The Crippled Corner

[crippled_avenger]

Ljiljana Blagojević, naravno. Ako bude htela. U svakom slučaju, ako bude drugog dela, mora da se pojavi majka...

Inače, sinoć je film prešao 125 000 gledalaca.

[Meho Krljic]

Ljiljana Blagojević je prirodan izbor, pretpostavljam zbog Budve na pjenu od mora???

A 125 k je impresivno!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Agota]

BRAVO! To je mucho dinero...

[Meho Krljic]

Behind the Break up - STRETCH

[Will-O'-The-Wisp]

Ključni režimski medij u Crnoj Gori o MALOM BUDU

http://www.pobjeda.me/2014/10/05/film-mali-budo-tigric-u-filmskoj-dzungli-balkana/#.VDJualeROfM

Nije ključni režimski medij, no Marija. Kad napiše dobru kritiku, napisala je. Sve "grijehe" sam joj oprostio nakon hvalospjeva "Ledolomcu".

Elem, ključni režimski medij veli: http://portalanalitika.me/kultura/tema/164658-kritika-mali-budo-ili-film-zablude

Pazi, i to piše čovjek koji je izgradio karijeru i imidž u javnosti sprdajući se albanskim stereotipima!!!

[Father Jape]

Kačite sve to na topik Mali Budo!

[Will-O'-The-Wisp]

Tek onda kad u srcu pohraniš SNOWPIERCER!!!

[crippled_avenger]

MALI BUDO je stvorio raskol u crnogorskom režimu!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Albedo 0]

nagli kritičaru, jesi li pisao o ledopirsingu u tim opozicionim novinama?

a ovaj Radojičić se opasno razgoropadio, došao čovjek do Komita, jbt kod ovih nacionalista opšte pravilo da Božićni ustanak ima veze sa svim ljudskim fenomenima

[Agota]

[Will-O'-The-Wisp]

nagli kritičaru, jesi li pisao o ledopirsingu u tim opozicionim novinama?

a ovaj Radojičić se opasno razgoropadio, došao čovjek do Komita, jbt kod ovih nacionalista opšte pravilo da Božićni ustanak ima veze sa svim ljudskim fenomenima

A napisao sam tekst, ali nisam našao vremena da ga skratim i sredim. A i novine mi duguju novac neki, tako da čekam...

A Radojičić je moć. Nagli sam kritičar. Sjajno!

[crippled_avenger]

Shawn Levy je snimio REAL STEEL, jedan od najboljih holivudskih filmova protekle decenije i tim ostvarenjem je kod mene stekao veliki kredit i dokazao da ume da napravi i visokooktanski popcorn film i da proizvede arhetipsku emociju. Otud je ekranizacija romana Jonathana Troppera, po scenariju samog pisca i sa All-Star podelom delovala obećavajuće, naročito za mene jer se na jednom mestu našlo dosta mojih favorita - Jason Bateman, Connie Britton i Adam Driver.

Nažalost, rezultat je daleko ispod zbira unetih elemenata. THIS IS WHERE I LEAVE YOU je stupidna, šablonizirana dramedija koja ne funkcioniše ni na jednom nivou izuzev što je Levy realizuje u visokom tempu. Brzina izlaganja rezultira time da film zbilja nikada nije dosadan ali vrlo isto tako sve prelomne scene pored toga što su kliše deluju i kao da su realizovane bez ubeđenja.

THIS IS WHERE I LEAVE YOU je film za koji je, ruku na srce, i nejasno kako je pa mogao biti dobar sa ovlolikim brojem klišea po minutu ali možda je neki strpljiviji reditelj možda mogao da izvuče nekakvu emociju da je eventualno spustio tempo. Rizik bi doduše bio da film bude podjednako glup i još dosadan pride.

Tropperov roman nisam čitao ali ako imamo u vidu da ga je sam adaptirao nema nekog naročitog razloga za samilost. Ako pisac misli da je ovo esencija njegovog romana onda nije reč o remek-delu koje zaslužuje bitno bolju realizaciju.

REAL STEEL je pokazao da Levy može mnogo više od onoga što pokazuje u ostatku karijere. Nažalost, THIS IS WHERE I LEAVE YOU nije film sa kojim je napravio očekivani iskorak u teritoriju kojom je vladao Mike Nichols.

* 1/2 / * * * *



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[crippled_avenger]

After rising in the international ranks with The Beat That My Heart Skipped, A Prophet, and more, France's Jacques Audiard delivered his highest-profile project a few years ago with the Marion Cotillard and Matthias Schoenaerts-led Rust & Bone. For those, like us, that have been waiting to hear what the filmmaker would take on next, after he tossed around ideas for a musical and a western, today brings news of his project.
Beginning production next week, it's been revealed that the drama Erran will mark his next project, the story of a Sri Lankan Tamil fighter who fled Sri Lanka to become custodian of public housing in the suburbs of Paris. CineEuropa pointed us to the news, but open casting calls have been floating around for some time. While it's not revealed yet who received the part, Audiard's script was partially inspired by Montesquieu's Persian Letters, focusing on "culture shock and this refugee's perception of modern-day French society."


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[crippled_avenger]

Pogledao sam THE SALVATION Kristiana Levringa, vstern koji su napisali Levring i ključni savremeni danski scenarista Anders Thomas Jensen. Levringov film je u izvesnom pogledu osavremenjena varijacija na ZLATNU PAĆKU Lole Đukića, da dve bitne razlike - Levringov film nije komedija već tradicionalni vestern sa motivom osvete odnosno Levring nema šta da kaže o spoju svog nacionalnog identiteta sa vesternom kao Lola Đukić.

Levringovi junaci su Skandinavci u Americi (koje igraju Danac Mads Mikkelsen i Šveđanin Mikael Perbrandt) inače ratni vterani koji uzimaju pravdu u svoj ruke kada tipska odmetnička banda koja teroriše tipsku vestern varošicu ubije porodicu jednog od njih.

U All-Star podeli su i Eva Green i Eric Cantona i Jonathan Pryce a Jeffrey Dean Morgan kanališe mlađeg Powers Bootha u ulozi vođe bande. Nažalost, Levring se kreće tankom granicom između klasičnog vesterna i nešto nasilnijeg eastwoodovskog vetsrena nastalog pod uticajem spaghetti iskustva.

Rezultat je nažalost sveden na reprodukciju starih tekovina žanra, bez naročitog žara ili svežih rešenja. U krajnjoj liniji, na kraju čak ni to što su junaci Skandinavci nema bitniju ulogu - čak nema ni jezičke barijere - tipa da se u nekoj sceni oni dogovaraju a ostali ih ne razumeju.

Jensen i Levring dakle nisu pružili apsolutno ništa novo i jedino vredno pažnje je to što oni koji koji vole ortodoksni vestern imaju novu priliku da vide stare poteze realizovane u 2014. godini.

THE SALVATION je prikazan u Kanu što pokazuje perverznu snagu kurioziteta. Očigledno je dovoljno sakupiti nekoliko poznatih glumaca, poticati iz jake kinematografije i imati jak koncept na papiru kako bi se došlo do Kana. THE SALVATION je potpuna suprotnost snazi i svežini THE HOMESMANa Tommy Lee Jonesa.

* * / * * * *

[crippled_avenger]

Editor's note: David C. Kang is professor of international relations and business at the University of Southern California, where he also directs the Korean Studies Institute and the East Asian Studies Center. He is the co-author of the forthcoming book "After Unification: Planning for the Long Run in Korea." The views expressed are his own.

(CNN) -- Speculation has been rampant over what exactly has happened to North Korean leader Kim Jong Un. After all, Kim hasn't been seen in public in over a month, and the country's media took the unusual step of admitting that Kim is in an "uncomfortable physical condition." Some commentators believe this suggests Kim might be more seriously ill than the country is letting on. But others have speculated something more dramatic might have occurred -- namely a coup.
David Kang
David Kang

Does the evidence back this up? The short answer is, no.

For a start, there have been no unusual military or troop movements inside North Korea, particularly tied to the Pyongyang defense command or other key military units. On top of this, just this past weekend, Hwang Pyong-so -- political director for the Korean People's Army, and widely seen as the second most powerful man in North Korea -- and former KPA political director Choe Ryong-hae made a surprise visit to South Korea for the end of the Asian Games.
Why is Kim Jong Un so camera shy?
North Korean leaders visit South Korea
Is Kim Jong Un no longer in charge?

The visiting officials brought with them a surprise: an informal offer from Kim to immediately resume high-level talks between North and South Korea. It is difficult to imagine that a regime facing an intense internal crisis or power struggle would dispatch two top political and military figures to South Korea, and make an offer in Kim's name, if there really were a silent power struggle going on back in Pyongyang.

Finally, it was reported that all the achievements of the North Korean athletes at the recently concluded games were attributed to Kim, with lectures given to workers on October 4 titled "The faith and consideration of Marshal Kim Jong Un for the athletes and workers." Clearly, the regime is still placing Kim at the center of its propaganda.

Is Kim Jong Un's sister in charge?

Absent any sort of evidence of military upheaval or unusual political activity, the only way this could be a coup is if it were completely invisible, a very unusual sort of coup indeed.

True, talk of coups against successive Kim regimes has been a staple of North Korea-watching for decades. But the legitimacy of North Korea's rulers has been centered on the Kim family since the country was founded, some seven decades ago. A coup would therefore not only have to physically replace Kim, but provide some sort of justification and legitimation for such action to the North Korean people.

The role of the Kim family in North Korea is typically misunderstood as a "cult of personality," but the reality is more complex than that. In fact, one reason the North Korean regime has proved so durable is that it is grafted onto deep Korean social and cultural roots. In contrast to many other communist regimes that attempted to wipe away the past, the North Korean regime built its legitimacy on the basic idea that Kim Il Sung is the "true" Korean, the only defender of the Korean nation from its enemies.

Is Kim Jong Un still in charge of North Korea?

With this view in mind, the Kim family did not try to wipe out many of the existing cultural or social features of Korean life, but instead embraced them (in an admittedly warped way). For example, the Korean Worker's Party adopted the Confucian scholar's brush -- perhaps the most obvious representation of traditional Korea -- as part of its official iconography. The party also encouraged its women to wear traditional Korean dress as often as possible, another link to its past.

But most important of all has been the use of the traditional Korean extended family as the basis of North Korean political rule. Korea is a clan-based, familial society, and Kim Il Sung simply melded himself -- and his son and grandson -- onto the entire country as patriarch.

Kim's son and grandson have continued this patriarchal approach: Activities such as "on the scene guidance," and other personal interventions by Kim have emphasized the personal link between the Kim family and their citizens. Of course this effort at legitimation is warped and repressive. But it has also resonated with many North Koreans.

All this suggests that while internal collapse is quite possible -- even likely -- if the Kim family itself should come apart, a coup by someone outside the family appears unlikely to succeed.

Kim's absence from celebrations marking the founding of the Korean Worker's Party on October 10 would certainly raise eyebrows. But right now, without any kind of concrete evidence, speculation that there might have been a coup looks misplaced.

Kim may be sick or even have had surgery. But he is also almost certainly still in power.

http://edition.cnn.com/2014/10/08/opinion/kang-kim-coup-rumors/index.html?hpt=hp_c1

[Ghoul]

na kraju čak ni to što su junaci Skandinavci nema bitniju ulogu - čak nema ni jezičke barijere - tipa da se u nekoj sceni oni dogovaraju a ostali ih ne razumeju.

nije se pazilo na času: ima, u kočiji, kad kaže ženi da ugrize za uvo siledžiju...

inače, film je prijatan, mlaka trojka po meni, ali zaista ne više od kurioziteta.

[crippled_avenger]

Stari tumači aktuelno stanje u svetu telekomunikacija.

http://starikadar.blogspot.com/2014/10/punjeni-telefon.html

[Meho Krljic]

Lepe opservacije.  No, baterije koje se napune za pola minuta već su realnost u R&D odeljenjima više nego jedne firme (kačio sam na neki od gornjih topika tekst o tome) i ostaje samo da se vidi koliko će još meseci proći pre nego što postanu dovoljno male da se stavljaju u prenosne uređaje. A onda će redaljka na utikaču biti mnogo manje zabavna za gledanje.

[Albedo 0]

Meho je nepopravljivi optimista, vjeruje ne samo da će se stvoriti superbaterije koje dugo traju i brzo se pune, već i vjerovatno da će se wifi proširiti po čitavoj planeti, da ćeš moći da hvataš signal i na vrhu neke planinčuge, i naravno da će sve biti besplatno i ekološki bezbjedno

da ne pričamo o fejsbuk revolucijama

[Meho Krljic]

Pa, ne pričam sasvim na osnovu neke moje psihotičke fantazije:


New "dual carbon" battery charges 20 times faster than Li-ion

Japanese company Power Japan Plus has announced the development and planned mass-production of "Ryden," a disruptive carbon battery that can be charged 20 times faster than an ordinary lithium-ion cell. The battery, which is cheap to manufacture, safe, and environmentally friendly, could be ideal to improve the range and charging times of electric cars.

Boston-Power Fast Charge Battery Technology


10 breakthroughs that will greatly improve phone batteries

[Albedo 0]

zavisi kako gledaš na stvari, npr možda ta baterija može biti ''environmentally friendly'', ali sama proizvodnja struje to svakako ne može biti

i šta se dešava kada korisnici dobijaju mogućnost da troše više struje - još veća proizvodnja struje!


kao i kod wifi-ja, ako hoćeš domet u svakoj vukojebini onda ćeš morati da postaviš antene u svakoj vukojebini

[Meho Krljic]

Malo širiš priču na teme koje nisu bile predmet mog originalnog posta, tako da, tu ja ne bih ni polemisao. Naravno da će veća dostupnost energije povećati njenu potrošnju. A ekološka proizvodnja struje je jako široka tema kojoj ne bih prilazio nepripremljen i u trenutku kad pišem izveštaj za njemačkog donatora i potrebna mi je koncentracija. 


Ali mogu da ovde okačim Tarzanijin prikaz Malog Buda. Vrlo je anfejvrabl, ali i prilično površan:


http://www.tarzanija.com/mali-budo-da-mi-vrati-96-minuta-zivota/

[Albedo 0]

dobro, nadovezujem se i na Kripov tekst, a i širenje priče je uvijek poželjno Piši izvještaj, al reko bih da je to još održivo dok ima 600-700 miliona, možda milijardu korisnika mobilnih telefona, al pitanje je šta će biti kad ih bude 7 milijardi


inače, već nekoliko kritičara ukazuje na kvalitet komičnih replika, i moram priznati da one nemaju onu ''vječnost'' kao u Maratoncima i sličnim klasicima, možda bi trebalo konsultovati ostrogotičare i blejdranere za nastavak. I ja bih jopet napomenuo da montenegro zombi skripta ima nekih odličnih fora, i htio bih da vidim taj nivo

[Meho Krljic]

New star emerges in North Korea amid speculation over Kim

              SEOUL (Reuters) - The man in the olive drab uniform and oversized Soviet-style military cap who strode through South Korea's main airport last week has climbed from an obscure desk job in North Korea to the most powerful position outside the ruling Kim family.

              Hwang Pyong So, now a top military aide to the North's leader Kim Jong Un, has had an unprecedented rise to the top rungs of North Korea's leadership in the space of a few years. With intense speculation on the whereabouts of Kim after his disappearance from official media for over a month, Hwang is even more in focus.

              Last week, Hwang was at the head of a delegation that visited South Korea for the closing ceremony of the Asian Games in the city of Incheon with little advance notice.

              He is the most senior official from the North to have ever come to the South, and opinion is divided on whether this could be a sign of turmoil in Pyongyang.

              Hwang, who is 64 or 65, was in the Organisation and Guidance Department (OGD), a powerful and secretive body that finalises appointments within North Korea's leadership, and rose to be its second-in-command, according to North Korea experts and South Korea's Unification Ministry.

              At the time, the OGD was headed by Kim Jong Il, the father of the current leader.

              Hwang was associated with Kim Jong Un in the late 2000s when the young man was first named in state media reports announcing his party and military credentials.

              When Kim Jong Un took power after his father's death in 2011, Hwang was among his coterie of advisers. As others fell by the wayside, Hwang became chief of the General Political Bureau of the army, a powerful position that mobilises the military for the leader, earlier this year.

              Last month, he also became vice chairman of the National Defence Commission, considered one of the most important posts in North Korea. Kim Jong Un is chairman.

              Jang Jin-sung, a North Korean defector who previously worked at a propaganda unit in the North's ruling party, said it was unusual for an OGD veteran to rise to such a prominent position.

              "These are the people who come to the forefront only when there is a purge or an execution," said Jang.

              Pyongyang's military leadership has been in a state of perpetual reshuffle since Kim Jong Un took power.

              Kim's uncle Jang Song Thaek, who was once seen as the No.2 in Pyongyang, was purged and executed late last year.

              Jang's replacement, Choe Ryong Hae, has been demoted several times since then. Now head of the state sports commission, a role Jang also held before being executed, Choe accompanied Hwang on the visit to South Korea.

              A source with ties to the leadership in Pyongyang and Beijing said Choe fell from grace for not preparing troops in his role as political head of the North Korean army.

              North Korean state media in April said Kim noted "serious defects" with an artillery unit within the army that he said failed to carry out "party political work" - a task within Choe's remit.

              Kim Jong Un further lost confidence in Choe when he learned the 65-year-old had stashed millions of dollars in a secret Chinese bank account, the respected Seoul-based Daily NK website reported in July.

              NEW UNIFORM

              Despite little military experience, Hwang wears a rank equivalent to a four-star general - not unusual in a top-heavy military leadership where party cadres often rotate in and out of uniform.

              "Hwang was promoted because Kim Jong Un was impressed with his division, the most combat-ready of the ones Kim inspected," the source with ties to the leadership said.

              Known as a close confidant of the young dictator, Hwang had few official dealings with people outside the reclusive North before leading the delegation to South Korea on Saturday.

              He arrived on a VIP plane bearing the emblem of the North Korean state, flanked by suited bodyguards wearing sunglasses and earpieces.

              During his 12-hour trip, Hwang smiled often, watched fireworks and Korean pop music at the closing ceremony, and at times spoke in a way that made it impossible to ascertain what he was saying, official transcripts show.

              Michael Madden, an expert on the North Korean leadership, said people who have met Hwang described him as lacking arrogance, favouring consensus and "very pleasant to interact with."

              He cuts a more formidable figure at home.

              At a military rally in Pyongyang in July, Hwang told troops to prepare for nuclear armageddon against America.

              "If the U.S. undermines our sovereignty and right to exist with its nuclear weapons and aircraft carriers, our army will launch a nuclear-armed rocket at the White House and major U.S. bases in and around the Pacific," Hwang said.

              Hwang first emerged in state media reports 10 years ago as greeting leader Kim Jong Il with "stormy cheers" at a concert.

              South Korea's Ministry of Unification has published little on Hwang beyond his job, rank and year of birth - 1949, the same generation as many of the cadres around Kim Jong Un. Kim's father, by comparison, was often accompanied by octogenarians.
Experts are divided as to how much control the OGD, and Hwang, have over Kim Jong Un, but there is general agreement that there has long been mutual dependency between party cadres and the Kim family.


              "Hwang is the guy who made the leap from the shadows to sunshine," said Jang, the defector.

               (Additional reporting by Benjamin Kang Lim in BEIJING; Editing by Tony Munroe, Raju Gopalakrishnan and Mike Collett-White)

[crippled_avenger]

Pogledao sam THE EQUALIZER Antoine Fuque. Nažalost, posle odličnog SAFE HOUSE, Denzel Washington ponavlja istu formulu ali rezultati su slabiji od 2 GUNS koji je bio već na garnici ali nije otišao ispod nivoa. THE EQUALIZER ima hajpovaniji scenario od 2 GUNS i Fuqua ima kudikamo sigurniju ruku od Kormakura, ali na kraju rezultat je ipak podnošljiv isključivo zahvaljujući Denzelu. Antoine Fuqua je u jednom trenutku ispao iz prve olige i očigledno to je ostavilo posledice na njega - Denzel odavno nije imao ovako konfuzno i mlako režiran vehicle.

Scenario Richarda Wenka (16 BLOCKS, VAMP) baziran na seriji iz osamdesetih, stekao je kultni status u toku razvoja projekta, ali na ekranu nema ništa naročito da se vidi. THE EQUALIZER je nijansu pretenciozniji derivat TAKENa, predug, sa neutemeljenom pretenzijom i hrpom krajnje neinventivnih plot pointa.

Pored TAKENa, u izvesnoj meri se kao referenca može uzeti i Michael Mann ali Fuqua sve gura u pravcu totalne stupidnosti.

Denzel Washington izdiže ovaj materijal ali mu opasno nedostaje materijal za igru. Ja nisam neki purista koji smatra da posle prelaska karakternih glumaca u akcijaše oni moraju pod obavezno da donose svoj A-game ali Denzel se ovde očigledno trudi a materijal mu izmiče.

Deluje apsurdno da se THE EQUALIZER toliko profiliše kao početak franšize, a sam po sebi je produžetak jednog filma od pre dve godine.

Jedini koji od ovog projekta ima koristi je Fuqua koji je na ovaj način izvučen iz Avi Lernerovog brloga. Denzel nažalost sada treba da misli o nekom novom smeru. daleko od toga da se ne radujem njegovom novom akcijašu na liniji SFAE HOUSE ali voleo bih kada bi nečim razbio ovu stagnaciju.

* * 1/2 / * * * *

[crippled_avenger]

Mogao bi se maltene uraditi shot for shot isti trejler sa kadrovima iz BUDA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Q_u3XP9Vu5M

[Meho Krljic]

Powers izgleda lepo u trejleru:

Exclusive New York Comic Con Powers Trailer

[crippled_avenger]

U online izdanju bitno cenzurisano ono što sam rekao -

http://www.kurir-info.rs/vesti/drustvo/dimitrije-vojnov-danas-svako-ko-zna-da-recituje-dobije-funkciju-u-kulturi-clanak-1587237

Moram da proverim kako je u printu...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Meho Krljic]

Ali lepo, onako opšte su te intervjuisali. Treba to pozdraviti.

[crippled_avenger]

Zanimljiva je lista rečenica koje nedostaju i koje u velikoj meri menjaju predznak onoga što sam izrekao.

http://starikadar.blogspot.com/2014/10/kurir-intervju-wikileak.html?m=1

Novinar je autor intervjua i on ima pravo da ga formuliše onako kako misli. Ovaj intervju je vrlo vešto skrojen da liči na moje izjave, samo sa izmenjenim, ublaženim, anesteziranim stavovima.

Na nivou novinarske tehnike, ovo je jedan od veštije napisanih tekstova u Kuriru poslednjih godina.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Albedo 0]

od sada traži autorizaciju, bar bi se izborio za nešto slabiju anesteziju.

oni su svakako prenijeli šta si htio da kažeš, samo ko će da izvuče iz ''vojska je izgubila društveni značaj'' ono što si napisao na blogu. Iako obe stvari znače jedno te isto.

izgleda da je i neki urednik bio aktivan, ne samo novinar

[crippled_avenger]

Ali se iz intervjua recimo ne vidi da sam protiv EU i iz kojih razloga. Ne vidi se da mislim da postoji pritisak na medije.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Albedo 0]

znači bilo je i sječe, ne samo anestezije, mada i to je danak odbijanju autorizacije, novinari jednostavno mogu da skrate šta hoće, ako im se ne uklapa u određene okvire

oni su u startu sebi napravili dobru poziciju, jer se intervju bavi svim i svačim, a iz naslova bi se zaključilo da ima veze samo sa kulturom, te ako pođe po zlu mogu da odstrane sve što nema direktne veze sa kulturom, a ostalo može biti žrtva nedostatka prostora i sličnog, iako je u stvari žrtva autocenzure. Kakva priča o EU, pa ovo je razgovor o kulturi - sasvim realan izgovor.

ono što bi trebalo imati u vidu, mada je to teško sprovesti u djelo, jeste da određeni stav bude integralan za intervju a ne usputan. Jedan odgovor na jedno pitanje uvijek može da se odstrani a ono što se provlači kroz čitav razgovor jednostavno ne može. EU se mogla na više mjesta spomenuti.

Parade su okupirale tri pitanja, EU samo jedno, i lako je izbačeno kao 13. prase. Jednostavno, da je novinar jedini autor intervjua ne bi ni postojala institucija autorizacije. Nauk za ubuduće

[Meho Krljic]

io9 salivira po novom Daredevil futidžu i opisuje klipove koje je Džef Leb prikazao na njujorškom komik konu detaljno, uz neke stillove, ali same trejlere nema.. Oh, well, i ovako iz priče deluje napaljujuće:

http://io9.com/weve-seen-the-first-fantastic-footage-from-the-new-dare-1645291890/+Fahey

[crippled_avenger]

Marvel hoće Loeba bez motike, kada ga je DC odškolovao u SMALLVILLEu, kada je bilo najteže...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Meho Krljic]

Loeb je ipak stajao iza najbolje superherojske serije nevezane za DC ili Marvelov univerzum - Heroes, pa se može reći da je od velike koristi i jednima i drugima.

[Meho Krljic]

Samo da se potvrdi: u Kapetanu Americi 3 igraće i Robert Dauni Džunior a zaplet je baziran na divizivnoj stripovskoj priči Civil War.

[crippled_avenger]

Oduvek sam mrzeo ove misije u GTA

http://www.b92.net/info/vesti/index.php?yyyy=2014&mm=10&dd=14&nav_category=16&nav_id=911679

Mehmete, izgleda da sam gresio...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Meho Krljic]

    I ja sam ih mrzeo. Ali, eto, ima patriota koji se žrtvuju samo da bi se njihova zastava zavijorila na srpskoj televiziji.

[Meho Krljic]

Why Iron Man Vs. Captain America Trumps 'Batman v Superman'

It turns out that all of the hullabaloo about Robert Downey Jr. and Iron Man 4 wasn't quite as simple as we thought. As of last night, Variety broke the story that Robert Downey Jr. would be signed for another major Marvel picture. It's not Iron Man 4. It is in-fact Captain America 3, but that's not the real kicker. The word around the campfire is that the third Captain America film, due to be released on May 6th, 2016 by Walt Disney DIS +0.27% and Marvel, will be a loose adaptation of the "Civil War" comic book arc that pitted masked hero against masked hero after the government demanded that all superheroes register their identities. If you read said story from 2006-2007, you'll know that the " evil" government anti-mask forces are led by Tony Stark while Steve Rogers leads the would-be resistance. Assuming the third Captain America film follows the story, the villain of Captain America 3 will be Tony Stark. So while DC and Warner Bros.' (Time Warner TWX 0% Inc.) is dropping Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice (Gah... that title!) on March 25th, 2016, Walt Disney just raised them what amounts to "Captain America vs. Iron Man."  We now have a very real scenario where Captain America 3 might actually out-gross Batman v Superman domestically and worldwide.


There is lot of other information and speculation to be found in Devin Faraci's more detailed write-up (including the possibility that the Russo Brothers may end up directing future Avengers installments), but please read only if you want speculative and very-real spoilers for Avengers: Age of Ultron and every Marvel movie after that. Regardless of what film will be better or even whether either film will be any good (I'm not a huge fan of the "Civil War" arc, although it has a core post-9/11 idea that could certainly work with better execution), Marvel has shelled out the money (at least $40m but back-end treats to get Downey Jr. back) for arguably the one "versus" that could in-fact trump the Man of Steel and the Caped Crusader. The reason is familiarity. This isn't just a Superman we saw once and frankly weren't all that thrilled with pitted against a Batman who we are being introduced to along with a brand new Wonder Woman and brand-new Lex Luthor on the sidelines. This is Robert Downey Jr.'s Iron Man that we (by 2016) will have spent eight years with pitted against Chris Evans's Captain America whom we have been following for five years in a film that turns Marvel's flagship hero into a villain. You don't get more "added value element" than that, folks.
That by itself, not just the return of Robert Downey Jr.'s Iron Man but a new status as a potential "big bad" makes Captain America: Civil War (or whatever they end up calling it) an event in a way that a theoretical Captain America 3: The Search For Bucky would not have been. As I noted back in May of 2013, Iron Man 3 was able to basically double the gross of Iron Man 2 ($1.2 billion versus $623m) partially (along with the 3D bump) by being the first major Marvel film to piggy-back off of The Avengers and thus act as a de-facto Avengers 1.5. More importantly, the fact that Iron Man 3 made nearly double the amounts of Thor: The Dark World ($644m), Captain America: The Winter Soldier ($714m), and Guardians of the Galaxy ($687m and counting now that it has debuted China) shows that there is simply a larger contingent of would-be audience members for the Tony Stark adventures than the other related stand-alone hero pics.


By putting Robert Downey Jr. in a key starring role in Captain America 3, Marvel has made the third Steve Rogers adventure a de-facto Iron Man 4 and a de-facto Avengers 3. So Marvel is basically getting the best of both worlds along with the obviously large number of fans who showed up purely out of their love for the Chris Evans-as-Steve Rogers adventures. The $1.2 billion earned by Iron Man 3 seems like an almost reasonable expectation going into this. So the question is, how much can we honestly expect Batman v. Superman to gross in what amounts to a maiden voyage for most of the DC Universe? This shows the sheer value of Marvel's patience in terms of building a shared universe, as their successes have allowed them to basically create a mega-event for any big franchise sequel by dropping other already established characters into them in some capacity. Everyone is attempting to copy Marvel's shared universe, but frankly no one else has (or will have for quite a while) the deep bench of popular branded characters played by actors whom we like seeing in said roles and the ability to screw with said characters like Marvel has right now.
I talk a lot about "added value elements" and Batman v Superman is basically "Added Value Elements: The Movie!" as its primary trump cards are seeing Ben Affleck as Batman (that's a big deal, especially for general audiences) and seeing the first live-action big-screen appearance of Wonder Woman (that's a big deal even if it basically means that much of the film's reception will depend on said element). An added value element in a sequel usually involves adding a popular movie star (The Rock in Fast Five), a popular established character (the Chipettes in Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakquel) or both (Heath Ledger as The Joker in The Dark Knight is arguably the mother-of-all added value elements). Marvel's big added-value element is a big movie star (Robert Downey Jr.) as an iconic and already established character (Iron Man) as the villain no-less.
I'm not going to play box office predictor two years out. Warner Bros. may-well throw out (and I'm completely making this up) Brad Pitt as The Joker or audiences may hate Avengers 2 for reasons unknown. And for the record, if Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice (Gah... that title!) ends up being a really good film (and nothing would make me happier, especially as it will probably be my daughter's first PG-13 superhero film in a theater) that gets fans and general audiences excited about whatever comes next in the DC Cinematic Universe, Warner Bros. won't care as much if their respective "heroes in conflict!" tent pole grosses more or less than Marvel's respective "heroes in conflict!" tent pole. But the conventional wisdom up until yesterday was that the slotting of Captain America 3 against Batman v Superman back in March was not about "winning" but rather about merely hurting DC's must-succeed team-up picture even if Captain America took a hit in the process. Whether by design or an on-the-fly decision (and I don't pretend to know which this was), Marvel has arguably trumped DC with their own arguably bigger "versus" superhero sequel event.
Yes Batman and Superman are, barring variables, arguably bigger characters than Iron Man and Captain America. But in terms of cinematic relevance and pre-affirmed audience interest (both notable variables), it is a much closer contest. If I may digress, the fact that Marvel is going ahead with the popular "hero vs. hero" arc points to something I've felt for some time, which is that as the Marvel Cinematic Universe as a whole body of work will end up being a defining examination of post-9/11 America with different characters dealing with different facets of our reaction and our new post-9/11 normal. The Iron Man trilogy dealt with war profiteering and perpetual conflict, the Thor films deal with war mongering and disproportionate responses, the Captain America films deals with security vs. liberty, while The Incredible Hulk dealt with the notion of a solution being worse than the problem.
Anyway, what this all means is that Marvel is apparently willing to do some major rejiggering of its flagship franchises in order to keep the Marvel Cinematic Universe alive past the eventual expiration point of the initial slate of heroes. Although I'd be more confident of their ability to stick to major outcomes if they were able to keep major characters dead for more than two acts at a time. Anyway, Marvel has again raised the stakes in terms of world-building, and the ability to play said cards is the reward for both success and patience in terms of establishing said characters over the last several years.
Obviously there is room for both Captain America 3 and Batman v Superman to succeed even in a relatively close proximity to each other. Obviously the best-case scenario is for both films to be high-quality superhero productions. Obviously in the end the "Which film is biggest?" contest is mostly about bragging rights and that each film will succeed or fail based on its own respective goals and expectations. My hope for 2016 is that both films are as much fun to watch as they have been to write about. But for the moment, I would argue that Captain America 3 is now a "bigger" film than Batman v Superman and shows that Marvel's triumph isn't just about known characters but about audiences wanting to see the Marvel Cinematic Universe version of those characters.

[Meho Krljic]

Nego, šta ćemo s Mladom Bosnom?

http://www.kurir-info.rs/zabava/pop-kultura/premijera-film-branio-sam-mladu-bosnu-u-sava-centru-clanak-1588590

Moja koleginica je oduševljena filmom, ali da čujemo još neko mišljenje.

[crippled_avenger]

"She's a demigod. Her father was Zeus."



There you have it. Wonder Woman's origin in BATMAN V. SUPERMAN straight from the mouth of producer Charles Roven (captured in this Vine).



There have been a bunch of different origin stories for the heroine sometimes known as Diana Prince over the years, including one where she's a "normal" (read: human) Amazonian woman and another where she starts out as a soulless mold of clay. However, DC has been revamping its lineup for the past three years in the "New 52" movement, and WW's backstory in this era is that she is the daughter of Greek god Zeus and the Amazon queen, Hippolyta. And, if that clip is to be trusted (his statement could possibly be chalked up to either confusion or deliberate misinformation), it seems that's the Wonder Woman that Snyder, Goyer, and WB will be playing with in this new cinematic DC-verse.



Now, we know that BATMAN V. SUPERMAN is packed, top-to-bottom, with new heroes and villains alike, so there really wouldn't have been time to give Ms. Price a chunk of time to explain her past like Bane/Talia al Ghul did in THE DARK KNIGHT RISES. Keeping it simple and relatable (not sure everyone around the globe even knows where the Amazon is...everyone knows Zeus) had to be the name of the game if they wanted to shoehorn the "demigod"'s first appearance into a BATMAN/SUPERMAN flick, so no time for complicated stuff like the orphaned souls of all the women ever murdered by men.



Still, Zeus, as in the lightning-chucking king of Mount Olympus, is a real thing in this "gritty" DC universe WB is concocting. So that's something.

[Meho Krljic]

Naravno, hardkor masiv se sad buni što je odabran ovaj oridžin jer preferiraju ultrafeminističku varjantu originalnog oridžina (u kome ju je majka izvajala od gline)gde nema muškaraca umešanih ni na koji način. Gikovi nisu uvek šovinisti 

[crippled_avenger]

http://pescanik.net/visok-rizik/


U filmu "Druga utakmica" rumunskog reditelja Kornelija Porumboja možemo da pogledamo musavi VHS snimak svih 90 minuta bukureštanskog derbija između Dinama i Steaue iz decembra 1988. Dok gledamo celu utakmicu, u off-u reditelj razgovara sa svojim ocem, inače fudbalskim sudijom koji je tada vodio ovaj ,,meč visokog rizika". Dok je Dinamo važio za vojni klub, Steaua je bila tim podržavan od strane Sekuritatee, te je utakmica razotkrivala sve dublji raskol između dve bezbednosne strukture uoči samog kolapsa Čaušeskuovog režima. Snimak utakmice nam pokazuje i metod kojim je rumunska televizija izbegavala da prikaže i najmanji incident između fudbalera na terenu: kad god bi došlo i do najmanjeg koškanja, kamera bi prešla na neutralne prizore (zgrade i drveće u okolini, delove tribina sa mirnim gledaocima) ili bi se potpuno odzumirala u total čitavog stadiona.

Sličnu strategiju primenio je i RTS kada su krenule ,,uznemirujuće scene na terenu" tokom utakmice Srbija-Albanija: reditelj prenosa se opredelio za džon-fordovski total dok se komentator upinjao da objasni kako se zapravo ništa posebno nije dogodilo i kako nijednom Albancu nije ni dlaka sa glave zafalila. Za razliku od Čaušeskuovog vremena kada ni pisaću mašinu nije baš svako smeo da poseduje, u Vučićevoj Srbiji skoro je svaki građanin opremljen bar telefonom sa kamerom, te se na youtubeu već mogu naći zoom-inovani snimci na kojima se sve vidi – ulazak fudbalera sa klupe srpske reprezentacije kako bi se sa Albancima obračunali oko ,,krpe" (što reče Dejan Ilić) koja je pala odozgo, zatim upada ,,navijača" među kojima je bio već svima poznati Bogdanov, a onda i najodvratniji deo kada bez zaštite policije albanski fudbaleri beže ka tunelu gde ih dočekuje sve i svašta, i još par div-junaka koji na njih nasrću nogama i pesnicama.

Naravno, znamo da je pomenuta krpa s neba izazvala čitav metež. A čim kažemo ,,krpa" impliciramo da se ovde radi o onome što teoretičar umetnosti Boris Grojs zove distrubucijom ,,slabih znakova", postupku nasleđenom iz istorije umetničkih avangardi, kao strategijom subverzije nekog ,,jakog znaka" kroz koji govori dominantni autoritet. Dron je svakako bio odgovor na zabranu ulaska albanskih navijača u Srbiju, mogućnost da se tim povodom dovitljivo interveniše i da se pokaže da je u prostoru društva kontrole zapravo moguće ispitivati granicu izvodljivog i pravno definisanog. Ali kako se izgleda ispostavlja, dron je bio teledirigovan iz same VIP lože i to od strane brata albanskog premijera. A njemu umetnost nije strana: i sam premijer Edi Rama poznati je slikar, dok je i njihov otac bio umetnik iz vremena Hodžine Albanije. Takođe, krpa je ipak bila nešto više od krpe jer je taj ,,slab znak" zapravo nosio ,,jako znamenje" poslato iz ,,jake" institucionalne i tehnološki opremljene pozicije govora. Štaviše, Olsi Rama ne samo što je premijerov brat već je i nameštenik kompanije Pegasus Communications koja se na svojoj internet stranici hvali time da ,,our full live broadcast production services bring the audience closer to the action".

Ovaj događaj tako govori o prirodi današnje ,,subverzije" koja je postala deo institucionalne politike ,,odozgo", a ne više neki agonijski akt ,,odozdo". Ne radi se dakle o još jednoj potvrdi mesijanstva umetnika Jozefa Bojsa koji je sedamdesetih rekao da će svako u budućnosti biti umetnik, već pre o potvrdi jednog drugog umetničkog iskaza iz sedamdestih, iskaza Gorana Trbuljaka da je ,,umjetnik onaj kome drugi za to dadnu priliku". Intervencija Olsija Rame dakle je pre svega pokazatelj institucionalizacije, džentrifikacije i elitizacije već ustanovljenih formi umetničke subverzije od strane onog kome je za to neko dao priliku. (Uključujući možda i samog ministra Stefanovića koji je sedeo u istoj loži, pa čak možda i crkvene dijeceze s čijeg je imanja dron navodno poleteo.)

Ali upravo tako ,,odozgo" orkestrirana intervencija ostvaruje ono što slabost subverzivnog govora obično ne može – politički spektakl koji u ovom slučaju direktno razotkriva potpunu prazninu javnog i intitucionalnog prostora u Srbiji koji sve više liči upravo na onaj total iz TV prenosa na kom prosto vidimo ,,ljudiće" u nekakvom nedefinisanom metežu. Ali, za razliku od visoko kontrolisanog prenosa, i visoko-kontrolisane državne subverzije s albanske strane, u medijskom prostoru dogodio se sinoć i još jedan akt subverzije, kada se neki navijač (a oni su se slobodno šetali po terenu) pojavio pred kamerama ispred zabezeknutog ,,kolege Strajnića" i istresao svoju homofobiju na Vučića i svoju vučićofobiju na pedere. Tada se zapravo pokazalo da prisustvujemo događaju u kom naizgled kontrolisani javno-medijski prostor puca po šavovima, i to baš uoči putineskne parade koja ima zadatak da pokaže da je taj prostor visoko kontrolisan i monolitan. Za razliku od sofisticiranog Rame iz lože, ovaj građanin je tipičan srpski lumpen koji nije čekao da mu drugi dadne priliku da postane umetnik već se za nju sam izborio.

Otuda, tri umetnička događaja o kojima je ovde reč (RTS-ova potemkinizacija, Ramina institucionalna subverzija i medijska intervencija razočaranog podržavaoca politike koju je Vučić po njemu izneverio) opisuju procep u kom se navodno jaka Vučićeva vlast ispostavlja kao krhka, kao ,,slabi znak", da ne kažemo kao ,,znak slabosti". Kako smo naučili iz jednog drugog incidenta koji je takođe načinio jedan premijerov brat, ali ovog puta Vučićev, Srbija je trenutno na ivici otvorenog obračuna ,,bezbedonosnih" struktura, što nas vraća na početak ovog teksta i na pomenutu utakmicu pred pad Čaušeskua. Zato recite Tomi da kaže Vučiću da je i Čaušesku pred kraj imao sličnih problema.


Peščanik.net, 15.10.2014.

[Джон Рейнольдс]

Dron je svakako bio odgovor na zabranu ulaska albanskih navijača u Srbiju,

Дакле, опет смо сами криви. Само сам чекао како ће српска гамад да покуша да спинује цео догађај. А "најодвратнији догађај" је, јасно, то што јадне шипоње ни криве ни дужне морају без полицијске пратње да се повуку ка тунелу где их усред мрака чека ко зна шта. Који олош, јеботе, КОЈИ ОЛОШ!

[Agota]

Управо одгледао Михалкова, добар је. Имам наравно примедби, генерално то није суптилан режисер, али вреди та три сата.

!!!
http://www.autograf.hr/mihalkov-svetska-premijera/

[crippled_avenger]

Branko Dimitrijević na Peščaniku, to je potentan antisrpski koktel ali tekst je odlićan.

Meni je mnogo zanimljivije to što zapravo zastava Velike Albanije praktično negira nezavisnost Kosova, i to iz albanske vizure.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Meho Krljic]

Pa valjda je nezavisnost Kosova (i delova Makedonije i Grčke) oduvek bila samo prelazna faza ka ujedinjenju u Etničku Albaniju? Mislim, to je stogodišnji projekat. Kao što bismo mi podržali osamostaljenje RepSrp sa jasnom perspektivom da se kasnije ujedinimo...

Elem, Warner je rešio da u ejpovanju Marvela ode respektabilno daleko i najavio deset superherojskih filmova:



Warner Bros. Announces 10 DC Movies, 3 Lego Movies and 3 'Harry Potter' Spin-Offs

Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice directed by Zack Snyder (2016)
Suicide Squad directed by David Ayer (2016)
Wonder Woman starring Gal Gadot (2017)
Justice League Part One directed by Snyder, with Ben Affleck, Henry Cavill and Amy Adams reprising their roles (2017)
The Flash starring Ezra Miller (2018)
Aquaman starring Jason Momoa (2018)
Shazam (2019)
Justice League Part Two directed by Zack Snyder (2019)
Cyborg starring Ray Fisher (2020)
Green Lantern (2020)

Ovo je odvažan plan, neki bi rekli suicidalan. Suicide Squad je strip sa eventualno kultnim sledbeništvom dok Cyborg čak i nema svoj magazin a i u Justice League serijalima je drugoligaški lik. Shazam je perverzna ideja, mada možda ovo planiraju da ponude najmlađima. Aquaman je, bez obzira na sve napore Džefa Džonsa, i dalje lik sa kojim se većina čitalaca sprda a Green Lantern je toksičan filmski IP na ime filma od pre par godina (zato su ga valjda stavili u 2020. godinu).

Mada ja razumem šta je ovde ideja, ali plašim se da Warner zaista misli da direktno imitiranje onoga što rade Dizni i Marvel može da donese uporedive uspehe. Na primer, Suicide Squad je njihov pokušaj da naprave svoj Guardians of the Galaxy - u oba slučaja imamo relativno niskotiražan strip o ragatag bunchu otpadnika koji na kraju nalaze način da budu heroji ali koji imaju vrlo nizak traction u narodu. Doduše, poslednjih par godina je Suicide Squad bio u stvari i bolji od Marvelovog GOTG - Adam Glass je radio odličan strip (mada krvoločan) a likovi poput Deadshota i Harley Quinn su mu obezbeđivali i određene možda ne A-listere ali solidne B-listere u postavi. Ovo bi mogao da bude dobar film ako bi ga režirali Neveldin i Tejlor, recimo, i ako mu se dopusti R-rating.

Cyborg je, verujem, pokušaj da Warner dobije svog Ant-Mana, mada je u ovom trenutku jasno da se ni Marvel nije dokazao sa svojim Ant-Manom. Meni je Cyborg inače veoma drag lik na ime svojih Teen Titans avantura iz sedamdesetih i mada je bio i u crtanom serijalu Teen Titans, on danas nije A-lister. Ako bi Warner uposlio nekog poput Antonija Mekija da ga igra (mada je to nemoguće zbog Mekijeve uloge u Marvelovim filmovima...) i filmu dao jednu malčice više griti komponentu - crni tinejdžer, užasno invalidiziran, koji postaje mučeni tehnološki superheroj - pa to ponudi na režiranje recimo Darenu Aronovskom, to bi moglo da bude zanimljivo.

Aquaman, bojim se, na svojoj strani ima samo Džejsona Momou koji... pa... da budem iskren, nisam siguran kada je Džejson postao neko za koga se veruje da ima Star Power... Nisam siguran kako ovaj film uopšte može da funkcioniše jer u najboljem slučaju mogu da ga zamislim kao nekakvu R-rated Malu sirenu...


I... Ezra Miler kao Fleš???? Bed ajdija..

[Meho Krljic]

Sa druge strane, koliko god da sam mrzeo Civil War u stripu (a to je i bila jedna od najlošijih partija Marka Millara u Marvelu do tada (mada ju je kasnije prestigao užasima poput New Ultimates i Old Man Logan)), mislim da je ideja da Captain America 3 bude zapravo to isto ali na filmu intrigantna. Marvelov filmski univerzum je još uvek prilično mali (i mlad) pa je jasno da sam zaplet ne može direktno da se prepiše iz stripa ali sama srž ideje o tome kako se sukobljavaju sa jedne strane superheroj koji predstavlja jasnu vezu korporativnog sektora i državne administracije a sa druge ikona džefersonovske vere da se drvo slobode povremeno mora zalivati krvlju tirana i da ni jedan od njih dvojice nije negativac - pa, ta ideja je zanimljiva i, čak, pomalo smela za Holivud. The Verge ima svoju meditaciju o tome:


The villain of 'Captain America 3' isn't Iron Man — it's the NSA

[crippled_avenger]

Zanimljivo je da John Reynolds nije primetio krupnu omašku u Dimitrijevićevim tekstu da je Steaua vojni a Dinamo policijski klub.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk