com/topic/python/

Ovaj dokumentarac je bio nominovan pre par godina za Oskara:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MxxxlutsKuI

Šta, nije dobio Oskara? Eh, kolone, jebale vas one.

Zasto nije izasao prije 5 ili 7 godina

Gluperde:



Black Women, Women of Color Will Be Disproportionately Affected by SCOTUS's Ruling on Birth Control

QuoteAmericans are, of course, the most thoroughly and passively indoctrinated people on earth. They know next to nothing as a rule about their own history, or the histories of other nations, or the histories of the various social movements that have risen and fallen in the past, and they certainly know little or nothing of the complexities and contradictions comprised within words like "socialism" and "capitalism." Chiefly, what they have been trained not to know or even suspect is that, in many ways, they enjoy far fewer freedoms, and suffer under a more intrusive centralized state, than do the citizens of countries with more vigorous social-democratic institutions. This is at once the most comic and most tragic aspect of the excitable alarm that talk of social democracy or democratic socialism can elicit on these shores. An enormous number of Americans have been persuaded to believe that they are freer in the abstract than, say, Germans or Danes precisely because they possess far fewer freedoms in the concrete. They are far more vulnerable to medical and financial crisis, far more likely to receive inadequate health coverage, far more prone to irreparable insolvency, far more unprotected against predatory creditors, far more subject to income inequality, and so forth, while effectively paying more in tax (when one figures in federal, state, local, and sales taxes, and then compounds those by all the expenditures that in this country, as almost nowhere else, their taxes do not cover). One might think that a people who once rebelled against the mightiest empire on earth on the principle of no taxation without representation would not meekly accept taxation without adequate government services. But we accept what we have become used to, I suppose. Even so, one has to ask, what state apparatus in the "free" world could be more powerful and tyrannical than the one that taxes its citizens while providing no substantial civic benefits in return, solely in order to enrich a piratically overinflated military-industrial complex and to ease the tax burdens of the immensely wealthy?

For twenty-one years, while the Kochs were financing an ideological war aimed at freeing American business from the grip of government, Donald Carlson was cleaning up the dregs their industry left behind. Stitched to the jacket he wore to work at Koch Refining Company, the booming Pine Bend Refinery in Rosemount, Minnesota, was the name Bull. His colleagues called him this because of his brawn and his willingness to shoulder the tasks no one else wanted to touch. "He wasn't always the greatest guy or dad, but he got up every morning and went to work. He stepped up to the plate every day," recalls his widow, Doreen Carlson. "If a job was too hard, they gave it to him."

Beginning in 1974, when he was hired, Carlson worked twelve- and sometimes sixteen-hour shifts at the refinery. Its profitability had proven the Kochs' purchase of Pine Bend prophetic. It had become the largest refinery north of Louisiana with the capacity to process 330,000 barrels of crude a day, a quarter of what Canada exported to the United States. It provided over half of the gas used in Minnesota and 40 percent of that used by Wisconsin. Carlson's job was demanding, but he enjoyed it. He cleaned out huge tanks that contained leaded gasoline, scraping them down by hand. He took samples from storage tanks whose vapors escaped with such force they sometimes blew his helmet off.

He hoisted heavy loads and vacuumed up fuel spills deep enough to cause burns to his legs. Like many of the one thousand employees at the refinery, Carlson was often exposed to toxic substances. "He was practically swimming in those tanks," his wife recalled. But Carlson never thought twice about the hazards. "I was a young guy," he explained later. "They didn't tell me anything, I didn't know anything."

In particular, Carlson said, no one warned him about benzene, a colorless liquid chemical compound refined from crude oil. In 1928, two Italian doctors first detected a connection between it and cancer. Afterward, numerous scientific studies linked chronic benzene exposure to greatly increased risks of leukemia. Four federal agencies—the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the Food and Drug Administration, the Environmental Protection Agency, and the Centers for Disease Control—have all declared benzene a human carcinogen. Asked under oath if he'd been warned about the harm it posed to his hemoglobin, Carlson replied, "I didn't even know what hemoglobin was."

In 1995, Carlson became too sick to work any longer at the refinery. When he obtained his company medical records, he and his wife were shocked by what they read. In the late 1970s, OSHA had issued regulations requiring companies whose workers were exposed to benzene to offer annual blood tests, and to retest, and notify workers if any abnormalities were found. Companies were also required to refer employees with abnormal results to medical specialists. Koch Refining Company had offered the annual blood tests as legally required, and Carlson had dutifully taken advantage of the regular screening. But what he discovered was that even though his tests had shown increasingly serious, abnormal blood cell counts beginning in 1990, as well as in 1992 and 1993, the company had not mentioned it to him until 1994.

Charles Koch had disparaged government regulations as "socialistic." From his standpoint, the regulatory state that had grown out of the Progressive Era was an illegitimate encroachment on free enterprise and a roadblock to initiative and profitability. But while such theories might appeal to the company's owners, the reality was quite different for many of their tens of thousands of employees.

Carlson continued working for another year but grew weaker, needing transfusions of three to five pints of blood a week. Finally, in the summer of 1995, he grew too sick to work at all. At that point, his wife recalls, "they let him go. Six-months' pay is what they gave him. It was basically his accumulated sick pay." Carlson argued that his illness was job related, but Koch Refining denied this claim, refusing to pay him workers' compensation, which would have covered his medical bills and continued dependency benefits for his wife and their teenage daughter. "The doctor couldn't believe he was never put on workmen's comp," she added. "We were just naive. We didn't think people would let you die. We thought, 'They help you, don't they?' "

In February 1997, twenty-three years after he joined Koch Industries, Donald Carlson died of leukemia. He was fifty-three. He and his wife had been married thirty-one years. "Almost the worst part," she said, was that "he died thinking he'd let us down financially." She added, "My husband was the sort of man who truly believed that if you worked hard and did a good job, you would be rewarded."

Furious at the company, Doreen waged a one-woman battle to get Koch Industries to acknowledge some responsibility for her husband's death and apologize. "I'm looking for some accountability," she told Tom Meersman, a reporter for the Minneapolis Star Tribune. For three years, Carlson pressed her legal claim. The company offered her some money but refused to call it compensation for a work-related death. It resisted until minutes before the case was about to be heard by a judge. And when it did finally agree to her terms, it did so only if she would sign a confidentiality agreement, keeping the matter private. "They never admitted it. They avoided court. There was no written record. They just gave me those little crumbs and told me to keep my mouth shut," she recalled.

More than a dozen years later, Carlson's confidentiality agreement had expired, and she could speak out. "I don't think you could write what I think of Koch. You're just collateral damage. It's just money for them, and they never have enough." Pressed about whether it was fair to pin the blame on the Kochs themselves, rather than on lower-level executives she dealt with, she retorted, "Charles Koch owns the refinery." She went on, "And they want less regulations? Can you imagine? What they want is things that benefit them. They never cut into their profits. I hear they're backing a lot of people politically, and I bet it's all about getting rid of regulations," she said. "But those regulations are for safety. It's not to make your workers rich; it's so they don't die."

    'Rich people leave, artists and queerdos return': is San Francisco's tech exodus real or a fantasy?    

8:46 - Dave Chappelle

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3tR6mKcBbT4

Direktor Kancelarije za KiM Marko Đurić biće novi ambasador Srbije u Vašingtonu, nezvanično saznaje B92.net.

https://consequenceofsound.net/2020/09/transgender-metalhead-satanist-republican-nomination-county-sheriff/

https://www.forbes.com/sites/theapothecary/2017/03/22/yes-it-was-the-affordable-care-act-that-increased-premiums/#4d8c0e7a11d2

Porn Stars Are Terrified of Amy Coney Barrett

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XGXRvDT2k8I
Johnny Carson - Joe Biden joke (September 16th 1987)

Gdje smo pricali o onoj radikalnoj komunistici
Aoc
Vidim tvit
Zenska bi da prosiri vrhovni sud
Ti ljudi jednostavno ne znaju igrati po pravilima
Ne zele
Zato pozivaju na revolucije

O kojim pravilima pričaš? O pravilu da predsednik bira sudiju, a senat mora da ga potvrdi? Ili o pravilu da ono što važi danas mora da važi i sutra?

Pa valjda sud ima x clanova
Sad bi mlada mijenjala da ima x+3
Slicno i sa imigrantima koje naprimaju da glasaju za njih
I majkl mur je srao kako se mora mijenjati popular vote naspram elektorskih glasova
Znaci mijenjaj pravila dok moja verzija kandidat plan ne pobijedi

Pa valjda trenutni predsednik treba da bira novog sudiju, a senat samo da potvrdi. Republički senat je odlučio da ignoriše Obaminog kandidata, pod izgovorom da je izborna kampanja u toku. Izborna kampanja nije zaista bila u toku, ali sve se dešavalo u poslednjoj Obaminoj godini. U svakom slučaju totalno nebulozan izgovor, ali ajde, ako sad imamo pravilo, onda hajde svi da ga se držimo.

Ne lezi vraže. Sada je izborna kapanja zaista u toku, dve nedelje pred same izbore, i senat je pogazio sopstveno pravilo i ipak odabrao Trampovog trećeg kandidata.

Dakle senat je taj koji "ne zna igrati po pravilima", i to pravilima koje je sam uveo. Ne žele. Zato pozivaju na revoucije.

A taj broj X se menjao vremenom. Evo šta kaže Vikipedija: Originally, the Judiciary Act of 1789 set the number of justices at six. Subsequently, the United States Congress increased the number of justices to seven in 1807, nine in 1837, and ten in 1863. The Judicial Circuits Act of 1866 set the number at seven to be achieved gradually through retirement or death of current associate justices. The court was down to eight when the Judiciary Act of 1869 restored the number to nine.

Dakle originalno je broj sudija bio 6, pa se menjalo na 7, 9, 10, 7, 8, i trenutno na 9.

Treba nadopuniti sa 4 5 liberala da sve bude posteno

Prvo revolucija.

nijedan komunista u sudu

Hit

Ako je broj aviona i bombi isti onda ne vidim razliku. Ako nema razlike onda čemu tolika buka?

Obama ima refleksije na dronovski program.

https://youtu.be/V-Q8MFjlQ2Y

Here's how rich people can help fix America

Ovo je zanimljiv podatak, recimo:

Quote

The top 1% of Americans now hold $34.23 trillion of wealth, while the bottom 50% have $2.08 trillion, according to the Federal Reserve. In other words, the top 1% of the country has 16.5 times more money than the bottom half. Are you kidding me?
Isn't it always that way, you ask? Actually no, not at all. In Q3 1989, (the furthest back the data goes) the wealthiest 1% had $4.81 trillion, while the lowest 50% had $.76 trillion—or only 6.3 times more. And as we've seen that ratio kept getting bigger.

Nemoguće da su Klinton, Obama i Bajden to dozvolili!

Nije parodija, nije fotomontaža, ovo je zaista napisao američki senator koji se nekada nadao da bude i predsednik:

ne verujem da je on lično, ne pišu oni svoje tvitove ko tramp i vučić, al dovoljno govori kakva mu je ekipa oko njega. premda je zabavno.

Da, u pravu si, ovo neki siroti intern koji će sad da zažali što nije malo jače slušo u školi.

taj Kruz je onaj evangelista mrsomud, njemu je i Tramp previše lijevo haha

Ko vodi evidenciju, može da zapiše da je Bajdenova administracija imala svoju prvu ozbiljnu vojnu akciju na tlu druge države:
Biden takes first military action with Syria strike on Iran-backed militias

Nije da to nismo očekivali. Ono što možda nismo očekivali je da se ipak javlja dosta liberalnih, jelte, intelektualaca koji ovo kritikuju, kao da su se malko ipak trgli i shvataju da su ovakve stvari pod Obamom puštali tek tako i da to nije ljucki.

Da, ovo kruži internetom, toliko je karikaturalno da skoro ne mogu da poverujem da je stvarno.

I Trampov avion je bacao bombe, da se ne lažemo, samo nisi video te bombe od silnih tvitova.

Who truly was the most dishonest president?

Nije problem što je Tramp bio nepošten, već nesposoban. Ta kombinacija nepošten i nesposoban ne daje drugi mandat.

Da je imao bolje rezultate na unutrašnjem planu, ostao bi. Tako je i planirao. Korona ga je s tim zeznula, anulirajući ekonomske rezultate njegove administracije.