Mehmete, reaguj!

[Meho Krljic]

Ovo mi je promaklo kad je objavljeno ali vredi da se ukaže:


10 Stupid Arguments People Use To Defend Comic Book Sexism

[Meho Krljic]

Jebote, dal je ovaj Džin Hoglan ljudsko biće???

http://youtu.be/uIGu4RQSy7M

[Meho Krljic]

Zabavno i informativno: zbiljnosti zarađivanja od prodaje nošenog donjeg veša putem interneta:


http://www.cracked.com/article_21818_5-things-i-learned-selling-my-used-panties-internet.html

[Meho Krljic]

Koga zanima otkud to da Marvel reklamira odavno završene DOGAĐAJE (Secret Wars, Civil War, Armor Wars, Infinity Guntlet...) kao nešto što stiže u 2015. godini, evo jedne (možda) plauzibilne teorije:


http://popwatch.ew.com/2014/10/21/marvel-comics-wtf/

[PTY]

Sense of disgust is '95 percent accurate' predictor of whether you're liberal or conservative



cientists say they can predict "with 95 percent accuracy where you'll fall on the liberal-conservative spectrum by showing you just one picture" and then studying how your brain responds to the image. Furthermore, studies show that political orientation may be as inheritance-based as height.

According to New Scientist, increasing evidence indicates that the sense of disgust is closely aligned with a person's political orientation. People who land on the conservative end of the spectrum have a more easily aroused sense of disgust than their liberal counterparts.

A team of scientists at Virginia Tech led by researcher Read Montague found that people who are more likely to sit on the right side of the political spectrum have a higher sensitivity to disgusting pictures like bodily waste, gore or the remains of dead animals.





These individuals also showed a greater preoccupation with ideas of bodily and spiritual purity and as a result tended to oppose things they view as unclean like same-sex marriage and abortion.

In their study — published Thursday in the Cell Press journal Current Biology — Montague's team took a group of 83 volunteers and performed fMRI brain imaging scans on them as the test subjects viewed a series of images. Some were disgusting, others threatening. Some were neutral and others pleasant.

After the images of their brain activity were recorded, the volunteers answered a questionnaire about a series of social and political issues, asking them to rate themselves on a continuum from "very liberal" to "very conservative."

In a press release about the study, Montague said, "A single disgusting image was sufficient to predict each subject's political orientation. I haven't seen such clean predictive results in any other functional imaging experiments in our lab or others."

When confronted with disgusting images, the people who classified themselves as conservatives showed increased brain activity in brain regions associated with disgust — the basal ganglia and amygdala — as well as in a complex network of regions involved in emotional self-control, information processing and attention. Liberals showed increased activity in their own brains, but in a diverse array of areas.

"In fact," Montague told New Scientist, "the responses in the brain are so strong that we can predict with 95 per cent accuracy where you'll fall on the liberal-conservative spectrum by showing you just one picture. This was surprising as there are no other reports where people's response to just one stimulus predicts anything behaviorally interesting."

The team's findings also indicate that since the structure and function of these areas of the brain are almost entirely determined by genetics, political leanings may be something we mostly inherit from our parents, just as much as height and hair color.

"We pursued this research because previous work in a twin registry showed that political ideology — literally the degree to which someone is liberal or conservative — was highly heritable, almost as heritable as height," Montague said in a statement from Virginia Tech's Carillon Research Institute.

However, that doesn't mean a person's political outlook is determined at birth, he cautioned.

"Genetics predetermines height — but not fully," he said. "Nutrition, sleep, and starvation can all change someone's ultimate height. But tall people's children tend to be tall, and that's a kind of starting point. If we can begin to understand that some automatic reactions to political issues may be simply that — reactions — then we might take the temperature down a bit in the current boiler of political discourse."

With regards to the approach of the 2014 midterm elections next week, Montague said it's incumbent upon voters to "Think, don't just react," he said. "But no one needs neuroscience to know that's a good idea."

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/10/sense-of-disgust-is-95-percent-accurate-predictor-of-whether-youre-liberal-or-conservative/#.VFPgqMr_awk.facebook

[Джон Рейнольдс]

10 Hours of Walking in NYC as Batman

Добар коментар:

Some of those people were looking straight into the camera (like last girl). This one seems fake

[Mica Milovanovic]

Ove novine su dotakle dno... 


http://www.blic.rs/Zabava/Vesti/510106/NAPOKON-OTKRIVENO-Nauka-otkrila-ko-je-ZAISTA-najpametniji-u-bendu

[Meho Krljic]

Da se razumemo, ja jedva da umem da sviram bubnjeve.

[Ghoul]

Da se razumemo, ja jedva da umem da sviram bubnjeve.

da SVIRAŠ?

ja sam mislio da se u to samo LUPA.

[RedSonja]

drugim rečima, jedva da si najpametniji u bendu.

[Meho Krljic]

Ne, daleko od toga, u zavisnosti o kom bendu pričamo, ja sviram sa: inženjerima mašinstva, inspektorima interpola i tako to. Da sam pametan i ja bih imao nekakvo dostignuće u životu da njime paradiram 

[Meho Krljic]

The sick and twisted history of Ultron, Marvel's lesson about the singularity

[Father Jape]

Ovo se već sigurno nedelju dana šeruje po Fejsbuku a ja sam tek sad shvatio da si ti s obe strane idealan za ovaj kviz

http://cummingordrumming.com/#

[Meho Krljic]

Meni sve ovo izgleda kao svršavanje. To je zato što je čin stvaranja muzike za mene intenzivno erotičan. 

[Meho Krljic]

http://youtu.be/k-X6MKrdgF0

[Father Jape]

Things drummers say in the studio

[Meho Krljic]

Britanski zakonodavac je od juče promenio regulativu koja se tiče pornografije proizvedene u Britaniji, izjednačivši onu koja se strimuje sa onom koja se prodaje na DVDjevima, time pooštrivši kriterijume, er, pristojnosti. Rezultat je da mnogi seksualni činovi koji su do juče bili legalni, od juče to više nisu. Dobar deo regulacija tiče se brige za zdravlje, pa se svakako može reći da je zakonodavac delao u dobroj nameri i sa razumevanjem da su neke stvari opšteprihvaćena igra. Na primer, pising i klistiranje su i dalje dopušteni ako fluidi po napuštanju tela ne dolaze u dodir sa drugom osobom; školska uniforma je dopuštena ako je u pitanju očigledan rolplej, odnosno ako se osoba koja uniformu nosi ne pretvara da ima manje od osamnaest godina; pretnje oružjem su prihvatljive samo ako nisu "uverljive" itd.  Ovo je interesantno za one koji restrikcije/ regulativu u pornografiji posmatraju kao barometar koji najavljuje restrikcije ili regulativu u drugim oblastima izražavanja. Na primer, stav ove regulative prema BDSM-u je prilično indikativan: vezivanje je, recimo, dopušteno ako se jasno ostavlja mogućnost sabu da signalizira odustajanje od scene (dakle, sputavanje svih udova i istovremeno nešto u ustima što sprečava govor su nedopustivi). Što ima smisla u pogledu didaktičke funkcije pornografije - uvek i svuda podsetiti gledaoca da je ovo voljna igra koja prestaje kada bilo ko od učesnika ne želi da se dalje igra. S druge strane, u pogledu, hajde da kažemo, umetničke, ekspresivne funkcije pornografije ovo je očigledan kamen o vratu i osakaćujuće ograničenje - u teoriji, odrasla & zrela osoba ne mora da bude eksplicitno podsećana da je to što gleda igra i želi samo da uživa u toj igri neprekinuta signalizacijom da zakonodavac smatra da ovo neće gledati samo zrele i odrasle osobe već možda i nezrele itd. Pomalo kao kada bi u svakom akcionom filmu opasne scene uključivale i švenkovanje da se pokaže kako kaskader u stvari pada na gomilu kartonskih kutija, kako žrtve izgorele u plamenu sekund kasnije skidaju sa sebe zapaljenu odeću i odlaze za šank da se osveže itd.

Detaljnije:



THE FOLLOWING CONTENT IS NOT ACCEPTABLE

The following content is not acceptable from the 1^st December 2014 
  Today marks the beginning of a new phase in a sustained campaign of internet censorship which has wide-reaching consequences beyond the mere production and consumption of pornography.   
  These new regulations impose even more draconian restrictions on the types of pornography that can be depicted on regulated Video on Demand services. Previously the Crown Prosecution Service's Guidance on the OPA provided a list of sexual activities which were deemed illegal to publish. 
  However these new Regulations specifically state that only sexual content that is equivalent to the BBFC R18 Category can be sold via VoD service. This is a significantly lower threshold. 
  According to Nikki Whiplash, a regulated video on demand service provider who attended a recent ATVOD and BBFC led seminar on the impact of the new regulations, the following sexual activities will be deemed either acceptable or unacceptable at R18 classification level:                                  Watersports and Squirting  Peeing and squirting are acceptable if not performed onto another person and/or then consumed. 
  Squirting during sex or masturbation is acceptable if fairly brie,  isolated and not deliberately consumed or put onto a body. It would be acceptable to imply that it was licked up if could be deemed as to be simulated. 
  Fisting  Fisting is not acceptable. Penetration with all five digits beyond last knuckle is not acceptable; but all five digits of two or more hands would be acceptable as long as not past last knuckle.   
  Ofcom have sought medical guidance on fisting and don't believe it to be a dangerous act to perform. However, as the CPS' Guidelines specifically cite fisting as obscene the BBFC can't pass fisting for classification. The BBFC acknowledge that they are well aware of the decision in R v Peacock but are obliged to have regard to CPS' OPA Guidelines. 
  Amputee Insertion  Since the BBFC haven't ever needed to consider amputee insertion, they reserve their position on the matter. 
  Enemas  Enemas are acceptable if once they are squirted out they don't hit anyone else and does not contain feces. It is not acceptable to subsequently lick up what has been expelled; unless this is simulated (for example switched for another substance). 
  Catheters   Catheterisation is acceptable, even if catheter connected to mouth; presuming that the tube is not transparent so that the liquid moving through cannot be seen. 
  Eating ejaculate  Any form of consumption of (male) ejaculate is acceptable. 
  Vomiting  Vomiting may be acceptable if it is not performed as part of a sexual act; and is not visibly enjoyed by the participants. 
  'Public' Sex   Should the content features any nudity or other activity which might outrage the public decency, then the BBFC must be assured that the material in question was shot on private land with no public access or shot abroad. However, simulating the impression that it is in public is acceptable, fir example a vehicle with tinted windows. The key consideration that the material has not been created in the public eye. 
  'Age Play'  Anything which might 'encourage' incest or sex with children under the age of eighteen is absolutely unacceptable. 
  However school uniforms are acceptable presuming that there are no references to the performer pretending to be under eighteen; and participants clearly 'of legal age' and participating in a consensual adult role play 
  Weapons  Sexual activities performed at gunpoint are unacceptable if it is "believable". This will depend on tone and believability. Basically if it looks like it could be a non-consensual activity then it is not acceptable. 
  Bondage and Restraint  Full bondage in conjunction with a gag is unacceptable, since there needs to be an obvious (to the viewer) means to signal to stop. Hence it is acceptable if not all four limbs are tied. Thus a means to indicate the withdrawal of consent must be visible to the viewer. For example full bondage and gagging would be acceptable if there is a safe signal which is defined as part of the scene.   
  Thus elements like artistic license, storyline and context become important. Hence a straightforward bondage scenario with no surrounding context is less likely to be acceptable than something with features a clearly signaled role play component. 
  BDSM Pain play  Acts which if copied by the uninitiated have the potential to cause injuries more than transient and trifling are extremely unlikely to be acceptable.   
  Only "moderate" pain play is acceptable. Thus reddening of the skin acceptable but no raised welts, blood and bruising are not. 
  Needle-Play  Needles are more likely to be considered acceptable as they only cause transient and trifling injury similar to legal tattooing. 
  Facesitting as Breathing Restriction  Facesitting employed as a breathing restriction or any other form of smothering is unacceptable. However, facesitting without breathing restriction is acceptable.  There is no flexibility on this. The airways must remain open. Apparently the rationale for this distinction is that men trying this at home might die. 
  Ballbusting  Ballbusting may be acceptable, depending on the level. OFCOM recommend submitting clips in question for review. It will come down to definition of moderate pain and whether viewers at home are likely to sustain serious injury if they try it at home. Hence ball-yanking is not acceptable; whereas controlled ball stretching is acceptable. 
  Trampling  This will depend on the surface upon which the person is being trampled on. 
  Urethral Sounds   The insertion of urethral sounds is acceptable presuming that they are not inserted so far in as to enter the bladder; and that appropriate sterile and safety considerations are taken such as the use of lubricant and gloves. 
  Insertion of objects like buttplugs   The insertion of other objects is acceptable presuming that it is clear that they couldn't get. Hence the use of buttplugs is acceptable. Hence a clip of a mobile phone vanishing up an anus would not be acceptable, despite being a spoof, on the basis that people might try it at home. 
  Power Tools  The use of power tools is unacceptable, since most people have one lying around at home. However purpose designed "fucking-machines" are acceptable. The test in question is the 'association with violence'. 
  Head-Scissoring   Head-scissoring is acceptable, presuming that it is gentle. However, if it is seen to be pushing on the carotid restricting blood flow then it is not acceptable. Hence, choking sounds or reddening of face as a result are not acceptable. As soon as any pressure is exerted it would be considered a choke hold and therefore not acceptable. 
  Wrestling  Wrestling is acceptable only if knockout moves are not deployed. Facesitting and seemingly non gentle scissoring are not acceptable. 
  Gagging  Gagging on cock and deep throat are acceptable if not for the whole scene. However, language of the 'gag on my cock' variety is unacceptable due to the  reference to choking. 
  Definitions  These guidelines should be interpreted subject to these definitions:  "Fairly brief" = less than a minute   "Isolated" = not more than a couple of occurrences in a scene. 

COMMENTARY – THE CONSEQUENCES OF THIS CENSORSHIP

  Pornography is the canary in the coalmine of free speech: it is the first freedom to die. If this assault on liberty is allowed to go unchallenged, other freedoms will fall as a consequence.   
  This declaration of State censorship will affect millions of consenting adults who choose to view British pornography; impose an unnecessary trade barrier, which has already caused independent UK producers to shut down; result in a significant loss of revenue to The Treasury; is practically unworkable as it can be circumvented by proxy servers; and has implications for all forms of freedom of expression on the internet. 
  Of particular concern in terms of loss of freedom is the underlying intent to allow undesirable foreign websites to be blocked under UK ISP's filtering systems. This has immeasurable implications on freedom of information and net neutrality.   
  Today, Backlash have launched a campaign to challenge this régime of State censorship disguised as regulation. 
  In the meantime, what follows is an explanation of the regulations and assessment of their impact. 
  What are the Regulations that came into force today?  The regulations which come into force today, the Audiovisual Media Services Regulations 2014 (AVMS Regs 2014), only apply to Video on Demand (Vod) services which are regulated by the Authority for Television on Demand (ATVOD), and restricts the types of sexual content that UK VoD providers can provide for their consumers to BBFC R18 classification level. 
  So what is a Video on Demand Service?  Video on Demand services offer consumers the opportunity to choose specific video content and then view it at a time which is convenient to them, rather than being slaved to pre-ordained broadcast schedules. Hence this would include catch-up services like Channel 4's online '4oD' service.   
  Who are ATVOD?  The Authority for Television on Demand is a quango, specifically designated as the "co-regulator" of UK VoD by Ofcom. Otherwise know as The Office of Communications, Ofcom is also a quango, with regulatory authority over the UK's broadcasting, telecoms and postal industries. 
  The Regulations: 'TV-like' Services  ATVOD's regulatory authority is conveyed by the European AVMS Regulations, which pertain to 'TV-like' services. Hence, to be regulated, the video content must resemble broadcast television by dint of being similar to it, hence the phrase: 'TV-like'.   
  Thus in most European jurisdictions the vast majority of adult video websites are not deemed to be TV-like.Whereas ATVOD have applied their interpretation of what constitutes a TV-like service in the UK far more restrictively.This has allowed ATVOD to bring within its regulatory ambit any website it deems to be TV-like. 
  It is eminently arguable that this restrictive interpretation has created a trade barrier for UK VoD services when attempting to compete with their European trade-partners. 
  Challenges to ATVOD's Interpretation of TV-Like  This restrictive interpretation of the definition of 'TV-like' VoD Services has been deployed in an attempt to catch a broad range of video services, both adult and otherwise. For example the BBC and The Sun newspaper were initially identified under ATVOD's aggressive regulatory regime as being TV-like; although they successfully appealed to Ofcom that their services in question were not TV-like 
  On the adult side, a client of mine successfully appealed ATVOD's determination that her esoteric Female Domination art site The Urban Chick Supremacy Cell  was not TV-like.   
  How do the Regulations Impinge on Pornographic Content?  These new regulations impose even more severe restrictions on the types of pornographic material that can be depicted on regulated VoD services.   Prior to today the Crown Prosecution Service's Guidance on the Obscene Publications Act provided a list of sexual activities which were deemed illegal to publish.  Yet the new Regulations specifically state that only sexual content that is equivalent to that categorised as R18 by the BBFC can be sold via VoD services. This is a significantly lower threshold.  Before we go on to explore the disparity between the OPA and the BBFC R18 guidelines, it is essential to understand why this has been imposed.  Why Impose R18 Classification on VoD?  The original EU AVMS directive stated that content that "might seriously impair minors" should be restricted in order to protect those under 18. However, when Ofcom  considered the research of 20 European States, they held that:   
  "No country found evidence that sexually explicit material harms minors". 
  Therefore, enshrining the already established R18 standard in law provides a convenient means to avoid the inconvenient evidence and the difficulty of establishing whether and what types of sexual content "might seriously impair minors". 
  Nonetheless, despite the absence of conclusive evidence, the regulations have been introduced under the aegis of "child protection", whilst having an adverse impact on consenting adults' sexual choices.    With that in mind, we can explore the different standards between the CPS' OPA Guidelines and the BBFC's R18 Classification Guidelines.   
  CPS' Guidelines on The Obscene Publications Act  According to the Crown Prosecution Service's Guidelines on The Obscene Publications Act: 
              "It is impossible to define all types of activity which may be suitable for   prosecution. The following is not an exhaustive list but indicates the             categories of material most commonly prosecuted: 
              sexual act with an animal              realistic portrayals of rape              sadomasochistic material which goes beyond trifling and transient           infliction of injury              torture with instruments              bondage (especially where gags are used with no apparent means of         withdrawing consent)              dismemberment or graphic mutilation              activities involving perversion or degradation (such as drinking urine,       urination or vomiting on to the body, or excretion or use of excreta)              fisting". 
  This should be read and contrasted with the BBFC's R18 guidelines.   
  The BBFC's R18 Guidelines  According to the BBFC's own Guidelines on their R18 Category: 
              "The following content is not acceptable: 
              material which is in breach of the criminal law, including material judged             to be obscene under the current interpretation of the Obscene             Publications Act 1959 
              material (including dialogue) likely to encourage an interest in sexually     abusive activity which may include adults role-playing as non-adults 
              the portrayal of sexual activity which involves real or apparent lack of     consent. Any form of physical restraint which prevents participants from    indicating a withdrawal of consent 
              the infliction of pain or acts which may cause lasting physical harm,         whether real or (in a sexual context) simulated. Some allowance may be             made for moderate, non-abusive, consensual activity penetration by any   object associated with violence or likely to cause physical harm 
              sexual threats, humiliation or abuse which do not form part of a clearly   consenting role-playing game. 
              Strong physical or verbal abuse, even if consensual, is unlikely to be          acceptable 
              These Guidelines will be applied to the same standard regardless of           sexual orientation of the activity portrayed." 
  THE CPS' OPA GUIDELINES AND THE BBFC R18 GUIDELINES – CONTRASTED  It is now possible to discuss the legal and logical inconsistences of the CPS' Guidelines on the OPA, before contrasting them with the much lower level of sexual material permitted by the BBFC's R18 Guidelines:   
  1) Sexual act with an animal.  Since animals cannot consent at law, this prohibition is consistent and logical. 
  2) Realistic portrayals of rape.  This phrase is extremely problematic. "Realistic portrayals of rape" suggests simulation, role-play and acting. In itself, this raises questions regarding evidence of harm to performers and viewers of such material.  
  Regarding evidence of harm, the 2005 Home Office Consultation on the possession of extreme pornographic material stated: 
  "As to evidence of harm, conducting research in this area is complex. We do not yet have sufficient evidence from which to draw any definite conclusions as to the likely long term impact of this kind of material on individuals generally". 
  Likewise, the Ministry of Justice's criminal policy unit also stated in clear, unequivocal and unambiguous terms: 
  "We have no evidence to show that the creation of staged rape images involves any harm to the participants or causes harm to society at large". 
  Hence, how can a simulated "portrayal" of rape become "realistic" enough to attract criminal liability for publication. 
  3) Sadomasochistic material, which goes beyond trifling and transient infliction of injury.  This phrase explicitly references the case of R v Brown (colloquially referred to as "Spanner"), which stated that individuals cannot consent to injuries "beyond trifling and transient" in a sexual context. 
  The CPS now defines this level of injury as: "significant medical intervention and/or permanent effects". 
  Whilst the House of Lords' decision in Brown has been consistently criticised for being Paternalistic, homophobic and arcane; it is still currently binding law. Therefore the inclusion of this clause is, regrettably, consistent with the criminal law. 
  4) Torture with instruments.  Since obscenity law is usually constructed in the context of controlling human sexuality, this clause is unlikely to prohibit the publication of CIA waterboarding or ISIS beheadings. Thus, it is unclear what might amount to "torture" in a sexual context and what might be classified as an "instrument". 
  5) Bondage (especially where gags are used with no apparent means of withdrawing consent).  This clause is particularly poorly phrased; however it seems to suggest that it must be clear to the viewer that the performer in bondage is visibly capable of withdrawing consent.  
  6) Dismemberment or graphic mutilation;  Whilst the act of committing "dismemberment" would be illegal (as per Brown, above), it is unclear what constitutes "graphic mutilation"? What about images of female genital mutilation? That is a clearly abusive and non-consensual practice. 
  However, it is likely to catch consensual sexual activities like "blood play" (cutting the top layer of skin for the purpose of sexual gratification), irrespective of whether it is performed in a risk awareness fashion. Hence this seems an unnecessary repetition of the "sadomasochistic material" and "torture with instruments" provisions above. 
  7) Activities involving perversion or degradation (such as drinking urine, urination or vomiting on to the body, or excretion or use of excreta).   Confusingly, these activities are legal to perform in real-life with consent. Yet they are classified as obscene with the highly subjective and pejorative language of  "perversion" and "degradation", ignoring the performers' right to consent to being "degraded". 
  8 ) Fisting.
Similarly fisting (both vaginal and anal) is legal to perform in real-life with consent.Yet the representation of that activity becomes illegal and classified along with bestiality? Hence, despite the jury finding Micheal Peacock not guilty in his #ObscenityTrial for the publication of both watersports and fisting material, the CPS have expressly refused to update their guidelines since then.

[Father Jape]

Cara Ellison je besna na Tviteru.

[Father Jape]

http://www.menshealth.com/best-life/doom-metal-show

[Meho Krljic]

Slušanje Sleepa je lekovito čak i sa ploče, a kapiram da su uživo praktično panacea.

[Meho Krljic]

Heh heh, nrd hjumor:


http://www.cracked.com/blog/15-leaked-text-messages-sent-by-famous-superheroes/

[tomat]

[Albedo 0]

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2481554/

[tomat]

ja nisam neki stručnjak za metal, i možda bi po neki naslov Cannibal Corpse-a mogao da opiše moj seksualni život, pa reko' 'ajde da vidim šta kažu stručnjaci.

[Meho Krljic]

Pa, ja ne mogu da se izjasnim o tvom seksualnom životu jer za njega svakako nisam stručnjak.

Što se mog tiče, hmmm, reći ću samo ovo:

http://youtu.be/Oqbeo5A6ujE

[Meho Krljic]

Evo:

Honest Trailers - Guardians of the Galaxy

[PTY]

   This Is What Batman Would Look Like In 16 Different Time Periods


http://cu.viralnova.com/alt-batman/

[Meho Krljic]

Uuu, fino. Vikinški i otomanski su sjajni.

[Meho Krljic]

Neki ljudi cosplay shvataju vrlo ozbiljno:


X-Men Epic Cosplay Video

Ema Frost i Wanda Maximoff su toliko dobre da mogu na film.

[Meho Krljic]

Ja Archie Comics nikad nisam čito ali zanimljivo je sad kad se serijal ributuje i u vozačko sedišete dolaze big guns: Mark Waid i Fiona Staples. Daćemo šansu.

[Meho Krljic]

Mrzi me da tražim na topiku World Today gde sam postovao o Justine Sacco i tvitu koji joj je uništio karijeru za vreme koje je potrebno da se iz SAD preleti do roga Afrike, pa ako nekog zanima nek traži (Edit: ne mrzi me toliko, evo ga ovde), ali evo odličnog, izvanrednog teksta sa Gawkera koji spaja lično i opšte i na izvrstan način hvata zeitgeist 2014. godine:


Justine Sacco Is Good at Her Job, and How I Came To Peace With Her

[Meho Krljic]

Ovde se Tarzanija nešto i ne ceni, ali ovo je lep tekst:


http://www.tarzanija.com/druga-strana-vikipedije/

[PTY]

Druže Meho, sigurno si na ovo već nabasao, ali ja sam tek jutros za to saznala i silno me obradovalo, pa da podelim:















Court Rules Orangutan Held In Argentina Zoo Is 'Non-Human Person' And Can Be Freed








BUENOS AIRES, Dec 21 (Reuters) - An orangutan held in an Argentine zoo can be freed and transferred to a sanctuary after a court recognized the ape as a "non-human person" unlawfully deprived of its freedom, local media reported on Sunday.
Animal rights campaigners filed a habeas corpus petition - a document more typically used to challenge the legality of a person's detention or imprisonment - in November on behalf of Sandra, a 29-year-old Sumatran orangutan at the Buenos Aires zoo.
In a landmark ruling that could pave the way for more lawsuits, the Association of Officials and Lawyers for Animal Rights (AFADA) argued the ape had sufficient cognitive functions and should not be treated as an object.
The court agreed Sandra, born into captivity in Germany before being transferred to Argentina two decades ago, deserved the basic rights of a "non-human person."
"This opens the way not only for other Great Apes, but also for other sentient beings which are unfairly and arbitrarily deprived of their liberty in zoos, circuses, water parks and scientific laboratories," the daily La Nacion newspaper quoted AFADA lawyer Paul Buompadre as saying.
Orangutan is a word from the Malay and Indonesian languages that means "forest man."
Sandra's case is not the first time activists have sought to use the habeas corpus writ to secure the release of wild animals from captivity.
A U.S. court this month tossed out a similar bid for the freedom of 'Tommy' the chimpanzee, privately owned in New York state, ruling the chimp was not a "person" entitled to the rights and protections afforded by habeas corpus.
In 2011, the animal rights group People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) filed a lawsuit against marine park operator SeaWorld, alleging five wild-captured orca whales were treated like slaves. A San Diego court dismissed the case.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/12/21/orangutan-argentina_n_6363582.html

[Meho Krljic]

Da, nisam video, ali se sećam ovih prethodnih habeas corpus pokušaja, čak su i spominjani ovde na forumu. Interesantan razvoj situacije, pratićemo šta se dalje dešava tokom naših života 

[Meho Krljic]

Nego, malo mi zasuze oči kad vidim ovako eklatantno romantičnu priču u stvarnom životu: Patrik Švarceneger je spreman da se odrekne i trast fanda koji su na stranu za njega ostavili roditelji mu Arnold i Marija, a koji je vredan malo manje od pedeset milijuna dolara, samo da bi bio sa ljubavlju svog života. A već smo slušali kako mu Marija Šrajver govori da joj tu problematičnu devojčuru ne dovodi za božićnu trpezu a on odgovorio da onda ni on neće da dođe. Maj gad! Ali Majli Sajrus je toga vredna. Znamo da jeste.
Patrick Schwarzenegger Risks £32m Fortune By Dating Miley Cyrus

[дејан]

iPad Drum Solo

[Meho Krljic]

Lepo 

Ja sam došo da okačim kako nije lako biti uspešna porno glumica ako si arapska porekla i ne stidiš ga se:
Mia Khalifa Is Now PornHub's Biggest Porn Star - But Her Lebanese Compatriots Are Less Than Impressed

[Meho Krljic]

E, moj Džimi 


Jimmy Fallon Blew a Chance to Date Nicole Kidman

[tomat]

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/01/07/slayer-on-childrens-instruments_n_6427440.html?ncid=fcbklnkushpmg00000063

[Meho Krljic]

Vrlo simpatično osim što oni naravno ne sviraju Slayer, ali dobro, hafingtonpostu je to isto, a i originalni video na JuTjubu ovo zove Slayer Mashupom iako nema ni jednog jedinog Slayer rifa u svemu    Luđe od svega je apsolutni festival trolovanja u JuTjub komentarima.

[Father Jape]

デモ演奏 【壬申の乱】 by 川口千里／菅沼孝三＆天地雅楽ドラムコンテストⅡ

[tomat]

http://www.blic.rs/Zabava/Vesti/527055/NE-ZNA-KAD-JE-DOSTA-Majli-okacila-fotku-masturbacije-i-jednu-na-kojoj-je-potpuno-gola-18

[Meho Krljic]

Majli radi zaista važan posao na umanjenju straha od ženskog tela i ženske seksualnosti u našoj falocentričnoj kulturi. Nije to lako kad istovremeno dejtuje momka iz jako konzervativne porodice, tata joj je alfa rednek i rasla je kao Diznijeva ikona. Naf rispekt.

A ova mala što kida bubanj gore... Do suza ne te stvari dovode, do suza. 

[Josephine]

http://www.the-open-mind.com/homeless-cat-saves-abandoned-baby-in-russia/

[Meho Krljic]

Da, bilo je to i u Politici pre neki dan. Zasuzilo mi je oko, pošteno. Mačka se, što ne piše u ovom RT tekstu, navodno zove Maša (tako je zovu ljudi iz zgrade), a i ja imam mačku Mašu, pa me je to dodatno raznežilo.

[Alexdelarge]

Zavisnost od video-igara
Dženifer Mur-Malinos (autor)
Izdavač: Izdavačka kuća Pčelica
Naslov originala: Choices / author Jennifer Moore-Mallinos, illustrations Gustavo Mazali
Niko nije bolje od Jovana Vujovića znao koliko neumerenost može biti loša, a naročito kad je u pitanju igranje video-igara. Opsednom pobedom, Jovan postaje žrtva video-vampira, potpuno iscrpljen, bledog lica, praznog pogleda i ostaje bez prijatelja. Da li će video-vampiri sasvim ovladati Jovanovim životom i učiniti da zapostavi stvari koje su mu nekad bile bitne, kao što su škola, porodica i prijatelji ili će Jovan uspeti da se oslobodi ovih strašnih stvorenja?

2014
Broširani povez
ćirilica
24 cm, 31 str.
978-86-6089-492-4

Cena: 480 din

[Meho Krljic]

Ja bih samo voleo da je jasno da, ako je dete zavisno od video-igara (i izuzetno cenim što ne piše "od igrica"), to je isključivo krivica roditelja koji nisu dovoljno roditeljevali.

[Father Jape]

Ovoliku količinu muževnosti u jednom klipu samo ovaj topik može da podnese:

FIDLAR - Cocaine

[tomat]

ovaj lik iz sata u sat kači muzičke zapise za koje se tvrdi da su demo snimci Aphex Twina. neki sumnjaju u autentičnost snimaka, neki vele da su to definitivno dela AT obzirom da liče na neke numere koje je kasnije i objavljivao. evo vidi, pa sam prosudi.

https://soundcloud.com/user48736353001

[Meho Krljic]

Oh, preslušaću večeras. Po naslovima deluje kao Aphex Twin